logo
Tennessee sees decrease in pedestrian deaths, but more progress needed

Tennessee sees decrease in pedestrian deaths, but more progress needed

Axios13-03-2025
Pedestrian deaths are ticking down in Nashville and across Tennessee, although numbers remain far higher than they were a decade ago.
Why it matters: There are measures that experts agree make pedestrians safer. Incremental progress in recent years could be a sign some improvements are working.
Advocates and government agencies say doubling down on those strategies could help prevent more pedestrian deaths in the future.
The latest: A new report from the Governors Highway Safety Association shows Tennessee making significant strides toward improving pedestrian safety.
By the numbers: Tennessee saw 63 pedestrian deaths during the first half of 2024, according to the report. That is a 30% drop compared with the same period in 2023.
The national report singled out our state's trend as particularly promising because of our "historically higher fatality counts."
Zoom in: More recent numbers from Nashville show that trend extending further. Metro police reported that 33 pedestrians were killed in Davidson County in 2024.
That's down from 39 in 2023.
Yes, but: It's far too soon for a victory lap. That is still far more than the 18 pedestrian deaths Nashville logged in 2014.
What they're saying: Wesley Smith of the advocacy group Walk Bike Nashville tells Axios the city must continue investments.
For instance, Nashville Electric Service is in the midst of updating streetlights.
But Smith urged officials to push upgrades to Murfreesboro Pike to the top of the list. He says that was the most dangerous road for pedestrians in 2024, accounting for nearly 1 in 4 fatal pedestrian crashes.
State of play: The Nashville Department of Transportation has several ongoing projects aimed at improving pedestrian safety.
The agency is conducting studies on major roads to determine whether speed limits should be lower. (Sections of Dickerson and Lebanon pikes have already gotten lower speed limits, NDOT spokesperson Cortnye Stone says.)
What's next: The first wave of Mayor Freddie O'Connell's Choose How You Move transportation plan will fund additional projects, including the beginning of a redesign for a high-traffic stretch of Gallatin Pike/Main Street in East Nashville.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ga. State to demolish nearly 100-year-old building in MLK Historic District
Ga. State to demolish nearly 100-year-old building in MLK Historic District

Axios

timea day ago

  • Axios

Ga. State to demolish nearly 100-year-old building in MLK Historic District

More than two months after a tense public hearing on a proposal to demolish a nearly 100-year-old building for its campus expansion project, Georgia State University will move ahead with tearing down the building. Why it matters: The old substation at 148 Edgewood Ave. is within the local Martin Luther King Jr. Historic District, and preservationists say demolishing such structures will make it harder to tell Atlanta's history through those spaces. The latest: The university confirmed to Axios that "after careful evaluation and public input," it will tear down the "long-vacant" building to construct what it calls a Fraternity and Sorority Life Plaza. The plaza will serve as greenspace for students who reside in its Greek life housing development. A mural will also be installed to honor the history of the building and celebrate Greek groups on campus, GSU said. What they're saying: GSU added it will salvage the brickwork from 148 Edgewood and incorporate it into the new space "as a tribute to its legacy." It also said the $12 million estimate to renovate 148 Edgewood for reuse "outweighs its limited ability to benefit students and faculty." The other side: David Y. Mitchell, executive director of the Atlanta Preservation Center and an opponent of GSU's plan, said in a statement to Axios that his organization hoped GSU would have given the building "the respect it has both earned and been recognized with." "Destroying this building will remove yet one more of the structures that somehow survived and visually represents how we became Atlanta." Catch up quick: Residents and historic preservationists began raising concerns about GSU's plans last year and created a petition to raise awareness. A contentious public hearing and open house was held May 28 where GSU officials and Greek life students debated with residents and other stakeholders whether to reuse or demolish 148 Edgewood. Zoom out: Demolishing the old substation, as well as Sparks Hall at 33 Gilmer St., is part of GSU's larger, long-range plan to create a " true college town downtown." A Panther Quad, which will rise in place of Sparks Hall, will feature additional greenspace that will connect to the campus' existing greenway. Gilmer Street will be transformed into a car-free zone to improve connectivity with Hurt Park, GSU officials previously told Axios. Flashback: The 148 Edgewood building was constructed as a substation in 1926 by the company now known as Georgia Power to supply electricity to Downtown, Kyle Kessler, a resident who opposes the demolition, told Axios last year.

The do's and don't of dog throwing away poop
The do's and don't of dog throwing away poop

Axios

time2 days ago

  • Axios

The do's and don't of dog throwing away poop

If you throw your bagged dog poop into a neighbor's trash cart, there's a good chance you've made them mad — perhaps enough to get a tongue lashing or worse: a reciprocal bag on your doorsteps. Why it matters: We take etiquette seriously here at Axios Twin Cities, digging deep into the biggest wedge issues in Minnesota, like shoes at house parties, free sampling of ice cream, how early is too early to mow your lawn and merging onto I-94. Friction point: The question we posed last week about dog waste really got people fired up. We received nearly 100 reader responses to this one. It's easy to see why it's such an issue. A 2022 city study found that Minneapolis' population of 112,000 dogs generates 15,340 tons of waste annually. Extrapolate those figures to the metro area, which has 8.7 times more people (and likely dogs), and we're talking about 133,500 tons of poo per year. This stuff has to go somewhere. The big picture: A majority of you said dumping it in a neighbor's bin is disrespectful and makes for a stinky cart. But a sizable number also said they're OK if someone's bagged dog poop ends up in their bin, especially if it's out on the curb on trash day, before the garbage truck arrives. Threat level: A City of Minneapolis spokesperson tells Axios that putting any kind of trash in someone else's cart is considered illegal dumping. And pet waste in your own bin is required to be double-bagged to protect garbage workers. Here's what readers say about the issue: If Bob A. from Mahtomedi can't find a public can, "I use anyone's trash can that is close to the road that I am walking on. My trash container is welcome to everyone ... better there than on the ground!" Max L. used to live in Chicago, and he said it was the norm to throw your bag into the first can you saw (our Axios Chicago colleague Carrie Shepherd confirmed this). But when Max and his wife did it here in Minneapolis, an irate neighbor came out of their house screaming. It was even worse for Bronson L. of St. Paul, whose husband once threw a tightly tied bag of dog poop into a stranger's can. A man who saw him do it followed Bronson home, and a few weeks later, threw a bag of poop onto his front steps. Ellen P. does what many Minnesotans do: bottles up her frustration, even when seven days' worth of poop bags pile up in her St. Paul can. "I am just passive aggressive and complained about it and now I am sharing the story with Axios." Oren S. grew up in St. Louis Park but lives in Toronto, where he says public garbage cans are everywhere, providing convenient places to deposit the bags. "Minneapolis needs to invest in more public trash bins!"

PETA calls Maine lobster festival ‘egregiously cruel' in new lawsuit against city
PETA calls Maine lobster festival ‘egregiously cruel' in new lawsuit against city

New York Post

time3 days ago

  • New York Post

PETA calls Maine lobster festival ‘egregiously cruel' in new lawsuit against city

Advertisement People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) has filed a lawsuit against a lobster festival in Maine, calling the steaming of lobsters 'egregiously cruel.' PETA filed the lawsuit on July 24 against the Maine Lobster Festival and the City of Rockland, asking the court to stop the steaming of lobsters. The group said the judge should declare the event a 'public nuisance.' 'Today, PETA filed a lawsuit against the Maine Lobster Festival and the City of Rockland in Knox County Superior Court over the city-endorsed event's egregiously cruel method of steaming thousands of lobsters alive in what PETA contends is a violation of Maine law prohibiting the torture and torment of animals,' the group wrote. PETA filed the lawsuit with the Knox County Superior Court. Advertisement It asked the court to 'issue a permanent injunction prohibiting the steaming of live lobsters on public lands.' According to the lawsuit, the festival prevents individuals from enjoying Harbor Park and other nearby areas. 4 PETA filed the lawsuit on July 24 against the Maine Lobster Festival and the City of Rockland, asking the court to stop the steaming of lobsters. Portland Press Herald via Getty Images 4 It asked the court to 'issue a permanent injunction prohibiting the steaming of live lobsters on public lands.' AFP via Getty Images Advertisement In the lawsuit, PETA argued that people should be able to enjoy the area 'without being forced to witness extreme animal suffering as approximately 16,000 live lobsters are illegally tormented and killed at the festival each year.' PETA Foundation Director of Litigation Asher Smith said the event amounts to 'municipally supported cruelty.' 'PETA is pushing to end these horrific displays and restore compassionate Rockland residents' ability to enjoy Harbor Park year-round,' Smith said. 4 PETA Foundation Director of Litigation Asher Smith said the event amounts to 'municipally supported cruelty.' Portland Press Herald via Getty Images Advertisement 4 'PETA is pushing to end these horrific displays and restore compassionate Rockland residents' ability to enjoy Harbor Park year-round,' Smith said. Getty Images In a statement shared with the Penobscot Bay Pilot, the Maine Lobster Festival and Rockland Festival Corporation denied the allegations. 'We are aware of the lawsuit filed by PETA and take any public concern seriously. However, the methods we use to prepare lobster at the festival follow widely accepted and legal culinary practices that have been in place in homes, restaurants, and seafood festivals across the globe for generations,' the groups wrote. 'While we appreciate PETA's concerns, there is no conclusive scientific consensus that lobsters feel pain in a way comparable to mammals. They do not have a brain capable of processing pain.' Fox News Digital reached out to PETA, Maine Lobster Festival and the City of Rockland for comment.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store