logo
Teoh Beng Hock's sister demands accountability

Teoh Beng Hock's sister demands accountability

KUALA LUMPUR: The sister of Teoh Beng Hock has demanded transparency and accountability from the authorities after the Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) and police decided not to pursue further action in the 2009 case.
Beng Hock's sister, Lee Lan expressed her dismay over the decision for no further action (NFA), especially given that multiple court rulings had established the death was not due to suicide or an accident.
She said that the Court of Appeal had ruled in 2014 that Teoh's death was caused by the actions of individuals, including Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers, and demanded that the police investigate the case under the proper criminal provisions.
"The recent police investigation of the case was under Section 342 of the Penal Code for wrongful confinement, instead of provisions appropriate for a homicide case.
"The post-mortem revealed serious neck injuries, yet no one has been held accountable.This is a clear case of homicide," she said at a solidarity event for her brother.
She also called for those currently in the government to act appropriately as they had in the past stood by the fact that he was killed.
"Those in government now, had in the past stood by the fact that Beng Hock was killed.
"Why now NFA? It's a slap on their face (on what they have stood for)," she said.
Last month, Beng Hock's family was informed by police that their latest investigation into the case had been classified as requiring no further action or NFA.
On Nov 21 last year, the High Court had directed the police to complete their long-delayed investigation into the death more than 15 years ago.
Beng Hock died on July 16, 2009 at the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam, after being questioned for hours by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). An inquest was held and the coroner returned an open verdict.
However, the Court of Appeal in 2014 ruled that his death was caused by "one or more persons unknown", including MACC officers.
In 2019, police launched an investigation under Section 342 of the Penal Code for wrongful confinement.
Prior to 2018, two special investigation teams were set up – one in 2011 and the other in 2015 – to look into Teoh's death, but both cases were classified as NFA by the public prosecutor.
Meanwhile, Eliminating Deaths and Abuse in Custody Together (Edict) chairman M. Visvanathan, said he would be able to solve the case within 21 days if he were appointed as a special prosecutor.
Speaking at the same event, he called for the A-GC to appoint him as an ad hoc prosecutor to oversee the case involving Beng Hock's death.
This, he said as three doctors had confirmed that Beng Hock had injuries to his neck which occurred prior to his fall from the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam in Shah Alam.
"I propose to the AG, prime minister and home ministry, make me the ad hoc prosecutor. I will solve this case within 21 days of my appointment," he said.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Court reserves judgment in Tommy Thomas's appeal to recuse judge
Court reserves judgment in Tommy Thomas's appeal to recuse judge

Free Malaysia Today

time38 minutes ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

Court reserves judgment in Tommy Thomas's appeal to recuse judge

Former attorney-general Tommy Thomas's lawyer argued that High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain was biased and had shown prejudgment when she dismissed his client's application to strike out the suit. PUTRAJAYA : The Court of Appeal has reserved judgment in former attorney-general Tommy Thomas's appeal to disqualify a High Court judge from hearing a malicious prosecution lawsuit filed by former minister Shahrir Samad. The three-member bench, led by Justice Supang Lian and comprising Justices Faizah Jamaludin and Ahmad Fairuz Zainol Abidin, said it would consider both written and oral submissions. A case management has been scheduled for June 12 to fix a date for the decision. Thomas's lawyer Alan Adrian Gomez argued that High Court judge Roz Mawar Rozain was biased and had shown prejudgment when she dismissed his client's application to strike out the suit. He claimed the judge relied on Thomas's memoir, My Story: Justice in the Wilderness, to suggest that Thomas had pressured the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) to investigate Shahrir. 'Thomas will not be accorded a fair trial as there is a breach of natural justice,' he added. 'Thomas only asked MACC investigators to complete the probe expeditiously,' Gomez said, adding that while Thomas approved Shahrir's prosecution, it was his successor, Idrus Harun, who decided to proceed with the trial. Gomez also took issue with the judge's remark in her judgment that Thomas, before becoming attorney-general in June 2018, had helped topple the Barisan Nasional government. 'BN was voted out in the 14th general election,' he said. In response, Shahrir's lawyer Firoz Hussein Ahmad Jamaluddin argued that the recusal bid was baseless and made only after the strike-out application failed. He said a judge cannot be disqualified simply for making adverse rulings and noted that judges routinely dismiss strike-out applications but still go on to hear the full case if the plaintiff had an arguable case. He said the judge, in this case, wanted the trial to proceed as there was a prima facie case for malicious prosecution. 'The trial should proceed so that the truth can be tested through cross-examination,' Firoz said. He also highlighted that an MACC officer testified in Shahrir's money laundering trial that the investigation was incomplete when charges were filed. On Jan 5, 2023, High Court judge Jamil Hussin acquitted Shahrir of failing to declare RM1 million received from former prime minister Najib Razak to the tax authorities after the prosecution decided not to continue the case. Thomas filed the recusal application on Aug 26, 2023, alleging that Roz Mawar made baseless findings inconsistent with the lawsuit and evidence. Shahrir opposed the application, arguing that dissatisfaction with a ruling was not grounds for recusal. On July 3 last year, the judge dismissed Thomas's attempt to strike out the lawsuit. Shahrir, a former Johor Bahru MP, filed the suit in December 2022, naming Thomas, former MACC chief Latheefa Koya, MACC and the government as defendants. The suit centres on a RM1 million cheque from Najib, said to be intended for housing project restoration in Larkin, Johor. Thomas, who was attorney-general from June 2018 to February 2020, denies any abuse of power and says prosecution decisions were made only after reviewing investigation papers from relevant agencies. He resigned in February 2020, while Shahrir's trial began in July 2022.

MACC seizes Ilham Tower again
MACC seizes Ilham Tower again

Free Malaysia Today

time39 minutes ago

  • Free Malaysia Today

MACC seizes Ilham Tower again

Ilham Tower belongs to former finance minister, the late Daim Zainuddin, and his family. (Website pic) PETALING JAYA : The Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) has seized the 274m-tall Ilham Tower, located in the Kuala Lumpur city centre. This is the anti-graft agency's second time seizing the tower, after making a similar seizure on Dec 21, 2023. In a statement, MACC said it received authorisation from the deputy public prosecutor to seize the tower on Jalan Binjai today. The tower, which belongs to the late former finance minister Daim Zainuddin and his family, was seized two years ago under Section 38(1) of the MACC Act, which deals with the seizure of immovable property. The anti-graft agency previously said it could seize the tower for up to 18 months pending investigations. MACC said today's seizure was made under Section 51(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001 (Amla). It said the authorisation for seizure was granted after the deputy public prosecutor was satisfied that it was related to an offence under Section 4(1) of Amla for structuring transactions to evade reporting requirements. 'Accordingly, it was ordered that the Ilham Tower building be seized by an MACC investigating officer. 'All dealings involving the transfer of ownership of the said immovable property are now prohibited. Failure to comply with this notice constitutes an offence under Amla,' MACC said. Last month, the graft busters opened eight new investigation papers into 'high-value' assets linked to Daim and his family members after receiving new information from overseas. Earlier this week, the Kuala Lumpur High Court granted MACC a court order to freeze 132 million pounds (RM758.2 million) worth of assets in London belonging to Naimah Khalid, the widow of Daim, and her family. The assets reportedly included two commercial buildings, five luxury residences and one bank account. Naimah plans to challenge the court order, which was granted ex parte, contending that the assets were lawfully acquired.

MACC seizes Ilham Tower again
MACC seizes Ilham Tower again

The Star

time43 minutes ago

  • The Star

MACC seizes Ilham Tower again

Photo: AZMAN GHANI/The Star PETALING JAYA: The Deputy Public Prosecutor's office has given the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) the full legal authorisation to seize Ilham Tower again. MACC said it had since ordered the immediate seizure of the 60-storey skyscraper through its investigating officer after authorisation was given. It said that the seizure will be done under Section 51(1) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLATFPUAA) 2001. 'Through a notice of seizure of immovable property under the section on June 4, the authorisation for seizure was granted pursuant to the powers conferred upon the Public Prosecutor under Section 376(3) of the Criminal Procedure Code (Act 593). 'This means the Deputy Public Prosecutor is satisfied with the information provided by the MACC related to an offence under Section 4(1) of the AMLATFPUAA 2001 for this case,' it said in a statement on Thursday (June 5). It added that all dealings related to the 274m-tall tower's transfer of ownership would be prohibited with immediate effect. This seizure comes after the tower, owned by the family of former finance minister the late Tun Daim Zainuddin, was originally seized by MACC in December 2023 due to an offence under the MACC Act 2009. This was believed to be part of an anti-money laundering probe that started in late May involving a corporate transaction valued at RM2.3bil (US$500mil) in November 1997 involving public-listed Renong Bhd and United Engineers Malaysia Bhd (UEM), which were both linked with Umno. On May 22, MACC chief com­mis­sioner Tan Sri Azam Baki said that eight investigation papers had been opened into the assets owned by Daim, his family and proxies, which had not been declared to the MACC during its initial 2023 investi­gation, due to having received new information from external agencies. Then on Wednesday (June 4), the High Court allowed an application by MACC to freeze assets worth £132mil in London that were allegedly linked to Toh Puan Na'imah Abdul Khalid, wife of the late Tun Daim Zai­nud­din, and her family.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store