Latest news with #A-GC


New Straits Times
18 hours ago
- Politics
- New Straits Times
Teoh Beng Hock case may reopen if new evidence emerges, says Azalina
KUALA LUMPUR: The investigation into the death of Teoh Beng Hock may be revisited if new developments emerge in the future, despite the case being classified as No Further Action (NFA). Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said said this is because criminal cases are not bound by any statute of limitations. "Unlike civil cases, criminal cases are not subject to any statute of limitations. "As such, if new developments arise in the future, further investigation and a review of the case may still be carried out," she said in a written parliamentary reply. Azalina (BN-Pengerang) said this in response to Lim Guan Eng (PH-Bagan), who had enquired about the reasons for the Attorney-General's Chambers' (A-GC) decision to classify the case as NFA. Meanwhile, she also said that while the police had established a special investigation team to reopen the probe into Teoh's death following the Court of Appeal's 2014 decision to set aside the coroner's open verdict, there was insufficient evidence to support any criminal charge against any individual. "As such, NFA directive has been issued by the A-GC in relation to this investigation paper, and this matter was also explained in the A-GC's media statement dated May," she said. In May, the Teoh Beng Hock Association for Democratic Advancement revealed that Teoh's death has classified as NFA. Following the revelation, the AG-C said that there was insufficien t evidence to prove any offence against any individual under the law. Teoh was found dead on July 16, 2009, at the Plaza Masalam building after giving a statement to the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) office on the 14th floor of the same building. He was the political secretary to then Seri Kembangan assemblyman Ean Yong Hian Wah, who was the Selangor executive councillor for local government, legalisation of illegal factories, and new village development. On Jan 5, 2011, the Shah Alam Coroner's Court ruled that Teoh's death in 2009 was not due to suicide or murder, and found that there was no third party in his death case. On July 21, 2011, the Royal Commission of Inquiry formed to investigate Teoh's death ruled that his death was due to suicide. On Sept 5, 2014, the Court of Appeal overturned the ruling on Teoh's death, ruling that his death was the result of unlawful acts by one or more unknown persons.


New Straits Times
2 days ago
- New Straits Times
Teoh Beng Hock's family rejects A-GC explanation letter on court ruling
KUALA LUMPUR: The Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) has written a letter to the family of the late Teoh Beng Hock in an effort to clarify the Court of Appeal's decision, which ruled that his death was the result of an unlawful act by one or several unknown persons. Attorney-General Datuk Mohd Dusuki Mokhtar said the letter also provided an explanation on the burden of proof and other related matters, but the family had rejected the explanation. "We sent the letter a few months ago. The contents largely explained the Court of Appeal's decision, the burden of proof, and other matters. "I cannot disclose the full details of the letter, but we have made efforts to reach out to the family, and they have refused to accept it," he said. Dusuki was asked to comment on his previous statement, in which he said the A-GC would be sending a letter to Teoh's family to address the circumstances surrounding his death, which occurred 16 years ago. Teoh died on July 16, 2009 on the fifth floor of Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam, after being questioned for hours by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC). An inquest was held and the coroner returned an open verdict. However, the Court of Appeal in 2014 ruled that his death was caused by "one or more persons unknown", including MACC officers. In 2019, police launched an investigation under Section 342 of the Penal Code for wrongful confinement. Prior to 2018, two special investigation teams were set up – one in 2011 and the other in 2015 – to look into Teoh's death, but both cases were classified as NFA by the public prosecutor. It was reported recently that the MACC had issued an apology to Teoh's family over his death at its Selangor office while under investigation. Its Chief Commissioner Tan Sri Azam Baki had said the commission deeply regretted the tragedy and acknowledged the pain and suffering endured by Teoh's family. He had also said that the MACCis prepared to provide a goodwill contribution to the late Teoh's family for the purpose of supporting the welfare and educational needs of his child.
![[UPDATED] Umno division chiefs urge enforcement of royal addendum for Najib's house arrest](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2Flogo_umno_1752763212.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
![[UPDATED] Umno division chiefs urge enforcement of royal addendum for Najib's house arrest](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fassets%2FNST-Logo%402x.png%3Fid%3Db37a17055cb1ffea01f5&w=48&q=75)
New Straits Times
6 days ago
- Politics
- New Straits Times
[UPDATED] Umno division chiefs urge enforcement of royal addendum for Najib's house arrest
KUALA LUMPUR: A total of 145 Umno division chiefs nationwide, including those from Sabah, have called for the enforcement of a royal addendum decree to allow former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak to serve the remainder of his sentence under house arrest. They said the decree had already been consented to by the 16th Yang di-Pertuan Agong, Al-Sultan Abdullah Ri'ayatuddin Al-Mustafa Billah Shah, and added that there was no longer any excuse to delay its implementation. Wangsa Maju Umno division chief Datuk Seri Dr Mohd Shafei Abdullah said all 145 division leaders are also demanding the Attorney-General withdraw the Federal Court appeal against the Court of Appeal's ruling on Jan 6. "As the government's top legal adviser, the Attorney-General should uphold the King's decree and support justice, not obstruct it. "In addition, all Umno divisions that have yet to convene are urged to table a special motion on the royal addendum during their respective division meetings. "This motion is important as proof of the party's unity and solidarity in defending the Malay Rulers institution and upholding the principle of justice for all," he said. He was speaking at a press conference after the special meeting of Umno division chiefs held at Royale Chulan here today. Among those present were Umno division chiefs Datuk Mohd Nazifuddin Najib (Langkawi), Datuk Seri Ahmad Bashah Md Hanipah (Alor Setar), Datuk Suraya Yaacob (Pendang), Datuk Seri Jamil Khir Baharom (Jerai), Datuk Johan Abdul Aziz (Hulu Langat), and Datuk Seri Ahmad Said (Kemaman). Mohd Shafei said the division chiefs said that this is not merely about an individual but concerns the rule of law, respect for the royal institution, and the principle of justice. The special meeting, among others, discussed grassroots demands within Umno regarding the royal addendum related to Najib. This follows the Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) not disputing the existence of the royal addendum, said to be a decree by the 16th Yang di-Pertuan Agong allowing Najib to serve his sentence under house arrest. Instead, the A-GC challenged the procedure of presenting the decree as new evidence in Najib's judicial review application at the High Court.


New Straits Times
11-07-2025
- Politics
- New Straits Times
Wan Rosdy: A-GC's acknowledgement confirms royal addendum's validity
KUANTAN: Pahang Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Wan Rosdy Wan Ismail has reiterated his stand that the royal addendum order concerning Datuk Seri Najib Razak is genuine, following the Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) acknowledgement of its existence. In a Facebook statement today, Wan Rosdy said the A-GC's stance, whether directly or indirectly, confirms the validity of the royal decree, and reinforces the truth of the affidavit he had submitted to the court earlier. "This further affirms that the affidavit I presented, stating my awareness of the royal addendum, is truthful and not hearsay. "Since the Attorney-General's Chambers has acknowledged the addendum's existence, it is only right that the court proceedings be halted and the decree enforced," he said. Wan Rosdy added that all parties involved, including the A-GC, the judiciary, and the government, must uphold the principle of separation of powers and respect the authority of the Yang di-Pertuan Agong and Malay Rulers, as enshrined in the Federal Constitution. "Personally, and on behalf of the people of Pahang, I pray that Datuk Seri Najib receives the justice outlined in the royal addendum," he said. On Wednesday, senior federal counsel Shamsul Bolhassan informed the court that the A-GC does not dispute the existence of the royal addendum, which allegedly allows Najib to serve the remainder of his prison sentence under house arrest, but is instead challenging the procedure of its submission as new evidence in Najib's ongoing judicial review.


New Straits Times
08-07-2025
- Politics
- New Straits Times
Court rules Isham's remarks on Najib's trial not contemptuous
KUALA LUMPUR: Former Umno information chief Isham Jalil's statements criticising Datuk Seri Najib Razak's corruption trials involving 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) did not undermine public confidence in the judiciary. High Court judge K. Muniandy made the ruling after dismissing committal proceedings initiated by the Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) against Isham today. The court said that the contempt alleged did not have a direct bearing on the specific courts in which the 1MDB and SRC International Bhd cases had been heard and decided. "The cases were already determined by that courts. Therefore, what could be regarded as scandalous or interfering with the course of justice earlier may not be so today. "The vague allegation that the respondent (Isham) has scandalised the judiciary by making the impugned statements, when seen in the light of the facts and context of the publication, the statements do not pose real risk of undermining public confidence in administration of justice," said the judge. Muniandy said the object of the law of contempt was not to protect judges and their dignity but to protect the rights of the public by ensuring that the administration of justice was not obstructed. "With the advent of social media, criticisms against a judge and his decision is commonplace, as replied by the respondent in his reply to the show cause. "As a judge, our duty demands that we adjudicate cases with absolute independence, unwavering impartiality, and unassailable integrity. "This is not always easy, as we must stand resilient in the face of adversity and criticism, for the scales of justice must never be swayed by external pressures or the clamour of public opinion," he said. Muniandy said the judgments in corruption cases involving 1MDB and SRC International were clearly based on facts and the law, rather than emotion or public pressure. "It shows that the ebb and flow of administration of justice is guided by legal principles, not by the shifting tides of public opinion or scurrilous attacks." Muniandy said while freedom of speech was a cornerstone of democracy, its exercise must respect the vital function of the judiciary. He said the power of contempt of court was a necessary tool to prevent genuine obstruction or subversion of justice. "However, its use should be reserved for cases where there is a real risk of undermining the administration of justice, not merely to suppress uncomfortable or even critical opinions. "The most effective way for the judiciary to dispel unwarranted criticism and defend its integrity is through undeniably fair and just judgments," he added. A-GC filed the contempt application on Dec 28, 2023, following Isham's remarks in an interview titled "Townhall For Justice: Keadilan Sebenarnya Untuk Siapa?" (Justice: Who Is It Really For?) In his remarks, Isham had criticised the corruption trial and appeal involving his former boss, Datuk Seri Najib Razak, in relation to the 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) and SRC International Sdn Bhd cases. The recorded interview, which discussed the trial and appeal proceedings in the SRC and 1MDB cases, was posted on the Facebook page of "The Malaya Post" on Sept 30, 2023.