![[UPDATED] High Court orders police to reopen investigation into Dutch model Ivana Smit's death](/_next/image?url=https%3A%2F%2Fassets.nst.com.my%2Fimages%2Farticles%2FKL_HIGH_COURT290725_1753762806.jpg&w=3840&q=100)
[UPDATED] High Court orders police to reopen investigation into Dutch model Ivana Smit's death
Judge Roz Mawar Rozain also ordered the police to brief the Attorney-General's Chambers (A-GC) every three months on the progress of the investigation.
The A-GC is to determine the sufficiency of the evidence and the next course of action.
Roz Mawar said this in her judgment after awarding Smit's mother, Christina Carolina Gerarda Johanna Verstappen, RM1.1 million in damages against the Inspector-General of Police, the case's investigating officer, and the government.
She said police had been negligent in their investigation and had failed to comply with a 2019 High Court order to properly reinvestigate the case.
In 2019, then High Court judge Datuk Collin Lawrence Sequerah directed A-GC to order the police to investigate the cause of Ivana's death, after setting aside the inquest verdict that classified her death as a 'misadventure' and reclassifying it as death caused by a person or persons known or unknown.
She said the 2019 High Court order was clear and straightforward, as it directed the case to be reclassified as a death caused by person or persons unknown and required the A-GC to instruct the police to reopen the investigation as a murder case.
Roz Mawar said following the previous High Court order, the police had established a specialised task force to re-investigate the case.
"This court observes that the defendants failed to ensure the effective operation and accountability of this investigative mechanism.
"The evidence indicates that the task force did not produce substantive results or provide meaningful updates to the interested parties, particularly the plaintiff and the deceased's family.
"The court recognises that investigations may take time to yield results, but the apparent lack of transparency and accountability in the task force's operations, combined with the absence of any demonstrable progress or communication, suggests a failure to properly manage and execute the reinvestigation mandate.
"This conduct, when viewed alongside the earlier investigative deficiencies, demonstrates a pattern of deficient performance of statutory duties that has resulted in prejudice to the plaintiff's legitimate interests in obtaining closure and understanding regarding her daughter's tragic death," she said in her judgment today.
However, Roz Mawar stressed that her findings should not be seen as a criticism of the police force as a whole.
She said the judgment highlights specific institutional failures that need to be addressed, rather than casting blame on the entire force.
"The awards are meant to serve both compensatory and deterrent purposes, underscoring the need for public authorities to carry out their duties with proper diligence and accountability."
Smit, who was at the home of American couple Alexander William Johnson and Laura Almazkyzy, was allegedly partying with the couple before she fell to her death.
She fell from the 20th floor, and her naked body was found on a sixth-floor balcony at 10am.
Smit, who had dual Dutch and Belgian citizenship, was the second runner-up in the Malaysia Supermodel Search 2014 when she was 15.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
11 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Cops to liaise with Indonesian Embassy for details on deceased baby's mother
KUALA LUMPUR: Kuala Lumpur City police will contact Indonesian authorities to get information on the biological mother of a 7-month-old baby girl who died last week at Bandar Sri Permaisuri, Cheras, here. Acting Kuala Lumpur police chief Datuk Mohamed Usuf Jan Mohamad said this was aimed at identifying the baby's biological mother and informing her about the incident. "The investigating officer will liaise with the Indonesian Embassy to identify the birth mother and inform her of her baby's death. "Checks revealed that the baby had been handed over to a married couple, who are in custody without any identification papers. "To date, we have recorded statements from seven individuals, including neighbours," he said, adding that the couple was under remand. "Once the investigation papers are completed, we will submit them to the Attorney-General's Chambers," he said at the City Police Headquarters here today. It was reported that the death of the 7-month-old baby girl in Bandar Permaisuri, Cheras, was believed to be due to a fractured skull, suspected to be the result of prolonged abuse by her adoptive mother over the past month. The suspect was believed to have acted out of frustration over the baby's frequent crying. A post-mortem revealed multiple injuries across the body, particularly on the head. On July 31, it was reported that a baby girl was found unconscious on July 30 in a condominium in Bandar Sri Permaisuri, Cheras. She had bruises and a bluish complexion and was later pronounced dead. Police confirmed receiving a report from a man at 9.34pm, stating that his adopted daughter had been found unconscious at their residence for unknown reasons. The adoptive parents, aged 38 and 50, were arrested to assist in the investigation.
The Star
12 hours ago
- The Star
High Courts acquits two men of murder charge
Lawyers Datin Freda Sabapathy (left) and Sarawana Kumar together with the accused local Jaya Kandan Madachamy,47, (second left) and Sri Lankan Rathis Thas Ganapakiyam, 42. JOHOR BARU: Two men, including a local sales assistant, have been acquitted by the High Court in a murder case dating back six years, escaping the death penalty. Jaya Kandan Madachamy, 47, and Rathis Thas Ganapakiyam, 42, walked free without having their defence called. Rathis is a Sri Lankan national.
The Star
13 hours ago
- The Star
What is judicial mercy, and how does it apply to Ong Beng Seng's case?
Both the defence and the prosecution noted that a fine in lieu of jail would be appropriate as Ong Beng Seng has advanced multiple myeloma, which is an incurable cancer. - ST/ANN SINGAPORE: Property tycoon Ong Beng Seng pleaded guilty to one count of abetting the obstruction of justice on Aug 4. Both the defence and the prosecution noted that a fine in lieu of jail would be appropriate as he has advanced multiple myeloma, which is an incurable cancer. His lawyers urged the court to exercise judicial mercy and impose a fine with no prison time. The prosecution did not object to this, noting that even if the court did not exercise judicial mercy, there was basis for it to consider Ong's ill-health as a mitigating factor for a significant reduction of sentence. ALSO READ: Singapore-based Malaysian billionaire Ong Beng Seng pleads guilty to abetting obstruction of justice in case linked to ex-minister Iswaran What is judicial mercy? Judicial mercy is the discretionary power of Singapore's courts to give a more lenient sentence because of exceptional mitigating circumstances. It has a high threshold, and so far has been exercised in only two types of situations. The first is where the offender is suffering from terminal illness. The second is where the offender is so ill that jail time would carry a high risk of endangering his or her life. The High Court previously said that when judicial mercy is exercised, the central consideration by the court is not the culpability of the offender. Instead, the sentence will be based on humanitarian considerations. These must outweigh public interests in punishing the offender for his crime. This is distinctly different from when ill-health is considered as a mitigating factor. The High Court said judicial mercy is to be invoked only sparingly. Previous cases where it was invoked saw no imprisonment, or a nominal period of imprisonment, or the statutory minimum. Difference between judicial mercy and ill-health as mitigating factor Judicial mercy has a higher threshold than ill-health as a mitigating factor. When judicial mercy is invoked, the main consideration for sentencing becomes one of humanity. When the courts pass sentences with ill-health considered as a mitigating factor, the central consideration is still the public interest in punishing one for the offence committed. The punishment would remain proportional to the offender's culpability, but may be reduced at the discretion of the court. The courts have exercised judicial mercy in cases where the offender has not long left to live or when prison time would pose a significant risk to the offender's life. Cancer-stricken woman In 2020, the court fined a woman S$5,000 (US$3,885) instead of jailing her for a week for contempt of court. The mother of two had breached court orders relating to divorce proceedings with her former husband. She had turned her children on him and harmed his reputation. The court granted judicial mercy, noting that the woman had stage 4 breast cancer, was using a wheelchair and weighed only 30kg. Six months to live In 2018, a man who managed a coffee shop had a three-week prison sentence cut to a S$250 fine after he was diagnosed with cancer and given six months to live. Lam Kim Heng, then 68, had tried to bribe a building inspection officer with a pack of cigarettes. But three weeks after sentencing, he found out he had acute myeloid leukaemia. The High Court granted judicial mercy when it heard his appeal about three months after the diagnosis. Former Tangs chairman's kidney scandal In 2008, then Tangs chairman Tang Wee Sung was jailed for a day and fined S$17,000 for attempting to buy a kidney. He suffered from multiple medical conditions, including end-stage renal disease. Tang had to undergo dialysis six days a week, and had extremely detailed checks, injections and medication daily. The court granted him judicial mercy. Tang underwent a kidney transplant in 2009 and died in 2022. Molester with nose cancer In 2006, a convicted molester was granted judicial mercy on appeal and had his original sentence of four months' jail and three strokes of the cane replaced with a S$5,000 fine. Chng Yew Chin, then 43, had molested his maid. But he appealed and a doctor told the court he could not be cured and had little time left. The court granted him judicial mercy, saying his cancer was a far harsher sentence that would kill him in the near future. - The Straits Times/ANN
