'Your truth, but not the truth': Defence drills complainant over bar surveillance footage in sexual assault trial of ex-NHL players
Hockey Canada trial (via Getty Images)
The cross-examination of the complainant in the high-profile
sexual assault trial
involving five former
NHL players
continued Friday in
Ontario Superior Court
, with the defence challenging her account of events before the alleged 2018 incident.
Michael McLeod
, 27, is charged with two counts of sexual assault. Dillon Dube, Cal Foote, Alex Formenton, and Carter Hart, all 25 or 26 years of age, each have one count of sexual assault.
Operation Sindoor
'Common sense prevailed': Trump on India-Pak ceasefire on Truth Social
'Pakistan initiated call; both nations agreed to stop military action after direct talks', says India
Ceasefire took effect at 5pm; top India, Pak military officials to talk again on May 12
All five have entered pleas of not guilty.
Alex Formenton's lawyer challenges complainant's memory and gaps; complainant resists under scrutiny
Defence presses complainant on memory, drinking at jr. hockey sexual assault trial
The female complainant in the case—identified as E.M. for a publication ban—was confronted by defence attorney Daniel Brown with discrepancies between her previous statements and video footage from Jack's, the London, Ont., bar where the complained-of incident started on the evening of June 18, 2018.
Daniel Brown, who acted for former Ottawa Senator Alex Formenton, dwelt on what E.M. said to investigators in 2018 and 2022. E.M. had initially reported she had purchased only two drinks that evening. Surveillance video shown in court Friday seemed to depict her paying for other beverages later in the evening.
'You said you got it wrong in 2022 because you hadn't looked at your 2018 statement,' Brown said to E.M. 'Why did you say that in 2018?'
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Click Here To Read More - HR Management Tools
Expertinspector
Undo
'I don't recall saying I didn't buy my own drinks,' E.M. responded. 'I said for the large portion of the night I wasn't paying for drinks.'
The defence also raised the issue of E.M.'s encounter with a past high school acquaintance who was a bouncer at the bar. CCTV indicated the two chatting and embracing with a side-hug—a contact E.M. never described in previous accounts.
Brown suggested she left this detail out because the bouncer could have disagreed with her version of events. E.M. responded that her friend did not know what transpired after they departed the bar and that she was embarrassed to include him in her previous stories.
'He would have no idea about what happened later on in the room,' she said. 'I was really embarrassed about what happened to me, and I didn't want anyone I knew to know what had happened to me.'
Brown insisted on having E.M. answer only his questions and questioned her memory on several fronts. Things came to a head when E.M. accused him of attempting to discredit her no matter how she answered.
'You're trying to make me second-guess everything I'm saying,' E.M. responded to Brown. 'I am giving you my truth. You push me for an answer. I say, 'I don't know'; you try to discredit me. I say something else; you try to discredit me.'
Brown replied, 'That was your truth, but not the truth, right?'
The exchange led to Assistant Crown Attorney
Meaghan Cunningham
standing up multiple times in protest, requesting the court to acknowledge that E.M. had previously responded to questions now being rephrased by Brown. When Brown stated it was 'not [her] problem' but the 'boys' problem', Cunningham stood again, terming the comment as inappropriate. Justice
Maria Carroccia
concurred, and Brown issued an apology.
E.M. insisted her recollection of the night is still partial, attributing it to alcohol and trauma. 'I don't recall any conversations. I was really drunk,' said E.M., who was cross-examined by three lawyers this week. 'Just not your problem, right? It's these boys' problem?' Brown said, to which Cunningham stood to say the comment was 'not appropriate'.
Also read:
Hockey Canada trial: Lawyer for Michael McLeod challenges complainant's choices and memory in sexual assault trial
The trial—now in its second week—has attracted steady public interest. Protestors once again congregated outside the courthouse Friday, with Brown reportedly being heckled upon arrival. Cross-examination of E.M. is to continue Monday, with attorneys for Dube and Foote to follow to cross-examine the complainant.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
5 unidentified men booked for ‘harassing' Merchant Navy officer
Dehradun: Days after a road rage incident on Dehradun's Rajpur Road sparked outrage after a video showing the occupants of a Haryana-registered SUV attempting to force a Merchant Navy officer and his family out of their car was widely circulated on social media, a case was registered against five unidentified men at Kotwali police station on Friday. SI Prawesh Rawat, who is investigating the case, said, "Based on a complaint lodged by Himanshu Chowdhary, a case has been registered against five unidentified acused, who were travelling in the SUV, under BNS sections, including 126(2) (wrongful restraint) and 351(3) (criminal intimidation)." Chowdhary said in his complaint that on the night of May 30, he was heading to a shopping mall around 9 pm with his wife and kids, when he decided to overtake the SUV ahead of them as it was moving slowly in the middle of the road. In a purported video of the incident, the accused were seen getting out of their SUV and banging on Chowdhary's car, demanding that he step out of the vehicle, even as his two children aged 3 and 8 were heard crying. The accused allegedly hurled abuses at Chowdhary and damaged his car. IG Garhwal, Rajeev Swaroop, said, "Such incidents will not be tolerated in Dehradun. The accused will soon be nabbed." Dehradun: Days after a road rage incident on Dehradun's Rajpur Road sparked outrage after a video showing the occupants of a Haryana-registered SUV attempting to force a Merchant Navy officer and his family out of their car was widely circulated on social media, a case was registered against five unidentified men at Kotwali police station on Friday. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Skype Phone Alternative Undo SI Prawesh Rawat, who is investigating the case, said, "Based on a complaint lodged by Himanshu Chowdhary, a case has been registered against five unidentified acused, who were travelling in the SUV, under BNS sections, including 126(2) (wrongful restraint) and 351(3) (criminal intimidation)." Chowdhary said in his complaint that on the night of May 30, he was heading to a shopping mall around 9 pm with his wife and kids, when he decided to overtake the SUV ahead of them as it was moving slowly in the middle of the road. In a purported video of the incident, the accused were seen getting out of their SUV and banging on Chowdhary's car, demanding that he step out of the vehicle, even as his two children aged 3 and 8 were heard crying. The accused allegedly hurled abuses at Chowdhary and damaged his car. IG Garhwal, Rajeev Swaroop, said, "Such incidents will not be tolerated in Dehradun. The accused will soon be nabbed."
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
Indian Men's Hockey Team Loses 1-2 To Netherlands In Euro Leg Of FIH Pro League
The Indian men's hockey team squandered a one goal lead to lose 1-2 to Olympic champions Netherlands in the first match of the European leg of FIH Pro League at Amstelveen, Netherlands on Saturday. The Netherlands struck the winning goal two minutes from the final whistle through Van Dam Thijs (58th minute), who also scored the equalising goal in the 25th minute. Captain Harmanpreet Singh had converted the first penalty corner of the match in the 19th minute to give India the lead. India began the match on a strong note, dominating possession with crisp passing despite Netherlands' high press. While the first eight minutes didn't yield any real threats on goal from either side, India got an opportunity soon after as they won the ball in the Dutch circle. Dilpreet Singh's reverse hit, however, was shut down at close range by Dutch goalkeeper Maurits Visser. At the other end, Netherlands threatened late in the first quarter as Thierry Brinkman approached the right flank, but the Indian defence stood firm to avert the danger. The Netherlands came out with intent in the second quarter, with Steijn van Heijningen testing Suraj Karkera in the 17th minute, only for the Indian goalkeeper to block the effort. India responded with purpose and were rewarded with a penalty corner after Dilpreet was impeded by a stick challenge inside the circle. Captain Harmanpreet stepped up and fired a powerful, low shot to give India the lead. As the second quarter progressed, India exhibited a tight defensive formation, but the home team managed to get the breakthrough in the 25th minute with Thijs van Dam finding the equaliser, leaving the scores at 1-1 before half-time. As the second half began, India's strong passing game was at the centre of proceedings, but the visitors were encumbered by a lack of clear scoring opportunities and shots on goal. To break the deadlock, India looked to bypass the midfield with long aerial balls, but the Dutch defence were up to the task. At the other end, the Netherlands grew increasingly assertive, posing more questions of the Indian backline, though the scores remained 1-1 after a tepid third quarter. The Netherlands had the lion's share of possession in the final quarter, and the hosts made it count. Thijs van Dam struck again in the 58th minute, making the most of a well-placed pass into the circle. With a deft first touch to control, he followed up with a fierce strike, ensuring victory for Netherlands. India will face Netherlands again on Monday in the second match of the European leg. India played the home leg of the ongoing Pro League in Bhubaneswar earlier this year, where they amassed 15 points with five wins in eight games.
India.com
an hour ago
- India.com
'Don't step out after...': This batter paid a huge price for not listening to Rohit Sharma, got mugged during...
Rohit Sharma with Team India. (PIC - X) New Delhi: A big revelation has been made about the star batsman of the Indian cricket team. Actually, this experienced batsman was robbed in 2012. This incident did not happen in India, but in the West Indies, which was revealed years later. Actually, this cricketer is the legendary test batsman Cheteshwar Pujara, who is currently out of Team India. Recently, during the launch of his wife Pooja Pujara's book 'The Diary of a Cricketer's Wife', Rohit Sharma narrated the story of how Pujara had to pay a heavy price for not agreeing. Actually, this incident happened during the Indian cricket team's tour of the West Indies in 2012. At that time Pujara was a part of the India-A team, when the team was in Trinidad and Tobago, he was robbed. During the book launch, Rohit asked Pujara about this incident of 2012, 'I haven't told. I mean, she is aware but she doesn't know the details. I am a vegetarian. So we were looking for a vegetarian meal at night. It was in TNT (Trinidad and Tobago) where we went out at 11 in the evening. We didn't find the meal but when we were walking back, I was mugged. I can't tell you in detail about it but that's the story he is referring to.' Rohit Sharma said that he had advised Pujara not to leave the hotel after 9 pm, because some areas of West Indies are not considered safe at night. Rohit told that Pujara had to go out to eat at night. Rohit said, 'Moral of the story is that he can be stubborn. We told him. We warned him not to go out in the night. Don't step out after 9 PM. This is the West Indies.' WATCH VIDEO BELOW: Rohit Sharma and Cheteshwar Pujara share shocking incident about not going out after 9 pm in West Indies. — ⁴⁵ (@rushiii_12) June 7, 2025 '(It was) such a big injury (and) such a bad injury. Both his ACL were gone. For any cricketer, leave alone if you are not an athlete or not playing any sport, for a sportsman it's very, very tough if you lose both your ACL,' Rohit Sharma said. 'We used to tease him about his running technique and all that but he managed to play more than 100 Test matches for India after that, a lot of credit goes to him for how he managed it. Great amount of dedication and passion he had to play the sport,' Rohit Sharma added.
