logo
U.S. Funding Halted Africa's HIV Crisis. Trump's Cuts Have Forced a Reckoning.

U.S. Funding Halted Africa's HIV Crisis. Trump's Cuts Have Forced a Reckoning.

Yomiuri Shimbun19-05-2025

Ilan Godfrey/For The Washington Post
Shonewe Thembelihle does a general checkup in March for Maphindi Mtsetfwa at the Miracle Campus in Sidvokodvo, Eswatini.
SIDVOKODVO, Eswatini – When American taxpayer money started flowing here 18 years ago, this country was the epicenter of the global HIV/AIDS crisis, with the world's highest prevalence rate, and so much death that 1 in 10 households was headed by a child.
U.S. aid unleashed a flood of lifesaving antiretroviral pediatric drugs. It funded doctors and data systems. It helped build an ultramodern medical facility in the center of the country, known as the Miracle Campus, that provided free care behind an entrance sign saying: 'From the American people.'
To the nurses and doctors who arrived during that dire phase, this was America at its most ambitious – a superpower vowing to help solve the health crises of the developing world. In Eswatini, U.S. money helped extend the average life expectancy by more than 10 years.
But now a project that once embodied America's largesse has exposed the pitfalls of that approach, as some aid and government workers in Eswatini fear it has left the country ill-prepared to take care of its own.
Even after the HIV/AIDS emergency eased, U.S. aid kept flowing at high volumes. America took steps to pass responsibility to African countries but kept its hands on crucial tasks.
'We shouldn't expect the U.S. to take care of a chronic disease to infinity,' said Echo VanderWal, executive director of the Luke Commission, the charity that runs the Miracle Campus.
Eswatini, formerly known as Swaziland, is a New Jersey-size country of lush green hills wedged between Mozambique and South Africa. Relative to the country's population of 1.26 million, the U.S. investment here had been significant: roughly $800 million since 2007, according to government records. Most of that money came as part of a single program, the President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), launched by President George W. Bush, who said America had a duty to 'make this world better.'
Among health workers as well as Eswatini government officials, there is widespread consensus that the U.S. earned tremendous goodwill with its investment here and helped turn the tide against the epidemic. Those officials and workers also criticize the abrupt nature of the Trump administration's foreign aid cuts as reckless.
But now that the status quo has been disrupted, Eswatini must grapple with uncomfortable questions about what comes next, whether a post-U.S. health system might be more sustainable or more dangerous.
'The American government had stepped up and been holding our hand for a long time,' said Lizzie Nkosi, a former health minister. 'That is not something we can easily lose.'
In Eswatini, the Miracle Campus is at the center of that reckoning.
Founded by an American husband and wife – Echo VanderWal, a physician assistant, and Harry VanderWal, a doctor – the Miracle Campus had become a celebrated emblem of U.S. generosity. Almost every employee carried an iPad, and surgeons used messaging apps to provide real-time updates on procedures. The hospital had 3D printers to customize medical equipment and drones that could transport medicine to rural villages.
But beyond the modern equipment, there was another reason people had sought out the campus, according to interviews with patients and health-care workers: the woes of Eswatini's own public health system. The national hospitals struggled to stock medicine and supplies, and government-appointed investigators had accused officials of mismanaging the national drug supply, citing poor oversight and alleged corruption. Even as Eswatini's economy grew, the country was increasingly relying on U.S. charity for the day-to-day care of its people. By 2023, after years of growing demand, the Miracle Campus was handling 24,000 patients a month – more than a quarter of the national load, according to data compiled by the Luke Commission based on government data.
The Health Ministry did not respond to a request for comment.
The VanderWals, today in their early 50s, had never questioned their faith-based motto to treat all seeking care. But two years before President Donald Trump's decision, Harry asked his wife: Are we part of the problem?
'We were carrying such a big portion of the national load,' Echo said. She called it 'unsustainable.'
One of the pharmacists at the Miracle Campus, Thembelihle Zondo, went so far as to say his country would have been further ahead if aid had been cut off years ago. 'The government would have just pulled up their socks, taken ownership to say, 'No one is going to help us, so we need to do this on our own.''
U.S. officials had been working with Eswatini to gradually hand off more responsibility, with the goal of winding down some of the funding by 2030. Wendy Benzerga, who was the U.S. Agency for International Development country director in Eswatini from 2015 to 2020, said that 'a lot more could have been done' to begin the transition earlier.
'But aid becomes this big machine,' said Benzerga, who emphasized that she was speaking in a personal capacity, not on behalf of the U.S. government. 'And it's comfortable for everyone.'
The Washington Post did not uncover evidence that U.S. funding was misused, and the government-appointed investigators did not indicate that American aid money was involved in the alleged corruption.
The State Department, in a statement, said PEPFAR 'has been impactful, saving millions of lives and helping bring the HIV numbers under control.'
'Secretary [Marco] Rubio has stated that PEPFAR is an important and life-saving program that will continue,' the statement said. 'He has also said that PEPFAR, like all assistance programs, should be reduced over time if they are impactful in achieving their mission.'
Now that shift has arrived without any preparation. In early February, with U.S. funding withdrawn, the Miracle Campus installed an entrance gate with a sign asking most patients to go elsewhere. It shuttered the maternity ward, halted preventive care, and stopped treating diabetes and hypertension. It had to lay off almost half of its 700 workers. It couldn't even pay its utility bills. The last trickle of patients come for HIV/AIDS medication refills, or for specialty surgeries performed by doctors who agreed to work without pay until funds were available.
Echo, the facility's executive director, says she sometimes believes that the campus's near-total shutdown is in Eswatini's best interests. 'I hate to say it, but I think it had to happen,' she said. But on other days, she sobs as she walks through the empty wards, or when she gets text messages from former patients who say they have no other place to go for reliable health care.
She still asks the same question that caused her to keep the doors wide open in the first place: What happens without us?
'Finest health care in the country'
They had first traveled to Eswatini in 2004, a trial to see if people like them might be able to help. Echo, raised in Idaho, had obtained her first passport specifically to make the trip. Harry, from North Carolina, had never traveled farther than Canada. They had four young children, some savings from flipping houses, a deep Christian faith and a sense they were ready for a risk. As they saw it, this was part of what it meant to be an American – not hesitating to offer help, whether to a neighbor or someone overseas.
'As Americans, we want to run in and fix things,' Harry said.
Hours off the plane, they saw people dying of HIV/AIDS. And by 2006, weeks after Harry finished his residency, they had moved for good. They rented an apartment and started crisscrossing the nation with medical supplies stuffed in the back of trucks. One of the main objectives, in those years before widespread drug availability, was chillingly modest: delaying orphanhood.
By 2010, the VanderWals had their first contract with the U.S. Agency for International Development – for performing adult circumcisions that reduce the risk of HIV/AIDS. The contract sum was modest, $180,000, but Echo remembers feeling they had 'broken the barrier' into the world of foreign aid. Three years later, they bought farmland near a river. Initially they just used the land's old dairy barn to store their medical supplies. But the money kept coming – ultimately, $40 million from USAID, according to government data. They used those funds for doctors, equipment and, later, solar panels and other technology. They leaned on private charitable donations, mostly from the U.S. and Canada, as they kept building out the campus.
What took form, spread across 200 acres, defied the stereotypes of a health facility in a developing country. They constructed an auditorium for team meetings and church-themed musical shows. They added an in-house 'farm team' that grew maize and other ingredients for hospital meals. They added a 'wood team' that made canes and crutches, and fabricated parts for buildings.
If the Luke Commission 'hadn't been there for Eswatini, I think most people would have been dead by now,' said Colani Nkambule, a security guard who works at the campus and lost both of his parents to HIV/AIDS in the early 2000s.
'They provided the finest health care in the country,' said Barbara Staley, an American Catholic missionary who has worked on and off in Eswatini since 2004.
But as demand skyrocketed, they also made personal decisions they admit were reckless. During the coronavirus pandemic, they took out a loan against the value of their home to help cover operational costs. Amid national drug shortages, they used a line of credit to buy medicine from South Africa. In 2023, they drained their retirement savings to help pay employees. 'Whatever was in the bank account, it's gone,' Harry said.
They eventually realized they had gone too far to keep the campus running – and by 2024, they were scaling back some services and using charitable donations to pay debts. Those moves also meant they relied on U.S. aid more than ever for their day-to-day operations.
By the time of the Trump administration's decision, they had no margin for error.
According to the Luke Commission's 2023 financial statement, 33 percent of its revenue came from USAID.
The campus's fate has now become Eswatini's top political battle, dominating local front pages and serving as a proxy for broader questions about how the kingdom moves on from the era of big U.S. aid.
While almost everybody agrees that it's foolish for the campus to sit nearly empty, the debate centers on whether Eswatini should offer a sustained financial lifeline – and whether the charity running the campus should come under government control. Nkosi, a senator who served as health minister until 2023, said the Luke Commission had been offered a financial deal two years ago on the condition that the government could approve the chairman of the board.
'They flatly refused,' Nkosi said.
Echo and Harry said they never received a formal offer, and instead wanted financial support without submitting to a government takeover. A parliamentary report from last year detailed how the back-and-forth negotiations had created 'bad blood' between the Health Ministry and the Luke Commission.
In many ways, Echo and Harry are no longer outsiders: They are citizens of Eswatini and refer to the country's monarch, Mswati III, as 'our king.' They raised their children here. They dress for formal occasions in traditional Swazi wraparound fabrics.
But they say they don't feel ready to make their hospital part of a national health system that can't stock its own drugs. Doing that, Echo says, 'would be the biggest mistake we'd make in our lives.'
No clear exit strategy
When Velephi Okello heard about Trump's decision to slash foreign aid, she thought to herself, 'Fasten your seat belts.'
As director of health services at Eswatini's Health Ministry, she had been imagining this moment for years – while sitting in on meetings with U.S. officials where they talked about PEPFAR's future, and about passing off more and more work to local partners. She had helped the country take major steps in self-sufficiency – buying its own antiretroviral drugs, for instance, rather than relying on international donations.
'We thought that the PEPFAR funds would take us to 2030, slowly and gently,' she said.
Before the Trump shutdown, the U.S. had retained responsibility for crucial tasks in Eswatini's day-to-day health care – not just by funding the Miracle Campus but by paying workers who were performing testing and working in communities. Of the USAID money flowing into the country, global nongovernmental organizations like Pact and the Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation had been among the biggest historical recipients.
An assessment published in late March from UNAIDS, a United Nations program devoted to fighting the disease, said there has already been a 'significant decline' in HIV case identification in Eswatini and described a risk of supply 'stockouts' in three to six months.
Nkosi, the former health minister, said that Eswatini still has one of the highest HIV rates in the world and that removing foreign support means restoking the emergency.
'That is just logic,' she said.
Okello said Eswatini is past the stage where the U.S. decision might 'collapse the health system.' She noted that years before U.S. support arrived, the country had declared a national emergency, launched local education programs and created a national response council. And Eswatini was the first country in Africa to reach a landmark global AIDS target, known as 95-95-95, referring to the percentages of people who know their HIV status, are undergoing therapy and have successfully suppressed the virus.
But after the withdrawal of U.S. aid, many in Eswatini are angry – not at America but at their own government.
Patients across the country, as well as doctors at government hospitals, say that while Eswatini has mounted a strong response to HIV/AIDS, it has allowed deepening problems in its overall health system. Patients tell similar stories: of going to hospitals for basic drugs and being told the essentials aren't in stock.
The government says it is taking the problem seriously, and three years ago commissioned an internal investigation that examined years of health and drug-procurement records.
The final investigation, which was not made public but was obtained by The Washington Post, laid out a scheme in which officials systematically buy drugs the country doesn't need or are about to expire. The scheme enriches suppliers, the report says, who make direct payments to complicit bureaucrats, who have accepted trips abroad and used cash to purchase luxury cars.
People living in Eswatini do not connect the king to the drug shortages. But political dissidents abroad say his system of patronage, as well as his lavish lifestyle – with 16 wives and a fleet of luxury cars – fosters a culture of corruption.
'You've got one person who is accountable to nobody but himself,' said Ignatius Dlamini, a political activist based in South Africa who chairs a group called United Eswatini Diaspora.
Eswatini's Health Ministry declined to respond to a list of questions about drug shortages and alleged corruption. It also did not respond to questions about the Luke Commission.
'It's a dire situation,' said Zakhele Dlamini, director of the forensic company that led the investigation. 'People are living in hell because there are no drugs – hence the Luke Commission and other private clinics that are the go-to for trying to survive.'
Six weeks after the U.S. aid was halted, the security guard at the Miracle Campus entrance had turned away patients with broken bones, people in tears, even his own relatives. One nurse had sold off cattle to help manage bills; another had downsized apartments. The employees were accruing backpay, but Echo worried that as the uncertainty dragged on, the entire Miracle Campus could come unglued.
So she called a morning meeting – 300 people crowding into an auditorium, with Harry in the background as a grandchild tugged at his knee.
She acknowledged that she didn't have many updates, that U.S. money still wasn't coming, and spoke again and again about 'how painful' this has been. But her speech, as it went on, took on the feel of a pep talk – both for her staff and herself. She said the facility still had a future, one that wouldn't rely so heavily 'on what people decide in another country.'
The meeting ended with a prayer, and the staff spent the rest of the day refilling antiretroviral prescriptions and performing a skin graft for a 6-year-old girl bitten by a venomous snake. Echo and Harry retreated to an upstairs conference room, spending one full day, then another, huddling with advisers and strategizing about their future. Eventually, they sketched out a vision of a smaller Miracle Campus, about one-sixth of its size at its peak, that relies more on private donations. They also decided, for the first time, to start charging patients who could afford it.
Harry said he still viewed America as having a 'spirit of compassion.' But as much as Americans rush in to solve problems, he said, they've never been very good at getting out.
'There wasn't a clear exit strategy,' he said.
They'd built the most advanced medical campus in Eswatini, but now it was just idled equipment and pretty landscaping. The sun had set. The staff had gone home. After almost two decades in the aid industry, this is what had come to: Harry and Echo, late at night, trying to figure out how to start over.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. gov't restores some medical research grants, says top Trump official
U.S. gov't restores some medical research grants, says top Trump official

Japan Today

time2 hours ago

  • Japan Today

U.S. gov't restores some medical research grants, says top Trump official

NIH Director Jay Bhattacharya is a physician and health economist who left a professorship at Stanford University to join the Trump administration A senior U.S. health official on Tuesday admitted President Donald Trump's administration had gone too far in slashing biomedical research grants worth billions of dollars, and said efforts were underway to restore some of the funding. Jay Bhattacharya, director of the National Institutes of Health (NIH), made the remarks during a Senate committee hearing examining both recent cuts to his agency and deeper reductions proposed by the White House in next year's budget. Bhattachartya said he had created an appeals process for scientists and laboratories whose research was impacted, and that the NIH had already "reversed many" of the cuts. "I didn't take this job to terminate grants," said the physician and health economist who left a professorship at Stanford University to join the Trump administration. "I took this job to make sure that we do the research that advances the health needs of the American people." The hearing came a day after more than 60 NIH employees sent an open letter to Bhattacharya condemning policies they said undermined the agency's mission and the health of Americans. They dubbed it the "Bethesda Declaration" -- a nod both to the NIH's suburban Washington headquarters and to Bhattacharya's role as a prominent signatory of the 2020 "Great Barrington Declaration," which opposed Covid lockdowns. Since Trump's January 20 inauguration, the NIH has terminated 2,100 research grants totaling around $9.5 billion and $2.6 billion in contracts, according to an independent database called Grant Watch. Affected projects include studies on gender, the health effects of global warming, Alzheimer's disease, and cancer. Trump has launched a sweeping overhaul of the US scientific establishment early in his second term -- cutting billions in funding, attacking universities, and overseeing mass layoffs of scientists across federal agencies. © 2025 AFP

U.K. to Cut Foreign Workers, the ‘Backbone' of British Nursing Homes
U.K. to Cut Foreign Workers, the ‘Backbone' of British Nursing Homes

Yomiuri Shimbun

time4 days ago

  • Yomiuri Shimbun

U.K. to Cut Foreign Workers, the ‘Backbone' of British Nursing Homes

Tori Ferenc for The Washington Post Jeremiah Akindotun helps Edna Barnett with her crossword puzzle at Hammerson House, a 116-room nursing home in north London where 58 percent of the clinical staff come from 49 different countries. LONDON – The 23-year-old Nigerian man handed the 78-year-old British woman her noon pill and, on a sunny June day, sat down for a little chat amid the family photos lining her wall. 'Will you miss me if I leave?' Jeremiah Akindotun asked with a smile. 'Oh, I think it's too sad, Jerry,' said Suad Lawy, sitting back in her chair. 'You get so attached. What's going to happen to our carers?' Akindotun is a health assistant at Hammerson House, a 116-room nursing home in north London where 58 percent of the clinical staff come from 49 different countries. Across the United Kingdom, foreign workers commonly provide intimate care to elderly Brits, with nearly a third of care staff coming from overseas. But maybe not for long. The British government, struggling to address immigration tensions, announced last month that it was ending the special overseas recruitment program that has been a pipeline for care workers in recent years. Officials said the move was necessary to make the care system less dependent on foreign labor and to root out fraud and exploitation in the fast-track care worker visa program, which was initiated five years ago to ease a staffing crisis in the care industry, one of Britain's biggest employment sectors. The plan funneled more than 220,000 workers into facilities around the country, according to a government-sponsored database, but it also faced problems. Most workers landed with legitimate companies, but thousands were scammed in their home countries by fake employment brokers. Others arrived only to be overworked and underpaid, even sexually exploited, under threats of having their visas canceled. Reputable nursing home administrators, however, said canceling the program outright is a body blow to their efforts to fill more than 131,000 open positions in a system that is creaking under the weight of an aging population. Nursing home care is provided by private companies in the U.K. but largely financed by cash-strapped local governments. British citizens show little interest in the jobs, which are considered low pay, low status and demanding, providers say. 'I haven't had a White British applicant in a year,' said Jenny Pattinson, CEO of the nonprofit that runs Hammerson House and another London care home. Underlying all of this is a debate about immigration that continues to convulse Britain, like most Western nations. A decade after its Brexit vote to leave the European Union, the U.K. is still arguing with itself about how multicultural and globally integrated it wants to be, questions that continue to drive politics. The Labour government, generally considered immigration-friendly, announced the end of the care worker visa program less than two weeks after being crushed in English regional elections by Reform UK, a right-wing, populist party started by anti-immigration activist and Brexit-champion Nigel Farage. Reform UK defeated hundreds of Labour and Conservative incumbents and took control of 10 local councils. Critics say Prime Minister Keir Starmer is trying to dent Reform UK's appeal by making his own rightward pivot on immigration. Cutting the care-worker visa was part of a broader package of immigration changes, including doubling the number of years required for visa holders to become permanent residents and raising the English-language requirement for skilled workers. In announcing the measures, Starmer sparked a backlash within his own party by warning that Britain risked becoming 'an island of strangers,' a phrase in which some found echoes of xenophobic rhetoric. In 1968, Enoch Powell was kicked out of the Tory shadow cabinet after saying in his famous 'rivers of blood' speech that White Britons 'found themselves made strangers in their own country.' Starmer rejected the comparison in an interview with the Guardian newspaper, saying that 'migrants make a massive contribution to the UK, and I would never denigrate that.' Immigration has bedeviled both Labour and Conservative prime ministers for years. Both legal immigrants and asylum seekers arriving on small boats surged to a peak of 906,000 by June 2023. The numbers are falling as restrictions imposed by the then Tory government and the new Labour government kick in, with net migration into the country down to 431,000 in measures released in May. But the issue remains divisive as a record 11,074 people arrived in small boats in the first four months of this year. Care home operators accused Starmer of going after their workers because they are easier migrants to block than those crossing the English Channel without permission. 'In my humble opinion, this is a knee-jerk reaction to the surge in votes for Reform,' Pattinson said. 'The government is saying 'Right, we've got to do something about immigration. Where is the largest body of workers coming from abroad? It's the care sector.' There aren't many aspects of British life in which immigration plays a larger, or more emotional, role than in health and social care. Migrants from the British commonwealth, and particularly the postwar 'Windrush' generation of workers recruited from the Caribbean, fill the ranks of beloved National Health Service. Nurses of colors danced and flew through the air as part of a tribute to the NHS in the Opening Ceremonies of the 2012 London Olympics. Lawy, a former secondary schoolteacher from Hampshire, a county that is 90 percent White, who has formed bonds with her Nigerian, South Asian and Filipino caregivers, said she had little experience with multiculturalism before moving to Hammerson House following a stroke. 'It's really opened my mind,' she said. 'My sister used to say she enjoyed living in a diverse community and I really didn't know what she meant,' Lawry said. 'Now I do.' Hammerson House is a Jewish care home. But Ayesha Khan, a Muslim physical therapist from Pakistan who arrived through the visa program last year, said she has felt welcome and useful. Managers told her to step away for prayers whenever she needed to and the only comment she has gotten about her hijab was from a questioner making sure she was not wearing it against her will. 'It's not just a home for residents here, it's a home for me,' Khan said. These ties make the new restrictions even more explosive, experts said, even as they acknowledged that there was a need for some reform of the abuse-prone visa program. 'It's a sacred cow, immigration is the backbone of the U.K. care system,' said Rob McNeil of Oxford University's Migration Observatory. 'There is a snap response, 'Oh my god, how terrible.' But if they don't resolve things at a structural level there will be consistent problems.' The program started in 2020 under Prime Minister Boris Johnson to address a drain of European workers that followed the Brexit vote. A lack of oversight, critics charge, allowed shady enterprises and outright fraudsters to operate alongside legitimate care providers. In a crackdown last year, government investigators revoked the licenses of 470 sponsoring organizations, leaving 39,000 guest workers stranded without jobs. 'A third of our calls now come from care workers,' said Olivia Vicol, head of Work Rights Centre, a legal advocacy group. Nursing home operators say the government has itself to blame for letting the bad actors flourish and that the staffing crisis will only get worse as a result of cutting the whole program without beefing up training, incentives and pay for British citizen to take the jobs. That could create even more political backlash for the government. 'This program was poorly designed at the outset and it's kind of obvious lever to pull when net migration numbers go up,' said Robert Ford, political science professor at the University of Manchester. 'But there will be an uproar if there is major crisis in care homes.' The government said it was immediately suspending new overseas recruitment through the program, but that current visa holders could apply for renewals until 2028. The number of family members workers can bring was cut, and they will now be required to stay 10 years for a sponsoring facility, instead of five, before being free to explore other work. For Akindotun, the health assistant, the changes put his whole future in doubt. With a master's degree in clinical psychology, he and his wife and toddler daughter arrived in the U.K. two years ago with hope that he could eventually work as a therapist. His training has been invaluable in dealing with Hammerson's elderly, infirm residents, he said. 'I have much to give here,' he said before sitting down with a 91-year-old who asks him to draw pictures for her. 'It's very demoralizing to feel that the government don't want us.'

UN report: Lack of US funding will cause 4 milion additional AIDS deaths by 2029
UN report: Lack of US funding will cause 4 milion additional AIDS deaths by 2029

NHK

time5 days ago

  • NHK

UN report: Lack of US funding will cause 4 milion additional AIDS deaths by 2029

The United Nations has warned that a permanent halt in US funding is expected to result in 4 million additional deaths from AIDS-related causes by 2029. The General Assembly met on Thursday to study a UN progress report on the fight against HIV/AIDS. The report says the US has been a leader in the global response to HIV for more than two decades, contributing more than 70 percent of donor funding. But it notes that the administration of US President Donald Trump has paused the contributions since the end of January. UN Deputy Secretary-General Amina Mohammed told the meeting that the cost of the reduction is stark. She said closures of clinics and other disruptions to HIV services are putting adolescent girls and young women at especially greater risk, and that more babies are being born with HIV. Mohammed said if US funding is permanently halted, the UN projects 4 million additional deaths and over 6 million new HIV infections by 2029. She called on countries to reverse the funding declines, saying they must not allow themselves to "shatter the possibility of achieving the 2030 goal to end AIDS as a public health threat." The UN report says nearly a quarter of the 39.9 million people living with HIV globally are not receiving life-saving treatment. It says one person is dying from HIV-related causes every minute.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store