'Ageing' biosecurity labs in Surrey pledged £1bn for upgrade
The government has pledged to spend £1bn upgrading an animal health research centre in Surrey.The Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) announced the investment in high-containment laboratories near Weybridge on Tuesday.The National Audit Office (NAO) said in a June report the site, run by the Animal and Plant Health Agency (APHA), currently has a "very high" risk of site failure.The NAO also estimated the total cost of redeveloping the site would be £2.8bn.
The government said the facilities will help manage animal disease outbreaks and the risk of future pandemics.The announcement followed the publication of a policy paper in March, which announced the development of a "national biosecurity centre" at the site.The centre will "provide essential research, surveillance and outbreak response to help stop diseases" damaging the UK, according to the document.Defra also announced £200m of funding in December for the APHA to upgrade biosecurity facilities at the Surrey site.Tuesday's announcement comes as part of a the UK's latest national security strategy.
Farmers 'better protected'
The government said work was already underway to redevelop the site.Temporary labs would be up and running in 2027 and 2028 while the national biosecurity centre was due to be fully operational is 2034, it added.Runnymede Borough Council granted outline planning permission to redevelop the site in December.APHA senior science director Jenny Stewart said Tuesday's announcement was a "vital milestone" in the project.The funding will allow the agency's researchers to "continue their critical work in modern, fit-for-purpose facilities", she added.Environment Secretary Steve Reed said: "Farmers and food producers will now be better protected from diseases, our food security strengthened, and public health better safeguarded against future pandemics."
The Surrey site houses 98% of APHA high-containment laboratories, is its main long-term animal health studies site and is the the agency's only facility that can deal with most zoonotic diseases, according to the NAO.The public spending watchdog warned in its report that the site is "in poor condition, with ageing buildings that need major repair and replacement".It added: "Any major failure at Weybridge could have potentially significant impacts on the UK."For example, APHA may not be able to deliver its emergency response during an outbreak."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
36 minutes ago
- The Independent
BBC newsreader changes ‘pregnant people' to ‘women' on live broadcast
A BBC News presenter has gone viral after replacing the term 'pregnant people' to 'women' while reading the autocue during a live broadcast. Martine Croxall was reporting on research from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine that warned of nearly 600 expected heat-related deaths on Saturday (21 June). Reading from the autocue, the presenter said: 'Malcolm Mistry, who was involved in the research, said the aged, pregnant people - women - and those with pre-existing health conditions need to take precautions." Ms Croxall address the broadcast on X on Sunday and said: "A huge thank you to everyone who has chosen to follow me today for whatever reason. It's been quite a ride.'
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labour's benefit cuts may discriminate against disabled women, say charities
Downing Street's disability cuts will have a 'devastating' impact on women's health and dignity and could breach equality law, the government has been warned. Charities and disabled people's organisations including Scope, Spinal Injuries Association, Inclusion London, ME Association and WinVisible told the Guardian that tightening eligibility for personal independence payments (PIP) would mean disabled women being discriminated against, due to their higher personal care needs compared with men. Under the new rules, to be voted on by MPs next week, a claimant must receive four points in a single daily living category to qualify for the payment. Washing below the waist will score just two – half the number given to needing assistance between the shoulders and waist. It means the new four-point rule won't take into account menstruation or some women's extra toilet requirements, such as incontinence from pregnancy, unless they have additional needs. More than 100 Labour MPs have signed a Commons bid to halt the cuts in their tracks, enough to threaten Keir Starmer's majority. Some 108 MPs' signatures appear on an amendment declining to give the welfare reform bill a second reading when it returns to the Commons on 1 July. The rebellion, the prime minister's largest yet, would be enough to defeat the government's plans if opposition MPs joined the Labour rebels. 'The proposed changes to the Pip assessment criteria ignore fundamental aspects of women's health and dignity,' said Dharshana Sridhar, campaigns manager at the Spinal Injuries Association. The decision to award fewer points for assistance with personal care below the waist overlooked the realities of menstruation, incontinence and intimate hygiene; needs that were especially complex and often more acute for women with spinal cord injuries, Sridhar said. 'By failing to recognise the distinct and disproportionate impact of these changes on disabled women, the proposals risk breaching the Equality Act 2010, both in terms of sex and disability discrimination, and the Public Sector Equality Duty. A benefits system that systematically disregards menstruation, personal care, and continence management for disabled women cannot credibly claim to meet its legal obligations to promote equality and eliminate discrimination.' Hat Porter, a spokesperson for the menstrual justice charity Irise, said: 'Already PIP applicants with conditions like endometriosis and fibroids face a much lower than average application success rate, with claimants' debilitating symptoms being dismissed as 'just a period'. 'Tightening the eligibility criteria would make it even harder to access financial support. For those who use Pip to cover the costs of carers or social care fees, having this lifeline stripped away could leave them without the support they need to manage tasks like changing period products. That would have a devastating impact on their dignity as well as health.' There are wider concerns that women will be more likely to miss out on Pip under the new rules, after the government's own impact assessment showed more women than men currently score fewer than four points on descriptors while getting a daily living award. The ME Association said that Pip's existing 'majority of the time' rule – which says a claimant must be unable to do an activity over half the time to qualify – would compound the discrimination against women. 'Menstrual symptoms, by definition, occur intermittently and may not affect a woman for over 50% of the time – meaning they are often excluded from consideration, regardless of how severely disabling they are when present,' said Ella Smith, the charity's welfare rights consultant. 'In practice, this could lead to many women losing eligibility under the proposed 4-point rule, not because their support needs are minor, but because those needs are dispersed across multiple activities or occur cyclically. With Pip being positioned to replace the work capability assessment as the sole gateway to assessing work capability, it is imperative that the new system takes account of intermittent yet profoundly disabling experiences such as menstruation.' Jessica Leigh, campaigns manager at Scope, said the charity had heard from 'hundreds' of disabled people who rely on benefits to afford sanitary products, incontinence pads, and needing to do more laundry. 'Disabled people are extremely concerned their personal hygiene and health will be among the many devastating costs of these cuts,' she said. The Pip changes come amid strained NHS community and social care, which several DPOs told the Guardian had already led to 'basic' hygiene being treated as a 'luxury' for some disabled women. Tumu Johnson, a spokesperson for Sisters of Frida, a disabled women's group, says: 'Disabled women have been told [by local councils] to wear incontinence pads instead of being provided support to use the toilet. They have also been told to use the hormonal pill to stop their periods instead of support to manage their menstruation the way they choose. We've heard from many disabled women who are scared that the Pip changes mean they could now lose vital personal care, on top of their other needs.' A Department for Work and Pensions spokesperson said: 'The vast majority of people who are currently getting Pip will continue to receive it. We're creating a sustainable welfare system that genuinely supports sick and disabled people while always protecting those who need it most. 'At the heart of this is our review of the Pip assessment to ensure it is fit for the future. We will work with disabled people and a range of experts on this as we deliver our plan for change.'
The Guardian
42 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Man who developed psychosis after being jailed for 13 years on indefinite sentence moved to hospital
A prisoner driven to psychosis after being jailed for more than a decade under an indeterminate sentence has finally been moved to a hospital for a treatment after a six-year battle by his family and supporters. Thomas White was sentenced to a minimum of two years in custody under the imprisonment for public protection (IPP) scheme in 2012 for stealing a mobile phone, but remains in prison over a decade later. His family said the undefined nature of his sentence, and spending years in prison without a release date, caused White to develop serious mental health problems, and he was eventually diagnosed with paranoid schizophrenia. 'He just started to get sicker and sicker – the present system is definitely psychiatric abuse,' his sister, Clara White, said. 'Without a doubt, he would have died in prison. He was dying. He was dying in front of us. We could see it. But now he has a chance of survival.' She said the family found out last Wednesday that White will be transferred to a medium secure mental health hospital, a move they have been fighting for since 2019. He is currently living on the hospital ward on HMP Manchester. 'I did cry. It was unbelievable. It was, oh my word, we've achieved what we've set out to do. I called my family, my mum, and there were tears in every family home,' she said. 'This is the first time that he's actually going to be cared for properly. Unfortunately he'll probably be there for many years. He's still under the IPP though. The stain of IPP has not been removed from him.' Clara White said her brother had no history of mental health problems before his imprisonment, but his health deteriorated drastically in 2016 after four years in prison with no end in sight. He started wearing his bedsheets as clothes, claiming he could hear voices through the air vents of the cells, and 'speaking in Roman numerals' down the phone. On one occasion when his mother visited him in prison, she had to ask a prison officer to identify him for her. 'For a mum to not recognise her son, that's how bad it was. He was disheveled. He'd lost half of his body weight,' Clara White said. 'His mind had been broken. Thomas spent inhumane periods in segregation. So he was alone with no human contact with his Bible talking to himself. I think somewhere along the line, something broke in Thomas and never repaired again.' She added that in the 13 and a half years he had been in custody, he had been moved between 13 different prisons, with his family sometimes having to drive for many hours to visit him. White's case was previously highlighted by a UN torture expert as 'emblematic of the psychological harm' caused by indeterminate sentences. IPP sentences were banned 12 years ago (four months after White's sentencing), but more than 2,000 people are still in prison serving an IPP sentence and at least 90 IPP prisoners have taken their own lives. The Labour peer Tony Woodley has introduced a private member's bill to resentence prisoners still under IPP sentences, but after decades of campaigning, many have little faith it will result in change any time soon. 'I've got so much respect for Lord Woodley trying to get rid of IPP sentences but do I think that will happen? No. And I'm absolutely glad we went down the hospital route because my brother wouldn't have lasted much longer waiting for a bill to go through,' Clara White said. She has been supported by the pastor Mick Fleming, from Church on the Street, who has highlighted White's case in his latest book, Walk In My Shoes. The pair plan to continue fighting on behalf of other IPP prisoners, and to get White's IPP sentence removed. 'We're not going to walk away and forget about the others, hundreds of other people need help,' she said. 'Thomas doesn't hope. He doesn't know what hope is anymore. He thinks that they're going to change their mind and keep him in prison. That's what IPP does to someone.'
