US Sen. Elizabeth Warren endorses Evanston Mayor Daniel Biss in crowded 9th Congressional District primary
Warren, a three-term senator from Massachusetts and briefly a front-runner for the 2020 Democratic presidential nomination, announced she was backing Biss in a statement shared with the Tribune in which she praised the two-term mayor as 'a relentless fighter for working people who can help deliver the structural change our country needs right now.'
'As Donald Trump and the MAGA Republicans continue to shred public services and rig the economy for the wealthy, we need progressive champions like Daniel in Congress to take on billionaires and powerful corporations, lower costs on essentials like health care and housing, and root out the corruption that keeps government working for the few instead of the many,' Warren said, referencing the president's 'Make America Great Again' slogan.
While the value of candidate endorsements is debatable, the nod from Warren could carry some extra weight as more than a dozen candidates vie for the chance to replace longtime U.S. Rep. Jan Schakowsky, an Evanston Democrat who announced in May that she would not seek a 15th term representing a district covering parts of the North Side, North Shore and northwest suburbs.
Schakowsky, like Biss, was among numerous Illinois Democrats who backed Warren for the party's presidential nomination in 2020. The senator dropped out less than two weeks before the Illinois' primary after finishing poorly in earlier state contests.
Biss, who campaigned for Warren in Iowa ahead of the 2020 caucuses alongside Illinois Treasurer Michael Frerichs and then-Cook County Commissioner Brandon Johnson, in a statement called her 'an inspiration to me and so many others as one of the most effective, boldest progressive leaders in our nation.' He said he was 'honored to have her backing in this race.'
'Senator Warren is a leader in this fight to take power from the billionaires and big corporations and put it back in the hands of the people, and I would be honored to work alongside her in Congress,' Biss said.
Biss, who just won a second term as mayor in Evanston in April, also has been endorsed by U.S. Rep. Sean Casten of Downers Grove and several current and former state lawmakers, including Rep. Kelly Cassidy of Chicago and Rep. Marty Beth Canty and Sen. Mark Walker, both of Arlington Heights, all of whom represent portions of the 9th District.
After eight years in the Illinois House and Senate, Biss ran unsuccessfully in the 2018 primary for governor, angling for the progressive lane in a race against now-Gov. JB Pritzker, a billionaire Hyatt Hotels heir, and Chris Kennedy, a wealthy scion of the Democratic Party's de facto royal family.
Coincidentally, Pritzker's first campaign for public office was an unsuccessful Democratic primary bid in the 9th District in 1998, when he finished third in a race won by Schakowsky, who's held the seat since winning the general election that fall.
A former assistant professor of mathematics at the University of Chicago, Biss was first elected Evanston mayor in 2021 and has supported the city's first-in-the-nation housing reparations program, while rankling some residents with his tie-breaking vote in 2023 to approve an agreement with Northwestern University for its new football stadium.
Among those also seeking the nomination in the heavily Democratic district are Biss' replacement in the state legislature, state Sen. Laura Fine of Glenview; state Rep. Hoan Huynh and state Sen. Mike Simmons of Chicago's North Side; progressive content creator Kat Abughazaleh, a newcomer to Illinois; and Bushra Amiwala, a board member in Skokie School District 73.5 who was one of the first Gen Z elected officials in the U.S.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Editorial: CPS doubles down on ‘sustainable community schools.' Where are the results?
Education is the great equalizer, and we believe everyone should have access to a good one. So we took notice when Mayor Brandon Johnson announced late last week that the city would be nearly doubling the number of so-called sustainable community schools in the city. What is a sustainable community school? It's a model — widely supported by teachers' unions — which turns public schools into community hubs offering services such as housing and food assistance, medical and dental care, mental health support and classes, including parenting or English for non-native speakers. Right now, Chicago Public Schools has 20 of these schools, but the number is going up to 36 — with more to come after that. Each of these schools costs an extra $500,000 annually, so adding 16 will cost an additional $8 million next year. You may be asking yourself why, when the district has a deficit of hundreds of millions of dollars it needs to sort out by the end of the month, that Johnson is announcing this. Well, it's simple: The new Chicago Teachers Union contract requires an additional 50 sustainable community schools by the end of its four-year term. To some degree, the district's hands are tied. We should say here that we don't think the idea of sustainable community schools is meritless. It makes sense that low-income and disadvantaged kids may need more to succeed than just the three Rs. But is the sustainable community school model the way? Let's look at the track record of these schools in Chicago. Chalkbeat reported that since 2018, enrollment at the 20 schools in the program has dropped by 15%, with six of them losing more than a quarter of their students — a far steeper decline than the district as a whole. And many of these schools are among the city's worst-performing academically. We'll allow that numbers don't tell the entire story when it comes to a program such as this one, but they're not meaningless either. And so far they're downright discouraging. Johnson, the former CTU organizer who has spent his mayoralty attempting to make his former employer's demands reality no matter how unaffordable or questionable, doesn't think we should be considering metrics at all. He dismisses using test scores or graduation rates to gauge success, defining the effort's worthiness instead as 'when every child has everything they need.' Perhaps that's because the data don't support this investment. Even the most ardent public school advocate should never say something like that. Just like any other program, sustainable community schools need to justify their investment, and they do so at least in part by demonstrating measurable success. Here's the reality. The situation with Chicago's low-income kids warrants urgent attention. Among low-income CPS students, just 22% are proficient in reading, 12% in math, and nearly half miss 10% or more school days. Those numbers cry out for meaningful solutions. Improving this woeful reality is challenging, and schools aren't well-positioned to be everything to everyone. The best thing schools can do is help foster stability. An environment of reassuring routines, predictable interactions and secure relationships helps children feel safe and ready to learn. Here are some extra school services that seem to work. One-on-one or small-group tutoring, especially in the early grades, provide some of the strongest evidence for boosting achievement. In Mississippi, intensive early-literacy tutoring, among other reforms, helped raise fourth-grade reading scores to above the national average. CPS has made strides with its Tutor Corps program and Tutoring Chicago help, but more is needed. Before- and after-school programs, summer learning and extracurriculars boost attendance, engagement and outcomes. And pairing students with consistent adult mentors (through Big Brothers Big Sisters, for example) improves graduation rates and reduces disciplinary incidents. These add-on services boost learning — but only with a solid academic foundation; without it, they risk distraction over results. Based on the CTU contract, CPS doesn't have a choice — it has to move forward with these sustainable community schools. If CPS' own data showed these schools were moving the needle academically, this investment could be justified — but so far, that hasn't happened. We're not convinced spending more and expanding on this model is the answer Chicago kids need. Schools can connect families to outside help, but they cannot become the housing authority, the health department and the social services office without sacrificing their core mission: teaching children to read, write and think critically. When schools try to be everything to everyone, they risk doing nothing well. So the jury is out on sustainable community schools. Supporters of the concept, including the mayor, should focus on delivering results for students rather than defining success in terms of how many new CTU members are employed. Submit a letter, of no more than 400 words, to the editor here or email letters@ Solve the daily Crossword
Bloomberg
4 hours ago
- Bloomberg
The Texas Quorum Drama Isn't New — Involving the FBI Is
Now that an Illinois judge has rejected the effort to arrest Texas Democratic lawmakers who fled to deny the Republican legislative majority the quorum it needs to redraw the state's electoral map, perhaps we can begin treating the episode less as a constitutional crisis and more as what it truly is: a recurring theme in the nation's history. First, as I've explained before, there's nothing new about legislators fleeing to try to block a vote. This practice of 'breaking the quorum' has been a part of US history since before the states were united. Second, there's nothing remotely strange about the legislative majority ordering the arrest of members who've fled. That, too, is a venerable tradition in our troubled republic.
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
The U.S. Air Force Just Ordered $7.8 Billion in New Missiles, and These 2 Defense Contractors Will Profit
Key Points The U.S. Air Force placed a seven-year supply order for $4.3 billion worth of JASSM and LRASM missiles with Lockheed Martin. The Air Force also ordered six years' worth of AMRAAM missiles from RTX for $3.5 billion. RTX will probably earn a lot more profit on its missiles than Lockheed will. 10 stocks we like better than RTX › "A billion here, a billion there, and pretty soon you're talking real money." -- Senator Everett Dirksen The honorable senator from Illinois went down in the history books with this famous quip about government spending -- which is nowhere truer than in the defense department, where billion-dollar paydays pop up with regularity. Still, when I took a look at the list of Pentagon contracts published on July 31 in particular, I admit my eyes did goggle a little. In just two announcements amounting to fewer than 600 words total, the U.S. government awarded Lockheed Martin (NYSE: LMT) and RTX Corporation (NYSE: RTX) just under $7.8 billion. Big news for LockMart and RTX Both contracts concern the ordering of missiles for the United States Air Force. Lockheed Martin's Missiles and Fire Control division got the larger order: $4.3 billion to upsize a previous contract instructing Lockheed to build and deliver Joint Air-To-Surface Standoff Missiles (JASSM) and Long-Range, Anti-Ship Missiles (LRASM) for use by the USAF and foreign allies Finland, Japan, the Netherlands, and Poland by Jan. 31, 2033. RTX's Raytheon military products division was awarded $3.5 billion to supply Advanced Medium Range Air-to-Air Missiles (AMRAAM) by fiscal third-quarter 2031. In addition to the U.S. Air Force, these missiles are destined for the air forces of a huge host of U.S. allies, covering almost the entire alphabet: Australia, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Hungary, Israel, Japan, Kuwait, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, Ukraine, and the United Kingdom. How to put big numbers in context Are you impressed yet? Well, before getting too excited about the large numbers being bandied about, make sure to note the completion dates for both contracts. Lockheed Martin's LRASM/JASSM sales, for example, run through early 2033. That means you need to spread out the $4.3 billion contract value over more than seven years to get a sense of how much annual revenue this contract will contribute, and whether it's enough to "move the needle" on Lockheed stock. Here's the answer: It bumps up Lockheed Martin's $71 billion-a-year revenue stream to perhaps $71.7 million -- an increase of less than 1%. Similarly, RTX's $3.5 billion win spreads across six years. That works out to less than $600 million a year in extra orders. On RTX's $84 billion revenue stream, it's an increase of at most 0.7%. Plus, bear in mind that the Pentagon was already buying missiles from both these companies. The new orders -- in large part -- will simply replenish backlog and continue revenues that LockMart and RTX were already collecting. Viewed in that context, it's entirely possible that the ongoing increase in annual revenue for each company will be less than 1%... or even less than 0.7%. What this means for investors All this said, and the caveats notwithstanding, we're still "talking real money" here -- even if it's not necessarily "move the needle" amounts of money. What's surprising to me is how much better RTX has been lately at turning revenue money into GAAP profits. According to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence, Lockheed Martin's operating profit margin in its Missiles and Fire Control division is currently an anemic 4.2%, making it by far the least profitable of Lockheed's four main business divisions. RTX's Raytheon division, in contrast, earns 9.7% operating margins on its sales -- twice Lockheed MFC's margin. This makes Raytheon RTX's second most profitable business division after airplane parts division Collins Aerospace, despite Raytheon being the company's smallest division by revenue. Strange as it may sound, while RTX won the smaller of the two (still very large) missile contracts last week, measured both by absolute value and by value as a percentage of total sales, RTX is almost certain to earn the most profit from its Pentagon contract. There's a reason why RTX stock sells for 2.5 times annual sales, while Lockheed stock is valued relatively less, at just 1.4x sales. And RTX's superior profit margin is that reason. Should you buy stock in RTX right now? Before you buy stock in RTX, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and RTX wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $663,630!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $1,115,695!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,071% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 185% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join Stock Advisor. See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of August 13, 2025 Rich Smith has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool recommends Lockheed Martin and RTX. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. The U.S. Air Force Just Ordered $7.8 Billion in New Missiles, and These 2 Defense Contractors Will Profit was originally published by The Motley Fool
