
Map Shows How Each State Could Lose SNAP Benefits Under New Requirements
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
Millions of Americans could lose some or all of their SNAP benefits due to newly approved work requirements, a think tank has found.
Why It Matters
SNAP benefits, also known as "food stamps," are paid to more than 40 million low- and no-income Americans across the U.S. to help with purchasing groceries.
Under the recently passed One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), expanded work requirements to be eligible for the benefits will cover a larger group of Americans than before.
Under the new requirements, millions of previously eligible SNAP recipients could become ineligible.
What To Know
To continue receiving benefits, more individuals will be required to work or volunteer for at least 20 hours a week, or take part in training programs. Many who were previously exempt from these provisions could now be required to prove they meet these conditions or face the possibility of losing their SNAP benefits.
According to the Center for Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP), a left-leaning think tank, more than 5 million SNAP recipients could be at risk of losing some or all of their benefits under the new OBBBA rules.
Beneficiaries in high population states with large numbers of SNAP claimants, like California, New York, Texas and Florida, would likely see the most people impacted. In these states alone, an estimated 1.2 million could be at risk of losing some or all of their benefits. In every U.S. state, between 5 percent and 12 percent of current SNAP recipients are at risk, according to the study.
In California, the nation's most populous state, 368,000 individuals—6.84 percent of the state's 5.38 million SNAP recipients—are considered at risk, according to the study. Florida shows a similar trend, with 253,000 at risk out of nearly 3 million beneficiaries. In Texas, 276,000 SNAP participants face potential loss—8.64 percent of the state's total recipients.
New York reports 318,000 people at risk—10.87 percent of its 2.93 million beneficiaries—making it one of the highest possible total impacts in the country, according to the report. Illinois follows closely with 205,000 at risk out of 1.9 million, or 10.59 percent.
Overall, the group found 26 states have over 8 percent of their SNAP populations at risk of part or all of their benefits.
What Are the New SNAP Work Requirements?
The new rules have introduced age-based changes to SNAP work requirements. Able-bodied adults between the ages of 55 and 64 who do not have dependent children, as well as parents of children aged 14 and older, must now work or volunteer at least 20 hours per week or participate in training programs to receive their benefits.
Previously, these requirements only applied to individuals up to age 54. Veterans, individuals experiencing homelessness and former foster youth could now also be subject to work requirements.
Parents with teenage children will also be affected. If their youngest dependent child is 14 or older, these parents will now have to meet the work requirements. However, children will still continue receiving benefits even if their caregivers lose eligibility.
It could also become more difficult for states to waive these requirements, as waivers will only eligible in areas with unemployment rates above 10 percent.
What People Are Saying
The Foundation for Government Accountability (FGA), a right-wing think-tank based in Naples, Florida, wrote in a May 16 report: "Most able-bodied adults on the program are exempt from work requirements and bureaucratic loopholes have allowed states to skirt them even further—waiving them for as many able-adults as possible. Even worse, the Obama and Biden administrations actively pressured states to continue this trend, leaving millions of able-bodied adults trapped in a cycle of dependency. With millions of open jobs nationwide and labor force participation rates behind pre-pandemic levels, it is more critical than ever to move able-bodied adults from welfare to work."
The CBPP in its report: "More than 5 million people will be at risk of losing at least some of their food assistance, including 800,000 children, under a significant expansion of SNAP's already harsh, ineffective, and red tape-laden work requirements to parents and other caregivers of children aged 14 and up and adults aged 55 to 64."
What Happens Next
The start date for expanded work requirements is not clear and was not included in the OBBBA text.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I Asked ChatGPT How the ‘Big Beautiful Bill' Will Affect Social Security Taxes — Here's What It Said
As the 'Big Beautiful Bill' is reportedly tied to proposed sweeping reforms of federal taxation and entitlement programs, many Americans are wondering: What does it mean for Social Security, especially the taxes that fund it? I asked ChatGPT to break down what the Big Beautiful Bill meant for Social Security Taxes — here's what it said. Read Next: For You: What Is the 'Big Beautiful Bill'? Essentially, this bill is aimed at overhauling the tax system, cutting government spending and possibly reforming entitlement programs like Social Security and Medicare. Trending Now: Could It Affect Social Security Taxes? According to ChatGPT, any major tax overhaul could impact how Social Security is funded in several ways below. Raising or Eliminating the Payroll Tax Cap Currently, only wages up to $168,600 (as of 2024) are subject to the 6.2% Social Security tax. The 'Big Beautiful Bill' proposes eliminating this cap, requiring high earners to contribute more, a change that could extend the life of the Social Security trust fund. Changing the Tax Rate The bill could mean an increase in the Social Security tax rate for workers and employers alike. Even a small rate bump would generate billions in revenue but could face stiff opposition. Means-Testing or Changing Benefit Formulas Instead of raising taxes, the bill may reduce future benefits for high-income retirees or change how cost-of-living adjustments (COLAs) are calculated, indirectly affecting how much taxpayers benefit from the system they fund. What Should Workers Expect? The 'Big Beautiful Bill' raises real questions about the future of Social Security funding. If you're a working American, especially under 50, it's smart to stay informed and prepare for potential changes in how much you contribute and what you can expect in return. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 5 Ways Trump Signing the GENIUS Act Could Impact Retirees6 Big Shakeups Coming to Social Security in 2025 This article originally appeared on I Asked ChatGPT How the 'Big Beautiful Bill' Will Affect Social Security Taxes — Here's What It Said Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
Trump paves path for private equity and crypto in retirement accounts. Here's what it means for your 401(k).
Your 401(k) options could change soon. President Donald Trump signed an executive order Thursday to clear the way for Americans to invest their retirement savings in private equity, cryptocurrency, real estate and other alternative assets. It's a big win for the asset industry — giving financial managers access to some of the $12.2 trillion in Americans' 401(k) and related retirement plans. Private assets can also be more lucrative, and the Trump administration said they can give retirement savers more opportunities. 'The theoretical benefits are that everyday Americans can invest in a broader menu of companies,' said Robert Brokamp, a financial planning expert at stock market research company The Motley Fool. But there are higher risks — and not necessarily higher rewards. Critics say it could put people in danger of losing a huge chunk of their retirement savings. 'There is a lot less transparency and liquidity in private markets,' said Brokamp. 'There's not as much information about the companies, and it could be hard to sell your investments — especially during a panic and many, many investors are trying to sell at the same time.' Plus the fees are higher for private assets than for typical 401(k) investments like mutual funds and ETFs. Benjamin Schiffrin, director of securities policy at Better Markets, said target-date mutual funds holding stocks and bonds charge 0.3% — while private funds can charge 1% to 2% in management fees and up to 20% in performance fees, and interval funds charge 2% to 3%. Right now, private equity is technically allowed in retirement plans, but it's rare — though some companies like BlackRock are planning new offerings. There are ways people can invest in crypto through their 401(k)s, too, but it's also not common. And many 401(k) recordkeepers don't support private equity funds yet. The executive order could change that. It directs the Department of Labor to re-examine its guidance and clarify its position on alternative assets like private market investments, real estate interests and digital assets within 180 days. And it tells the Securities and Exchange Commission to consider ways to facilitate access to alternative assets for plans like 401(k)s. 'I think this is going to open the floodgates,' said Schiffrin. 'I think up until now, you've actually seen a lot of hesitancy on the part of 401(k) plan managers to go down the road of including private market assets like private equity and private credit, things like that in the 401(k) plans.' Employers would have to decide to offer the plans — and experts anticipate many might be reluctant, as they could be held liable for losses. However, with updated guidance from the government, employers may feel more comfortable adding these alternative assets into their 401(k)s. Many experts say that might not be a good thing. SageMint Wealth managing partner Anh Tran, a certified financial planner and attorney, believes there's a real risk that some investors will be drawn in by the allure of potentially higher returns from alternative investments without having the full picture. She said she would not advise anyone to make this kind of investment unless they fully understand the risk of losing that money entirely. 'It could be detrimental to less-informed investors whose only investment account is their 401(k),' said Tran. 'Without proper guardrails, such as limiting exposure to 5% to 10% of the portfolio, these investors could be exposed to unnecessary risk, misaligned expectations and potentially irreversible losses.' Knut Rostad, co-founder and president of the nonprofit Institute for the Fiduciary Standard, also fears private assets in 401(k)s could put retirement savers at risk of big losses. 'I think in practice, there'll be many fiduciaries who ignore this directive because they understand precisely what will result from it,' he said, referring to Trump's executive order. 'The result will be a massive train wreck where many people are seriously hurt. Their retirement accounts will be annihilated.' And cryptocurrencies come with their own dangers. 'It's not clear what, if any, protections investors are going to have when it comes to investing in crypto,' said Better Markets' Schiffrin. 'So that just is a whole separate category of risks that having crypto in 401(k)s opens up.' Meanwhile the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association, a trade organization for broker-dealers, investment banks and asset managers, cheered the announcement as a win for retirement savers. 'As more U.S. companies choose to remain non-public, private markets have developed into a more robust asset class,' Kenneth E. Bentsen Jr., president and CEO of SIFMA, said in a statement. 'Access to such investments, however, has been limited primarily to institutional and high net worth investors.' He continued: 'Policy changes to expand access to private markets investments — appropriately tailored under ERISA and SEC rules — could serve to improve diversification, democratize access, and offer more investment choices to the benefit of everyday retirement savers.' Experts believe it could take months to see any changes. For now, they say education and safeguards are key — especially for younger investors and people without access to professional financial advice. 'There must be transparency, education and limits in place to prevent widespread harm,' said Tran. 'Otherwise, we could be setting the stage for not only financial loss, but broader economic and social consequences.'


Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
NASCAR Driver Pays Tribute to Hulk Hogan With Special Livery
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. NASCAR driver Ricky Stenhouse Jr. is honoring Hulk Hogan at Watkins Glen on Sunday by sporting a special design on his No. 47 Chevrolet. The news came from Stenhouse's team, Hyak Motorsports. The team is going to feature Hogan's Real American Beer on the car as a sponsor with a red, white, and blue color palette. The words "Hulkamania Forever" will be read on the decal with a photo of the wrestling icon. The team will keep it on their car for the remainder of the season. Ricky Stenhouse Jr., driver of the #47 Real American Beer Chevrolet, drives during the NASCAR Cup Series Toyota/Save Mart 350 at Sonoma Raceway on July 13, 2025 in Sonoma, California. Ricky Stenhouse Jr., driver of the #47 Real American Beer Chevrolet, drives during the NASCAR Cup Series Toyota/Save Mart 350 at Sonoma Raceway on July 13, 2025 in Sonoma, California. Photo by"We're heading to The Glen this weekend and we're proud to have Real American Beer on the car in honor of Hulk Hogan. We'll be giving it everything we've got out there," Stenhouse said in the statement. The wrestling legend died last month of a heart attack. Chad Bronstein co-founded the beer company with Hogan and appreciated the gesture from Hyak and Stenhouse. "Hulk built Hulkamania and Real American Beer with strength, pride and resilience -- for the fans, for their communities, for our country," Bronstein said. "Real American Beer is here to carry on Hulk's legacy. We're grateful to Hyak for helping us honor him and carry his commitment to his fans forward." Stenhouse and Real American Beer began their partnership back in June when the No. 47 sported the logo on its decal at Michigan. For more F1 news, head on over to Newsweek Sports.