What's the real name of Alligator Alcatraz? Get inside look at detention center
These articles discuss the Florida detention center "Alligator Alcatraz," its conditions, and the challenges faced by those trying to access it.
The reports reveal a state-run facility built quickly to detain people under Trump-era immigration policies. They highlight issues like denied entry to lawmakers, heat and bugs inside the tents, and difficulties for detainees to contact legal counsel. "Alligator Alcatraz" is officially recognized by the state and has inspired merchandise.
Read the stories below to catch up.
No image found US President President Donald Trump arrives to attend a roundtable discussion as he visits a migrant detention center, dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz,' located at the site of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport in Ochopee, Florida, on July 1, 2025. President Trump is visiting a migrant detention center in a reptile-infested Florida swamp dubbed 'Alligator Alcatraz.' Trump will attend the opening of the 5,000-bed facility -- located at an abandoned airfield in the Everglades wetlands -- part of his expansion of deportations of undocumented migrants, his spokeswoman said. (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS / AFP) (Photo by ANDREW CABALLERO-REYNOLDS/AFP via Getty Images)
NO. 1: IT'S OFFICIAL: ALLIGATOR ALCATRAZ IS NOT A NICKNAME. IT'S FLORIDA'S NAME FOR DETENTION SITE
Alligator Alcatraz is not just a moniker designed to sell political merchandise. | Published July 1, 2025 | Read Full Story by Ana Ceballos
No image found Florida state Sen. Carlos G. Smith and fellow lawmakers speak to the media before being denied entry into Alligator Alcatraz, the state immigration detention facility in the Everglades, on Thursday, July 3, 2025. By PHOTO BY AL DIAZ
NO. 2: 'WHAT ARE THEY HIDING?' FLORIDA LAWMAKERS SHUT OUT OF ALLIGATOR ALCATRAZ
In a surprising and possibly unlawful act, five state legislators were denied entry Thursday into a taxpayer-funded migrant detention center deep in the Everglades, raising questions about what will happen behind the razor-wire fences that are being erected surrounding the controversial facility the state has named Alligator Alcatraz.Armed only with state law and a growing list of humanitarian concerns, state Senators Shevrin Jones and Carlos Guillermo Smith, along with Representatives Anna V. | Published July 3, 2025 | Read Full Story by Antonio Maria Delgado
No image found Aerial view of structures including gigantic tents built at the recently opened migrant detention center, 'Alligator Alcatraz,' located at the site of the Dade-Collier Training and Transition Airport in Ochopee, Florida on Friday July 04, 2025. By Pedro Portal
NO. 3: GIANT BUGS, HEAT AND A HOSPITAL VISIT: INSIDE ALLIGATOR ALCATRAZ'S FIRST DAYS
Concerns about conditions for detainees were heightened when one was rushed out of the detention center Monday in an ambulance. | Published July 8, 2025 | Read Full Story by Ana Ceballos Alex Harris Claire Healy
The summary above was drafted with the help of AI tools and edited by journalists in our News division. All stories listed were reported, written and edited by McClatchy journalists.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
23 minutes ago
- Chicago Tribune
Letters: Op-ed by liberal attack dog is an over-the-top criticism of Donald Trump
The Tribune's vendetta against President Donald Trump continues. Liberal college lecturer Storer H. Rowley goes after Trump like the newspaper's personal attack dog. His Aug. 3 opinion piece is so over the top that I thought I was reading the satirical Babylon Bee. The headline blares: 'Six months into his presidency, Trump has created a police state.' In Rowley's opinion, Trump has created a 'hellscape' of fear and chaos where unaccountable, masked immigration agents are hunting unauthorized workers 'like animals.' Trump deliberately appeals to white nationalists. His police state tactics are causing blowback. Only people power and voters can stop a criminal president! Nowhere does Rowley admit that the current situation was caused by the Joe Biden administration, which allowed countless immigrants to enter the U.S., and that Trump is trying to fix that situation. But Rowley does admit that 'Americans voted to get the border under control, and to be fair, Trump's administration has done that.' Hmm. On the opposite page in print, eternal liberal Clarence Page dwells on the Jeffrey Epstein files, just like CNN, in his column 'Trump drives a wedge into his own movement.' And no surprise that the Tribune did not report on the Department of Justice investigation into the Democrats' push to sell 'Russia collusion' to the American public during Trump's first op-ed by Storer H. Rowley is right on the mark. I don't believe most Americans want to have a police state that scares Americans and legal immigrants. We should never have masked officers scooping up people from schools, playgrounds and their homes, with no constitutional rights, and whisked away to a foreign gulag. We look like the dictator states we have always and Customs Enforcement has arrested, detained and/or deported tens of thousands of workers; this has chilled many others from reporting to jobs where they fear being picked up by ICE. The Department of Government Efficiency has encouraged tens of thousands of federal workers to retire early or quit and mandated the firing of tens of thousands of additional federal workers by closing departments and offices; this has deterred many individuals who might join the federal workforce in a typical year from seeking federal employment. Is it any surprise that unemployment is up and new jobs are down?Due process is a fundamental right guaranteed by the U.S. Constitution. It protects all people, citizens and noncitizens alike, from arbitrary government decisions and ensures fairness in legal matters. It's a basic promise: Before the government can take away someone's life, freedom, or property, they must have a fair chance to defend themselves. But today, that promise is under serious threat. In April, the U.S. Supreme Court deliberated on whether noncitizens have any right to a fair legal process before being removed from the country. Although the justices had different views on how much process is due, the court decided: Due process protections apply to everyone in America, regardless of immigration status. Due process means having access to a fair hearing before a neutral judge. It means having the right to speak with a lawyer. It means protecting the integrity of our legal system and protecting our communities. The Supreme Court's reaffirmation comes at a time when immigration policies have made it easier to deport people without traditional legal hearings, raising urgent questions about the strength and future of constitutional protections for all of us. Our organization represents residents from Barrington, Hoffman Estates, Inverness, Palatine, Rolling Meadows and Schaumburg, some of whom are immigrants. We are committed to ensuring all residents receive the legal protections to which they are entitled under the law. We value fairness and justice. Weakening due process protections for some puts all of our rights at risk. If the government can take away someone else's rights without a hearing, what prevents them from doing the same to you? Readers can take action by raising their voices in support of a fair legal process for everyone. Most importantly, remember that standing up for due process isn't just about protecting others; it's also about defending the fundamental rights that make America a place of justice and fairness for the last three months, the U.S. created a paltry 106,000 jobs. This, of course, was to be expected, as Donald Trump's tariffs have brought uncertainty and chaos to the economy. His response? Fire the messenger. But this poor jobs report is just another example of history showing that Republicans aren't very good with the economy. As recently as the fourth quarter in 2024, Joe Biden's last in office, the unemployment rate was 4%. Biden delivered the longest stretch of 4% or lower unemployment in 50 years, while creating an impressive 15 million new jobs in just four years. That's almost eight times more jobs what we saw with the last three Republican presidents combined. In his first term, Donald Trump actually lost 2 million jobs. In fact, since 1990, the U.S. has created over 50 million new jobs. Almost 49 million of those jobs — or 96% — were created by Democratic presidents. Poor job growth and economic downturns under Republican presidents are to be expected. Of the last 11 recessions that have occurred post-World War II, 10 have occurred under Republican presidents. In more recent history, George H.W. Bush's recession begat Bill Clinton's economic recovery; more than 18 million new jobs were generated during Clinton's term, the most in our history. George W. Bush's 'Great Recession' begat Barack Obama's economic recovery, one of the longest stretches of economic expansion in our history. Donald Trump's COVID-19-related recession begat Joe Biden's economic recovery. History shows that electing a Republican president often leads to slower growth, while also leading to massive budget deficits driven by tax cuts for the rich — Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' is forecast to add over $3 trillion to the national debt. In fact, the only presidents to reduce the deficit in the last 60-plus years were Democrats. The tired belief that Republicans are better at handling the economy simply isn't true.
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
Blue state Republicans sound alarm on redistricting tit-for-tat
Blue state Republicans whose political futures would be at risk in retaliatory redistricting efforts by Democrats are sounding the alarm on Texas's mid-decade effort to pad the GOP majority. President Trump's push to have Texas redraw its House maps — with a goal of picking up five more seats ahead of next year — has prompted red and blue states alike to consider redrawing their maps in response. Mid-decade redistricting being considered in California alone could cancel out Republicans' wins in the Lone Star State. The redistricting tit-for-tat is frustrating blue state Republicans. 'I think the whole thing is pretty disgusting,' Rep. Doug LaMalfa (R-Calif.), whose reelection could be at risk if California Democrats pursue new maps, told The Hill of the redistricting battles across the country. Constituents don't want politicians manufacturing 'a temporary gain by — any side — manipulating lines.' Rep. Kevin Kiley (R-Calif.), who also could face running in an even more competitive House in California, introduced a bill this week that would prohibit mid-decade redistricting. Kiley told The Hill that California Gov. Gavin Newsom's (D) plans for a special election to circumvent the state's independent redistricting commission is 'a very dangerous thing,' and 'a threat to Democracy in our state.' 'I don't like what's happening in Texas either,' Kiley said. 'The idea that we're going to start constantly redrawing maps, and we could see this domino effect where districts or states across the country are shuffling the lines on their maps — it creates great instability. It creates chaos. It's a huge distraction.' Texas Republicans' efforts to pass their new map stalled when Democrats fled the state to stop the GOP from achieving a quorum, or the minimum number of lawmakers needed in order to conduct business. Those maps will inevitably pass, however, given Republicans hold a majority in the state legislature, have a GOP governor and there's a conservative majority on the Texas Supreme Court. The redistricting battle in Texas has unnerved Democratic governors, who have criticized the GOP for trying to change their House lines ahead of an election year. But it's also prompted California, New York and Illinois officials to explore their own options to redraw district lines, saying they have to fight fire with fire. Caught in the cross-fire are blue state Republicans who face a conundrum: They're against seeing their own House districts drawn out even as some of them may support the GOP push happening in places like Texas. But members of the party warn it's a lose-lose situation for both parties. 'I think they're unintended consequences to all of this, and I'm not sure those unintended consequences aren't gonna be felt by both sides,' said former Rep. John Faso (R-N.Y.), who advised Republicans during their last redistricting fight in New York. LaMalfa agreed with Kiley about the Texas redistricting effort: 'It's not a good look down there either.' But he is not cosponsoring Kiley's bill, skeptical it will go anywhere. Top House Republican leaders have been largely quiet about the redistricting battles, but they are well aware about the concerns from their members. Kiley said he has talked to Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.) about his bill. While he declined to reveal the details of that conversation, he said the legislation is a chance for Johnson and House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) to 'show some leadership and say enough is enough.' LaMalfa said that the redistricting battles were discussed on a recent conference call with House Republicans, and that members were largely opposed to the redistricting changes. 'The outcry from Republicans isn't limited to California. Rep. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.), also situated in a competitive district, announced this week he's introducing legislation that would ban gerrymandering.' 'Gerrymandering is wrong and should be banned everywhere — including in New York, Texas, California, and Illinois,' he wrote on X. 'I'm introducing legislation to ban it. I look forward to every single Democrat signing on to it.' Some at-risk Republicans, like Reps. Young Kim (R-Calif.) and Kevin Calvert (R-Calif.), are staying focused on the battles in their own state without necessarily dinging fellow Republicans in Texas for upending their maps. In written statements, Kim said that overriding California's independent redistricting commission 'for partisan reasons disenfranchises voters and degrades trust in our political system,' and Calvert said that 'a partisan political gerrymander is not what the voters of California want.' And the National Republican Congressional Committee, which is responsible for ensuring the GOP maintains its majority, has so far only focused on dinging Newsom for entertaining a redistricting effort, with NRCC spokesman Mike Marinella calling it a 'desperate and pathetic attempt to appeal to the radical base (who already hates him) so he can chase after his political ambitions.' The larger issue of mid-decade redistricting and gerrymandering has become a lightning rod between the parties. Democrats have criticized Texas Republicans for redrawing maps in the middle of the decade and making an already gerrymandered House map more friendly for Republicans. Republicans, however, say Democrats are being hypocritical. They point out that New York, for example, has sought to engage in mid-decade redistricting after Democrats overplayed their hand and had their maps struck down by a court in 2022. The GOP, too, says it's rich for Democrats to complain about gerrymandering when the states that Texas Democrats are traveling to, like Illinois and New York, have also been gerrymandered. Some blue-state Republicans are more at risk than others. 2024 Election Coverage 'They would have to pass a constitutional amendment proposal in two consecutive legislatures, which means the earliest this could be on the ballot would be in 2027,' Faso said of New York Democrats' efforts, calling it 'light years away in political terms.' LaMalfa recognized, too, that lawmakers in Congress have little to no power to halt the redistricting wars that have the potential to anger voters and threaten members' reelections. 'We can say, 'Hey, don't do this,' and there's enough saying what we are saying, 'Hey, don't do this.' But they're going to do what they want,' LaMalfa said.
The Hill
23 minutes ago
- The Hill
GOP's FBI talk on Texas sparks firestorm with Democrats
Claims by Texas Republicans that the FBI is getting involved in efforts to track down and possibly detain Democratic state lawmakers who fled Texas to stop a partisan redistricting effort is getting strong pushback from Democrats in Congress. Democratic lawmakers are investigating how involved the FBI is in the Texas redistricting battle, but lawmakers who have weighed in on the matter say that FBI intervention would be an egregious politicization of the nation's top law enforcement agency. Claims that FBI Director Kash Patel is helping to track down state-level Texas Democrats come after Senate Democrats received information that the Justice Department ordered 1,000 FBI personnel to come through 100,000 Jeffrey Epstein-related documents in March to flag mentions of President Trump. Democrats say that if Patel is taking sides in the Texas redistricting fight, it would be a misuse and politicization of the FBI — something they warned about during Patel's Senate confirmation proceedings earlier this year. 'Shouldn't the FBI be tracking down terrorists, drug traffickers and child predators? The Trump administration continues to weaponize law enforcement to target political adversaries,' House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries (N.Y.) said in a statement on social media. Responding to a claim by Texas Sen. John Cornyn (R) that the FB I will help find Texas Democratic lawmakers who fled the Lone Star State, Jeffries said: 'These extremists don't give a damn about public safety.' 'We will not be intimidated,' he declared. Jeffries said in a Thursday interview with ABC News Live that the FBI lacks the legal authority to intervene in a state-level political dispute. 'There would be no authority for the FBI to target Democrats from the Texas legislature in connection with an act that Democrats have taken that is authorized by the Texas Constitution,' he said. He said the redistricting effort in Texas is 'a clear power grab because Donald Trump and House Republicans are desperate to try to hold on to their thin majority in the House of Representatives.' The FBI declined to comment on Republican claims that the agency was assisting Texas law enforcement in tracking down Democratic state lawmakers who have taken refuge in Illinois and other states. Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse (D-R.I.), a senior Democrat on the Senate Judiciary Committee, called out the Trump administration for abusing its power and misusing law enforcement personnel. 'This ridiculous misuse of federal law enforcement for political ends should be rejected by any fair-minded person,' Whitehouse said. Whitehouse, the ranking member of the Judiciary panel's Federal Courts Subcommittee, said in December that there was 'a lot of quiet concern about Kash Patel' and how he would lead the FBI. 'You really don't want an FBI director who wants to use that position to try to direct, intimidate and control the American media, and you really don't want one who comes in with an enemies list of his own that he wants to pursue without justification,' Whitehouse told MSNBC in an interview at the time. Democratic lawmakers warned the FBI to step back from the Texas redistricting fight after Cornyn, the senior Republican senator from Texas, who faces a tough primary fight against Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton next year, urged Patel to help track down Texas Democrats and investigate them for the potential crimes. 'I am proud to announce that Director Kash Patel has approved my request for the FBI to assist state and local law enforcement in locating runaway Texas House Democrats,' Cornyn said in a statement Thursday morning. 'I thank President Trump and Director Patel for supporting and swiftly acting on my call for the federal government to hold these supposed lawmakers accountable for fleeing Texas,' Cornyn said. Democrats called the development a potentially 'dangerous' politicization of the FBI. 'The FBI should be working to keep our communities safe, not getting involved in the political thuggery of Texas Republicans. What legal grounds they could possibly have to play a role in this escapes me – but if they were to get involved, it would certainly set a dangerous precedent for the politicization of the Bureau,' Sen. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) told The Hill. Van Hollen sponsored an amendment to the Commerce, Justice, Science Appropriations bill for fiscal year 2026 that would have blocked the Trump administration from spending money to relocate the FBI headquarters to anyplace other than Greenbelt, Maryland, the site chosen by the General Services Administration in 2023. The amendment was initially adopted to the spending bill but then stripped on a party-line Republican vote. Democratic sources say the growing politicization of the FBI will likely become an issue in the upcoming September government funding negotiations. Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-S.D.) kept the Commerce, Justice, Science spending bill out of a three-bill appropriations package that passed the Senate on Friday after Democrats objected. Thune was doing events in South Dakota on Thursday and did not comment on the latest partisan back-and-forth of the FBI's involvement in the Texas redistricting battle. Speaker Mike Johnson's (R-La.) office did not respond to a request for comment. Cornyn, who faces a tough fight with Paxton that will decide the future of his long Senate career, has spearheaded the push to bring the FBI into the political food fight over Texas redistricting. Democrats suspect Cornyn is jumping into the fray to win points with the Republican base ahead of next year's primary at a time that some polls show him trailing Paxton. Cornyn sent a letter to Patel Tuesday to 'encourage' the FBI to 'take any appropriate steps to aid in Texas state law enforcement efforts to locate or arrest potential lawbreakers who have fled the state.' He argued the departure of state lawmakers from Texas was designed to 'avoid legislative responsibilities' and a 'violation of their oath of office.' Cornyn said he is specifically 'concerned' that Democratic legislators 'solicited or accepted funds to aid in their efforts to avoid their legislative duties' and 'may be guilty of bribery or other public corruption offenses.' Republican Texas Gov. Greg Abbott said on Thursday that 'Texas DPS and the FBI are tracking down derelict Democrats.' 'They will be taken directly to the Texas Capitol,' he wrote in a social media post on X. Not Above the Law, a coalition of left-of-center activist groups, said that Cornyn's efforts to push the FBI into the Texas political fight threatened political rights and freedoms 'core to our democracy. 'Federal law enforcement must never be weaponized as a political tool of the president or manipulated by state-level politicians to serve partisan agendas. Using federal agents to encroach on state matters sets a dangerous precedent that threatens the rights and freedoms of every Americans,' the group said in a statement. The signatories to the statement include Lisa Gilbert, co-president of Public Citizen, Praveen Fernandes, vice president of the Constitutional Accountability Center, Kelsey Herbert, campaign director at MoveOn, and Brett Edkins, managing director for policy and political affairs at Stand Up America.
