logo
Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed

Trump officials are vowing to end school desegregation orders. Some parents say they're still needed

Time of India08-06-2025
Even at a glance, the differences are obvious. The walls of
Ferriday High School
are old and worn, surrounded by barbed wire. Just a few miles away,
Vidalia High School
is clean and bright, with a new library and a crisp blue "V" painted on orange brick.
Ferriday High is 90%
Black
. Vidalia High is 62% white.
For Black families, the contrast between the schools suggests "we're not supposed to have the finer things," said Brian Davis, a father in Ferriday. "It's almost like our kids don't deserve it," he said.
The schools are part of
Concordia
Parish, which was ordered to desegregate 60 years ago and remains under a court-ordered plan to this day. Yet there's growing momentum to release the district - and dozens of others - from decades-old orders that some call obsolete.
In a remarkable reversal, the
Justice Department
said it plans to start unwinding court-ordered desegregation plans dating to the Civil Rights Movement. Officials started in April, when they lifted a 1960s order in Louisiana's
Plaquemines
Parish. Harmeet Dhillon, who leads the department's civil rights division, has said others will "bite the dust."
Live Events
It comes amid pressure from Republican Gov. Jeff Landry and his attorney general, who have called for all the state's remaining orders to be lifted. They describe the orders as burdens on districts and relics of a time when Black students were still forbidden from some schools.
The orders were always meant to be temporary - school systems can be released if they demonstrate they fully eradicated segregation. Decades later, that goal remains elusive, with stark racial imbalances persisting in many districts.
Civil rights groups say the orders are important to keep as tools to address the legacy of forced segregation - including disparities in student discipline, academic programs and teacher hiring. They point to cases like Concordia, where the decades-old order was used to stop a charter school from favoring white students in admissions.
"Concordia is one where it's old, but a lot is happening there," said Deuel Ross, deputy director of litigation for the
NAACP Legal Defense Fund
. "That's true for a lot of these cases. They're not just sitting silently."
Debates over integration are far from settled Last year, before President Donald Trump took office, Concordia Parish rejected a Justice Department plan that would have ended its case if the district combined several majority white and majority Blac k elementary and middle schools.
At a town hall meeting, Vidalia residents vigorously opposed the plan, saying it would disrupt students' lives and expose their children to drugs and violence. An official from the Louisiana attorney general's office spoke against the proposal and said the Trump administration likely would change course on older orders.
Accepting the plan would have been a "death sentence" for the district, said Paul Nelson, a former Concordia superintendent. White families would have fled to private schools or other districts, said Nelson, who wants the court order removed.
"It's time to move on," said Nelson, who left the district in 2016. "Let's start looking to build for the future, not looking back to what our grandparents may have gone through."
At Ferriday High, athletic coach Derrick Davis supported combining schools in Ferriday and Vidalia. He said the district's disparities come into focus whenever his teams visit schools with newer sports facilities.
"It seems to me, if we'd all combine, we can all get what we need," he said.
Others oppose merging schools if it's done solely for the sake of achieving racial balance. "Redistricting and going to different places they're not used to ... it would be a culture shock to some people," said Ferriday's school resource officer, Marcus Martin, who, like Derrick Davis, is Black.
The district's current superintendent and school board did not respond to requests for comment.
Federal orders offer leverage for racial discrimination cases Concordia is among more than 120 districts across the South that remain under desegregation orders from the 1960s and '70s, including about a dozen in Louisiana.
Calling the orders historical relics is "unequivocally false," said
Shaheena Simons
, who until April led the Justice Department section that oversees school desegregation cases.
"Segregation and inequality persist in our schools, and they persist in districts that are still under desegregation orders," she said.
With court orders in place, families facing discrimination can reach out directly to the Justice Department or seek relief from the court. Otherwise, the only recourse is a lawsuit, which many families can't afford, Simons said.
In Concordia, the order played into a battle over a charter school that opened in 2013 on the former campus of an all-white private school. To protect the area's progress on racial integration, a judge ordered
Delta Charter School
to build a student body that reflected the district's racial demographics. But in its first year, the school was just 15% Black.
After a court challenge, Delta was ordered to give priority to Black students. Today, about 40% of its students are Black.
Desegregation orders have been invoked recently in other cases around the state. One led to an order to address disproportionately high rates of discipline for Black students, and in another a predominantly Black elementary school was relocated from a site close to a chemical plant.
The Justice Department could easily end some desegregation orders The Trump administration was able to close the Plaquemines case with little resistance because the original plaintiffs were no longer involved - the Justice Department was litigating the case alone. Concordia and an unknown number of other districts are in the same situation, making them vulnerable to quick dismissals.
Concordia's case dates to 1965, when the area was strictly segregated and home to a violent offshoot of the Ku Klux Klan. When Black families in Ferriday sued for access to all-white schools, the federal government intervened.
As the district integrated its schools, white families fled Ferriday. The district's schools came to reflect the demographics of their surrounding areas. Ferriday is mostly Black and low-income, while Vidalia is mostly white and takes in tax revenue from a hydroelectric plant. A third town in the district, Monterey, has a high school that's 95% white.
At the December town hall, Vidalia resident Ronnie Blackwell said the area "feels like a Mayberry, which is great," referring to the fictional Southern town from "The Andy Griffith Show." The federal government, he said, has "probably destroyed more communities and school systems than it ever helped."
Under its court order, Concordia must allow students in majority Black schools to transfer to majority white schools. It also files reports on teacher demographics and student discipline.
After failing to negotiate a resolution with the Justice Department, Concordia is scheduled to make its case that the judge should dismiss the order, according to court documents. Meanwhile, amid a wave of resignations in the federal government, all but two of the Justice Department lawyers assigned to the case have left.
Without court supervision, Brian Davis sees little hope for improvement.
"A lot of parents over here in Ferriday, they're stuck here because here they don't have the resources to move their kids from A to B," he said. "You'll find schools like Ferriday - the term is, to me, slipping into darkness."
Economic Times WhatsApp channel
)
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump-Putin talks are a start, but peace will be an uphill task
Trump-Putin talks are a start, but peace will be an uphill task

Hans India

time6 hours ago

  • Hans India

Trump-Putin talks are a start, but peace will be an uphill task

US President Donald Trump has discovered that bringing the Russia-Ukraine war to an end is far more difficult than his campaign promise suggested. During the run-up to his second term, he had boasted that he could end the conflict within 24 hours of taking office. Yet, several months into his presidency, the brutal war continues to rage on, with no clear resolution in sight. On Friday, Trump hosted Russian President Vladimir Putin at a summit in Alaska. The highly anticipated meeting was billed as a possible turning point. While both leaders described the discussions as constructive, there was little tangible progress. But it is encouraging that negotiations have started at the highest level. Despite the sobering reality, Trump has chosen to set the bar higher, moving beyond a call for a temporary ceasefire to pressing for a full-fledged peace accord. In comments following his meeting with Putin, Trump also urged Ukraine to strike a deal with Russia, bluntly stating: 'Russia is a very big power, and they're not.' Ukraine, however, doesn't seem to agree. Reports suggest that Putin has insisted on more territorial concessions from Kyiv, a demand that Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has already rejected. Russia currently occupies nearly one-fifth of Ukraine's territory. But Zelensky will meet Trump in Washington on Monday. The last time Zelensky visited Washington, Trump - accompanied by Vice President JD Vance - publicly rebuked him for failing to show sufficient 'respect' toward the United States, sparking a chorus of support from Republican lawmakers. But the political landscape is shifting. This time, Trump may not find it as easy to pressure Zelensky. Within the United States, skepticism is mounting among conservatives about Trump's approach to Russia. A growing number of Republicans are uneasy with what they perceive as excessive concessions to Putin and a lack of clarity in American strategy. This unease was amplified by an unusual moment on Fox News, a network typically aligned with Trump. The channel hosted former US Ambassador to NATO Kurt Volker, who bluntly described the Alaska summit as 'Putin 1, Trump 0.' Such criticism from a traditionally friendly media outlet illustrates how politically fraught the issue has become for the President. Trump's attempt to position himself as the ultimate dealmaker is colliding with the harsh realities of geopolitics. As the war drags on, Trump's credibility is also at stake. His promise of a swift resolution has raised public expectations both at home and abroad. Failure to deliver risks is damaging his reputation not only as a negotiator but also as a leader capable of shaping global affairs. At the same time, the stakes for Ukraine are existential: Zelensky cannot afford to concede more territory without jeopardizing his country's sovereignty and political survival. Thus, Trump finds himself walking a diplomatic tightrope. On one side lies the allure of securing a historic peace agreement that could cement his legacy. On the other hand, there is the risk of being perceived as capitulating to Putin or alienating a war-weary but determined Ukraine. If Trump can clinch this peace deal, he will go down in history as a great statesman who made the world a more peaceful place, irrespective of whether he receives or does not receive the Nobel Peace Prize. But he shouldn't worry; he will be in the company of Mahatma Gandhi, a great peace-loving leader who never got the coveted Prize.

Will Zelensky wear a suit for White House meeting with Trump? Marjorie Taylor Greene says ‘highly likely'
Will Zelensky wear a suit for White House meeting with Trump? Marjorie Taylor Greene says ‘highly likely'

Hindustan Times

time6 hours ago

  • Hindustan Times

Will Zelensky wear a suit for White House meeting with Trump? Marjorie Taylor Greene says ‘highly likely'

Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky will meet President Donald Trump in the White House on Monday, with several European leaders in attendance. The expectation is to reach a solution that will bring about an end to the Russia-Ukraine conflict. Things got heated the last time Volodymyr Zelensky and Donald Trump met at the White House. (AP) However, this meeting is one to watch since the last time Trump and Zelensky met in the Oval Office this year, things got heated. One of the questions posed to Zelensky from a reporter, at the time, was why he did not wear a suit. 'Why don't you wear a suit? You're at the highest level in this country's office, and you refuse to wear a suit. Do you own a suit? A lot of Americans have problems with you not respecting the dignity of this office," the reporter asked, as per BBC. Zelensky had then made a jibe that he would wear the 'costume' when the war was over. The reporter in question was Brian Glenn, chief White House correspondent for Real America's Voice, and Republican lawmaker Marjorie Taylor Greene's partner. Also Read | From Macron to Meloni: European leaders to join Zelensky for Washington meet with Donald Trump Soon after this question, issues of respect and gratitude seeped into the conversation between the world leaders, that ultimately saw a showdown in the Oval Office. This time, ahead of Zelensky's meet, Glenn has posed the same question again. Will Zelensky wear a suit this time? "Will Zelensky wear a suit?", Glenn's channel Real America's Voice asked on X. MTG, the Georgia lawmaker, quipped 'Is there betting on this?' She continued 'I'm going with highly likely he wears a suit.' It's not just the conservative lawmaker though, several other people on X are also speaking about Zelensky's sartorial choice ahead of the meeting. 'Zelensky better wear a suit & tie! Nice shoes too!,' one remarked. Another said, 'Zelensky just arrived in DC. and is spending the night in a guest house…I hope he remembers his manners and Suit tomorrow.' Meanwhile, another person wondered 'Will Zelensky wear a suit this time?' Trump readies to meet European leaders While the internet might engage in light banter over Zelensky's clothes, the importance of hosting so many leaders of Europe is not lost on President Trump. He wrote on Truth Social 'Big day at the White House tomorrow. Never had so many European Leaders at one time. My great honor to host them!!! President DJT.' In another post, he said, 'The Fake News will say that it is a big loss for President Trump to host so many great European Leaders at our beautiful White House. Actually, it is a great honor for America!!! President DJT.'

Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service
Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service

Time of India

time7 hours ago

  • Time of India

Republicans look to make a U-turn on federal commitment to electric vehicles for the Postal Service

A year after being lauded for its plan to replace thousands of aging, gas-powered mail trucks with a mostly electric fleet, the US Postal Service is facing congressional attempts to strip billions in federal EV funding. In June, the Senate parliamentarian blocked a Republican proposal in a major tax-and-spending bill to sell off the agency's new electric vehicles and infrastructure and revoke remaining federal money. But efforts to halt the fleet's shift to clean energy continue in the name of cost savings. Donald Maston, president of the National Rural Letter Carriers' Association, said canceling the program now would have the opposite effect, squandering millions of dollars. "I think it would be shortsighted for Congress to now suddenly decide they're going to try to go backwards and take the money away for the EVs or stop that process because that's just going to be a bunch of money on infrastructure that's been wasted," he said. Beyond that, many in the scientific community fear the government could pass on an opportunity to reduce carbon emissions that contribute to global warming when urgent action is needed. Electrified vehicles reduce emissions A 2022 University of Michigan study found the new electric postal vehicles could cut total greenhouse gas emissions by up to 20 million tons over the predicted, cumulative 20-year lifetime of the trucks. That's a fraction of the more than 6,000 million metric tons emitted annually in the United States, said professor Gregory A. Keoleian, co-director of the university's Center for Sustainable Systems. But he said the push toward electric vehicles is critical and needs to accelerate, given the intensifying impacts of climate change. "We're already falling short of goals for reducing emissions," Keoleian said. "We've been making progress, but the actions being taken or proposed will really reverse decarbonization progress that has been made to date." Many GOP lawmakers share President Donald Trump's criticism of the Biden-era green energy push and say the Postal Service should stick to delivering mail. Sen. Joni Ernst, R-Iowa, said "it didn't make sense for the Postal Service to invest so heavily in an all-electric force." She said she will pursue legislation to rescind what is left of the $3 billion from the Inflation Reduction Act allocated to help cover the $10 billion cost of new postal vehicles. Ernst has called the EV initiative a "boondoggle" and "a textbook example of waste," citing delays, high costs and concerns over cold-weather performance. "You always evaluate the programs, see if they are working. But the rate at which the company that's providing those vehicles is able to produce them, they are so far behind schedule, they will never be able to fulfill that contract," Ernst said during a recent appearance at the Iowa State Fair, referring to Wisconsin-based Oshkosh Defense. "For now," she added, "gas-powered vehicles - use some ethanol in them - I think is wonderful." Corn-based ethanol is a boon to Iowa's farmers, but the effort to reverse course has other Republican support. Rep. Michael Cloud , R-Texas, a co-sponsor of the rollback effort, has said the EV order should be canceled because the project "has delivered nothing but delays, defective trucks, and skyrocketing costs." The Postal Service maintains that the production delay of the Next Generation Delivery Vehicles, or NGDVs, was "very modest" and not unexpected. "The production quantity ramp-up was planned for and intended to be very gradual in the early months to allow time for potential modest production or supplier issues to be successfully resolved," spokesperson Kim Frum said. EVs help in modernization effort The independent, self-funded federal agency, which is paid for mostly by postage and product sales, is in the middle of a $40 billion, 10-year modernization and financial stabilization plan. The EV effort had the full backing of Democratic President Joe Biden, who pledged to move toward an all-electric federal fleet of car and trucks. The "Deliver for America" plan calls for modernizing the ground fleet, notably the Grumman Long Life Vehicle, which dates back to 1987 and is fuel-inefficient at 9 mpg. The vehicles are well past their projected 24-year lifespan and are prone to breakdowns and even fires. "Our mechanics are miracle workers," said Mark Dimondstein , president of the American Postal Workers Union. "The parts are not available. They fabricate them. They do the best they can." The Postal Service announced in 2022 it would deploy at least 66,000 electric vehicles by 2028, including commercial off-the-shelf models, after years of deliberation and criticism it was moving too slowly to reduce emissions. By 2024, the agency was awarded a Presidential Sustainability Award for its efforts to electrify the largest fleet in the federal government. Building new postal trucks In 2021, Oshkosh Defense was awarded a contract for up to 165,000 battery electric and internal combustion engine Next Generation vehicles over 10 years. The first of the odd-looking trucks, with hoods resembling a duck's bill, began service in Georgia last year. Designed for greater package capacity, the trucks are equipped with airbags, blind-spot monitoring, collision sensors, 360-degree cameras and antilock brakes. There's also a new creature comfort: air conditioning. Douglas Lape, special assistant to the president of the National Association of Letter Carriers and a former carrier, is among numerous postal employees who have had a say in the new design. He marvels at how Oshkosh designed and built a new vehicle, transforming an old North Carolina warehouse into a factory along the way. "I was in that building when it was nothing but shelving," he said. "And now, being a completely functioning plant where everything is built in-house - they press the bodies in there, they do all of the assembly - it's really amazing in my opinion." Where things stand now The agency has so far ordered 51,500 NGDVs, including 35,000 battery-powered vehicles. To date, it has received 300 battery vehicles and 1,000 gas-powered ones. Former Postmaster General Louis DeJoy said in 2022 the agency expected to purchase chiefly zero-emissions delivery vehicles by 2026. It still needs some internal combustion engine vehicles that travel longer distances. Frum, the Postal Service spokesperson, said the planned NGDV purchases were "carefully considered from a business perspective" and are being deployed to routes and facilities where they will save money. The agency has also received more than 8,200 of 9,250 Ford E-Transit electric vehicles it has ordered, she said. Ernst said it's fine for the Postal Service to use EVs already purchased. "But you know what? We need to be smart about the way we are providing services through the federal government," she said. "And that was not a smart move." Maxwell Woody, lead author of the University of Michigan study, made the opposite case. Postal vehicles, he said, have low average speeds and a high number of stops and starts that enable regenerative braking. Routes average under 30 miles and are known in advance, making planning easier. "It's the perfect application for an electric vehicle," he said, "and it's a particularly inefficient application for an internal combustion engine vehicle."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store