
Musk wants South African rocket launch site and rare earths
New developments since the Oval Office spectacle cast new light on the potential implications for South Africa's critical minerals, space ambitions, and ongoing trade negotiations.
Three weeks ago, behind closed doors at the White House, South African-born billionaire Elon Musk and US President Donald Trump found common ground in a much friendlier, extended lunch meeting with President Cyril Ramaphosa, which followed an earlier public spat in the Oval Office.
While that initial encounter set the stage, a flurry of developments since – including a public and very messy fallout between Trump and Musk – has cast new light on the potential implications for South Africa's critical minerals, space ambitions, and ongoing trade negotiations.
As previously reported for Business Day, both Musk and Trump talked to the South Africans about South Africa's rare earths and extremely high tariffs on imported cars. Rare earths are used in magnets in just about every hi-tech gadget on Earth, and especially in electric vehicles (EVs).
'You guys are the largest economy on the continent… and you have minerals we need,' Trump said, according to DA leader and Agriculture Minister John Steenhuisen, who was in the room.
Both Musk and US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick were interested in South Africa's critical minerals because of the shortage of rare earths used, especially in magnets. Magnets are vital in several of Musk's multibillion-dollar businesses, and he takes an active interest in the location of mines capable of providing the rare earths they require.
Though Trump did most of the talking and Musk was almost as reticent in the closed-door lunch meeting as in the Oval Office, both had rare earths and their use in magnets on their minds. At the time, China, the world's main supplier of rare earths for magnets, had frozen exports of both the minerals and the magnets to the US.
There have been a few key developments since the White House meeting. This week, China and the US agreed that China's magnet and rare earths exports to the US will resume. The magnet and rare earths freeze was a significant threat to the US, and several product lines had to suspend production in the US, Japan and Europe.
You could say Musk got to experience what it felt like to be Ramaphosa or Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky.
South Africa has a valuable rare earths mine, Steenkampskraal, about 380km north of Cape Town, but its first significant output will not be available until some time next year (2025).
Musk also said he was interested in launching SpaceX rockets from the Denel Overberg rocket test site at Arniston, outside Cape Town. Two space experts said the value of the Arniston launch site to Musk is to launch satellites that will orbit over the South Pole, as well as Starlink low-Earth orbit satellites to provide broadband to consumers.
In the White House meeting, Musk did not mention Starlink, which has been in the news in South Africa lately, apparently because the South African government has already set up a process to review its Broad-Based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) policy as it affects companies like Starlink.
This week, Communications Minister Solly Malatsi confirmed that the decision will depend on a review process by the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa, which he first raised in September 2024. The review was announced last month, but no outcome of that process is expected soon.
In the three weeks since the White House meeting, Trump and Musk have exchanged extremely harsh words in a fallout that echoed around the world. You could say Musk got to experience what it felt like to be Ramaphosa or Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelensky, though Musk, at least, brought it on himself.
Musk broke with Trump by announcing that he 'couldn't stand it anymore', called Trump's omnibus budget bill, the One Big Beautiful Bill – its official title – a 'disgusting abomination', an 'outrageous, pork-filled' spending bill that will 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit to $2.5 trillion (!!!) and burden America [sic] citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt'.
Then Musk alleged that Trump is implicated in the scandal around indicted alleged paedophile Jeffrey Epstein, who committed suicide in prison before his trial. Oops.
More directly relevant since the White House meeting is the still uncertain status of US-South Africa trade talks.
Then on Tuesday Musk dialled it back with a reconciliatory phone call. Clearly he discovered being out in the cold was no fun. 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week,' he messaged. 'They went too far.' Then the two men spoke on the phone. We'll see where that goes.
Musk apologised, but didn't say which part was 'too far' – the bill or the hint at a connection to an accused paedophilia celebrity? Musk's objection to the bill is real. Musk believed most fervently in that part of the Maga agenda that would cut America's mushrooming debt. With this bill, that goal has been abandoned and may be hard to resurrect.
But what does the Trump-Musk feud mean for South Africa's trade negotiations, particularly in light of these recent developments?
More directly relevant since the White House meeting is the still uncertain status of US-South Africa trade talks. Ramaphosa has announced that he will meet Trump this weekend in Canada on the sidelines of the G7 meeting.
However, Trump is running the policy for South Africa directly from the White House, and sources in the State Department said nothing from the White House meeting has trickled down to them to indicate that negotiations are under way. Trump has successfully imposed a total blackout on any leaks about what happened behind closed doors.
Neither Secretary of State Marco Rubio nor anyone from his department was in the meeting. The three officials who did discuss a new trade deal with the South African delegation are located elsewhere in the administration, and Trump has not yet nominated an Assistant Secretary of State for African Affairs, who normally leads US Africa policy.
Jamieson Greer, the US Trade Representative, which is a cabinet position, met the South African ministers in Washington for substantive talks. And at the White House, Lutnick was active in discussing future deals.
Trump, who has taken a special interest in the auto sector, raised the question of auto tariffs and directed Lutnick to follow up in his talks with South African Trade and Industry Minister Parks Tau.
Perhaps the most important implementer of US Africa policy at present, Massad Boulos, who is a senior adviser to the US president, was in the meeting too.
The father-in-law of Tiffany Trump, the president's youngest daughter, Boulos emigrated to Texas from Lebanon as a teenager, and spent his career in Nigeria as CEO of a trucking and heavy machinery dealership. He was instrumental in the Trump campaign for Arab-American votes in the election in 2024. His first appointment was as Arab and Middle Eastern adviser to the president, a position he still holds.
Boulos, whom Trump singled out in the Oval Office meeting, has been driving US policy in eastern DRC peace talks, and had meetings with the Nigerian president, among others, since taking office.
The Denel Overberg test site near Arniston, the brainchild of the Aerospace Systems Research Institute led by Professor Michael Brooks at the University of KwaZulu-Natal, has successfully launched several suborbital South African rockets to nearly 18km, some using South African-made engines. Its last launches used a new six-storey gantry, and it is currently on track to be capable of launching satellites into orbit in 2028. A SpaceX investment could significantly accelerate this progress.
More than 30 significant space companies and start-ups are based in South Africa. They collaborate with the South African National Space Agency.
Sources in Washington are reluctant to predict whether the optimism of Ramaphosa and his delegation about a trade deal will be justified.
South Africa is currently working with international space sector partners in the US, Europe and China. The US and South Africa are partnered on a project to build a new deep-space ground station in Matjiesfontein in the Western Cape. It will support communications for future US Artemis missions to the moon and Mars.
In August 2023, Chinese President Xi Jinping signed two agreements with South Africa on cooperation in space projects. One focused on crewed spaceflight, and the other included South Africa in the team for the planned Chinese-Russian International Lunar Research Station.
South Africa is also working with the European Space Agency.
The trade deal South Africa offered the US included a duty-free quota of 40,000 US vehicles a year for the auto sector and duty-free access for automotive components sourced from South Africa for automotive production in the US.
South Africa agreed to buy LNG gas from the US for 10 years, costing about $1.2-billion in trade per annum, or $9-billion to $12-billion over 10 years.
Sources in Washington are reluctant to predict whether the optimism of Ramaphosa and his delegation about a trade deal will be justified. Trump was aiming for 90 trade deals with foreign countries in 90 days. That was 70 days ago, and only one outline deal, with the UK, has been announced.
More than any president in recent history, the final decision will depend almost entirely on how this president feels about it at the time. DM
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Trump's white South African resettlement plan and the global colour line
The narrative that white South Africans are victims of racial persecution has long circulated in far-right echo chambers, sustained by groups like AfriForum and amplified by conservative US media. Yet no credible human rights body has substantiated claims of systematic violence or oppression based on race in South Africa. Image: File/X THE arrival of over 3 000 white South Africans in the United States under President Donald Trump's fast-tracked refugee resettlement programme is a racial spectacle of historic proportions. Framed by Trump as a rescue mission from 'racial discrimination' and even 'genocide' in post-apartheid South Africa, the scheme repackages whiteness as victimhood while reasserting racial hierarchies through the veneer of humanitarian concern. Cheryl Harris's seminal concept of 'whiteness as property' is especially instructive here. This programme protects not the displaced, but the entitlements embedded in whiteness — land, social status, and the right to global mobility. These arrivals, facilitated under a controversial executive order, mark the first time in US history that white South Africans have been accepted en masse as refugees. The move has drawn intense scrutiny, with South African Foreign Minister Ronald Lamola dismissing the claims as 'unfounded and inflammatory'. He clarified that the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) had no involvement and had consistently found no basis for refugee status for white South Africans. 'The resettlement of South Africans under the guise of being 'refugees' is a political project to delegitimise our democracy,' Lamola asserted. The narrative that white South Africans — particularly Afrikaner farmers — are victims of racial persecution has long circulated in far-right echo chambers, sustained by groups like AfriForum and amplified by conservative US media. Yet no credible human rights body has substantiated claims of systematic violence or oppression based on race in South Africa. In February 2025, Trump signed Executive Order 14152: Addressing Egregious Actions of the Republic of South Africa, suspending non-essential aid. He cited South Africa's land reform policies and its support for Palestine at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) as evidence of 'anti-white discrimination'. His language echoed apartheid-era rhetoric, framing land expropriation without compensation — a constitutional measure designed to redress historical injustice — as proof of racial targeting. This is not a story about humanitarian rescue. It is about the repackaging of privilege as persecution. Trump's administration, by reclassifying specific 'South African communities' for humanitarian parole, has revived the settler-native divide. As Mahmood Mamdani has noted, this manoeuvre casts descendants of apartheid's beneficiaries as 'refugees' and South Africa itself as the oppressor. Achille Mbembe's critique of global humanism is relevant here: the programme renders Black suffering invisible while privileging whiteness as a passport to refuge and legitimacy. Consequently, while Black refugees languish in camps, whiteness is deemed inherently worthy of protection, effectively enacting a form of apartheid within the asylum system itself. The 1951 Refugee Convention defines a refugee as someone fleeing a 'well-founded fear of persecution.' Neither the Convention nor US law has ever interpreted this to include the loss of economic dominance or historical privilege. Fleeing land redistribution or reduced social status does not amount to persecution, especially when these changes are legally enacted by a democratic society seeking to correct historical wrongs. The parallels to earlier racial engineering are striking. In 1932, the US-sponsored *Carnegie Poor White Study* analysed the 'problem' of poor whites in South Africa. The initiative was not rooted in concern for poverty but in preserving white supremacy. The report warned that poor whites threatened the racial order and recommended state interventions to uplift them, while black South Africans were systematically excluded from similar support. This laid the foundation for apartheid's white welfare state and established a pattern of American intervention when white South Africans faced hardship, real or perceived. Trump's resettlement scheme is the 21st-century iteration of this pattern. White South Africans are framed not as beneficiaries of a violent racial order, but as victims of transformation, worthy of rescue. South Africa's Constitutional Court recently affirmed that acquiring foreign nationality — whether through refugee resettlement or otherwise — does not automatically strip someone of South African citizenship. In a landmark ruling, the Court struck down a section of the Citizenship Act that had quietly revoked citizenship without due process, calling the move irrational and unconstitutional. However, the case of these white South Africans is unique. Their refugee claims are based on false premises and a political agenda. South Africa may therefore have grounds to argue that accepting the US offer constitutes a voluntary renunciation of citizenship. The Constitutional Court's ruling on dual citizenship might not protect them in this politically charged context. Nowhere is the hypocrisy more glaring than in the American South. In the Mississippi Delta, six Black farmworkers filed a federal lawsuit in 2021 after being replaced by white South Africans brought in under the H-2A visa programme. The plaintiffs, many descended from enslaved people who built Southern agriculture, earned just $7.25 per hour — the federal minimum wage — while their white South African replacements were paid over $11. The lawsuit alleges that these Black workers were forced to train their replacements, who were then housed in better accommodations and elevated in status simply because they were white. Between 2011 and 2020, the number of South Africans on H-2A visas increased by 441%, making them the second-largest national group in the programme. The majority are white. The message is clear: in the racial calculus of US capitalism, white foreign labour is worth more than black American lives. Mexican seasonal workers, once the backbone of US agriculture, are also increasingly excluded — both by border walls and by labour policies that privilege whiteness over need. The result is a reshuffling of the global racial order, disguised as economic necessity. Trump's South African refugee programme is less about humanitarian concern and more about reaffirming a hierarchy of global suffering, where privilege continues to mask itself as victimhood. What we are witnessing is the reinforcement of a global colour line — one where whiteness retains its claim to mobility, safety, and opportunity, while blackness and brownness are rendered threats to be contained. The implications are profound: Refugee systems that prioritise whiteness over need. Economic visas favour white foreign farmers over Black citizens. Historical privilege is purposely mistaken for victimhood. This is not humanitarianism. It is neo-colonialism in motion. As the world watches Trump engineer the next stage of global apartheid, we must ask: What kind of refugee is it when only the privileged are welcome? When does skin colour ration citizenship, safety, and opportunity? If the notion of 'refuge' is to mean anything, it must centre justice, not historical comfort. Siyayibanga le economy! * Siyabonga Hadebe is an independent commentator based in Geneva on socio-economic, political and global matters. ** The views expressed here do not reflect those of the Sunday Independent, Independent Media, or IOL.


The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
Strengthening the Global Fight Against Corruption
Brazil, Brasilia – The 2nd G20 Anti-Corruption Working Group (ACWG) under the South African Presidency convened in Brasilia from June 9 to 12, 2025, uniting delegates to address critical issues in preventing and combating corruption. Co-Chaired by South Africa and Brazil, the meeting aimed to reinforce the Working Group's priorities to strengthen the public sector by promoting transparency, integrity, and accountability, increasing the efficiency of asset recovery measures, enhancing participation from the public sector, private sector, civil society, and academia, and improving whistleblower protection mechanisms. The South African Ambassador to Brazil, Mr. Vusi Mavimbela, delivered the opening remarks during the inaugural session. He highlighted the importance of international collaboration in the fight against corruption and stressed South Africa's dedication to advancing collective goals, stating, 'Through our G20 Presidency theme, 'Solidarity, Equality, and Sustainability', we reaffirm our commitment to advancing collective efforts toward inclusive global economic growth and sustainable development.' Brazil's Minister of State for the Office of the Comptroller General, H.E. Mr. Vinícius Marques de Carvalho, delivered the keynote address, stressing the significance of inclusive approaches in anti-corruption efforts. He underscored the complex nature of corruption, requiring diverse perspectives and expertise. H.E. Carvalho called for a multi-agency strategy, urging the involvement of civil society, academia, and the private sector in shaping effective anti-corruption policies. At the heart of the meeting were the discussions of the draft G20 High-Level Principles on the Management of Seized and Confiscated Assets. These draft principles aim to provide a framework for G20 countries to manage seized assets, closing gaps identified by the ACWG to strengthen asset recovery. The Group also considered the Zero Draft Ministerial Declaration, encapsulating the commitment of G20 countries to address corruption through prevention. This draft will be presented for adoption at the Ministerial Meeting in October 2025. In addition to the main sessions, a side event was held on measuring integrity in public procurement, exploring challenges in quantifying corruption, and the necessity for evidence-based methodologies, co-hosted by the United Nations Development Program (UNDP). The UNDP informed that it is establishing a framework for measuring integrity, collecting data from 60 countries by the end of 2025. This initiative aims to provide objective tools to gauge the effectiveness of anti-corruption measures. Another side event was held to address the preventive dimension in the fight against corruption and new forms of organised crime, co-hosted by EL PACTO 2.0, a partnership with the European Union focused on justice and security. The G20 ACWG and the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Working Group on Bribery held a joint meeting aimed at supporting the shared commitment to combating the bribery of foreign public officials in international transactions. The 2nd G20 ACWG l Meeting provided an opportunity for delegates to exchange views, share experiences, and deepen their understanding of the evolving challenges and opportunities in the fight against corruption through the lens of the Presidency's theme of solidarity, equality, and sustainability. The Working Group acknowledged that there remains considerable work ahead to fully realise the deliverables committed to at the start of the year, including timely responses to the questionnaires, substantive inputs toward the draft Ministerial Declaration, and the High-Level Principles on the Management of Seized and Confiscated Assets. Through these efforts, the G20 seeks to instil confidence in its commitment to combating corruption and promoting sustainable development, ensuring a brighter future for all. As South Africa and Brazil lead this charge, the hope is that the momentum generated from this meeting will translate into tangible actions that resonate beyond borders, creating a global environment where corruption has no place. At Caxton, we employ humans to generate daily fresh news, not AI intervention. Happy reading!


eNCA
5 hours ago
- eNCA
Macron urges renewed nuclear dialogue after Israel's Iran strikes
France's President Emmanuel Macron on Friday urged the US and Iran to resume nuclear talks following a wave of Israeli strikes against Iran. "Iran bears a heavy responsibility in the destabilisation of the whole region," he said after Western nations in recent days accused Tehran of deliberately escalating its nuclear programme, despite several rounds of US-Iran talks. "We call for the resumption of dialogue and the reaching of a deal." US President Donald Trump's Middle East pointman Steve Witkoff had been set to hold a sixth round of talks with Iran on Sunday in Oman. After Israel's deadly strikes early on Friday, Trump afterwards urged Iran to "make a deal, before there is nothing left", warning of "even more brutal" attacks to come. Macron, who earlier on Friday defended Israel's right to protect itself, said France could help in the case of an Iranian retaliation against Israel. "If Israel were to be attacked in retaliation by Iran, France, if in a position to do so, would take part in protection and defence operations," he said. Macron earlier in the day spoke by phone to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, the Elysee said, following a spike in diplomatic tensions. The French presidency said the phone conversation took place but did not provide details. Relations between Macron and Netanyahu have been strained in recent months over Israel's blockade of Gaza and France's plans to recognise a Palestinian state. - UN meeting postponed - France and Saudi Arabia have been planning to co-chair a UN conference on a two-state solution for Israel and the Palestinians next week in New York. But Macron said on Friday evening that meeting had been postponed. "While we have to postpone this conference for logistical and security reasons, it will take place as soon as possible," Macron said at a press conference. Israel pounded Iran in a series of air raids, striking 100 targets including nuclear and military sites, as well as killing the armed forces' chief of staff. In the aftermath of the strikes, Macron also spoke with leaders including Trump and the Crown Prince of Saudi Arabia. Earlier Friday, Macron said Israel had the right to defend itself and ensure its security but also called for de-escalation. "To avoid jeopardising the stability of the entire region, I call on all parties to exercise maximum restraint and to de-escalate," he said on X. Macron spoke after convening a meeting of the National Defence and Security Council. "All necessary steps will be taken to protect our nationals and our diplomatic and military missions in the region," Macron said. Iran has gradually broken away from its commitments under the nuclear deal it struck with world powers including the United States and France in 2015. The landmark deal provided Iran sanctions relief in exchange for curbs on its atomic programme, but it fell apart after the unilateral withdrawal of the United States during Trump's first term in 2018.