logo
Cheap and deadly: How Ukraine's drones are blunting Russian advantages in troops, tanks, and artillery

Cheap and deadly: How Ukraine's drones are blunting Russian advantages in troops, tanks, and artillery

Time of India17-07-2025
Drones
, drones, drones. Only drones. A lot of drones."
A weary Ukrainian platoon commander speaks to the transformed nature of modern warfare as he's medically evacuated from the front lines.
Explore courses from Top Institutes in
Select a Course Category
Kamikaze drones
.
Surveillance drones
.
Bomber drones.
Drones that kill other drones.
These machines swarm the skies in vast numbers. They're cheap, they're deadly and they're among the main reasons
Ukraine
believes it can hold out against advancing Russian forces this year and even beyond, according to a dozen Ukrainian commanders, officials and arms manufacturers involved in Kyiv's defence.
Ukrainian soldiers describe the drone-infested corridor covering about 10 km either side of the line of contact as the "kill zone" because remotely piloted unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) deployed by both sides can swiftly spot and neutralise targets.
Live Events
The
war
's evolution into the most drone-intensive conflict ever seen has eaten away at
Russia
's ability to exploit its traditional advantages in troop numbers, artillery and tanks, according to two Ukrainian battlefield commanders interviewed.
Any large vehicle operating near the front is now an obvious target, meaning Russian forces can no longer make the kind of rapid advances they did in 2022 with columns of armoured vehicles, according to the commanders as well as the founder of OCHI, a system which centralizes video feeds from over 15,000 Ukrainian military drone crews on the front lines.
"The enemy sees you completely," OCHI's Oleksandr Dmitriev added. "No matter where you go or what you are driving."
Russia has consequently adapted its tactics, the Ukrainian battlefield commanders said; its forces now typically attack in small groups of five or six - on foot or on motorbikes or quad bikes - in an attempt expose Ukrainian positions by drawing their fire and then launching drone strikes at them, they added.
Russia's defence ministry didn't respond to a request for comment on this article.
Despite the changes in warfare, Russian forces retain the ascendancy and are making slow but steady advances in the east and north of Ukraine. Russia has also caught up in UAV technology after falling behind early in the war, according to military analysts, and like its enemy is churning out drones domestically at a rate of millions a year.
Meanwhile, European leaders are trying to parse President Donald Trump's announcement this week that America would supply arms to Ukraine via NATO, with Europe picking up the bill. Many details remain unclear, including the types and quantity of weapons, how quickly they would be sent and precisely how they would be paid for, U.S. and European officials said this week.
The White House didn't respond to queries on the supply plan. Spokeswoman Anna Kelly said the war had gone on too long and Trump wanted to end the killing, and so is selling U.S. arms to NATO for Ukraine and threatening hefty sanctions on Russia.
The people interviewed for this article, who were speaking before Trump's weapons announcement, said they believed Ukraine could fight on and resist Russia even if no more U.S. aid was forthcoming, though they didn't give precise timelines.
Many cited the primacy of drones as having levelled the field to some degree and made Ukraine more self-sufficient, and also pointed to growing military supplies from European allies.
"We can hold out for months," said Oleksandr Kamyshin, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy's arms expert and strategic adviser, when asked about what would happen if U.S. weapons supplies ceased. "In 2023 or 2024, it would have been a lot worse - we would be talking about days or weeks."
Polish military analyst Konrad Muzyka, who has made numerous visits to the front lines, said Ukraine's focus was to sap the strength of Russian attacks, adding that Kyiv didn't currently have the capability to launch offensives of its own.
He said Ukraine would likely struggle in a long war of attrition due to its manpower shortages and Russia's superior resources. Although drones have changed the battlefield, he cautioned against overstating their ability to make up for an absence of artillery and mortars.
"To deliver the amount of damage that an artillery shell does to a target, you would need to launch tens of drones," he added. "Drones can fill in the gaps to some extent and give you some breathing space, but they are not a substitute for artillery."
DESTRUCTION RAINS FROM ABOVE
Drones are demons, at least for those in the kill zone that straddles the 1,000 km line of contact.
Reconnaissance UAVs from both sides - resembling shrunken airplanes, made of plastic or styrofoam and equipped with sophisticated cameras - can spot enemies from several kilometres away. They hover over the front lines, relaying back what they see in real time.
They find targets for the fleets of bomber drones - often hexacopters the size of coffee tables that can drop precision grenades with 3D-printed tailfins - as well as kamikaze drones, some with RPG warheads strapped on to pierce armour, which can fly into soldiers, tanks and weapons systems.
The platoon commander being evacuated from the front, a 35-year-old called Ivan who goes by the call sign "Atom", said soldiers on both sides now saw UAVs as the biggest threat to their lives, replacing shells, mines and enemy fighters which were the primary perils earlier in the war.
A medic with him on the bus, 34-year-old Olga Kozum, concurred: Most of the battlefield injuries she and her colleagues treat are caused by UAVs, she said.
According to internal Ukrainian estimates seen by Reuters, drones accounted for 69% of strikes on Russian troops and 75% of strikes on vehicles and equipment in 2024. About 18% of strikes on Russian infantry and 15% of strikes on vehicles and equipment were conducted with artillery, and even less with mortars, according to the same estimates.
The wartime UAV arms race has spawned many innovations; both sides are deploying short-range, fibre-optic drones that cannot be electronically jammed, as well as "interceptors" that hunt down and destroy enemy reconnaissance and attack drones.
Kyiv's planned production this year of 30,000 long-range UAVs, designed to attack targets deep inside Russia such as arms depots and energy facilities, gives Ukraine an increased offensive threat, according to Vadym Sukharevskyi, commander of the country's drone forces until early June.
The average cost of a long-range strike drone ranges from $50,000 to $300,000, about 10 times less than a missile of similar range, although a drone's warhead is smaller, Sukharevskyi said in an interview while still in the post.
"This is our asymmetrical answer," he said, adding that Ukraine started developing such drones "precisely because we lack missiles".
Kamyshin, President Zelenskiy's adviser, added: "You can't win a big war if you are only defending." Long-range drone strikes are "one of the main cards Ukraine can play against Russia right now".
WANTED: U.S. PATRIOTS AND INTEL
Ukraine's military-industrial base is expanding rapidly, and now accounts for around 40% of the weapons and equipment used, including drones, according to Zelenskiy, who on Wednesday set out a target to reach 50% in six months.
Kyiv has also sought to diversify its supplies and its European allies are providing growing amounts of munitions, potentially making the country more resilient to geopolitical shocks.
The Kiel Institute, a German-based economic research group, estimated in a report last month that Europe had surpassed the U.S. in total military aid provided over the course of the war for the first time since June 2022, reaching 72 billion euros compared with 65 billion euros from Washington.
The institute said aid flows to Ukraine shifted significantly in March and April as no new U.S. aid was allocated and European countries upped support.
While the U.S. has been - and remains - the largest sole supplier of artillery shells to Ukraine during the war, Europe is expanding capacity and has purchased hundreds of thousands of munitions from within and outside the continent.
Of around 420,000 artillery shells received by Ukraine from the start of this year until around mid-May, only 160,000 were from the United States, according to a European security source who requested anonymity to discuss confidential matters.
Kamyshin said Ukraine made around 2.4 million of its own shells in 2024, although these were mostly for mortars, which are shorter range.
Ukraine is nonetheless particularly reliant on the U.S. in the areas of air defences and intelligence sharing, military analysts said.
Kyiv particularly covets U.S. Patriot air defence systems, capable of intercepting ballistic missiles that Russia is firing with increasing frequency. As of April this year, Ukraine had seven fully operational systems, well short of the 25 that Zelenskiy has requested, according to analysts at Ukrainian publication Defence Express.
Long-range drone and missile attacks often rely on U.S. satellite intelligence. European countries can only go a small way to replacing were the United States to stop sharing it, the European Union Institute for Security Studies said.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump Says US China Close To Trade Agreement, Will Meet Xi If Deal Is Struck
Trump Says US China Close To Trade Agreement, Will Meet Xi If Deal Is Struck

NDTV

time4 minutes ago

  • NDTV

Trump Says US China Close To Trade Agreement, Will Meet Xi If Deal Is Struck

President Donald Trump said on Tuesday the US was close to a trade deal with China and that he would meet his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping before the end of the year if an agreement is struck. "He asked for a meeting, and I'll end up having a meeting before the end of the year most likely, if we make a deal. If we don't make a deal, I'm not going to have a meeting," Trump told CNBC in an interview referring to China's Xi. "We're getting very close to a deal. We're getting along with China very well," Trump said. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said last week he believed the US had the "makings of a deal" with China after officials from the two countries met in Stockholm in a bid to resolve economic disputes aimed at extending their truce on a trade war by three months. China is facing an August 12 deadline to reach a durable tariff agreement with the US administration, after Beijing and Washington reached preliminary deals in May and June to end escalating tit-for-tat tariffs and a cut-off of rare earth minerals. Without a deal, global supply chains could face renewed turmoil from US duties snapping back to triple-digit levels that would amount to a bilateral trade embargo. Speaking to CNBC, Trump also said his administration would soon impose tariffs on US imports of pharmaceuticals, semiconductors and chips, which is expected to impact China.

Nikki Haley's strong message to Trump after tariff threats to India over Russian oil: ‘Don't give China a pass…'
Nikki Haley's strong message to Trump after tariff threats to India over Russian oil: ‘Don't give China a pass…'

Mint

time4 minutes ago

  • Mint

Nikki Haley's strong message to Trump after tariff threats to India over Russian oil: ‘Don't give China a pass…'

Nikki Haley, former US Ambassador to the United Nations, on Tuesday (August 5) criticised the Trump administration for what she called a double standard in its approach to oil trade with Russia, warning against straining US-India ties. Posting on X (formerly Twitter), Haley said, 'India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause. Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India.' Haley's comment comes amid the Trump administration granting a temporary pause on tariffs affecting China despite its oil imports. The move has drawn criticism from Haley who argue it sends the wrong message to strategic partner like India and emboldens China. This is a developing story.

Don't give China a pass and burn relationship with strong ally like India: Nikki Haley on Trump's tariff threat
Don't give China a pass and burn relationship with strong ally like India: Nikki Haley on Trump's tariff threat

First Post

time4 minutes ago

  • First Post

Don't give China a pass and burn relationship with strong ally like India: Nikki Haley on Trump's tariff threat

Nikki Haley has criticised President Donald Trump's threat to raise tariffs on Indian imports over Russian oil trade, accusing him of giving China a pass. read more Nikki Haley, former US Ambassador to the United Nations, has criticised President Donald Trump for his remarks about significantly increasing tariffs on Russian oil imports from India, accusing him of giving 'China a pass' and warning against damaging ties with 'a strong ally like India'. In a post on X, Haley said that China, a key adversary of the United States and 'number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil,' had been granted a 90-day tariff pause by the Trump administration. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause. Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India,' she said. India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause. Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India. — Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) August 5, 2025 On Tuesday, Trump stated that he would raise tariffs on Indian imports from the current 25% rate 'very substantially' within 24 hours due to New Delhi's continued purchase of Russian oil, according to Reuters. 'They're fuelling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy,' Trump told CNBC in an interview, as quoted by Reuters. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD According to the report, Trump added that the main issue with India was its high tariff rates, though he did not specify the new proposed rate. He alleged that a substantial portion of oil imported from Russia was being sold on the open market 'for big profits', adding that the United States would 'substantially raise' the tariffs imposed on India for purchasing 'massive amounts of Russian oil' as of Monday. The remarks followed an earlier announcement by Trump on his social media platform, Truth Social, where he reiterated the move and added a yet-undisclosed penalty for India's continued oil imports from Russia. 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA. Thank you for your attention to this matter!!!' the US President wrote. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The United States and China had agreed in May to a 90-day tariff pause, during which US tariffs were reduced from 145% to 30%, and Chinese duties from 125% to 10%, according to an Al Jazeera report. Soon after Trump's remarks on Monday, the Indian government described the targeting of India as 'unjustified and unreasonable'. In a statement, the spokesperson for the Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) said that India would take all necessary steps to protect its national interests and economic security. The statement highlighted that India had been repeatedly targeted by the United States and the European Union for importing oil from Russia since the outbreak of the conflict in Ukraine. 'In fact, India began importing from Russia because traditional supplies were diverted to Europe after the outbreak of the conflict. The United States at that time actively encouraged such imports by India for strengthening global energy markets stability. India's imports are meant to ensure predictable and affordable energy costs to the Indian consumer. They are a necessity compelled by global market situation. However, it is revealing that the very nations criticising India are themselves indulging in trade with Russia. Unlike our case, such trade is not even a vital national compulsion,' the statement read. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The MEA spokesperson noted that in 2024, the European Union's bilateral trade in goods with Russia stood at €67.5 billion, along with trade in services estimated at €17.2 billion in 2023. 'This is significantly more than India's total trade with Russia that year or subsequently. European imports of LNG in 2024, in fact, reached a record 16.5 million tonnes, surpassing the last record of 15.21 million tonnes in 2022.' The spokesperson added that Europe's trade with Russia includes not only energy, but also fertilisers, mining products, chemicals, iron and steel, and machinery and transport equipment. 'Where the United States is concerned, it continues to import from Russia uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilizers as well as chemicals. In this background, the targeting of India is unjustified and unreasonable. Like any major economy, India will take all necessary measures to safeguard its national interests and economic security,' the statement reiterated. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD India has consistently defended its sovereign right to determine its energy policy based on national interest. The government has stated that its energy purchases are shaped by market dynamics and strategic needs. 'You are aware of our broad approach to energy sourcing requirements, that we look at what is available in the market and the prevailing global situation. We are not aware of any specifics,' MEA Spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said last week, responding to queries about Trump's announcement. Responding to another question, Jaiswal said that India's bilateral relationships should not be seen through the lens of third countries. 'Our ties with any country stand on their merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. As far as India-Russia relations are concerned, we have a steady and time-tested partnership,' he added. Answering a query on Friday, Trump indicated that it would be 'a good step' if India stopped buying oil from Russia. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Trump administration had imposed 25% tariffs on Indian goods and a penalty for Russian oil imports in the last week of July, despite hopes of reaching an interim India-US trade deal that could have prevented a tariff escalation. Experts have warned that if India were to cease Russian oil imports, global crude prices could spike to $200 a barrel, significantly impacting global energy markets and consumers.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store