24 dangerous pathogen groups are posing serious health risks, UK experts warn
ADVERTISEMENT
Pathogens that cause the bird flu, COVID-19, and a bat-borne virus that causes brain swelling pose a risk to public health and could lead to the next pandemic, biosecurity experts in the United Kingdom have warned.
The UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) identified 24 pathogen families as a health risk for one of several reasons: either they are highly contagious or cause serious disease, they do not have enough vaccines or treatments to combat them, or they could be exacerbated by climate change or antibiotic-resistant superbugs.
They include the pathogen groups behind illnesses like mpox, coronavirus, norovirus (or the winter vomiting bug), the flu, gonorrhoea, Ebola, Zika, Lassa fever, and Nipah virus, which is mainly spread by fruit bats and can cause brain swelling.
Related
How EU countries compare on readiness for the next health crisis
Eight of these pathogen families are at high or medium risk of causing a pandemic, the agency said. While there are vaccines and treatments available for some of them, many are still in clinical trials.
UKHSA officials called for more research and investment to keep the pathogens from spiralling into a bigger problem.
"We hope this will help to speed up vaccine and diagnostics development where it is most needed, to ensure we are fully prepared in our fight against potentially deadly pathogens," Dr Isabel Oliver, the UKHSA's chief scientific officer, said in a statement.
Related
EU's medicine stockpiling strategy challenged by national security concerns
Pathogen list 'a double edge sword'
Independent experts said the list could help streamline the UK's efforts to prepare for looming infectious disease threats.
It follows an update from the World Health Organization (WHO) last year that
named 33 "priority pathogens"
as pandemic-level risks.
However, Jose Vazquez-Boland, chair of infectious diseases at the University of Edinburgh, warned that the priority list could be a 'double-edged sword,' raising attention to high-risk pathogens but potentially undercutting research on those that did not make the cut.
Related
How well are countries in Europe dealing with health issues? New report shows progress is stagnating
Meanwhile, Emma Thomson, who directs the MRC-University of Glasgow Centre for Virus Research, urged the UKHSA to regularly update the priority list when new risks appear.
"It is essential that this list remains dynamic and responsive to emerging threats," Thomson said in a statement.
"History has shown that pandemic risks can arise from unexpected sources".
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
12 hours ago
- Euronews
European steel sector on high alert amid slow-moving trade negotiation
The EU steel sector was on high alert on Wednesday following the implementation of 50% US tariffs on steel and aluminium, a move that might divert global steel imports formerly heading to the US towards the EU. "With the doubling of US blanket tariffs on steel to 50% without exceptions, we expect massive deflection of the 27 million tonnes of steel previously destined for the US towards the European market,' director general of the European Steel Association (EUROFER) Axel Eggert warned in a statement. 'We are being flooded by cheap foreign steel,' he added, 'without swift action, we will not just be underwater — we will drown.' Kerstin Maria Rippel, the chief executive of the German Steel Federation said the 50% tariffs marked 'a new level of escalation' in the EU-US trade conflict. 'A 50-percent tariff on steel exports is a massive burden on our industry, as it will increase pressure on an economy already in crisis and will impact our steel sector in multiple ways,' Rippel said. On Monday, US President Donald Trump signed an executive order, which the White House shared on X, claiming that the rise of tariffs on steel and aluminium would 'provide greater support' to US industries, and would 'eliminate the national security threat' posed by imported steel and aluminium. Last March, Trump had re-established tariffs on steel and aluminium, which were initially imposed in 2018 and 2020 under his first mandate. The steel sector has already been struggling with Chinese overcapacities flooding the EU market, but since the US imposed tariffs across the globe the bloc is facing overcapacities from multiple countries. Import penetration in the EU is up to 30% in 2025 in a context of depressed demand, Eggert claimed. In Brussels, the pressure has intensified following Trump's increased tariffs at a time when the EU seeks to negotiate a resolution to its trade dispute with the US. 'The 50% tariffs have clearly not helped the negotiations at all,' said one EU diplomat. On Wednesday, EU Trade Commissioner Maroš Šefčovič acknowledged in an X post that the two sides 'are advancing in the right direction at pace', and are 'staying in close contact to maintain the momentum', following his meeting with his US counterpart, Jamieson Greer in Paris on the sidelines of an OECD trade ministerial. But quizzed by journalists later in the day, Šefčovič said he 'strongly' regretted Trump's latest 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium, adding: 'It doesn't help, especially as we are making progress.' A group of EU high-level experts, including Tomás Baert, trade advisor to European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, has been in Washington since Monday to negotiate the technical details that could help the EU and the US break the deadlock. Besides the 50% tariffs on steel and aluminium, the EU is also facing a 25% tariff on cars and a 10% levy on all other imports. The US also has launched several investigations into pharma, semiconductors and aircrafts that could lead to further tariffs. Trump has further threatened to impose a 50% tariff on all EU goods as of 9 July if the negotiations fail to meet his expectations. The US and the EU exchanged proposals two weeks ago, but both sides have dismissed the other's offers. The EU offered a deal of zero-for-zero tariffs on all industrial goods and purchase of strategic products such as US energy, tech and agri-products, whereas the US expected the EU to review some of its regulations. The infant mortality rate has increased in at least eight EU countries in 2024, according to the latest figures from the countries' national statistics offices. The infant mortality rate refers to the number of deaths of children under one year of age per 1,000 live births. In 2024, both France and Romania reported infant mortality rates surpassing the EU average of 3.3 deaths per 1,000 live births from 2023. Romania experienced a significant rise in its rate, jumping from 2.1 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2023 to 6.4 in 2024. This is followed by France, which saw the rate double from 2 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2023 to 4.1 deaths per 1,000 live births. This means that one child out of 250 dies before the age of one in France, according to the French Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE). Since 2015, France's infant mortality rate has consistently been higher than the EU average. Boys are 1.2 times more likely than girls to die before the age of one and twins or triplets are five times more at risk than any other children. Between 2023 and 2024, Portugal experienced a 20% increase in infant mortality rates, a trend that deviates from the country's overall mortality rate. The causes behind this trend are not clear, but several factors may contribute, including the increasing age of mothers, an increase in multiple pregnancies and geographic inequality of access to maternal health care, according to health experts. On the other hand, Latvia and Sweden have the lowest infant mortality rate in the EU. Currently, Lithuania, Ireland, Luxembourg, Denmark and Slovenia only have estimated numbers. 2024 was a year marked by health staff shortages and the closure of some maternity hospitals in countries like Portugal, Germany and France. During the summer of 2024, 10 Portuguese maternity wards were closed or with restrictions. This followed the government's presentation of a Health Emergency and Transformation Plan to be implemented in three months to guarantee general access to healthcare. In the past decade in France, 15% of small maternity units have closed. Over the past two decades, the number of doctors and nurses per capita has increased substantially in most EU countries. However, the workforce is ageing and interest in health careers among young people is declining due to low salaries and poor working conditions.
Euronews
13 hours ago
- Euronews
Infant mortality in the EU: An unexpectedly bleak picture
The infant mortality rate has increased in at least eight EU countries in 2024, according to the latest figures from the countries' national statistics offices. The infant mortality rate refers to the number of deaths of children under one year of age per 1,000 live births. In 2024, both France and Romania reported infant mortality rates surpassing the EU average of 3.3 deaths per 1,000 live births from 2023. Romania experienced a significant rise in its rate, jumping from 2.1 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2023 to 6.4 in 2024. This is followed by France, which saw the rate double from 2 deaths per 1,000 live births in 2023 to 4.1 deaths per 1,000 live births. This means that one child out of 250 dies before the age of one in France, according to the French Institute of Statistics and Economic Studies (INSEE). Since 2015, France's infant mortality rate has consistently been higher than the EU average. Boys are 1.2 times more likely than girls to die before the age of one and twins or triplets are five times more at risk than any other children. Between 2023 and 2024, Portugal experienced a 20% increase in infant mortality rates, a trend that deviates from the country's overall mortality rate. The causes behind this trend are not clear, but several factors may contribute, including the increasing age of mothers, an increase in multiple pregnancies and geographic inequality of access to maternal health care, according to health experts. On the other hand, Latvia and Sweden have the lowest infant mortality rate in the EU. Currently, Lithuania, Ireland, Luxembourg, Denmark and Slovenia only have estimated numbers. 2024 was a year marked by health staff shortages and the closure of some maternity hospitals in countries like Portugal, Germany and France. During the summer of 2024, 10 Portuguese maternity wards were closed or with restrictions. This followed the government's presentation of a Health Emergency and Transformation Plan to be implemented in three months to guarantee general access to healthcare. In the past decade in France, 15% of small maternity units have closed. Over the past two decades, the number of doctors and nurses per capita has increased substantially in most EU countries. However, the workforce is ageing and interest in health careers among young people is declining due to low salaries and poor working conditions.
Euronews
14 hours ago
- Euronews
Can Europe make ecological farming competitive?
Simplifying some of the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) rules could save €1.58 billion per year for farmers and €210 million each year for member states, according to the European Commission. To achieve this goal, the EU executive has proposed easier payments for small farmers, including increasing the annual lump sum to €2,500, and more flexible environmental controls, namely for the conservation of peatlands, wetlands and watercourses. Farmers will also benefit from an easier mechanism to be reimbursed in the event of natural disasters or animal diseases and will have a single digital system to reduce bureaucracy. 'The aim is to make life easier for farmers, ultimately contributing to their livelihoods and well-being,' said Gerardo Fortuna, Euronews' agricultural policy reporter. "It is also clearly a response to the large-scale farmers' protests that we saw last year in Brussels and in other EU countries," the reporter said, referring to the long and sometimes violent wave of farmers' protests ahead of the 2024 European elections. Farmers are happy, but environmentalists say the measures will be counterproductive. The latter argue that less environmental protection could lead to more climate change, which could harm agriculture. "What we need to understand is that agriculture depends on nature. So when the EU has been delaying or eliminating environmental rules for several years, it is also putting the future of agriculture and farmers' jobs at risk," said Sarah Martin of environmental organisation Client Earth. However, the European farmers' federation, Copa-Cogeca, insists that "environmental objectives remain in the CAP" but the Commission has intervened in areas "that have proven unworkable for our farmers". In the 2021-2027 EU budget, the CAP received €386 billion, about a third of the total budget. For the 2028-2034 budget, the Commission advocates merging the CAP with the Cohesion Fund, which is used for regional development. The new financial instrument, called National and Regional Investment Partnerships, could be announced when the Commission unveils its EU budget proposal in July, and farmers are resisting the idea. 'Europe needs to invest in agriculture, with a strong fiscal increase in the face of inflation. We call for maintaining a common policy capable of guaranteeing a single market, investing to achieve the transition that society wants and, in fact, supporting a strategic sector such as agriculture,' said Patrick Pagani. The Client Earth officer agreed that investment in agriculture is important for food security, but said that the CAP does not contribute to this. 'We don't have the resilience to deal with natural disasters caused by intensive farming practices; nor to address the causes that put farmers in these situations, which are climate change, environmental degradation, loss of pollinators and so on,' said Sarah Martin. The European Parliament also opposes this idea and, in a recent resolution, demanded that the CAP fund remain autonomous and receive even more funding in the next budget. Watch the video here! Journalist: Isabel Marques da Silva Content production: Pilar Montero López Video production: Zacharia Vigneron Graphism: Loredana Dumitru Editorial coordination: Ana Lázaro Bosch and Jeremy Fleming-Jones
