Explainer: What is the High Seas Treaty to protect world oceans?
LONDON, June 9 (Reuters) - While many countries have agreed to take steps to protect the vast, ungoverned swathes of the world's oceans, they have yet to see their High Seas Treaty go into effect. This week's U.N. Oceans Conference in the French city of Nice hopes to change that.
The treaty, signed in 2023, provides a legal framework for creating marine protected areas on the "high seas", or the ocean areas that lie beyond any national jurisdiction.
Currently, less than 3% of the oceans are under some form of protection, although altogether the world's oceans cover two-thirds of the planet.
The treaty contains 75 points covering areas such as protecting, caring for and ensuring responsible use of marine resources, and includes a provision for requiring environmental impact assessments of any economic activities in international waters.
The treaty also aims to ensure that all countries have fair and equitable access to the ocean's resources. While it is widely referred to as the High Seas Treaty, officially it is called the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Treaty.
As of Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron said 50 countries had ratified the treaty, with 60 needed for it to go into effect.
Separate to the High Seas Treaty, countries agreed under a 2022 U.N. biodiversity pact to put 30% of their territorial waters under conservation.
Oceans support coastal economies and livelihoods through tourism, fishing, shipping, mining, offshore energy and more.
Oceans also absorb about a third of the world's carbon dioxide, or CO2 - the primary gas driving climate change - while ocean-swimming phytoplankton provide about half of the world's oxygen.
But marine life is now struggling, and human industry and development are almost entirely to blame.
More than 1,500 ocean plants and animals are now at risk of extinction, and that number is expected to rise amid ongoing pollution, overfishing, ocean warming, opens new tab and acidification, according to scientists at the International Union for Conservation of Nature.
Additionally, new threats to ocean organisms and ecosystems could emerge in coming years in the form of deep-sea mining for rare-earth minerals. In Nice, Macron is expected to urge countries to support postponing sea-bed exploration while researchers work to understand deep sea ecosystems.
Scientists are also concerned about the possibility that governments could look to modify ocean chemistry to boost its capacity for absorbing CO2 - a scenario that researchers say could help to limit global warming but could also have unintended consequences.
Macron's news on Monday of 50 governments having ratified the treaty means it is still short by 10 signatures.
The treaty will enter into force 120 days after 60 countries have ratified it. Work then begins on setting up institutions and committees to implement the treaty, while its signatories expect to hold a first conference within a year.
Despite its involvement in the original treaty negotiations, the United States under current President Donald Trump is not expected to ratify the treaty.
Macron is co-hosting this third U.N. Oceans conference with Costa Rica, and with at least 55 heads of state, business leaders and civil society groups expected to attend the five-day event.
Aside from discussions to advance the treaty, delegates are also expected this week to discuss overfishing, water pollution and other threats to marine life.
They'll also be looking for fresh ideas on how to pay for it all - with ocean-linked financing lagging far behind other sustainable investment areas. For the five years spanning 2015-2019, ocean-related spending totalled $10 billion.
By comparison, the U.N. estimates that every year at least $175 billion is needed for marine protection.
The last U.N. oceans summit was held in Lisbon and co-hosted by Kenya in 2022. The next, co-hosted by Chile and Korea, is set for 2028.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
41 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Beth, review: a baffling and muddled sci-fi drama about race and IVF
Beth is Channel 4's first 'digital original drama'. What does this mean? Your guess is as good as mine. But it's being shown as a 45-minute programme on regular television and in 15-minute mini-episodes on YouTube. 'Truly groundbreaking,' says the man from Channel 4. Hmm. The thinking seems to be that young people with chronically short attention spans watch YouTube, and Channel 4 needs young people. In which case, they've made a baffling choice of subject, because does anyone under the age of 30 want to watch a stifling drama about a couple going through IVF? It's billed as a sci-fi thriller, which piques the interest a bit. Think of it as an undercooked episode of Black Mirror. Joe and Molly (Nicholas Pinnock and Abbey Lee) have been trying for a baby. They've had multiple rounds of fertility treatment and multiple miscarriages. Now at the end of the road, they're told by their doctor that there is a chance they could conceive naturally. 'Once you remove the stress and strain, miracles can happen. That's the irony with IVF,' he explains. He also puts his hand on Molly's knee in the consulting room, which we are invited to find a bit suspicious. Is there something going on between those two? When Molly does get pregnant, and the baby arrives – white and bearing no resemblance to Joe – the question hanging in the air is: who's the father? We skip from the labour room to a few years later. You may be wondering where the sci-fi element kicks in, and the answer is about five minutes from the end. The big reveal is bizarre. Until then, though, it is just a little bit odd. Molly's mother becomes unnaturally freaked out by a child's drawing. There is some business with a wall clock. As for the title, I still have no idea who Beth is. Film-maker Uzo Oleh has a background in high-end fashion photography and he has crafted something that looks beautiful, not least because Lee is a model who has appeared on the cover of Vogue. As an entry into television writing and directing, it's a promising start, but too hung up on the visuals. The tone is arty. The casting is a problem, because while the talented Pinnock acts like a regular guy invested with a full range of human emotions, Lee is at an icy remove even in scenes where she's supposed to be full of warmth. At times, as Molly and Joe wear their expensive clothes in a tasteful apartment, a couple supposedly in love but displaying about as much emotional connection as Nick Robinson and Emma Barnett on the Today programme, it reminded me of Eyes Wide Shut. It helps to watch it twice, once you've seen the twist. But when the emphasis is on the convenience of 15-minute instalments, will anybody have the time to do that?
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Tech stampede to the exit: British brilliance born of our great universities is being plundered daily, says ALEX BRUMMER
At the weekend, the country was encouraged to be cheerful when Whitehall spin doctors came out in force to celebrate a Labour investment of £86billion in science and technology by 2029-30. The Higher Education Policy Institute notes a different reality. The spending pledge represents a real-terms freeze. Five years ago during Covid, Boris Johnson's government committed £22billion of spending on R&D by 2024-25. The new number is a modest cash increase of £500million. At 2.7 per cent of national output, British spending on R&D is woefully mean. Rachel Reeves and the Government seek to confuse voters with spending gobbledegook. The reality is that uplifts in spending for the NHS and defence will leave the cupboard bare. Britain's brilliant technology is exiting these shores through the back door after a series of overseas and private equity assaults. For sale: Britain's brilliant technology is exiting these shores through the back door after a series of overseas and private equity assaults on leading edge science-based enterprises It was hoped that the Tory-sponsored National Security & Investment Act of 2021 would end wanton destruction of Britain's tech and bioscience genius, bringing a halt to a period when great companies such as Arm Holdings were shunted overseas. Despite the eye-watering sums being propagated by the Government, the biopharma Francis Crick Institute is short of funding needed to attract deserting US scientists to the UK. And in the presence of Sir Keir Starmer, Nvidia boss Jensen Huang cautioned that the UK lacks the digital infrastructure needed to capitalise on AI. The extra £1billion pledged by the Prime Minister is unlikely, given spending constraints, to be wholly new money. But we can live in hope. Technology brought to market by firms spun out of Britain's great research universities is being plundered daily. US chipmaker Qualcomm is to swallow Britain's Alphawave for £1.8billion, a stunning 96 per cent premium. If evidence were needed that London-listed shares are trading at bargain basement prices, it is provided by such departures. As if this were not proof enough, US quantum computing company IonQ is seeking to snaffle British tech start-up Oxford Ionics for £800million. Advent, destroyer of aerospace pioneer Cobham and submarine sonar group Ultra Electronics, is making a £3.7billion offer for precision instrumentation supplier Spectris. Private equity group Advent operates a model of high leverage, which breaks up and sells parts in rapid-fire time. The deal can only be destructive to Britain's supply chain to vital industries where there is a cutting edge. A Spectris board of nodding-dogs shows little sign of putting up any fight in the national interest when faced with a handsome premium. Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds and Secretary of State for Science Peter Kyle have no strategy for addressing the private equity and overseas takeovers. This may not be surprising when Investment Minister Poppy Gustafsson sold her Cambridge-based cyber security pioneer Darktrace to private equity outfit Thoma Bravo last year. That isn't a wonderful blueprint for a Britain seeking to create its own Silicon Valley. Mad men Phil Jansen can be a tricky person to work with. Soon after his arrival as chief executive of BT he fell-out with respected chairman Jan du Plessis. It has taken Jansen just six months as chairman of WPP to wave goodbye to boss Mark Read, a 30-year lifer at the advertising group. Read was dealt a difficult hand by his predecessor and WPP's inspiration Sir Martin Sorrell. It was a marketing giant in transition and carrying substantial debt. Read has pressed ahead with the embrace of AI but received little credit as the stock plummeted to a five-year low and the firm lost its status as the world's largest advertising agency. There will be no shortage of candidates to replace him. But it should be a case of beware the chairman. Bad skin The sale of scientifically-based skin dermatology brand Medik8 to cosmetics leader L'Oreal, for an estimated £850million, is another loss to the UK. Last time the French group bought into Britain when it acquired The Body Shop, it came to an ugly end. The late Anita Roddick's creation was neglected and ended up in unsafe hands. Not a beautiful precedent.
Reuters
5 hours ago
- Reuters
Explainer: What is the High Seas Treaty to protect world oceans?
LONDON, June 9 (Reuters) - While many countries have agreed to take steps to protect the vast, ungoverned swathes of the world's oceans, they have yet to see their High Seas Treaty go into effect. This week's U.N. Oceans Conference in the French city of Nice hopes to change that. The treaty, signed in 2023, provides a legal framework for creating marine protected areas on the "high seas", or the ocean areas that lie beyond any national jurisdiction. Currently, less than 3% of the oceans are under some form of protection, although altogether the world's oceans cover two-thirds of the planet. The treaty contains 75 points covering areas such as protecting, caring for and ensuring responsible use of marine resources, and includes a provision for requiring environmental impact assessments of any economic activities in international waters. The treaty also aims to ensure that all countries have fair and equitable access to the ocean's resources. While it is widely referred to as the High Seas Treaty, officially it is called the Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction Treaty. As of Monday, French President Emmanuel Macron said 50 countries had ratified the treaty, with 60 needed for it to go into effect. Separate to the High Seas Treaty, countries agreed under a 2022 U.N. biodiversity pact to put 30% of their territorial waters under conservation. Oceans support coastal economies and livelihoods through tourism, fishing, shipping, mining, offshore energy and more. Oceans also absorb about a third of the world's carbon dioxide, or CO2 - the primary gas driving climate change - while ocean-swimming phytoplankton provide about half of the world's oxygen. But marine life is now struggling, and human industry and development are almost entirely to blame. More than 1,500 ocean plants and animals are now at risk of extinction, and that number is expected to rise amid ongoing pollution, overfishing, ocean warming, opens new tab and acidification, according to scientists at the International Union for Conservation of Nature. Additionally, new threats to ocean organisms and ecosystems could emerge in coming years in the form of deep-sea mining for rare-earth minerals. In Nice, Macron is expected to urge countries to support postponing sea-bed exploration while researchers work to understand deep sea ecosystems. Scientists are also concerned about the possibility that governments could look to modify ocean chemistry to boost its capacity for absorbing CO2 - a scenario that researchers say could help to limit global warming but could also have unintended consequences. Macron's news on Monday of 50 governments having ratified the treaty means it is still short by 10 signatures. The treaty will enter into force 120 days after 60 countries have ratified it. Work then begins on setting up institutions and committees to implement the treaty, while its signatories expect to hold a first conference within a year. Despite its involvement in the original treaty negotiations, the United States under current President Donald Trump is not expected to ratify the treaty. Macron is co-hosting this third U.N. Oceans conference with Costa Rica, and with at least 55 heads of state, business leaders and civil society groups expected to attend the five-day event. Aside from discussions to advance the treaty, delegates are also expected this week to discuss overfishing, water pollution and other threats to marine life. They'll also be looking for fresh ideas on how to pay for it all - with ocean-linked financing lagging far behind other sustainable investment areas. For the five years spanning 2015-2019, ocean-related spending totalled $10 billion. By comparison, the U.N. estimates that every year at least $175 billion is needed for marine protection. The last U.N. oceans summit was held in Lisbon and co-hosted by Kenya in 2022. The next, co-hosted by Chile and Korea, is set for 2028.
