California school board members praise Trump admin's probe into state allegedly hiding kids' 'gender identity'
Some California school board members are rejoicing after the U.S. Department of Education are looking into the state's effort to curb parental notification policies.
"We warned [Gavin] Newsom," Chino Valley Unified School District (CVUSD) Board President Sonja Shaw told Fox News Digital. "I am a mother and a school board president, and I have been screaming from every rooftop: parents have the undeniable right to know what's happening with their children, and we will not let Newsom and his bureaucrats cover it up."
Shaw's school district passed parental notification policies, which required school officials to inform parents of their child identifying as transgender or looking to change their names or pronouns.
This prompted California Attorney General Rob Bonta in 2023 to sue the school district.
Other school districts in California followed CVUSD in passing parental notification policies, including the Murrieta Unified School District (MVUSD), Temecula Valley Unified School District (TVUSD), Orange Unified School District, Anderson Union High School District, and Rocklin Unified School District.
In January 2024, Bonta warned school districts not to pass what he called "forced outing" policies.
President Donald Trump is stepping in after the state of California pushed back against parental rights policies, school board members hope to be vindicated for their efforts.
"What we are seeing happening in real time is our president vindicating the efforts of the previous local school boards in California, as the fight against wokeism continues," Dr. Joseph Komrosky, a school board trustee at TVUSD, said.
The Department of Education on Thursday launched an investigation into the California Department of Education over alleged violations of the Family Educational Rights Privacy Act (FERPA), citing California's new law AB 1955 that bars schools from so-called "forced outing" policies or disclosing a child's "gender identity" to their parents.
FERPA ensures parents have the right to access their children's educational information, and the Trump administration says that includes interactions with school employees pertaining to gender identity and mental health.
"Parents continue to have full, guaranteed access to their student's education records, as required by federal law," a spokesperson for California Gov. Gavin Newsom said in a statement to Fox News Digital. "If the U.S. Department of Education still had staff, this would be a quick investigation — all they would need to do is read the law the Governor signed."
Komrosky said the parental notification policies were to "empower the parents," and "protect the innocence of children by voting in our respective parental notification policies across the state."
"Newsom and Bonta have consistently overstepped their jurisdiction by threatening the TVUSD school board in an attempt to control our policies for curriculum and parental notification. We will not back down as elected officials representing the voice of our community," TVUSD Board member Jen Wiersma said.
California officials argued that AB 1955 strengthens existing protections against "forced outings" of students, which Bonta claims is "wrongfully and unconstitutionally discriminating against and violating the privacy rights of LGBTQ+ students" in his lawsuit against CVUSD.
Shaw said Newsom and Bonta targeted them for implementing "common-sense" policies.
"But we refused to back down," Shaw said. "Thanks to the relentless efforts of [Liberty Justice Center,] we fought back—and we won, even in California's courts. Here in Chino Valley, we still have a parental notification policy that they couldn't even get us to rescind, even after weaponizing every aspect to stop us."
Shaw referred to LJC declaring victory for parents while representing CVUSD in court with the state of California. Although the court ruling forced CVUSD to revise their parental notification policy, administrators are still required to notify parents about changes to a child's school records.
"We took our battle to the federal level by filing claims with the Office for Civil Rights, writing letters to the Department of Education, and alerting President Trump," Shaw said.
"Newsom's state education agenda dismisses the voice of parents and undermines the local control we've fought to uphold. Chino Valley USD will continue to prioritize transparency and the rightful role of families in their children's education," Andres Cruz, a CVUSD board clerk, said.
MVUSD in November 2024 rescinded their parental notification policy in a 3-2 vote and said that they never implemented it.
Board trustees Nick Pardue and Julie Vandegrift voted to keep the policy.
"Gavin Newsom used state law to threaten local school districts like ours who tried to protect our parent's Constitutional rights," Pardue told Fox News Digital. "Now that our president has intervened on behalf of parents and local control, he has decided to defy federal law. He is supposed to support and defend the Constitution and obviously disregards that obligation."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Poll reveals how Americans feel about Trump sending troops into LA over ICE protests
As President Donald Trump has deployed the National Guard and the United States Marines to Los Angeles in the wake of violent protests over federal immigration raids, Americans have soured on the president's response as Angelenos continue to take to the streets. Forty-five percent of adults disapprove of Trump deploying the California National Guard, while 38% approve, according to a YouGov poll released on Tuesday. The poll also shows that 17% of Americans are not sure about the deployment. Another YouGov poll released Tuesday showed that more Americans disapprove than approve of the Pentagon sending the Marines to Los Angeles, with 47% disapproving and 34% approving. There are 19% — about 1 in 5 — who are unsure. Conducted on June 10, the YouGov poll surveyed 4,309 U.S. adults. Since protests began on Friday, June 6, Trump has repeatedly defended his actions. On Monday, he took to Truth Social to suggest that Los Angeles would be 'completely obliterated' if he did not send in the National Guard. 'If I didn't 'SEND IN THE TROOPS' to Los Angeles the last three nights, that once beautiful and great City would be burning to the ground right now, much like 25,000 houses burned to the ground in L.A. due to an incompetent Governor and Mayor,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Tuesday. Gov. Gavin Newsom did not approve or consent to Trump's deployment of the National Guard and has attacked the president's actions since last week. When Trump and White House border czar Tom Homan floated the idea that Newsom should be arrested for not approving, Newsom dared them to arrest him. Among several elected Republican lawmakers who have criticized Newsom and the developments out of Los Angeles, House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said the governor should not be arrested. But he offered an outdated alternative. 'I'm not going to give you legal analysis on whether Gavin Newsom should be arrested but he ought to be tarred and feathered, I'll say that,' Johnson told reporters. Newsom saw this and replied in an X post. 'Good to know we're skipping the arrest and going straight for the 1700s style forms of punishment,' the governor wrote Tuesday. As of Wednesday morning, Trump ordered the deployment of over 4,000 California National Guard troops to Los Angeles, the Los Angeles Times reported. The Pentagon also deployed 700 U.S. Marines from Camp Pendleton, with a military convoy heading from Twentynine Palms toward the City of Angels. Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass ordered an 8 p.m. to 6 p.m. curfew on Tuesday, but 25 people were arrested in connection with violating the curfew, the Times reported. Colombian fugitive living 30 years in Mass. deported after deadly secret uncovered Mayor Wu seeks transparency on ICE arrests, 'secret police tactics' Can Trump deploy the National Guard to stop protests? Here's what the law says What Gov. Newsom said after an Ala. senator called LA 'a third world country' Mass. labor groups rally against ICE arrest of California union leader Read the original article on MassLive.
Yahoo
39 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Photos show National Guard with rifles on ICE enforcement missions
There are currently 4,100 California National Guardsmen and 700 Marines in the greater Los Angeles area after President Donald Trump ordered them to protect federal buildings and federal law enforcement as protests opposed to ICE raids increased over the weekend. MORE: Hegseth asserts Trump can send troops anywhere to protect ICE agents conducting raids Most of the attention has been focused on the crowd control assistance that these troops could provide around federal buildings, but Trump's memo calling up National Guardsmen also said they would "temporarily protect ICE and other United States Government personnel who are performing Federal functions, including the enforcement of Federal law." MORE: LA protests live updates: Trump's actions put democracy 'under assault,' Newsom says On Tuesday, the X page for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) posted photos of California National Guardsmen on the scene of a detention being carried out by an ICE agent with the caption "Photos from today's ICE Los Angeles immigration enforcement operation." One of the photos was later reposted by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth's personal X account with the caption "This We'll Defend." A U.S. official told ABC News that the photos showed National Guardsmen providing force protection to federal personnel and were not conducting law enforcement duties. MORE: Amid LA protests, what officials say about the rules of force for National Guard, Marines The Posse Comitatus Act prevents active-duty U.S. military personnel from carrying out domestic law enforcement duties though that restriction can be lifted when a president invokes the Insurrection Act, which President Trump has not done. MORE: What is the Insurrection Act, and what happens if Trump uses it to quell LA protests? In the photos, the National Guardsmen were armed with rifles but it was unclear if they were loaded with ammunition. ABC News has previously reported that while the federalized troops are carrying weapons, their guns will not have ammunition loaded in the chamber, according to U.S. officials. But they will carry ammunition as part of their regular uniforms that can be used in the rare case of needed self-defense. California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom and the state of California have asked a federal court to stop the Trump administration from using federalized National Guardsmen and Marines to accompany ICE agents on immigration raids saying it will "escalate tensions" and raises questions if the force protection they are providing constitutes law enforcement duties which they are not allowed to do by federal law. "Defendants intend to use unlawfully federalized National Guard troops and Marines to accompany federal immigration enforcement officers on raids throughout Los Angeles," said the lawsuit filed by California Attorney General Rob Bonta on behalf of Newsom. "They will work in active concert with law enforcement, in support of a law enforcement mission, and will physically interact with or detain civilians." "To preserve the peace, Plaintiffs respectfully urge the Court to grant the circumscribed emergency relief requested through this motion for a temporary restraining order, which will prevent the use of federalized National Guard and active duty Marines for law enforcement purposes on the streets of a civilian city," the motion requested. MORE: Gov. Greg Abbott to deploy Texas National Guard in anticipation of protests A hearing on the state's motion will be held on Thursday. On Tuesday, Hegseth told a congressional committee that he and President Trump have the power to send National Guard and active-duty troops anywhere in the country to ensure that ICE agents can enforce the law. "We believe that ICE, which is a federal law enforcement agency, has the right to safely conduct operations in any state, in any jurisdiction in the country," Hegseth told a House Appropriations Defense subcommittee. "ICE ought to be able to do its job, whether it's Minneapolis or Los Angeles," he added. On Wednesday, testifying before a Senate Appropriations subcommittee, Hegseth again defended using troops with ICE agents on immigration raids, saying it was needed to keep them from being attacked. Democratic Sen. Jack Reed shot back, calling it "illegal." "Law and order is a civil function under the Constitution of the United States -- civil enforcement, law enforcement authorities -- not the U.S. military," Reed said. "This is not only, I think, illegal, but also a diminution of the readiness and focus of the military," he added. Photos show National Guard with rifles on ICE enforcement missions originally appeared on
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Gavin Newsom should get out of Trump's way in LA
'Donald Trump has manufactured a crisis and is inflaming conditions.' So says California Gov. Gavin Newsom after an X poster sent him video of his constituents setting police cars on fire and throwing rocks. What Donald Trump is doing is enforcing the law. By sending Immigration and Customs Enforcement and other federal agents into Los Angeles to arrest undocumented immigrants and then sending in the National Guard to restore order after riots erupted, Trump is doing nothing more than his job, something the Biden administration and Newsom himself largely abdicated. Joe Biden's border policies – somewhere between an open invitation and abject surrender before a late-term reversal – allowed waves of unwelcome migrants to enter the United States, millions of them, making it necessary for a tough surge of enforcement around the country to restore some respect for our borders. Gavin Newsom's sanctuary state policies made sure that plenty of that enforcement would need to take place in California. If Newsom didn't want to see flash bang grenades deployed in Los Angeles restaurant kitchens and heavily armed federal agents in donut shops and Home Depots, maybe he shouldn't have spent billions of taxpayer dollars making California a more welcoming home for people who broke the law. The biggest move he made was to spend the state into a deficit offering Medical (California's version of Medicaid) to those without legal status. It is a decision he has tried to partially reverse as the budget impact became clear. More appalling was a law passed by California's Democrat-dominated legislature to make undocumented immigrants eligible for six-figure housing down payment assistance or making poor citizens complete with the undocumented for scarce work-study opportunities at state universities and community colleges. You know, the places of education where citizens of El Salvador and Mexico already got cheaper tuition than those interloper immigrants from Missouri or Idaho. Newsom says 'Commandeering a state's National Guard without consulting the Governor of that state is illegal and immoral.' That's not exactly right. It wasn't 'illegal and immoral' for Democratic President Lyndon B. Johnson to use commandeered National Guard units to enforce civil rights laws in 1965. And it isn't now for the threat to American sovereignty caused by Biden's feckless border policy and the violent reaction to efforts to rectify it, dangers just as grave as Alabama civil rights scofflaws were a half century ago. In both cases, protests threatened to derail the enforcement of federal law. And while Newsom says the National Guard is an unneeded provocation, the LA police chief has had second thoughts. 'Looking at the violence today, I think we've got to make a reassessment,' Jim McDonnell, told The New York Times. He's right. The Guard hasn't engaged with protestors yet, but they are an important backstop to the police who face not only local riots but the threat that others with broader anti-American agendas will come to take advantage of the chaos caused by the original timorous response from California law enforcement. It is unclear what message rioters were sending by setting multiple Waymo taxis on fire in downtown LA, but it is surely clear that unmanned transportation isn't exactly a symbol of Trump administration overreach. Maybe the violent protestors have more in mind than a confrontation over immigration enforcement. That was certainly the case in the violent riots over the murder of George Floyd that killed nine and cost billions. I have my problems with the Trump approach to immigration. Afghan patriots who served our military in trying to tame that terrorist-infested land deserve our thanks, not the boot. The U.S. has a long history of welcoming those who flee communism. Why that doesn't apply to Venezuelans, I don't know. Kicking out either group seems kinda dumb. And the policy of refusing to allow China to send full-fair paying students to our schools to subsidize American students' education doesn't make much fiscal sense to me. But if America is to return to its roots as a land built on exploiting the hard work, innovations and and entrepreneurialism of wave after wave of migrants, we have to have a reckoning over the lawlessness of the Biden years. It might get ugly in some cases, but in trying his best to kick out undocumented immigrants, Trump is only doing what we elected him for. Gavin Newsom should get out of the way.
