Marlborough roadworks to continue through August
Barry Hayworth, who has lived in Marlborough all his life called the works "terrible".He said: "You sit in the traffic all the time, you don't go shopping. When it builds up, it just goes crazy. "People cannot get from A to B, it takes hours, it's just a joke. Just keep away from Marlborough when there are roadworks."Nova Fine Art manager Alison Taylor, said the jams stopped people coming to Marlborough.She said: "That has a knock on effect with the shopping. The market has decreased in the last few months and there has been just solid traffic on the high street."Framemakers gallery manager, Becky Davies, said: "The thing we find hardest is when all of Facebook Marlborough notice board is saying to everyone to avoid the town."
"We appreciate it is chaos but from a business point of view it is a very negative thing to see."Charity shop manager and resident, Adam Roche, said every route in Marlborough was "throttled".And it was so noisy at his home he had "special" windows fitted. Mr Roche added: "There is always the smell of diesel. Our windows are filthy."Getting out of our parking space is always a nightmare as well."Wales & West Utilities' Ryan Barkway said: "We are sorry for any inconvenience our work may cause."We know working on roads like this is not ideal, but the work really is essential to upgrade the network and to keep the gas flowing safely."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
36 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Learner drivers being exploited by brokers charging over DOUBLE the price for earlier tests
Learner drivers are being exploited by dodgy brokers charging more than double the price for an earlier test. Endless waiting lists as long as six months to sit practical tests means the slots have become hot commodities. Given the huge demand, a driving test black market has been created as test bookings are now being sold at inflated prices of around £200 through third party websites, Facebook groups and WhatsApp. Unofficial broker companies are selling the appointments by using instructors' official Personal Reference Numbers to access available slots, then selling them at an extortionate price where they take the profit off the original fee. The details are then changed to match that of the buyer. The service allows learners to get a test in a matter of days or weeks. Most test slots are being booked through a portal only accessible to qualified instructors. One revealed he was even approached by a broker who offered to pay him in exchange for his details to access the appointments. One report revealed a slot in just nine days was sold for £137 by an instructor - instead of the flat rate of £62 on weekdays or £75 for weekends and evenings. In a WhatsApp group seen by Manchester Evening News, several dates for last minute slots across different locations were being offered within days notice. In another, a sooner slot was being sold at £100 to give the broker a £38 profit. While there are also dedicated Facebook groups with tens of thousands of members desperate to find last-minute test dates or swap slots. One driving instructor said test slots being block booked means there is often no availability for his own legitimate students. 'They are making so much profit,' the instructor told the M.E.N. 'This is a public service. It's not like they can go somewhere privately. They are selling these tests at £250 or even £300 so it's become big business. I look at it as though the students have paid enough to learn to drive, and the test is the final part of it all.' Some desperate learners are going to huge lengths to get earliest test slots possible – even if that means driving the length of the UK to sites that are more remote and in lower demand. In August This is Money reported that multiple freedom of information requests to the DVSA by Marmalade car insurance over a six-month period revealed learners travelled an extra 48 per cent further to take their driving test in 2023 compared to 2019. One learner travelled a staggering 647 miles from Exeter to Shetland to take their practical exam, while another travelled 633 miles from Folkestone to Shetland. The process of paying to complete a theory test, driving lessons and the practical test is a huge financial commitment running up to hundreds of pounds, making the pressure to pass higher than ever. The Online Business Service - what driving instructors use to book and manage tests for their pupils - said: 'Because learners are desperate and know they are going to wait 20 weeks for a test, they book it early and try and go for it. But the pressure to pass is then higher than ever before, because if you fail, you then have to either pay an extortionate amount or wait another 23 weeks. 'They then may need more lessons in that wait time, at a cost of £35 or £40 an hour. The cost implications of failing are lot higher, so this is just desperation. They become stuck in this vicious cycle.' In January 2023, the Driver and Vehicle Standards Agency (DVSA) banned anyone from selling tests at profit. But since then they have has issued 350 warnings, 792 suspensions and closed 813 businesses for misuse of its booking service. The The Royal Automobile Club (RAC) has also found many unofficial sites offering booking slots for around £200 each. A DVSA spokesperson said: 'DVSA's consultation on improving car driving test booking rules will be used to inform the next steps on improvements we can make to the test booking system so it's easier and fairer for everyone. ' is the only official way to book your practical driving test, and we urge people to report any social media channels or posts offering unofficial test slots or bookings to the social media network. We will take decisive action against those who misuse the booking system to exploit learners.'
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
EU-US trade deal hits investor confidence; Tesla awards Elon Musk $30bn of shares
Update: Date: 2025-08-04T12:23:24.000Z Title: Boom! Shares in lenders exposed to the UK car finance scandal have surged at the start of trading in London, as', 'investors react to Friday night's supreme court ruling. Content: Rolling coverage of the latest economic and financial news, as shares in Lloyds and Close Brothers jump Millions in line for payouts from £18bn car loan compensation scheme Graeme Wearden Mon 4 Aug 2025 14.23 CEST First published on Mon 4 Aug 2025 08.18 CEST From 9.13am CEST 09:13 Boom! Shares in lenders exposed to the UK car finance scandal have surged at the start of trading in London, as investors react to Friday night's supreme court ruling. Shares in Close Brothers jumped 27% after the stock market opened, after the court ruled in its favour in a case over car finance. Close Bros are leading the FTSE 250 index of medium-sized companies. Lloyds Banking Group is leading the larger FTSE 100 share index – its shares have jumped by almost 6% in early trading. As flagged earlier, Lloyds had previously set aside £1.2bn to cover compensation claims over car finance commissions paid to car dealers. These share price moves are a clear sign that the Supreme court ruling is a win for the lenders, even though the FCA is now consulting on a compensation scheme for motorists. That's because the FCA estimates the cost of its scheme will be between £9bn and £18bn. Before the supreme court overturned two of the three rulings against the industry, lenders were facing an estimated bill of £44bn. Updated at 9.17am CEST 2.23pm CEST 14:23 Today's $30bn share award won't be the end of the discussions about Elon Musk's pay. In their letter to shareholders, Robyn Denholm and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson explain that the Tesla board's special committee will continue its work on 'a longer-term CEO compensation strategy'. They intent to put this plan to a shareholder vote at Tesla's annual meeting on 6 November. 1.50pm CEST 13:50 Shares in Tesla have risen by over 2% in pre-market trading – a sign that Wall Street approves of Musk's new share package. They've risen by 2.3% to $309 per share, up from $302 on Friday night, which will lift the value of Musk's 96m share package closer to $30bn. Investors may well be reassured that today's share package will keep Musk at Tesla, as the shares will vest in two year's time. 1.24pm CEST 13:24 Customer loyalty towards Tesla across America has plunged since CEO Elon Musk endorsed President Donald Trump last summer, according to data from research firm S&P Global Mobility. The data shows Tesla's customer loyalty peaked in June 2024, when 73% of Tesla-owning US households in the market for a new car bought another Tesla, Reuters reports Brand loyalty rate started to nosedive in July, the month when Musk endorsed Trump. The rate bottomed out at 49.9% last March, after Musk launched the Department of Government Efficiency in January and started firing thousands of government workers. S&P analyst Tom Libby called it 'unprecedented' to see the runaway leader in customer loyalty fall so quickly to industry-average levels, adding: 'I've never seen this rapid of a decline in such a short period of time.' Tesla's US loyalty rate has since ticked back up to 57.4% in May. But even so, this does raise the question about whether Musk really deserves $30bn of shares…. 1.11pm CEST 13:11 Gwyn Topham Eurostar passengers travelling and from Paris face long delays and cancellations after a power failure on the high-speed rail line north of the French capital. The cross-Channel train operator warned that trains between London and Paris and Brussels and Paris would be disrupted throughout Monday. It said trains were still running but had been rerouted via slower rail lines, adding up to two hours to departures on Monday morning. A number of afternoon services have been cancelled. The latest disruption comes during peak holiday season, on the main rail route from Britain to the continent. Eurostar said it advised passengers to postpone their journey if possible, and exchange their ticket free of charge or request a full refund. It said extra staff had been deployed in the stations to assist passengers. 12.50pm CEST 12:50 Just in: Tesla has awarded Elon Musk stock options worth almost $30bn, in its latest attempt to pump up the billionaire's pay packet, and keep him at the company. Tesla had announced that is has approved an award of 96 million shares of restricted stock to CEO Musk, under its 2019 Equity Incentive Plan. At Tesla's latest share price, $302, the shares would be worth $29bn. Musk would have to pay just $23.34 per share to get them, which would cost him around $2bn. This follows the blocking off Musk's massive, $56bn, pay packet by a Delaware judge. If the Delaware pay deal is reinstated (there's an appeal to Delaware's Supreme Court), these new share options will by immediately forfeited, Tesla add (a sign that it is an attempt to get Musk at least part of that offer). Robyn Denholm and Kathleen Wilson-Thompson, members of the special committee of the Tesla's board of directors, told shareholders that it was 'imperative to retain and motivate our extraordinary talent, beginning with Elon'. In a letter to shareholders, they added: We would also like to stress that prior to recommending this award, we reviewed your letters, read your X posts, and considered the direct feedback we have received from many of you in order to align our recommendation with your expressed views. From those communications, we know that one of your top concerns is keeping Elon's energies focused on Tesla. This award is a critical first step toward achieving that goal, although it is limited by the capacity of our current equity incentive plan. As such, we are also working on next steps to address that issue. Still, while our work remains ongoing, we feel it is important to communicate directly and transparently with you all, our shareholders and Tesla's owners. Updated at 12.56pm CEST 12.03pm CEST 12:03 The Swiss franc has weakened again this morning, adding to Friday's losses, as traders anticipate steep tariffs on Switzerland's goods at the US border. The euro has climbed by almost 0.5% against the swiss franc, to 0.9355CHF. Raffi Boyadjian, lead market analyst at Trading Point, says: Many investors remain hopeful that some of the steep tariffs announced last week will be renegotiated and reduced. For example, reports suggest that Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney will meet with Trump later this week to potentially reach a deal that would bring down the 35% levy on Canadian imports into the US. The Canadian dollar is unchanged versus the greenback today, but the Swiss franc is tumbling following the White House's decision to slap 39% tariffs on Switzerland – something not expected by the Swiss government. The yen, meanwhile, enjoyed a revival in its safe-haven status during Friday's risk-off trading, although it is paring those gains today, with the dollar rebounding to just below 148 yen. 11.39am CEST 11:39 Jean-Philippe Bertschy, an analyst at Vontobel, has warned that 39% tariffs on Swiss exports to the US would be 'devastating for numerous brands in Switzerland.' 11.27am CEST 11:27 Eurozone August Sentix -3.7 (est +6.9, last +4.5) A bit of surprise from Sentix who is, however, just a survey of analysts. The index's setback suggests still a sub-50 Composite PMI and while I don't read too much into today's data, it confirms that recovery remains fragile. 10.50am CEST 10:50 Investor sentiment in the euro zone has taken a tumble, as the EU-US trade deal annnounced a week ago dampened confidence. Data provider Sentix's latest confidence gauge found that investors are not impressed by the EU's latest tariff deal with the US. The survey of 1,050 investors, conducted from July 31 to August 2, found a decline in the current economic situation, and also in future expectations. It also found a slump in confidence about the Swiss economy, after Donald Trump announced Switzerland will face a 39% tariff – much higher than the EU's 15%. Sentix reports: The latest data from the 'first mover' provides investors' initial assessment of the EU-US tariff deal. And the result is devastating for the eurozone. The sentix economic index has fallen significantly to -3.7 points. The current situation and expectations are both declining. The wrinkles of concern in the economy are deepening again. Even German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, who recently raved about a turnaround in the economy, has been proven wrong: the Germany index has collapsed by more than 12 points to -12.8 points. Donald Trump and the US are the winners in the current figures. Advance effects are the main factor pumping up the situation figures. However, expectations are also falling in the US to -7.8 points. Investors are particularly harsh on the Swiss economy. The sentix economic index has slumped by a full 21.2 points here. Sentix managing director Manfred Huebner says: 'The tariff agreement is proving to be a real mood killer.' Updated at 10.53am CEST 10.43am CEST 10:43 Swatch group chief executive Nick Hayek has called on Swiss President Karin Keller-Sutter to meet US President Donald Trump in Washington to negotiate a better deal than the 39% tariffs announced on Swiss imports into the United States. Hayek told Reuters on Monday he was confident an agreement could still be reached before the tariffs, which were announced on Friday, went into effect on August 7. Hayek said: 'Karin Keller-Sutter is the boss of the Swiss government, she is the president. She should take the plane and go to Washington. That would increase the chances of a deal enormously. 'It's not doomsday. Of course a settlement can be reached. Why would Donald Trump say tariffs are coming on August 1 and not implement them until the 7th? The door is always open.' 10.42am CEST 10:42 The Swiss stock market has tumbled into the red after Donald Trump shocked Switzerland by announcing a 39% tariff on its imports to the US. The Swiss Main Index (SMI) is down over 1%, after losing almost 2% at the start of trading. The market had been closed on Friday for a public holiday, so this is Zürich traders' first opportunity to react. Most stocks are in the red, including pharmaceuticals firm Roche (-1%), luxury goods maker Richemont (-0.8%), and bank UBS (-1.8%). Economists have warned that the tariffs would have a serious impact on the export-oriented Swiss economy, increasing the risk of recession. 10.23am CEST 10:23 South Africa's FirstRand has said it may need to update its accounting provisions after Friday's supreme court ruling on motor finance claims, potentially pushing the lender's annual earnings growth towards the lower end of its forecast. It told shareholders: On 11 December 2024, FirstRand Bank London Branch obtained permission from the Supreme Court to appeal the UK Court of Appeal's judgment against it in respect of the Wrench and Johnson motor finance commissions cases. The appeal was heard by the Supreme Court between 1 April 2025 and 3 April 2025. FirstRand welcomes the clarity provided by the judgment. FirstRand Bank London Branch's main ground of appeal (that car dealers do not owe their customers a fiduciary duty) was upheld, and it is important to note that the successful ground was the most important and substantive issue that required the Supreme Court's consideration following last year's UK Court of Appeal ruling. The company had earlier expected to deliver full-year earnings growth in the low double-digit to mid-teens range, Reuters reports. Shares in FirstRand are up 4.7% this morning, on the Johannesburg stock exchange. Updated at 10.31am CEST 10.02am CEST 10:02 The trade body for the motor finance sector has criticised the Financial Conduct Authority for proposing to backdate its compensation scheme to 2007. Stephen Haddrill, director general of the Finance & Leasing Association, told Radio 4's Today programme that while it 'makes sense' to have a compensation schem, there rae 'major concerns' about the time limit. Haddrill argued: I just think it's completely impractical. It's not simply firms that don't have the details about contracts back then, customers don't either.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Who will get a car loan scheme payout and how much might they receive?
Millions of people are in line for payouts after the City regulator announced on Sunday that it would launch a compensation scheme for people affected by the car finance scandal. Here we explain who might be eligible, how much they might receive and what they need to do. On Friday the supreme court largely overturned last October's court of appeal ruling on car finance that could have led to compensation payouts of up to £44bn. The Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) set out its plans for a redress scheme 48 hours later, saying it would consult on a scheme covering loans dating back to 2007, with estimates putting the total cost to lenders at between £9bn and £18bn. It's partly because the FCA has been running its own investigation into so-called discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs), a particularly controversial type of car finance. With these deals, motor finance lenders – typically banks – gave dealers the power to set interest rates on car loans, with dealers getting more commission the higher the interest rate. This practice, which allegedly incentivised dealers to overcharge customers, was banned by the FCA in 2021. Given the regulator's concern, it was always likely that many DCA cases were going to be in line for compensation; about 14.6m contracts included this arrangement between 2007 and 2020. The FCA is proposing that the compensation scheme covers DCAs 'if they were not properly disclosed', – believed to be the case for the vast majority of the loans. However, the supreme court also upheld one of the three test cases on Friday – not a DCA one – deeming it 'unfair'. This was due to the size of the commission paid to the car dealer – a particularly large 55% of the total cost of the credit (in other words, the interest and fees) – and a failure to explain the structure of the deal clearly enough in documents provided to the customer. The FCA said that that court decision 'makes clear that non-disclosure of other facts relating to the commission can make the relationship unfair'. Many people, therefore, who signed car finance deals between 2007 and 2024 whose agreement did not include a DCA may still be in line for a payout if there are unfair elements. However, this potential payout will depend on the facts of each case. Clearly a large commission could be a factor, and others will be how financially literate the borrower was when they signed the contract, and how much information was provided to them. The regulator will start consulting on the scheme by early October. The consultation is due to take six weeks and the FCA aims to finalise the scheme 'in time for people to start receiving compensation next year'. People who have already complained do not need to do anything as they should be 'in the system'. For the rest, the FCA says: 'Consumers concerned they were not told about commission and who think they may have paid too much for the finance should complain now.' The MoneySavingExpert website has free tools that create an email for you to send to the relevant lender based on your answers to a few key questions. Or you can complain yourself. It is free and simple, the FCA says. You will need to complain to the company you were paying each month, and ideally do it in writing. Complaining now gives the company concerned a chance to track down your information, and if there is a problem it is probably better to know now rather than later. The short answer? No. Claims management companies and consumer law firms have been touting for business for some time, and appear to be ramping up their efforts to encourage people who may have lost out to sign up. But the FCA and Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) are concerned that some firms are not telling consumers about free alternatives, are making bold and sometimes misleading claims about payouts, and are charging fees worth up to 30% of any compensation. Nikhil Rathi, chief executive of the FCA, said: 'Our aim is a compensation scheme that's fair and easy to participate in, so there's no need to use a claims management company or law firm. If you do, it will cost you a significant chunk of any money you get.' The FCA estimates 'most individuals will probably receive less than £950 in compensation'. It has previously said that in the case of loan agreements that included a DCA, consumers may have been overcharged by £1,100, as a result of paying too much interest on a typical £10,000, four-year car finance deal. Some claims law firms have said some clients were charged much more, amounting to several thousand pounds in hidden commission. Also, because the FCA thinks that the scheme should cover agreements dating back to 2007, there will be people who bought several cars during this period, who may be entitled to multiple payouts. However, the FCA has indicated that it would need to balance the interests of consumers, firms and the broader economy when setting up a scheme. Presumably, that may mean people might not get back all of their 'loss'. That said, any amount people get is likely to be boosted by interest, which could add up to a reasonable amount if it is several years' worth. The FCA said it planned to consult on an interest rate for each year of the scheme based on the average Bank of England base rate that year, plus 1%. 'This would be in the ballpark of a simple [ie, not compound] interest rate of 3% per annum,' it said. Yes, this is a concern, as it is thought that most banks typically purge customer data after six years. The FCA ordered firms to stop deleting car finance documents when it launched its initial investigation in January last year. But the files relating to customers with contracts that ended more than six years earlier may have already been lost. The Financing and Leasing Association, which represents leading car loan providers, said: 'We have concerns about whether it is possible to have a fair redress scheme that goes back to 2007 when firms have not been required to hold such dated information, and the evidence base will be patchy at best. We will be interested to see how the FCA addresses this point in its consultation.' However, many people will have kept their paperwork. During the payment protection insurance (PPI) scandal, banks were urged to err on the side of consumers, even when there was no documentation, but it is not yet clear if this will happen with car loans.
