The decline of key Atlantic currents is underway, and it's been flooding parts of the US for 20 years
The risk of flooding events along the U.S. Northeast coast has doubled since 2005. Now, scientists have discovered that up to 50% of these events occurred because key Atlantic ocean currents are slowing down.
In a new study, researchers found that a considerable portion of the increase in flood risk was linked to the deceleration of the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC) — a giant network of ocean currents in the Atlantic Ocean that includes the Gulf Stream and brings heat to the Northern Hemisphere.
The AMOC relies on surface waters that have traveled north from the Southern Hemisphere sinking in the North Atlantic. Once they reach the seabed, these waters can ride back south on bottom currents. But climate change is blocking the sinking step by releasing meltwater from the Arctic and Greenland Ice Sheet into the North Atlantic. This dilutes the salt concentration and reduces the density of surface waters, keeping them at the top of the water column.
"Our results clearly show that AMOC weakening has contributed to above-average sea level rise and more frequent flooding along the U.S. Northeast coast over recent years," study lead author Liping Zhang, a project scientist at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)'s Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory, told Live Science.
The East Coast as a whole is extremely vulnerable to sea level rise and flooding from climate change, but the Northeast coast is a hotspot when it comes to these impacts, Zhang said. That's mainly because weak circulation in the Atlantic Ocean redistributes heat to regions like the Northeast coast, which causes the water there to swell, she said.
Related: 'We don't really consider it low probability anymore': Collapse of key Atlantic current could have catastrophic impacts, says oceanographer Stefan Rahmstorf
"Global warming actually has two effects [on sea levels]," she said. "One is the melting of ice caps, which is adding water mass from the land to the ocean, and the other is through thermal expansion, which is when water gets warm and starts expanding."
Areas of the ocean that receive the most heat, and therefore undergo more thermal expansion, are likely to experience more rapid sea level rise. "From dynamics, we can see that the AMOC has the strongest [sea level rise] effect on the U.S. Northeast coast," Zhang said, "so that's why we focused on this region."
The aim of the new study was to explore the impact of a "moderate" AMOC decline on sea levels and flooding frequency along the Northeast coast. A moderate decline is consistent with climate modeling and direct observations over the past 20 years, Zhang said, so the research is a realistic picture of the AMOC's contribution to the recent increase in sea levels and flooding.
The researchers first used a global climate model to simulate large-scale atmospheric and ocean dynamics. They then fed this model sea level data for the Northeast coast from 1912 through 2022, "to force the model to be consistent with observations," Zhang said. Next, the scientists increased the resolution of the ocean component in the model, enabling them to focus on coastal regions. The last step was a statistical analysis to tease out the likely contributions of the AMOC from those of global warming more generally, Zhang explained.
The results indicated that the AMOC has played a major role in boosting sea levels and flooding risk along the Northeast coast over the past two decades.
Twenty years ago, people living on the Northeast coast could expect around five days of flooding per year, but that has recently increased to 10 days per year, Zhang said. Weakening of the AMOC may be responsible for 20% to 50% of this increase — a substantial contribution when compared to the influence of the global warming trend, the researchers wrote in the study.
RELATED STORIES
—Are Atlantic Ocean currents weakening? A new study finds no, but other experts aren't so sure.
—Key Atlantic current is weakening much faster than scientists had predicted
—This spot will be key to the inevitable collapse of a key Atlantic current
The model predicted that AMOC-driven sea level rise and flooding frequency will continue to increase over the next three years but then stabilize and reach a plateau as the AMOC itself stabilizes, albeit in a weak state. The model's prediction of an increase in flooding is backed by a mountain of research, but the flattening out of sea level rise and flooding risk may not happen in reality, Zhang said.
That's because the model used in the study accounted for the effect of thermal expansion on sea levels but did not incorporate ice melt, Zhang said. "In the real world, if we add the risk of melting ice caps, we might see flooding risk continue to go up," she said.
Despite the limitations of the study, Zhang thinks the results can help policymakers plan for the future. "I think the two to three-year predictions will provide critical information for long-term decisions — for example, infrastructure planning, land use and financial planning," she said.
The results were published Friday (May 16) in the journal Science Advances.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
22 minutes ago
- CNN
‘SuperAgers' are blessed with a different brain, according to 25 years of research
The human brain shrinks as it ages, affecting the ability to remember — it's part of life. Yet there are a lucky few, called 'SuperAgers,' who possess a brain that fights back. For these people, memories stay as sharp as they were 30 or more years in the past. Carol Siegler, who lives in the Chicago suburb of Palatine, is a SuperAger. At 82, she won the American Crossword Puzzle Tournament for her age group, which she said she entered 'as a gag.' 'I've auditioned twice for 'Jeopardy!' and did well enough on it to be invited to the live auditions. Then Covid hit,' Siegler told me in 2022, when she was 85. Today, Siegler is still going strong, well on her way to her 90th birthday, said Tamar Gefen, an associate professor of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the Mesulam Institute for Cognitive Neurology and Alzheimer's Disease at Northwestern University in Chicago. Gefen conducts research at Northwestern's SuperAging Program, which is currently studying 113 SuperAgers. Over the past 25 years, however, 80 SuperAgers have donated their brain tissue to the program, which has led to some fascinating discoveries. CNN spoke to Gefen about those decades of work. She is a coauthor of a new analysis of the research that was published Thursday in Alzheimer's & Dementia, the journal of the Alzheimer's Association. This interview has been lightly edited and condensed for clarity. CNN: How do you define a SuperAger, and what have you found out about their behavior over the years? Tamar Gefen: To be a SuperAger in our program at Northwestern, a person must be over 80 and undergo extensive cognitive testing. Acceptance in the study only occurs if the person's episodic memory — the ability to recall everyday events and past personal history — is as good or better than cognitively normal people in their 50s and 60s. We have screened close to 2,000 individuals who think they may be a SuperAger and less than 10% meet the criteria. Over the past 25 years, we have studied about 300 SuperAgers — a number of whom have donated their brain for research. One key trait of SuperAgers is that they seem to be highly social people. They value connection and are often active in their communities. This is interesting because we know isolation is a risk factor for developing dementia, and so staying socially active is a known protective feature. Another common thread in all SuperAgers is a sense of autonomy, freedom and independence. They're making decisions and living their lives the way that they want to live. I feel very strongly that successful aging is not just about sociability. If a person feels trapped, tethered or burdened, especially in a vulnerable state like poor health or older age, I think it can encroach on their entire psychosocial being. But as far as healthy behaviors, SuperAgers run the gamut. We have SuperAgers with heart disease, diabetes, who aren't physically active, who don't eat any better than their similar age peers. There is one SuperAger who drinks four beers every night. He laughs and says, 'Maybe it's done me wrong, but I'll never know.' He doesn't have an identical twin to compare his behavior to, so would he have lived to 108 instead of 98? We don't know. CNN: Many of your most intriguing discoveries have come from studying donor brain tissue. What have you discovered about the memory center of the SuperAger brain? Gefen: Our studies have shown that an area of the brain that is responsible for attention, motivation, and cognitive engagement — known as the cingulate cortex — is thicker in SuperAgers, even compared with those of people in their 50s and 60s. In the hippocampus, the memory center of the brain, we found SuperAgers have three times fewer tau tangles when compared to their 'normal' peers. Abnormal formations of tau proteins are one of the key signs of Alzheimer's. In Alzheimer's disease, tau also targets the neurons of the primary neurons of the cholinergic system — which is responsible for sustaining our attention in daily life. But that doesn't happen in the brain of a SuperAger. Therefore, the cholinergic system appears to be stronger, and likely more plastic and flexible for reasons that we're not sure about. That's interesting, because I see SuperAgers as focused. They can pay close attention, engage and actively listen. How else could they recall 13 out of 15 random words after 30 minutes? I picture them engraving the words on their cortex with a chisel. SuperAger brains also have bigger, healthier cells in the entorhinal cortex, an area essential for memory and learning, that has direct connections to the hippocampus. The entorhinal cortex, by the way, is one of the first areas of the brain to get hit by Alzheimer's disease. In another study we examined every layer of cells within the entorhinal cortex of SuperAgers, and we painstakingly measured the size of the neurons. We found that in layer two, which is the layer that is most important for information transmission, SuperAgers had humongous, plump, intact, beautiful, gigantic entorhinal cortex neurons. It was an incredible finding, because their entorhinal neurons were even larger than those in individuals who are much younger, some even in their 30s. That told us there is a structural integrity component at play — like the architecture, the bones, the skeleton of the neuron itself is sturdier. We're expanding the studies of these neurons to understand their biochemical signatures, determine what makes them special, and see if these signatures are found in other types of neurons in the brain of SuperAgers. Are these same neurons particularly vulnerable in those with Alzheimer's disease, and if so, how and why? CNN: What have you learned from your research about how the brain of a SuperAger reacts to injury, disease and stress? Gefen: We're looking at the inflammatory system in the brain of SuperAgers, with the goal of understanding how the immune cells in their brain respond to disease and adapt to stress. Inflammation, once it crosses a certain threshold, is a major component of cell loss in Alzheimer's disease and nearly all other neurodegenerative diseases. Compared with the brain of same-age peers, SuperAgers have fewer activated microglia, the resident immune cells of the brain, in their white matter. White matter is the brain's super highway, transporting information from one part of the brain to another. Here's how it works: Microglia are activated because there is some kind of antigen or disease, typically something destructive in the brain. In some cases, however, microglia and other immune cells become hyperactive and go into overdrive, thus causing inflammation and possible damage. The brain of a SuperAger, however, has fewer activated microglia. In fact, the levels of microglia were on par with people in their 30s, 40s and 50s. That could mean there is less junk or disease in the brain of a SuperAger so the microglia have no need to be active. Or it could mean microglia are responding efficiently to in clearing out disease or toxins, and because they are more plastic and adaptable, the microglia are able to activate, respond and then calm down. All of this is fascinating — it may be that at the cellular level, the immune system of a SuperAger brain could be stronger or more adaptive, much like the layers of cells we found in the entorhinal cortex. CNN: Whether or not you were born with the right genes to protect your brain sounds like the luck of the draw. What does that mean for the future? Gefen: Genetics are tricky. It's not just whether you have a gene or not, it about how your internal and external environment works together to influence how a gene is 'turned on,' or expressed — some may be more highly expressed, some will have lower expression. This is the epigenetic part of the puzzle. There is a list of candidate genes that we are starting to study very carefully, these are genes that also have a role in aspects of longevity, senescence, cell repair and cognitive reserve to name a few. I'm excited about that, not only for the genetics that are heritable from parents, but also genetics at the cell level, that enable each neuron or immune cell to carry out its respective job within the brain. With the technology that's advancing so rapidly, I'm certain we're going to get to a point where prevention or modification at the genetic level will be part of the playbook. Clearly, there is not a one target resolution for Alzheimer's disease. I know we all want that one easy fix but it's just simply not going to happen. It's going to take many teams and many specialists to come together and create a kind of personalized cocktail for prevention or treatment. I think it's possible, but it's going to take time.
Associated Press
22 minutes ago
- Associated Press
July was Earth's third-warmest on record, EU scientists say
ROME (AP) — The world experienced it's third-warmest July on record this year, the European Union agency that tracks global warming said Thursday, after two consecutive years when temperatures soared past previous records. Despite a slightly lower global average temperature, the scientists said extremes — including heat and deadly floods — persisted in July. 'Two years after the hottest July on record, the recent streak of global temperature records is over — for now. But this doesn't mean climate change has stopped,' said Carlo Buontempo, director of the Copernicus Climate Change Service. 'We continued to witness the effects of a warming world.' The EU monitoring agency said new temperature records and more climate extremes are to be expected unless greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere are brought down. On July 25, Turkey recorded it's highest-ever temperature of 50.5 C (122.9 F) as it battled wildfires. While not as hot as July 2023 or July 2024, the hottest and second-warmest on record, the Copernicus Climate Change Service reported that the planet's average surface temperature last month was still 1.25 C (2.25 F) above the 1850-1900 pre-industrial period, before humans began the widespread burning of oil, gas and coal. It said the average global surface air temperature reached 16.68 C (62.02 F) in July, which is 0.45 C (0.81 F) above the 1991-2020 average for the month. Greenhouse gases released from the burning of fossil fuels like gasoline, oil and coal are the main cause of climate change. Despite a somewhat cooler July, the 12-month period between August 2024 and July 2025 was 1.53 C above pre-industrial levels, exceeding the threshold set in 2015 to limit human-caused warming to 1.5 C (2.7 F). Copernicus is the European Union's earth observation system based on satellite and on-the-ground data collection. Britain rejoined the climate agency in 2023. Julien Nicolas, a senior Copernicus scientist, said it was important to view last month's decrease in the context of two anomalous years in terms of warming. 'We are really coming out from a streak of global temperature records that lasted almost two years,' Nicolas said. 'It was a very exceptional streak.' He added that as long as the long-term warming trend persists, extreme weather events will continue to happen.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
The Trump Administration's Illegal Plan to Defund Carbon Tracking Satellites
We've previously reported on the Trump administration's proposed new budget and the harsh cuts it delivers to NASA for the coming year. Personnel are leaving in droves, and morale is reportedly low as plans must be consistently scaled back or cancelled altogether. But that budget hasn't been approved yet. In July, lawmakers sent a letter to the newly appointed acting NASA administrator, Sean Duffy, telling him not to implement cuts from the budget until it has passed. Now, reports indicate that Duffy is continuing to pursue non-final cuts, including the defunding of two atmospheric monitoring satellites, both in the Orbiting Carbon Observatory (OCO) series. OCO3 works in tandem with the International Space Station. Since entering operation, these two satellites have produced some truly worrying data. They help quantify carbon levels in the atmosphere and track the behavior of things like carbon sinks in the oceans. Their insights are used regularly across industries, particularly agriculture. This NASA-created graphic of OCO2 proves irrefutably that the agency is not spending a lot of money on this project. Credit: NASA Worse, OCO2 and OCO3 are fully functioning satellites already in space. The vast majority of their costs have already been spent, while they each have many years of operation remaining to return further value. One NASA scientist told NPR: 'Just from an economic standpoint, it makes no economic sense to terminate NASA missions that are returning incredibly valuable data.' As a motivation, we can only surmise that it might be an extension of the administration's overall hostility toward climate science and any government project that accepts it as real. The administration has a long-standing history of attacking climate science and scientists, as well as refusing to publish government-funded research. Just recently, the current heads of the Department of Energy commissioned a report on how the 'climate consensus' is wrong. In that vein, these satellites could be shuttered simply to stop them from producing the data they do. These enormous cuts to NASA are typical of the proposed budget, though. If passed as-is, it would cut the National Institutes of Health by 40% and the Centers for Disease Control would lose 44% of their budget. The National Science Foundation would be cut by 55%. Meanwhile, other reporting suggests that the militarization of space will have no shortage of funding at all. So, what will NASA spend money on over the coming year? One recently announced option is building nuclear reactors on the moon, which would assist with human colonization and further expansion into the solar system. That mission has not yet received a budget proposal.
