Woman dragged out of Idaho town hall asks for $5 million in damages, 6 men charged
Woman dragged out of Idaho town hall asks for $5 million in damages, 6 men charged
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Lawmakers face backlash over Elon Musk and DOGE during town halls
Lawmakers from around the country are facing tough questions and tense atmospheres at town hall events over their stances on DOGE.
Six men have been criminally charged in Idaho after an altercation at a Republican town hall ended in a woman being forcibly removed.
The Coeur d'Alene City Attorney's Office confirmed with USA TODAY on April 21 that it filed charges on April 16 against five people working with a security firm and another attendee over their roles in the Feb. 22 incident.
The arrests came after town halls across the country have become heated, as constituents from both parties expressed concern over President Donald Trump's swift and far-reaching staffing cuts. House Republicans were even advised to stop hosting town halls on account of the angry crowds.
Police reports indicate Teresa Borrenpohl had yelled out at an event hosted by the Kootenai County Republican Central Committee at the Coeur d'Alene High School several times before she was approached and asked to leave. She told the Idaho Capital Sun she was expressing displeasure at the meeting, and "screamed," admittedly "out of turn," right before the incident occurred.
On April 21, Borrenpohl filed a notice of a tort claim seeking $5 million in damages against several people involved in the incident.
'Town halls are intended to foster conversation and discourse across the aisle, which is why I am deeply alarmed that private security dragged me out of the public meeting for simply exercising my fundamental right of free speech,' Borrenpohl said in a statement announcing the claim.
A 'dumpster fire': Angry voters bash lawmakers over Trump and DOGE
Video: Plainclothes sheriff asked for her removal before she was dragged out
A police report outlines a video of an interaction at the center of the charges, taken by Laura Tenneson. Here's what the detective reported seeing:
A man approaches Boorenpohl, who was sitting several seats into a row of the auditorium, asking her to "get up or be arrested." Although the video shows he is wearing jeans, a black jacket and a cap, the report identified him as Sheriff Bob Norris of Kootenai County, where Coeur d'Alene is located. (The sheriff's office did not comment on Norris' actions but confirmed with USA TODAY that there were no other personnel present at the event.)
Norris asks her multiple times to leave, before grabbing her arm and pulling on her arm, as she says several times, "please don't touch me."
"You want pepper spray?" he asks.
Norris steps out of the aisle and appears to direct two other men in, though no explicit order could be heard. Those two men begin trying to remove Boorenpohl. She screams at Norris, asking him to confirm if they are deputies, to which he doesn't answer.
Two men, also in plainclothes without markers indicating they were security, take Borrenpohl by the arms and another by the feet. She ends up laying in the aisle on her stomach with one of the men kneeling over her back and another man standing nearby with zip ties for handcuffs.
Eventually, they drag her up the aisle by her arms. At one point her shirt comes up, exposing her midsection and bra, the report states.
Borrenpohl also admitted to biting one of the men during the struggle and was cited for battery, a police report states.
Six people charged in town hall incident
Police reports and the host of the event, Kootenai County Republican Central Committee, identified several of the suspects involved in removing Borrenpohl as members of a private security firm Lear Asset Management.
According to a statement from the KCRCC a few days after the incident, Lear volunteered security services without a contract, as they were unarmed. The organization also said the event was private and attendees were warned that disruptors would be asked to leave.
Five of the people charged by the city were with Lear Asset Management, which did not return USA TODAY's request for comment. The charges are:
Paul Trouette – four counts of battery, two counts of false imprisonment, one count of security agent uniform violation and security agent duties violation
Alex Trouette IV – one count of security agent uniform violation and one count of security agent duties violation
Russell Dunne – two counts of battery and one count of false imprisonment, security agent uniform violation, security agent duties violation, and security agent license violation
Christofer Berg – one count of battery, false imprisonment, security agent uniform violation, and security agent duties violation
Jesse Jones – two counts of battery, two counts of false imprisonment, and one count of security agent uniform violation and security agent duties violation
The sixth man, Michael Keller, was not affiliated with Lear Asset Management but was charged with battery in a separate incident. Police reports said he had an altercation with a woman who told police she was trying to get closer to Borrenpohl when Keller blocked and pushed her.
KCRCC did not respond to USA TODAY's request for comment, but said in a Feb. 27 statement:
"The KCRCC acted wholly within our legal rights and Idaho law to ensure the peace, safety, and rights of those in attendance," it reads. "We remain committed to providing a platform for civil engagement and will not allow such disruptions to undermine public discourse."
The Idaho Republican Party later issued a statement in support of the county party, saying "The IDGOP reaffirms its commitment to free speech as a foundational value but it does not extend to violence or the suppression of other's voices."
Contributing: Riley Beggin
Kinsey Crowley is a trending news reporter at USA TODAY. Reach her at kcrowley@gannett.com. Follow her on X and TikTok @kinseycrowley or Bluesky at @kinseycrowley.bsky.social.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Donald Trump Says 'Bring in the Troops' as LA Riots Escalate
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump called for troops to enter Los Angeles amid rioting in the Californian city that stemmed from protests against immigration enforcement. The Republican president is deploying 2,000 California National Guard troops to L.A. to quell the intense violence, despite opposition from Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom. "Looking really bad in L.A. BRING IN THE TROOPS!!!" Trump posted to his Truth Social platform in the early hours of Monday morning. This is a developing story. Updates to follow.
Business Insider
3 hours ago
- Business Insider
BlackRock, State Street to urge dismissal of collusion case, Bloomberg says
BlackRock (BLK), Vanguard Group, and the asset management arm of State Street (STT) are headed to court over a lawsuit brought by Republican state attorneys general claiming they colluded to reduce coal output, Josh Sisco and Silla Brush of Bloomberg reports. Lawyers from the companies are set to urge a federal judge to dismiss the case. The suit claims the firm have large stakes in coal producers and profited when energy prices soared. Confident Investing Starts Here:
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Unsubstantiated 'chemtrail' conspiracy theories lead to legislation proposed in US statehouses
BATON ROUGE, La. (AP) — As Louisiana Rep. Kimberly Landry Coates stood before her colleagues in the state's Legislature she warned that the bill she was presenting might 'seem strange' or even crazy. Some lawmakers laughed with disbelief and others listened intently, as Coates described situations that are often noted in discussions of 'chemtrails' — a decades-old conspiracy theory that posits the white lines left behind by aircraft in the sky are releasing chemicals for any number of reasons, some of them nefarious. As she urged lawmakers to ban the unsubstantiated practice, she told skeptics to 'start looking up' at the sky. 'I'm really worried about what is going on above us and what is happening, and we as Louisiana citizens did not give anyone the right to do this above us,' the Republican said. Louisiana is the latest state taking inspiration from a wide-ranging conspiratorial narrative, mixing it with facts, to create legislation. Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee signed a similar measure into law last year and one in Florida has passed both the House and the Senate. More than a dozen other states, from New York to Arizona, have introduced their own legislation. Such bills being crafted is indicative of how misinformation is moving beyond the online world and into public policy. Elevating unsubstantiated theories or outright falsehoods into the legislative arena not only erodes democratic processes, according to experts, it provides credibility where there is none and takes away resources from actual issues that need to be addressed. 'Every bill like this is kind of symbolic, or is introduced to appease a very vocal group, but it can still cause real harm by signaling that these conspiracies deserve this level of legal attention,' said Donnell Probst, interim executive director of the National Association for Media Literacy Education. Louisiana's bill, which is awaiting Republican Gov. Jeff Landry's signature, prohibits anyone from 'intentionally" injecting, releasing, applying or dispersing chemicals into the atmosphere with the purpose of affecting the 'temperature, weather, climate, or intensity of sunlight.' It also requires the Department of Environmental Quality to collect reports from anyone who believes they have observed such activities. While some lawmakers have targeted real weather modification techniques that are not widespread or still in their infancy, others have pointed to dubious evidence to support legislation. Discussion about weather control and banning 'chemtrails' has been hoisted into the spotlight by high-profile political officials, including Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and U.S. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene. Recently, Marla Maples, the ex-wife of President Donald Trump, spoke in support of Florida's legislation. She said she was motivated to 'start digging' after seeing a rise in Alzheimer's. Asked jokingly by a Democratic state senator if she knew anyone in the federal government who could help on the issue, Maples smiled and said, 'I sure do.' Chemtrails vs. contrails Chemtrail conspiracy theories, which have been widely debunked and include a myriad of claims, are not new. The publication of a 1996 Air Force report on the possible future benefits of weather modification is often cited as an early driver of the narrative. Some say that evidence of the claims is happening right before the publics' eyes, alleging that the white streaks stretching behind aircrafts reveal chemicals being spread in the air, for everything from climate manipulation to mind control. Ken Leppert, an associate professor of atmospheric science at the University of Louisiana Monroe, said the streaks are actually primarily composed of water and that there is 'no malicious intent behind' the thin clouds. He says the streaks are formed as exhaust is emitted from aircrafts, when the humidity is high and air temperature is low, and that ship engines produce the same phenomenon. A fact sheet about contrails, published by multiple government agencies including NASA and the Environmental Protection Agency, explains that the streaks left behind by planes do not pose health risks to humans. However, the trails, which have been produced since the earliest days of jet aviation, do impact the cloudiness of Earth's atmosphere and can therefore affect atmospheric temperature and climate. Scientists have overwhelmingly agreed that data or evidence cited as proof of chemtrails 'could be explained through other factors, including well-understood physics and chemistry associated with aircraft contrails and atmospheric aerosols,' according to a 2016 survey published in the journal Environmental Research Letters. In the survey of 77 chemists and geochemists, 76 said they were not aware of evidence proving the existence of a secret large-scale atmospheric program. 'It's pure myth and conspiracy,' Leppert said. Cloud seeding While many of the arguments lawmakers have used to support the chemtrails narrative are not based in fact, others misrepresent actual scientific endeavors, such as cloud seeding; a process by which an artificial material — usually silver iodide — is used to induce precipitation or to clear fog. 'It's maybe really weak control of the weather, but it's not like we're going to move this cloud here, move this hurricane here, or anything like that,' Leppert said. Parker Cardwell, an employee of a California-based cloud seeding company called Rainmaker, testified before lawmakers in Louisiana and asked that an amendment be made to the legislation to avoid impacts to the industry. The practice is an imprecise undertaking with mixed results that isn't widely used, especially in Louisiana, which has significant natural rainfall. According to Louisiana's Department of Agriculture and Forestry, a cloud seeding permit or license has never been issued in the state. Geoengineering While presenting Louisiana's bill last week, Coates said her research found charts and graphics from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration on spraying the air with heavy metals to reflect sunlight back into space to cool the Earth. The Consolidated Appropriations Act of 2022 directed the Office of Science and Technology Policy, with support from NOAA, to develop an initial governance framework and research plan related to solar radiation modification, or SRM. A resulting report, which Coates holds up in the House session, focuses on possible future actions and does not reflect decisions that had already been made. SRM 'refers to deliberate, large-scale actions intended to decrease global average surface temperatures by increasing the reflection of sunlight away from the Earth,' according to NOAA. It is a type of geoengineering. Research into the viability of many methods and potential unintended consequences is ongoing, but none have actually been deployed. Taking focus In recent years, misinformation and conspiratorial narratives have become more common during the debates and committee testimonies that are a part of Louisiana's lawmaking process. And while legislators say Louisiana's new bill doesn't really have teeth, opponents say it still takes away time and focus from important work and more pressing topics. State Rep. Denise Marcelle, a Democrat who opposed Louisiana's bill, pointed to other issues ailing the state, which has some of the highest incarceration, poverty, crime, and maternal mortality rates. 'I just feel like we owe the people of Louisiana much more than to be talking about things that I don't see and that aren't real,' she said. ___ Associated Press writers Kate Payne in Tallahassee, Florida, and Jack Dura in Bismarck, North Dakota, contributed to this story.
