See if the new Nothing Phone 3 bends or breaks in this durability test
Of course, it wasn't long before the new $799 handset fell into the hands of popular tech YouTuber Zack Nelson (he of JerryRigEverything), who took no time at all in putting it through its paces in his carefully designed and very unscientific durability test.
As usual, the box cutter makes an appearance early on. Here, the Nothing Phone 3 would've recoiled in horror if smartphones were capable of such a thing. But they can't. So it didn't.
Nelson scrapes the blade down the phone's sides, which are made of anodized aluminum and therefore scratch up pretty badly.
During his enthusiastic dragging of the cutter across the phone's various surfaces, Nelson points out that the Nothing Phone 3 has a USB-C 2.0 port, which he describes as 'wildly out of date for a flagship,' adding, 'When you have the same specs as an iPhone, you know you're at least three years behind.' Most Android flagships are using USB-C 3.2, which transfer data 20 times faster than 2.0, Nelson notes.
Next, out comes the naked flame, which is held close to the phone's 6.6-inch OLED display. A nasty mark appears after about 20 seconds. 'The burn mark is permanent, so don't try this at home,' the YouTuber cautions.
Next up, the bend test. Nelson's infamous bend test, applied by his own bare hands, has caused some phones to snap in two. But the Nothing Phone 3 is build of solid stuff and shows no flex at all. Nice.
'The Nothing Phone 3 definitely survives my durability test,' Nelson concludes.
Impressively, it also survives the YouTuber's teardown, which involves removing the back panel to take a closer look at the Nothing Phone 3's innards. Watch the video (top) to find out more.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta Hires Two Key Apple AI Experts After Poaching Their Boss
(Bloomberg) -- Meta Platforms Inc. hired a pair of key artificial intelligence researchers who worked at Apple Inc., shortly after poaching their former boss from the iPhone maker. The Dutch Intersection Is Coming to Save Your Life Advocates Fear US Agents Are Using 'Wellness Checks' on Children as a Prelude to Arrests LA Homelessness Drops for Second Year Manhattan, Chicago Murder Rates Drop in 2025, Officials Say The social networking giant hired Mark Lee and Tom Gunter for its Superintelligence Labs team, according to people with knowledge of the matter. Lee has started at Meta after leaving Apple in recent days, while Gunter will begin work in the near future, said the people, who asked not to be identified because the hires haven't been announced. The moves are part of a scramble for AI talent across the tech industry. Meta, the owner of Facebook and Instagram, has been especially aggressive in its recruiting. Chief Executive Officer Mark Zuckerberg has made artificial intelligence the company's top priority, spending heavily on workers and data centers to try and keep pace with rivals like OpenAI and Google. Gunter left Apple last month, Bloomberg News reported at the time, and both he and Lee worked closely with Ruoming Pang, the chief of Apple's large language models team who Meta poached earlier this month. To secure Pang, Meta offered a multiyear compensation package worth well over $200 million, Bloomberg reported. Lee was known as Pang's first hire at Apple, while Gunter, who was a distinguished engineer at Apple, was regarded as one of the group's most senior employees. Gunter started at a different AI company after leaving Apple and departed in recent days. A Meta spokesperson declined to comment, while Apple didn't respond to a request for comment. The latest hires reflect the continuing turmoil at the Apple Foundation Models team, or AFM, which develops the technology underpinning generative AI. The company's top AI executives have been considering using outside models to power the Siri voice assistant and other Apple Intelligence features, clouding the team's future. The group reports to research head Daphne Luong, a top deputy to AI Senior Vice President John Giannandrea. They're evaluating strategy changes alongside Mike Rockwell and Craig Federighi, the software executives now in charge of Siri. The idea would be to rely on OpenAI's ChatGPT or Anthropic PBC's Claude as the foundation for Apple Intelligence beginning next year. In order to bring long-promised Siri features to market, including the ability to tap into personal data to fulfill queries, Apple is simultaneously developing versions with both its own models and third-party technology. Before the new voice assistant can launch next spring, the company will have to decide on which underlying software to use. Meta has capitalized on this uncertainty with generous job offers. In many cases, Meta is promising compensation that is several multiples higher than what Apple pays its AFM engineers. In order to prevent more departures, Apple has begun offering some engineers in the group — which includes 100 or so people — raises to stay put. Still, those increases are a far cry from Meta's offers. Gunter, for instance, is joining a club of several other AI experts who are receiving multiyear packages worth more than $100 million. Earlier this week, Zuckerberg posted on Threads that Meta would 'invest hundreds of billions of dollars into compute to build superintelligence,' a reference to the concept of an advanced form of AI that can complete tasks better than humans. Some of the company's top AI hires have been assigned desks near Zuckerberg at the company's headquarters in Menlo Park, California, allowing for easier collaboration. 'I'm focused on building the most elite and talent-dense team in the industry,' he posted on Threads. What the Tough Job Market for New College Grads Says About the Economy How Starbucks' CEO Plans to Tame the Rush-Hour Free-for-All Godzilla Conquered Japan. Now Its Owner Plots a Global Takeover Forget DOGE. Musk Is Suddenly All In on AI The Quest for a Hangover-Free Buzz ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
28 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Meta hires two Apple AI researchers after poaching their boss, Bloomberg reports
(Reuters) -Meta Platforms has hired Apple AI researchers Mark Lee and Tom Gunter for its Superintelligence Labs team, Bloomberg news reported on Thursday, citing people familiar with the matter. Lee has started at Meta after leaving Apple in recent days, while Gunter will begin work in the near future, the report said. Reuters couldn't immediately verify the report. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Fast Company
29 minutes ago
- Fast Company
Underserved students interested in STEM are often overlooked
The STEM talent shortage in the U.S. isn't caused by lack of student interest in science, technology, engineering, and math. It is caused by us overlooking and under-supporting the students who are most capable of driving the innovation economy forward. For years, policymakers have rung alarm bells about the shrinking American STEM pipeline. The data is sobering: While Japan, China, and Korea award over 40% of their college degrees in STEM fields, the U.S. lags behind at under 20%, according to the Center for Security and Emerging Technology. As the global economy becomes more knowledge-based, America's ability to compete depends on whether we can widen and diversify the pool of STEM talent. Much of the public narrative around STEM has mainly focused on students who are behind grade level and need additional supports to catch up. But an equally urgent and far less discussed issue is the vast population of students who are ready to accelerate but remain invisible in our systems. Schools need to actively recruit students According to a report by The Education Trust and Equal Opportunity Schools (EOS), more than 640,000 Black, Latino, and low-income students who are academically capable are missing from Advanced Placement (AP) and International Baccalaureate courses each year. These students often attend schools that offer advanced coursework, but they are not actively enrolled in those programs. The problem isn't one of supply. The courses exist. The opportunity gap lives inside the enrollment lists. Even more telling, College Board data shows that many Black and Latino students have already demonstrated their potential to succeed in AP-level math and science through PSAT performance. Yet they are never invited to take the leap. The result? A leaky pipeline that loses capable students who might have become engineers, data scientists, or biotech innovators. At EOS, we've partnered with hundreds of districts across the country to identify and enroll these 'missing students.' Our work proves that when schools take an intentional, data-driven approach to proactively recruit underrepresented students into rigorous courses the results are transformative. Students are ready for advanced coursework This isn't about fixing students; it's about fixing opportunity and adult mindsets. A rigorous independent evaluation by George Smith and researchers at Mathematica found EOS significantly increased AP course enrollment—particularly among underserved students. Practically, this means enrolling an average of 52 additional students per school—two full classrooms of previously overlooked young people. Furthermore, there was no difference in the schools' average AP exam performance, which underscores an important truth: These students were always ready for advanced coursework. Without proactively identifying and enrolling them, they would have continued to fall through the cracks. Targeted supports yield substantial returns Identifying and enrolling students is only the beginning. To ensure students and teachers thrive, capacity-building must follow enrollment. The National Math and Science Initiative (NMSI) College Readiness Program has shown that, in participating schools, students enrolled in more AP science courses and increased the number of earned college credits. Female students and Black students, in particular, saw significant gains. Within six years, 28% of Black NMSI students earned STEM degrees—compared to 12% of the general national student population. Among female students, 27% of NMSI students earned STEM degrees within six years—versus 12% nationally. What made the difference? A multi-tiered support system: ongoing teacher training, student prep sessions, curriculum resources, reduced exam fees, and targeted incentives. This type of capacity-building suggests that small, targeted investments can yield substantial returns. Unlike intensive interventions designed to help students reach grade-level proficiency, many high-potential students hovering just below AP readiness may benefit from lighter-touch supports such as adaptive learning tools to fine-tune gaps, short-term tutoring to reinforce core concepts, and professional development that equips teachers to deliver rigorous, culturally affirming instruction. The good news is this approach may be more scalable than we think. The marginal cost of providing these additional supports for students who are already academically proximate to advanced coursework is relatively low compared to the long-term payoff in postsecondary success and workforce readiness. Strategic touchpoints with adaptive learning, targeted tutoring, and additional resources can significantly propel students forward. Unleashing the full potential of those ready to soar—especially when so many of them have been overlooked for far too long, yields meaningful dividends for students. EOS-identified students have passed over 290,000 AP exams since 2011-2012, which would amount to roughly $345 million in college tuition and fee savings for EOS-partner students and their families based on trends in pricing. Final thoughts The STEM pipeline isn't just leaking at the bottom—it's leaking at the top too. Policymakers, educators, and business leaders must center opportunity as the foundation for improving outcomes. Bold action is required, such as establishing competitive grant programs for states and districts to increase enrollment and success of underrepresented students in advanced coursework. Investing in students ready to accelerate, leveraging adaptive learning and targeted tutoring, and scaling proven initiatives like EOS and NMSI are essential next steps. Our economic future and national competitiveness depend on fully tapping all of America's talent.
