logo
Antennas Direct Goliath TV antenna review: An absolutely massive, but very powerful outdoor antenna

Antennas Direct Goliath TV antenna review: An absolutely massive, but very powerful outdoor antenna

Tom's Guidea day ago

Range: 70 miles1080p reception: YesSize: 27.5 x 24 x 87 inches (H x W x L)
These days, there are tons of small, indoor, high-quality TV antennas. But the facts of physics still remain — with a little more power, you can capture more channels.
The Antennas Direct Goliath, which is being sold with the company's Juice Plus preamp, is for those who want the most channels and the best reception — and who don't mind installing an antenna that lives up to its name.
Like with any antenna, your mileage will vary depending on your location, nearby terrain, and what broadcasters are near you (even an antenna the size of the Goliath can't get around mountains), but for those struggling to get reception, it just might get closer than any other antenna on the market.
Let's get one thing out of the way right now — the Antennas Direct Goliath is, true to its name, giant. It measures in at a whopping 87 inches long, 27.5 inches high, and 24 inches wide, and that's without any mounting posts. It was actually much lighter than I thought it would be given its size, but at nine pounds, it's still certainly not lightweight.
While others have moved to different designs, the Goliath has a more 'old-school' Yagi design, which is still effective and efficient when it comes to directional and long-range reception. To that end, the Goliath isn't multi-directional like many modern antennas, so while there's room for error, you'll need to make sure it's pointed in the right direction.
According to Antennas Direct, the Goliath is made to be durable enough to withstand wind speeds of up to 115 mph. The weather in my area wasn't wild enough for me to test that, however it certainly does seem pretty strong.
As mentioned, the antenna ships with a ClearStream Juice Plus preamplifier, which itself is split into two parts: There's the main unit, which should be installed near the Goliath (typically on the mounting post), and a power inserter, which plugs into the wall and can be located on the indoor side of the cable. The Juice Plus comes pre-installed in a heavy-duty weather-proof casing, so it too should be able to survive the elements — though perhaps water is a bigger concern for it than wind.
Is the Antenna Direct Goliath elegant? Well, no, not really. It's not really meant to be. It's imposing. Some might want something a little more petite than the Goliath, and if you prioritize design over power, then it's perhaps not for you. But hey, at least it makes a statement on your roof.
Setting up the Goliath is a little more involved than most other antennas. Before you can mount it, you'll have to actually assemble it. The antenna comes in a series of poles, clips, and bolts, and it took me a good 30-45 minutes to put the thing together. It's worth working in an area with a good amount of space, too. I decided to assemble it in my relatively small office, and found myself hitting walls with random poles in the process. Strike one.
Once you assemble it, you'll need to mount it on the roof, and it's worth noting that you might need a taller-than-average mounting post considering the antenna's heft. I did not realize this would be necessary, and had to wait a day for a new mounting post to arrive before I could install it. Strike two.
The rest of the setup is relatively straightforward, but you'll need to be a little more careful to complete installation. The antenna is large and very unwieldy, so make sure you're safe and secure before trying to carry it up a ladder, for example. Once the antenna is on the roof and mounted to the post, you'll mount the Juice Plus below it, connect a coaxial cable from the Juice Plus to the antenna, and then connect another coaxial cable that runs inside your home to the Juice Plus. Then you'll need to plug in the power inserter, both to the wall and the coax wall jack, and then finally, run another coaxial cable to your TV.
If your setup is anything like mine, you already have a coaxial cable running through the walls, so you'll need an additional three cables. The Juice Plus comes with two, which is handy.
If you're keeping track, I never got to strike three. Considering that strike could have been falling off a ladder, I'm pretty glad I didn't — but really, be careful up there, and don't do anything silly without someone else nearby. If you're smart, you'll have someone else hand you the antenna instead of trying to carry it up a ladder yourself.
The whole point of the Goliath is performance, and perform it does. But, it's worth noting a few caveats. This is a unidirectional antenna. It has a 24-degree reception pattern, which is a pretty small slice of space — and as a result, it's easy to come across online users who have opted for two Goliath's instead of one. The antenna's range, however, is a massive 70 miles, and it's specifically designed for UHF frequencies from 470 to 608 MHz.
Before installing the Goliath, our home had a Televes DiNova Boss Mix antenna, which was left over from the previous tenants. Upon moving in, all we had to do was plug the TV into the coax wall jack and scan for channels. It was able to pick up 100 channels. After installing the Goliath and scanning for channels again, only 76 channels were found.
Now, there are a few reasons for this. For starters, as mentioned, the Goliath is very directional, and while the DiNova Boss Mix antenna that I had before is still somewhat directional, it has a much wider reception pattern that allows it to capture signals from a wider field of view. The Goliath has a longer range too, but between 50 and 70 miles, there aren't many channels that I would be missing out on without the Goliath.
That said, the quality of the signal was very good on all of these channels. It easily picked up local affiliates and delivered crisp and detailed video for all of them. Subchannels in 480p looked about as good as you would expect from a 480p signal. This high quality largely has to do with some of the technologies built into the antenna. Antennas Direct says it's effective at rejecting interfering signals from LTE and 5G towers, and indeed, I never really noticed a poor quality signal with this antenna. It picked up all of the channels that it could excellently. It's just that it didn't pick up all the channels that other antennas might.
All that to say, just because you have a big antenna, that doesn't mean you're going to get more channels or necessarily a much better signal. If you live in an area where broadcast stations are spread out a little and are decently close, then you might want to go for an antenna with a wider reception pattern instead.
The Antennas Direct Goliath is an impressively powerful antenna, but it's not for everyone. If you need to capture signals from far-away broadcast stations within a relatively clustered area, it's the antenna for the job, and for some, buying two will yield better results for two areas of broadcast stations.
But, check where the stations are broadcasting from before you buy an antenna like this, because its directionality will impact how much it can actually pick up — and you might find that a smaller antenna with a lower range and wider reception pattern is better for your needs.
That said, if you live in a rural area and need a long-range antenna with a focused reception pattern, the Goliath is an excellent option.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Antennas Direct Goliath TV antenna review: An absolutely massive, but very powerful outdoor antenna
Antennas Direct Goliath TV antenna review: An absolutely massive, but very powerful outdoor antenna

Tom's Guide

timea day ago

  • Tom's Guide

Antennas Direct Goliath TV antenna review: An absolutely massive, but very powerful outdoor antenna

Range: 70 miles1080p reception: YesSize: 27.5 x 24 x 87 inches (H x W x L) These days, there are tons of small, indoor, high-quality TV antennas. But the facts of physics still remain — with a little more power, you can capture more channels. The Antennas Direct Goliath, which is being sold with the company's Juice Plus preamp, is for those who want the most channels and the best reception — and who don't mind installing an antenna that lives up to its name. Like with any antenna, your mileage will vary depending on your location, nearby terrain, and what broadcasters are near you (even an antenna the size of the Goliath can't get around mountains), but for those struggling to get reception, it just might get closer than any other antenna on the market. Let's get one thing out of the way right now — the Antennas Direct Goliath is, true to its name, giant. It measures in at a whopping 87 inches long, 27.5 inches high, and 24 inches wide, and that's without any mounting posts. It was actually much lighter than I thought it would be given its size, but at nine pounds, it's still certainly not lightweight. While others have moved to different designs, the Goliath has a more 'old-school' Yagi design, which is still effective and efficient when it comes to directional and long-range reception. To that end, the Goliath isn't multi-directional like many modern antennas, so while there's room for error, you'll need to make sure it's pointed in the right direction. According to Antennas Direct, the Goliath is made to be durable enough to withstand wind speeds of up to 115 mph. The weather in my area wasn't wild enough for me to test that, however it certainly does seem pretty strong. As mentioned, the antenna ships with a ClearStream Juice Plus preamplifier, which itself is split into two parts: There's the main unit, which should be installed near the Goliath (typically on the mounting post), and a power inserter, which plugs into the wall and can be located on the indoor side of the cable. The Juice Plus comes pre-installed in a heavy-duty weather-proof casing, so it too should be able to survive the elements — though perhaps water is a bigger concern for it than wind. Is the Antenna Direct Goliath elegant? Well, no, not really. It's not really meant to be. It's imposing. Some might want something a little more petite than the Goliath, and if you prioritize design over power, then it's perhaps not for you. But hey, at least it makes a statement on your roof. Setting up the Goliath is a little more involved than most other antennas. Before you can mount it, you'll have to actually assemble it. The antenna comes in a series of poles, clips, and bolts, and it took me a good 30-45 minutes to put the thing together. It's worth working in an area with a good amount of space, too. I decided to assemble it in my relatively small office, and found myself hitting walls with random poles in the process. Strike one. Once you assemble it, you'll need to mount it on the roof, and it's worth noting that you might need a taller-than-average mounting post considering the antenna's heft. I did not realize this would be necessary, and had to wait a day for a new mounting post to arrive before I could install it. Strike two. The rest of the setup is relatively straightforward, but you'll need to be a little more careful to complete installation. The antenna is large and very unwieldy, so make sure you're safe and secure before trying to carry it up a ladder, for example. Once the antenna is on the roof and mounted to the post, you'll mount the Juice Plus below it, connect a coaxial cable from the Juice Plus to the antenna, and then connect another coaxial cable that runs inside your home to the Juice Plus. Then you'll need to plug in the power inserter, both to the wall and the coax wall jack, and then finally, run another coaxial cable to your TV. If your setup is anything like mine, you already have a coaxial cable running through the walls, so you'll need an additional three cables. The Juice Plus comes with two, which is handy. If you're keeping track, I never got to strike three. Considering that strike could have been falling off a ladder, I'm pretty glad I didn't — but really, be careful up there, and don't do anything silly without someone else nearby. If you're smart, you'll have someone else hand you the antenna instead of trying to carry it up a ladder yourself. The whole point of the Goliath is performance, and perform it does. But, it's worth noting a few caveats. This is a unidirectional antenna. It has a 24-degree reception pattern, which is a pretty small slice of space — and as a result, it's easy to come across online users who have opted for two Goliath's instead of one. The antenna's range, however, is a massive 70 miles, and it's specifically designed for UHF frequencies from 470 to 608 MHz. Before installing the Goliath, our home had a Televes DiNova Boss Mix antenna, which was left over from the previous tenants. Upon moving in, all we had to do was plug the TV into the coax wall jack and scan for channels. It was able to pick up 100 channels. After installing the Goliath and scanning for channels again, only 76 channels were found. Now, there are a few reasons for this. For starters, as mentioned, the Goliath is very directional, and while the DiNova Boss Mix antenna that I had before is still somewhat directional, it has a much wider reception pattern that allows it to capture signals from a wider field of view. The Goliath has a longer range too, but between 50 and 70 miles, there aren't many channels that I would be missing out on without the Goliath. That said, the quality of the signal was very good on all of these channels. It easily picked up local affiliates and delivered crisp and detailed video for all of them. Subchannels in 480p looked about as good as you would expect from a 480p signal. This high quality largely has to do with some of the technologies built into the antenna. Antennas Direct says it's effective at rejecting interfering signals from LTE and 5G towers, and indeed, I never really noticed a poor quality signal with this antenna. It picked up all of the channels that it could excellently. It's just that it didn't pick up all the channels that other antennas might. All that to say, just because you have a big antenna, that doesn't mean you're going to get more channels or necessarily a much better signal. If you live in an area where broadcast stations are spread out a little and are decently close, then you might want to go for an antenna with a wider reception pattern instead. The Antennas Direct Goliath is an impressively powerful antenna, but it's not for everyone. If you need to capture signals from far-away broadcast stations within a relatively clustered area, it's the antenna for the job, and for some, buying two will yield better results for two areas of broadcast stations. But, check where the stations are broadcasting from before you buy an antenna like this, because its directionality will impact how much it can actually pick up — and you might find that a smaller antenna with a lower range and wider reception pattern is better for your needs. That said, if you live in a rural area and need a long-range antenna with a focused reception pattern, the Goliath is an excellent option.

This £700 phone's cameras keep up with those of the Galaxy S25 Ultra — see the results for yourself
This £700 phone's cameras keep up with those of the Galaxy S25 Ultra — see the results for yourself

Tom's Guide

time22-05-2025

  • Tom's Guide

This £700 phone's cameras keep up with those of the Galaxy S25 Ultra — see the results for yourself

Everyone loves a good David vs. Goliath match-up, and thanks to the newly launched Honor 400 Pro, we have the opportunity to have a camera shootout where this mid-priced phone goes up against the toughest opponent the smartphone world can muster. At £700, the Honor 400 Pro is roughly equivalent to Samsung's Galaxy S24 FE, which sells for $649/£649/AU$1,100. But to really give the 400 Pro a challenge, I instead opted to bring the $1,299 / £1,249 / AU$2,150 Galaxy S25 Ultra, Samsung's top phone for photography right now, and our top pick of the best camera phones you can buy today. This isn't as weird a comparison as you may think. The Honor 400 Pro has a very similar camera loadout to the Galaxy S25 Ultra, with a 200MP main camera, 50MP 3x optical zoom camera, 12MP ultrawide camera and 50MP selfie camera. While the Honor 400 Pro lacks a second telephoto camera like the S25 Ultra, these are still remarkably similar specs for a phone almost half the price. More to explore with the Honor 400 series, and we'll go through those in a review at a later date. But right now, let's see how much of a fight it puts up against a more expensive and better-equipped component. It's a strange start with this shot of the entrance to a brick building. The Honor 400 Pro's image is weirdly bright, even after me picking out one of the darkest shots of the ones I took. It doesn't degrade the image's level of detail, but compared to the more natural-looking Galaxy S25 Ultra, it looks off. We don't see this kind of color processing in the Honor 400 Pro's other photos, so it's either a fluke or something to do with the 200MP main camera specifically. Either way, the Honor's tripped over and given Samsung an easy win. Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. In this shot of a church and its yard, and putting the difference in zoom level aside, we have two good images to look at this time. So far, so good. The Samsung take on the scene is more saturated, whereas the Honor has focused on brightness. Given the state of the weather on the day I took these photos, the Honor's view of the scene is much more honest, while also showing off the old stonework at its best. Winner: Honor 400 Pro This first of two telephoto tests is at a zoom level where both phones get to use a dedicated zoom camera. But having the right lens is only the start. Pointing the phones at this town sign, the Honor has more color and more detail. While the Samsung's image looks brighter, the sign itself is darker and quite grainy, which is not what you need in a photo like this. Winner: Honor 400 Pro Here's the place where the two phones' camera set-ups differ. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has a dedicated 50MP 5x telephoto camera, whereas the Honor 400 Pro uses its 3x camera with some digital zoom to create a lossless 6x image. This snapshot of a cat I happened to pass on my travels is roughly the same level of detail in both phones' shots, although you can see more in the S25 Ultra's version, likely because of the native zoom level. But it's hard to see the difference unless you zoom in further, making the Galaxy S25 Ultra's win only a slim one. Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra We wrap things up with a selfie-off. And it's immediately obvious that the Galaxy S25 Ultra's image is brighter, helping rescue the darker parts of the image from obscurity, while the Honor 400 Pro leaves them in shadow. Honor's selfie camera output is a slightly higher resolution than the Samsung's, with the option to go even higher if you want more detail. But as it stands, this image is weaker in terms of contrast, making fine elements like my hair harder to differentiate from my skin in places. Winner: Galaxy S25 Ultra And so, Samsung remains control of the top spot on our best camera phones guide. But I didn't put it up against the Honor 400 Pro thinking it would lose. I wanted to see how wide the margin of quality was, and we've seen it's not as large as you'd expect. The Galaxy S25 Ultra is a smarter pick for most photography-focused users, both practically because of its greater availability and in terms of its overall shot quality. But the Honor 400 Pro's cameras keeping up and even beating the Samsung in places is no mean feat. While too expensive to be considered for our best cheap phones guide, the Honor 400 Pro may have a claim to being one of the best value phones of the year, sitting alongside devices such as the OnePlus 13R and the Google Pixel 9a. We'll let you know for sure after further testing, but right now Honor deserves a pat on the back for going five rounds in the ring with the Galaxy S25 Ultra — and coming out alive.

Here are Tuesday's biggest analyst calls: Nvidia, Tesla, Dell, Alphabet, Boeing, Salesforce, Microsoft & more
Here are Tuesday's biggest analyst calls: Nvidia, Tesla, Dell, Alphabet, Boeing, Salesforce, Microsoft & more

CNBC

time20-05-2025

  • CNBC

Here are Tuesday's biggest analyst calls: Nvidia, Tesla, Dell, Alphabet, Boeing, Salesforce, Microsoft & more

Here are Tuesday's biggest calls on Wall Street: UBS upgrades Mettler-Toledo to buy from neutral UBS said the lab instrumentation medical company has resilience and pricing power. "We're upgrading Mettler-Toledo (MTD ) to Buy supported by a constructive view of: 1) incremental opportunities for service sales, 2) industry leading pricing power, 3) beneficial portfolio exposure, and 4) a medium-term tailwind from reshoring." Deutsche Bank upgrades MKS to buy from hold Deutsche said it sees an attractive entry point for the semicap company. "We upgrade MKSI to a Buy. Elevated sub-system inventories at semicap customers appear to have abated as of its most recent earnings report, one of our biggest concerns facing its core semiconductor sub-systems business when we initiated coverage June 2024." Bank of America reiterates Nvidia as buy The firm said it came away feeling more bullish after the CEO's keynote address at the Computex conference. " NVDA's key differentiators include its ability to: 1) expand its addressable market across multiple vectors of silicon, systems, software and services, 2) drive scale with global supply-chain partners, and 3) solid balance sheet to make strategic investments in the ecosystem." Goldman Sachs reiterates Microsoft as buy Goldman said it has "increasing conviction" in Microsoft's AI investments. "We reiterate our Buy rating while raising our PT to $550 (vs. $480 prior) as we mark-to-market our multiples." Wells Fargo reiterates JPMorgan as overweight Wells said the banking giant is firing on all cylinders following its investor day on Monday. "JPM further showcased "Goliath is Winning," given likely ongoing share gains with superior returns and efficiency, consistent w/our preview..." BMO reiterates Alphabet as outperform BMO said its survey checks of fears over Alphabet search competition are unwarranted. "Fears that Google Search will be disrupted by AI Search competitors are overblown, as users report higher levels of loyalty to Google and satisfaction with Google's AI Overviews. Reiterate Outperform and $200 Target Price." Wells Fargo initiates SAP as overweight Wells said the software solutions company is defensive. "SAP stands out as a defensive horizontal story w/ vertical (or at least idiosyncratic) traits likely to resonate in a fluid tape. See cloud migration momentum driving cont. growth re-accel & closing margin gap w/ mature peers." Morgan Stanley reiterates Tesla as overweight Morgan Stanley said it's sticking with top pick Tesla. "We find market expectations around Tesla's near-term automotive business remain too high and do not fully reflect the quantum of incremental capacity and competition coming out of China, ultimately having an impact in international markets." Wolfe upgrades LivaNova to outperform from peer perform Wolfe said the med-tech company is well positioned for growth. "What's sustainable organic growth for LIVN? 2025 guide is 7%-8% but we view real growth this year as 6%+ (not inclined to look through shut down of a smaller business). Is 6%+ a good zip code 2026+? Yes…do not believe this is crazy." Citi upgrades Kinetik Holdings to buy from neutral Citi said investors should buy the dip in the nat gas pipeline company. "We upgrade KNTK to Buy from Neutral following an > 20% decline in the stock price which we now believe has created a more attractive risk-return proposition." Wells Fargo reiterates Dell as a top pick Wells said it's sticking with the stock ahead of earnings next week. "Dell remains Top Pick - AI momentum (best positioned for materializing Blackwell cycle) + pos. trad'l server demand." KBW upgrades Blue Owl to outperform from market perform KBW said the alternative investment company is best positioned. " OWL is well positioned to benefit from growing retail demand for direct lending/credit strategies." Bernstein reiterates Boeing as outperform Bernstein raised its price target on Boeing to $249 per share from $218. "Key events over the last ten days have been: Qatar Airways widebody order, AviLease 737MAX order, IAG 787 order, UAE Chinook helicopter order, restart of deliveries to China, restart of KC-46 tanker deliveries, and some loosening of tariff concerns." Citi upgrades Air Lease to buy from neutral Citi said the air craft lessor is well positioned. "Buy-rated Air Lease should benefit from a global air travel resurgence, especially in Asia. Morgan Stanley reiterates Salesforce as overweight The firm said it's sticking with Salesforce heading into earnings next week. "Low investor expectations, matched with achievable targets and an undemanding multiple yield limited downside, framing a positive risk/reward. OW." Evercore ISI upgrades Hewlett Packard Enterprise to outperform from in line Evercore said it sees an attractive risk/reward for the stock and lifted its price target to $22 per share from $17. "Net/Net: We view the current risk/reward as favorable, with multiple pathways to upside if investors have the duration. Therefore, we're upgrading our rating on shares of HPE to Outperform and raising our target to $22." Loop downgrades MongoDB to hold from buy Loop said AI tailwinds are emerging slower than expected for the software company. "We are downgrading our rating on MDB from Buy to Hold and lowering our PT from $350 to $190."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store