logo
What is an oligarchy?

What is an oligarchy?

The Hill28-04-2025

Democrats are embroiled in a debate over using the term 'oligarchy' to describe the Trump administration — not if they think the description applies, but whether Americans are familiar enough with the word to understand its drastic meaning.
Background:
First-term Sen. Elissa Slotkin (D-Mich.) recently discussed her 'game plan' for getting the Democratic Party back on solid footing after losing control of the White House and Senate and failing to reclaim the House in last fall's election.
Speaking to Politico before a speech in her home state last week, Slotikin said Democrats should remove 'oligarchy' from their vocabulary deployed to attack President Trump and his allies, because it doesn't resonate beyond lefty coastal audiences. She suggested instead that Democrats should say the party opposes 'kings.'
But Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), a two-time former candidate for the Democratic presidential nomination who has maintained a strong progressive following, pushed back on the suggestion during an appearance on NBC's ' Meet the Press ' on Sunday. Sanders and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) have been on a multi-city circuit, dubbed the ' Fighting Oligarchy Tour,' that has drawn thousands of supporters in recent weeks.
'I think the American people are not quite as dumb as Ms. Slotkin thinks they are,' Sanders told 'Meet the Press' host Kristen Welker. 'I think they understand very well, when the top 1 percent owns more wealth than the bottom 90 percent, when big money interests are able to control both political parties, they are living in an oligarchy.'
What it means:
On Sanders's campaign website, the duo's tour events are described as 'real discussions across America on how we move forward to take on the Oligarchs and corporate interests who have so much power and influence in this country.'
Merriam Webster named 'oligarchy' among its ' words of the week ' during the last week of March because it was one of the most searched terms online around the time Sanders and Ocasio-Cortez launched their tour.
'Oligarchy' is formally defined as 'government by the few' or 'a government in which a small group exercises control especially for corrupt and selfish purposes.'
More colloquially, the term has been used to describe the 'convergence of economic and political power,' or elite wealth and political influence.
While it describes a government structure, some experts argue that it isn't mutually exclusive from other forms of government, including democracy.
Luke Winslow, an associate professor of communication at Baylor University who has written about oligarchy in America, recently pointed to four factors that set an oligarchy apart from other forms of rule: exclusivity, wealth, subtlety and legal immunity.
Where it's been applied:
The term 'oligarchy' has historically been used to refer to the aristocratic elite who hold sway over government in other countries.
It is often used to describe powerful, ultrawealthy heads of business in Russia, including by the Biden administration, which levied sanctions against 'oligarchs' who were part of Russian President Vladmir Putin's inner circle.
'Elites close to Putin continue to leverage their proximity to the Russian President to pillage the Russian state, enrich themselves, and elevate their family members into some of the highest positions of power in the country at the expense of the Russian people,' the Biden Treasury Department wrote in a news release on the sanctions in 2022.
The phrase also has been used to describe leadership in The Philippines, China, Iran and Ukraine.
2024 Election Coverage
Why some are using it to describe the U.S.:
Sanders and other progressives often have pointed to growing income inequality in the U.S. among factors they cite as evidence of the country veering toward oligarchy, as well as the wealth of Trump's top advisers.
Trump, a billionaire businessman and former reality television star, has counted billionaire tech mogul Elon Musk, who is the world's wealthiest person with a reported net worth north of $380 billion and was a top donor to Trump's 2024 campaign, among his closest advisers since returning to the White House in January, and multiple billionaires and multi-millionaires are serving on Trump's Cabinet.
'We are living in the richest country in the history of the world, and yet you got one person, Mr. Musk, who owns more wealth than the bottom 53 percent of American households. That is insane. That is oligarchy on steroids,' Sanders said on 'Meet the Press.' 'Are you living in a democracy when Mr. Musk can spend $270 million to elect Trump and then becomes the most important person in government?'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Vance on LA unrest: Newsom should ‘look in mirror' and stop blaming Trump
Vance on LA unrest: Newsom should ‘look in mirror' and stop blaming Trump

The Hill

time3 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Vance on LA unrest: Newsom should ‘look in mirror' and stop blaming Trump

Vice President JD Vance on Tuesday tore into California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) for suggesting the unrest in Los Angeles is a consequence of federal involvement in state and local law enforcement efforts. 'Gavin Newsom says he didn't have a problem until Trump got involved,' Vance wrote in a post on X, attaching two photos that he said were taken before Trump ordered the National Guard to protect border patrol agents in California. One depicted rioters appearing to attack a 'border patrol' van, and another depicted a car set ablaze. The Hill was not able to verify the authenticity of the photos. 'Does this look like 'no problem'?' Vance asked. Vance suggested Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass 'fomented and encouraged the riots,' with the goal of promoting mass migration into the U.S., adding, 'It is their reason for being.' 'If you want to know why illegal aliens flocked to your state, stop accusing Donald Trump. Look in the mirror,' Vance said. 'If you want to know why border patrol fear for their lives over enforcing the law, look in the mirror.' Vance pointed to California's Medicaid expansion last year to low-income undocumented immigrants as an example of a policy that has 'encouraged mass migration into California.' Newsom has since proposed ending new Medicaid enrollment for undocumented adults, but his proposal faces resistance from the state legislature. 'Your policies that protected those migrants from common sense law enforcement. Your policies that offered massive welfare benefits to reward illegal immigrants. Your policies that allowed those illegal migrants (and their sympathizers) to assault our law enforcement. Your policies that allowed Los Angeles to turn into a war zone,' Vance continued. 'You sure as hell had a problem before President Trump came along. The problem is YOU,' Vance added. Vance's post is the latest in a back-and-forth between the administration and Newsom, who has resisted Trump's extraordinary steps to deploy 4,000 National Guard troops to the area and mobilize 700 active-duty marines. Newsom has insisted that the situation was under control before the Trump administration escalated tensions by making a provocative show of force. He accused Trump of 'intentionally causing chaos, terrorizing communities and endangering the principles of our great democracy.' After Trump suggested his border czar arrest Newsom, the California governor responded by saying, 'The President of the United States just called for the arrest of a sitting Governor. This is a day I hoped I would never see in America.' 'I don't care if you're a Democrat or a Republican this is a line we cannot cross as a nation — this is an unmistakable step toward authoritarianism,' Newsom added Monday afternoon. Vance then replied to Newsom, saying, 'Do your job. That's all we're asking.' 'Do YOUR job. We didn't have a problem until Trump got involved. Rescind the order. Return control to California,' Newsom responded, prompting Vance's latest response.

Newsom denies Trump spoke to him before deploying more National Guards
Newsom denies Trump spoke to him before deploying more National Guards

Axios

time5 minutes ago

  • Axios

Newsom denies Trump spoke to him before deploying more National Guards

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) on Tuesday said President Trump did not speak with him, despite deploying national military personnel to respond to Los Angeles protests. Why it matters: Trump claimed that he had spoken with the governor and criticized his handling of the rallies against Immigration and Customs Enforcement's actions. "There was no call. Not even a voicemail," Newsom said on X. "Americans should be alarmed that a President deploying Marines onto our streets doesn't even know who he's talking to." Driving the news: Trump, speaking to the media on Tuesday, said he last talked with Newsom "a day ago." "Called him up to tell him, got to do a better job," Trump said. "He's doing a bad job, causing a lot of death and a lot of potential death." Reality check: California authorities have not reported any deaths during the protests. A total of 72 people have been arrested over the past weekend, with five police officers being injured, according to local media report on Monday Context: The Marines deployed to LA have not yet responded to immigration protests.

Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable
Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable

Axios

time6 minutes ago

  • Axios

Black Caucus chair says Trump's actions on L.A. are impeachable

Congressional Black Caucus chair Yvette Clarke (D-N.Y.) said Tuesday she believes President Trump mobilizing the National Guard and deploying Marines to Los Angeles rises to the level of an impeachable offense. Why it matters: It's a break with House Democrats' general aversion towards impeachment from the head of one of their most powerful groups. The comment comes amid growing animosity between Democrats and the Trump administration over the president's use of law enforcement to carry out a campaign of mass deportations. The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Driving the news: During a press conference, Clarke was asked if Trump's actions to quell protests in L.A. rise to the level of an impeachable offense "I definitely believe it is," she responded, "But we'll cross that bridge when we get to it." Clarke and other Democrats have argued that Trump has violated the U.S. Constitution by mobilizing the National Guard over Newsom's objections. Reality check: Democrats are highly unlikely to pursue an organized impeachment effort against Trump any time soon. Two rank-and-file members, Reps. Shri Thanedar (D-Mich.) and Al Green (D-Texas), have spearheaded their own rogue impeachment initiatives, but most Democrats have dissociated themselves with those efforts. Most Democrats are clear-eyed that impeachment would be doomed to failure with Republicans in control of Congress — and they often note that Trump won in 2024 despite previously being impeached twice. What they're saying: House Democratic Caucus chair Pete Aguilar (D-Calif.) told reporters at a subsequent press conference, "I've said before that ... House Democrats aren't focused on impeachment today."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store