logo
The Liberal Party does not need a renovation. It's a knockdown rebuild job

The Liberal Party does not need a renovation. It's a knockdown rebuild job

The Age05-05-2025

Previously, I have written that unlike political leaders who come and go, major parties don't have a use-by date. Party machine operatives invariably avoid the fallout of defeat or dysfunction, regardless of their performance. The flak is typically reserved for the politicians, ignoring that the party machine has a crucial, at times the crucial, role to play in who wins the hard-fought democratic race.
Truisms are hard to avoid at election time. If the Spanish philosopher and writer George Santayana's estate does not get a good royalty stream, it should. Santayana is credited with these words: 'Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.'
Perhaps the point will be more sharply made by simply invoking Groundhog Day, as the umpteenth election report is tabled, showcasing how the Liberal Party can improve its performance.
Here's my gripe as someone who has been a Liberal Party member for almost 50 years and seamlessly active for all that time. We're told repeatedly the party is a 'lean, mean, fighting machine'. That is delusional garbage. The real problem is that enough members believe the delusional garbage, so getting a meaningful debate off the ground about reform is impossible. The truth is that the Liberal Party is both organisationally moribund and dysfunctional. But it's more contrived than that.
Of the Liberal Party's KPIs, nothing is more important than building a large membership. The number of members in Australia has always been a well-kept secret, which has more to do with Byzantine factional games than anything else. On a good day, we're told there are about 70,000 members in a nation with a voting population of about 18 million. A significant proportion of membership is factionally driven. For many, it's the reason they belong.
To do justice to the term 'mass organisation' the Liberal Party should have a KPI of at least 500,000 members, better described these days as supporters. This cohort needs to be a diverse and vibrant as the Australian nation. This is not a quest for trophy numbers. These are the workers and volunteers who make 'people power' happen – something that the Liberal Party has let drift into obscurity for decades. A new-look Liberal Party needs to be a statement of embracing the end of the two-party structure. It needs to be part of the solution rather than bemoaning how it's all turned to custard.
Loading
With 500,000 supporters, the Liberal Party founded 80 years ago would be able to put the feet on the ground in an election campaign that Climate 200 and the teal MPs it supports has since its founding in 2019. Anecdotal feedback from teal seat to teal seat confirms a repeat of the 2022 federal election, where the Liberal Party was frequently outnumbered by 10 to one on polling booths, shopping centres and transport hubs.
This does not require a renovation. It requires a knockdown rebuild.
Starting with a base of 500,000 supporters, a political fighting machine can be taken seriously in conducting genuine community-based events, conducting strategic pre-selections, and genuine, grassroots fundraising. The hallmark of fundraising should be to raise money from large numbers of donors. As it is, political fundraising is about raising large amounts of money from small numbers of donors – something Climate 200 is coy and defensive about. They should come clean.
How much more evidence do we need that the electorate is resentful of our adversarial, two-party democracy? It's time to get with a program underpinned by user-friendly structures that make them part of local communities. The Liberal Party needs to embrace a modus operandi where it does politics with people rather than at people.
As for the dancing-on-graves ritual, Dutton deserves a dignified departure from parliamentary politics. He has with sincerity and speed taken responsibility for one of the more lamentable election nights since Federation.
Loading
The more enduring dancing is likely to be on the grave of the two-party political system, at least as we knew it. The federal political pie chart now has three roughly equal slices, rather than two, based on first preference votes. Denial is no response to this move in the shifting tectonic plates of Australian democracy.
On Saturday night, a 'landslide' result was recorded by the Labor Party with what looks like a 35 per cent primary vote, significantly less than the combined 'others' vote, at this stage of counting. Welcome to the latest update in the death throes of the two-party system.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump AUKUS review: Expert urges Australian defence companies not to get ahead of themselves
Trump AUKUS review: Expert urges Australian defence companies not to get ahead of themselves

Sky News AU

time6 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

Trump AUKUS review: Expert urges Australian defence companies not to get ahead of themselves

Defence industry Specialist Brent Clark says it is not unusual for governments to do reviews of defence partnerships. This comes amid US President Donald Trump's upcoming review of the AUKUS security partnership. 'Quite clearly, Australian companies would be concerned about the review; however, I think it is important to not let ourselves get ahead of where we are right now,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'It is not an unusual event for governments to do reviews. 'I would think that the Trump administration would be remiss if they actually weren't doing the review into AUKUS.'

Australians must not follow Trump's road to ruin
Australians must not follow Trump's road to ruin

Sydney Morning Herald

time7 hours ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

Australians must not follow Trump's road to ruin

It would appear as through Parnell McGuinness (' JD Vance chastised Europeans on free speech. He wasn't wrong ', June 8) and similar-minded conservative commentators such as Sky News After Dark, are continuing on their ideologically driven warpaths oblivious to the voice of the Australian people as expressed in the May 3 election. While these media darlings of the right still want to rant and rave and feed each other's egos with negativity, doom and gloom, the great mass of Australians are getting on with life, comfortable with their government which is safe, stable, secure and focused on traditional Australian positive values of a fair go, kindness and friendliness. To become relevant again and play a meaningful role in modern Australia, the right-wing media needs to jettison these antagonistic Trump-like approaches which were clearly rejected by the Australian people. Warren Marks, Richmond (Tas) Parnell Palme McGuinness warns against the suppression of ideas, quoting the US vice president's controversial advice to the Munich Security Conference in February that 'governments must listen to and respect their citizens'. However, she, like JD Vance, can't resist cherry-picking just which ideas and citizen groups are worthy of respect. She uses the case of the phrase 'identified as' being currently questioned and 'no longer [deemed] acceptable' by some activists, as an example of 'groups trying to control public conversation'. But is this really a 'kind of slippery censorship', or just the progression of an idea so it more accurately conveys the lived experience of a group? Wasn't JD Vance's speech realistically more of an attempt to control? It's a shame Palme McGuinness sabotages her own argument, adopts the culture war cover, and portrays progressive ideas as threats. Everyone counts, Parnell. Kerrie Wehbe, Blacktown EVs not for me After 60 years of driving, I recently explored the hybrid option (' The sweet spot: How to get the most out of your super and the pension', June 8). I currently drive a diesel SUV, and being a self-funded retiree, I receive no government pension. I spend about $100 per fortnight on fuel. The hybrid currently comes with no spare wheel and no tow-bar, which I need to tow my boat. The changeover figure is $12,000 in the dealer's favour. The cost of a one-off tow-bar is an extra $2000, and a spare wheel costs a couple of hundred more. That equates to about six years' driving if I continue to use diesel. There is no government incentive for me to change. Free rego for all EV-driving retirees might sway me. I think I will stay with my diesel as I am not that green. David Sayers, Gwandalan Undeserved reward This just brings discredit to the whole honours system (' Politicians, scientists and costume designer feature in King's awards ', June 8). The highest honours go to those who have already achieved a higher role in society, often just for doing what that job requires. Isn't achieving that position (and the salary that goes with it) reward enough? Meanwhile, those who make a real sacrifice and give true service to others might receive a lower honour (when nominated), if any at all. In the case of the honour given to Scott Morrison, one hopes that it is primarily because most ex-PMs have historically received a similar award. Otherwise, it wouldn't seem to be merited. The citation says it's for 'his leadership during the COVID-19 pandemic and his key role in the AUKUS nuclear submarine deal'. Doesn't that come with the job of being PM? His role in the pandemic overlooks the refusal to require those already wealthy to pay back JobKeeper payments for which they were ultimately found to be ineligible, the 'stroll-out' of vaccines, and the needless antagonism of China over the pandemic's origins (which damaged Australia's trade). And the value of the AUKUS deal remains questionable. And then there are the multiple ministries, robo-debt, claims to not hold a hose, and statements that women protesters were lucky not to be shot. I predict that this will prompt many other letters to the editor.

‘Three-pronged attack': Australia's commercial defence future analysed
‘Three-pronged attack': Australia's commercial defence future analysed

Sky News AU

time8 hours ago

  • Sky News AU

‘Three-pronged attack': Australia's commercial defence future analysed

Defence industry specialist Brent Clark discusses Australia's national defence future. 'Obviously, the Australian government has a three-pronged attack on this,' Mr Clark told Sky News host Ed Boyd. 'There are a variety of steps that each company must do to each of those elements, if you're a supplier that is different to being a company that wishes to be a builder, as such. 'I would suggest quite heavily that Australian companies are investing in infrastructure, skills, capabilities.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store