Navy flagship HMS Prince of Wales leaves Australia during eight-month deployment
As the sun sets on HMS Prince of Wales, we bid farewell to @COMUKCSG after an incredible visit. The Carrier Strike Group's first return since 1997 has strengthened our partnership and deepened UK-Australia ties. Until we meet again 🇬🇧🇦🇺#UKAustralia #CSG25 @SarahMacFCDO pic.twitter.com/aq9853GWQk
— UK in Australia 🇬🇧🇦🇺 (@ukinaustralia) July 29, 2025
A Royal Navy spokesman said that the carrier had sailed from Darwin having taken part in the Talisman Sabre exercise as well as acting as a host for diplomatic visits, including from representatives of the indigenous Larrakia people.
He said: 'The flagship hosted a string of senior British and Australian politicians, including Defence Secretary John Healey and Foreign Secretary David Lammy, his Australian counterpart Penny Wong and Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles.
Members of the Royal Navy were visited by Defence Secretary John Healey, Foreign Secretary David Lammy and Australia's Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Defence Richard Marles (Robbie Stephenson/PA)
'The aircraft carrier has also served as the impressive setting for a business and industry event, discussing the growing importance of defence links between London and Canberra.
'And the 2,500-plus personnel in the task group have enjoyed down time to explore the largest city in Australia's Northern Territory.'
Able Seaman Owen Altoft, an 18-year-old chef from Newcastle who is on his first deployment, said: 'It's an experience being out in Australia.
'This deployment has been great – seeing what the world's like, seeing different places, cultures and food. It's what I signed up for.
'I tried kangaroo at the local food market and would try it again in a restaurant.'
The Royal Navy spokesman said that the next stage of the deployment would involve combined air exercises with the carrier's F-35 jets and the Japanese navy.
The Hon Pat Conroy MP visited @HMSPWLS while in Darwin. A great opportunity to demonstrate our joint capabilities, discuss partnerships and working together in the Indo-Pacific 🇦🇺🤝🇬🇧 #CSG25 #AUKUS pic.twitter.com/0znRz5wU18
— UK Carrier Strike Group (@COMUKCSG) July 29, 2025
He said: 'Both nations operate the same short take-off/vertical landing version of the stealth jet, the B variant, although Japan has not flown the fifth-generation strike fighter for quite as long as the UK.'
Earlier in the deployment one of the stealth fighter jets was stranded at an airport in Kerala, India, after suffering mechanical issues.
After the week-long exercise with Japan, the carrier will continue with its visit to the country while some vessels from the UK task group will head to South Korea.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
UK flight delays: What rights do you have to compensation for cancelled flights?
Flights departing the UK could face days of disruption after a 'technical issue' at an air traffic control centre caused more than 150 cancellations on Wednesday (30 July). Travellers may be entitled to care while they wait – but not, as this was beyond the control of airlines, compensation. But your rights depend on where your flight begins and the airline involved. For all flights from the UK and EU airports (as well as those in the wider EEA), European air passengers' rights rules prevail. These were introduced in 2006 and are known as EC261. After Brexit, the UK copied and pasted the same regulations into British law as UK261. The rules were devised to require airlines to do the right thing for their passengers. They specify the care and compensation you can expect when your plane is cancelled or heavily delayed. These rules also apply for flights on EU and British airlines departing from outside the European Union and the UK. A cancellation, or even a delay of hours rather than minutes could trigger the obligation for an airline to provide a hotel room and meals as appropriate. If the airline is to blame it will also owe hundreds of pounds in cash. Conversely, when flying on a non-EU/UK carrier from outside Europe, you may just have to put a dismal aviation episode down to an expensive experience, and see if your travel insurer can help. These are the key questions and answers. In the UK and Europe, what can I expect if my flight is cancelled or delayed? For delays of under two hours you have no rights (unless a short delay in the UK triggers a missed connection and much later arrival at your final ticketed destination – see below). For longer delays, the airline should provide refreshments as appropriate after a specified length of time. This applies regardless of the cause of the delay. The time at which the duty of care kicks in depends on the distance you are flying: Note that if the airline believes providing the care would further delay the flight, it need not deliver. If the delay extends overnight, the airline is obliged to find and pay for a hotel room. In practice, carriers often say, 'too difficult', and invite the passenger to book their own and reclaim later. While this practice does not comply fully with the rules, aviation authorities tend to turn a blind eye to it. My flight from an airport outside the UK or EU is cancelled. What am I entitled to? If you are booked on a UK or EU airline you have full rights as above. On any other airline, you have none – though in practice a reputable airline will provide meals and accommodation as appropriate. Some travel insurance policies will help meet expenses that cannot be claimed back elsewhere, and may pay a modest amount of flight delay compensation. It's no longer worth going. Can I cancel and get my money back? If your flight is cancelled, and you decide not to travel, you should get money back within a week. Some airlines may offer a voucher instead. If there is a benefit in taking a voucher – say an 'uplift' in value of 25 per cent – and you know you will be using the same airline within a year, that might be a good decision. But easyJet, Britain's biggest budget airline, does not offer any benefit – insist on cash. How do I qualify for a cash payout? If you are flying from a UK/EU airport or on a British/ European airline and have your flight cancelled – or are delayed in arrival by at least three hours – the presumption is that you are owed hundreds of pounds in compensation. The payment depends on distance: Under 1,500km, for example London to Barcelona: £220 or €250 1,500-3,500km, such as Manchester- Lisbon: £350 or €400 Above 3,500km, eg Birmingham- Dubai: £520 or €600. If a long-haul arrival delay is between three and four hours, the compensation is halved. The only way the airline can avoid paying out is by demonstrating 'extraordinary circumstances' were responsible. Define 'extraordinary circumstances'? The rules provide only a partial answer: 'political instability, meteorological conditions incompatible with the operation of the flight concerned, security risks, unexpected flight safety shortcomings and strikes'. Court cases have gradually refined the concept of 'extraordinary circumstances' to exclude technical problems. In other words: if a mechanical failure caused the delay, you are due compensation. A judge ruled such issues are 'inherent in the normal exercise of the activity of the air carrier'. Official strikes by the airline's own staff are regarded as within the carrier's control, but oddly 'wildcat' walkouts not sanctioned by a trade union are not. Crew sickness is a grey area, with no legal certainty. Ryanair says: 'Only a small number of claims will be eligible for compensation. Most delays/cancellations are out of Ryanair's control.' How do I claim? Each airline should enable you to fill out an online form, but these are sometimes difficult to track down. The pages for three leading airlines are here: Compensation must be paid by bank transfer (or cheque), except if the airline obtains the prior signed agreement of the passenger to pay with vouchers for future travel. For example, an airline might offer a 30 per cent uplift if you accept vouchers that are valid for a year – so a choice between £350 in cash or £455-worth of flights. What if I have a justifiable claim but it is turned down? One course of action is alternative dispute resolution, but The Independent has serious reservations about some of the decisions of these arbiters. Writing a Letter Before Action – warning that you will go to Money Claim Online if you do not get a positive response within two weeks – is worth trying, so long as you follow through. For a £350 claim the fee is £50, which is refunded if you win. Since Brexit UK citizens no longer have access to the European Small Claims Procedure, so if you are chasing compensation on a flight originating in the EU it might be easiest to go through a claims handler. One such firm is AirHelp, but be warned that the company will keep between 35 and 50 per cent of any payout (the higher amount if court action is involved). My flight was an hour late departing, but I missed a tight connection If you arrive at your final ticketed destination three hours or more late, you are still in line for compensation – as long as the cause was down to the airline. For example, in 2018 I flew on British Airways from Heathrow to Moscow for an onward connection to Volgograd on the Russian airline S7. The plane was an hour late leaving London because of overrunning engineering work. I missed the connection in Moscow and arrived five hours behind schedule at Volgograd. BA paid delay compensation without a fuss; the issue of meals was easily solved because S7 sent me to the business lounge to wait. It is notable that in the CAA delay figures for 2023, almost all the airlines that are largely feeding 'hub' airports did better than the average: Air France, Emirates, KLM, Lufthansa and Qatar Airways all outplayed easyJet and Ryanair in getting planes away on time. They have a strong incentive for punctuality, with connections sometimes less than an hour and the penalty for messing up so high. Turkish Airlines is unique among the big network carriers with an average delay of 29 minutes, which must wreck a significant number of transfers.
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Air control boss hauled in for grilling from transport secretary amid calls for him to resign after airports chaos
The head of the UK's air traffic control firm has been called in for a meeting with the transport secretary after a fault left tens of thousands of summer holidaymakers facing grounded flights on Wednesday. Passengers across Europe were stranded during the peak holiday season when planes were cancelled and diverted – with some turning around mid-air to return to their departure cities – because of a 20 minute glitch. And Heidi Alexander has called an urgent meeting with National Air Traffic Services (NATS) boss Martin Rolfe to discuss his handling of the chaos. Ms Alexander said the meeting will help her 'understand what happened and how we can prevent reoccurrence'. It comes after Heathrow, Gatwick, London City, Birmingham, Edinburgh and Manchester airports were among the airports hit by the outage that left many aircraft and flight crew out of position. Take-offs for thousands of passengers were cancelled because inbound flights had turned back. In some cases, travellers were held on planes on the tarmac with no news of when their flight might take off. The disruption, which began just after 4pm on Wednesday, was down to a 'technical issue' at the control centre of ATC provider Nats in Swanwick, Hampshire, the company said. It is understood NATS systems were down for around 20 minutes, with the company issuing an apology to all those affected by the issue. Flight analytics experts Cirium said that by 5.30pm, 80 flights to and from the UK had been cancelled. Government sources suggested Ms Alexander will not ask Mr Rolfe to resign, with one saying officials were concerned, but that disruption was limited and flights had largely returned to normal by the end of the day. But Ryanair immediately called for Mr Rolfe to resign over the chaos caused by the failure. Chief commercial officer Neal McMahon said he should quit and that, if he does not, Ms Alexander must remove him from his post. He said: 'It is outrageous that passengers are once again being hit with delays and disruption due to Martin Rolfe's continued mismanagement of Nats. 'Yet another ATC system failure has resulted in the closure of UK airspace meaning thousands of passengers' travel plans have been disrupted. It is clear that no lessons have been learned since the August 2023 Nats system outage, and passengers continue to suffer as a result of Martin Rolfe's incompetence.' The airline said Mr Rolfe is 'out of his depth and must step aside to make way for someone who can do the job properly'. Business minister Gareth Thomas was on Thursday asked whether Mr Rolfe will be "fired" over the incident. He told Times Radio: "The transport secretary is summoning the chief executive of Nats to help us get to the bottom of what went wrong yesterday. "Clearly, an incident happened two years ago and measures were taken then. "It looks like those measures weren't enough but we need to get to the bottom of what exactly happened, and conversations will take place today." A former industry chief has said that it is "unrealistic" to expect an air traffic management system where there is no technical failure. Graham Lake, former director-general of air traffic management industry association Canso, told the BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "If you look at the minutes of outage over a period of years, your availability - system availability - is, frankly, very, very good. So, I think it's unrealistic to expect a system where you have no technical failure." He added: "The failure yesterday was short and sweet, if you like, the recovery was quick - aircraft were operating again very, very quickly." And Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey called for an urgent investigation into NATS to ensure the system is fit for purpose.
The Independent
2 minutes ago
- The Independent
Lenders encouraged to improve digital processes to help borrowers' understanding
People looking to borrow digitally could be at risk of bypassing important information if lenders' online and in-app processes are not designed well enough, the regulator has said. Lenders are being encouraged by the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) to consider how their digital processes can help prospective borrowers understand what they are signing up for. The FCA has shared examples of good and poor practice with lenders. It found that some were using shorter, simplified language and providing 'explainer' videos that helped customer understanding. However, the design of some digital loan processes lacked 'positive friction', the regulator said. Even though some digital processes are designed to be quick, firms can consider the appropriate amount of friction required, the regulator said, so customers have the opportunity to read and understand the information provided. Firms may have access to data that indicates customers are advancing through applications too quickly and not accessing key information, features or help, the regulator said. Under the Consumer Duty, the FCA expects firms to understand the needs, characteristics and objectives of their customers, and this should inform how products are designed and how customers will interact with them. Firms can identify customers with characteristics of vulnerability and those requiring additional support through digital channels. They can also review the effectiveness of the support available, the regulator said. Alison Walters, director of consumer finance at the FCA, said: 'Online and app-based applications can make it easier for people to get the credit they need to navigate their financial lives. 'But poorly designed applications could mean people bypass important information. We're sharing examples of what works and what doesn't, so lenders can better support their customers.'
