logo
Is a River Alive? by Robert Macfarlane review

Is a River Alive? by Robert Macfarlane review

The Guardian28-04-2025

Tracking a river through a cedar forest in Ecuador, Robert Macfarlane comes to a 30ft-high waterfall and, below it, a wide pool. It's irresistible: he plunges in. The water under the falls is turbulent, a thousand little fists punching his shoulders. He's exhilarated. No one could mistake this for a 'dying' river, sluggish or polluted. But that thought sparks others: 'Is this thing I'm in really alive? By whose standards? By what proof? As for speaking to or for a river, or comprehending what a river wants – well, where would you even start?'
He's in the right place to be asking. In September 2008, Ecuador, 'this small country with a vast moral imagination', became the first nation in the world to legislate on behalf of water, 'since its condition as an essential element for life makes it a necessary aspect for existence of all living beings'. This enshrinement of the Rights of Nature set off similar developments in other countries. In 2017, a law was passed in New Zealand that afforded the Whanganui River protection as a 'spiritual and physical entity'. In India, five days later, judges ruled that the Ganges and Yamuna should be recognised as 'living entities'. And in 2021, the Mutehekau Shipu (AKA Magpie River) became the first river in Canada to be declared a 'legal person [and] living entity'. The Rights of Nature movement has now reached the UK, with Lewes council in East Sussex recognising the rights and legal personhood of the River Ouse.
Macfarlane's book is timely. Rivers are in crisis worldwide. They have been dammed, poisoned, reduced to servitude, erased from the map. In the UK, 'a gradual, desperate calamity' has befallen them, with annual sewage dumps (recorded by a tracker called Top of the Poops) at despicable levels. 'Generational amnesia' means that young people don't know what clean rivers are. Macfarlane wants them to revive – and to remind us of the interconnectedness of the human and natural world, as captured in a Māori proverb: 'I am the river; the river is me.'
Many Indigenous communities believe that rivers are conscious, with souls, intelligence, even memory. Macfarlane is less a philosopher wrestling with notions of sentience and pan-psychism than he is a nature writer, the author of memorable books about mountains, landscape and underworlds, as well as a celebrant of words (acorn, bluebell, kingfisher, otter, etc) he fears children no longer know. He's also a dauntless traveller and in his new book records trips to India and Canada as well as Ecuador. To the question 'Is a river alive?' he wants to answer as simply and resoundingly as his nine-year-old son did: yes! And he wills himself to believe it by granting rivers human pronouns: instead of which or that, 'I prefer to speak of rivers who flow'. But it's a long journey, with many challenges along the way.
He begins with a modest outing, to the springs near his home in Cambridge which, in the summer of 2022, the hottest on record, have all but dried up. He'll see what a dead river looks like in southern India but in Ecuador's cloud forest, Los Cedros, it's a happier story: here's water saved from 'pollutocrats' by Ecuador's progressive constitution. But not all is as secure as it ought to be. Andean forests and rivers have been wrecked by logging, farming and mining. And a young anti-mining activist, five months pregnant, has just been shot dead in the north of Ecuador.
Macfarlane, at least, is among allies. He meets eco-centric lawyers as well as a shambling, bearded castaway, Josef DeCoux, who has fought to protect the river and cloud forest for decades. He's awed by their tireless resistance to corporate profiteering and feels companioned by the forest: 'Lushness beyond imagination. Greenness beyond measure.'
His prose aspires to poetry throughout. Fireflies 'score the dark like slow tracer bullets'. Flamingos 'stand in their own reflections, doubled like playing-card queens, blushing the water pink'. Glow-worms 'put tapers on their yellow lantern'. Shooting stars are 'scratches on the world's tin'. A half moon is a 'clipped coin'. He so rarely falters in his 'love-language' for the natural world that when he describes the sun, near Chennai, 'rising red as a Coke can over the ocean' it feels bathetic. But bathos is the point: along with plastic bottles, turds and effluents, the Coke can is emblematic of a polluted coastline.
Chennai is the most dispiriting of Macfarlane's visits. The River Adyar, reeking and sewage-stricken, is 'as close to death as any river I have seen in my life'. And the Ennore Creek, a site of heavy industry, hasn't just been infilled, built over and surrendered to heavy industry, but has been erased from the official government map, as if it didn't exist: annihilation cartography. Amid the toxins, hope for rivers is hard to find.
He is cheered by a trip to a lakeside waterbird sanctuary ('an avian Venice') and by rescuing turtle eggs on a beach. Still, here and elsewhere doubts creep in. He's a researcher, not an animist (the book has 50 pages of notes). Are Rights of Nature 'an over-enchanted dream'? How compatible is the 'stiff discourse'' of rights with a dashing, quicksilver river? 'For those who, like me, have been largely raised on rationalism, to imagine a river is alive in a way that exceeds the sum of the lives it contains is difficult, counterintuitive work,' he says. 'It requires unlearning, a process much harder than learning.'
Sign up to Inside Saturday
The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend.
after newsletter promotion
The unlearning comes in a remote region of Quebec when, before his epic 100-mile journey trekking and kayaking downstream, he's instructed by Rita, an Innu poet, activist and sage: 'Don't think too much with your head … You will be transported by the river – who will speak through you.' So it does. When he and his companions go over scary rapids it's as if he's been 'flooded from within', the river flowing through him, a process mirrored in the prose, which rushes in long, ecstatic paragraphs that allow themselves commas but resist full stops. The river is under threat from damming but Macfarlane himself is released, surrendering agency to the water, pantheistically enraptured by 'some vast and unknowable other life-way'.
'The river has great wisdom and whispers its secrets to the hearts of men,' Mark Twain said. It's not just Macfarlane who bears this out but the three people he spends most time with on his travels: the eerily intuitive mycologist Giuliana in Ecuador, the geomancer Wayne in Canada and the ecologist Yuvan in India with his 'ductile, fast-flowing mind'. All are grieving when they begin their journeys after the death of someone they loved. But the river consoles and even heals them: 'I felt my power return,' Giuliana says.
Here's another reason to fight for the Rights of Nature – not just to save rivers and forests, but to save ourselves. 'The tale of a dying river / Does not end where you stand with the visitors / at a sickbed,' Ted Hughes wrote in his poetry collection River, four decades ago. The battle is to save rivers as living beings. Macfarlane's impassioned book shows the way, ending on a riskily lyrical high with his arrival as a waterbody complete: 'I am rivered.'
Is a River Alive? by Robert Macfarlane is published by Hamish Hamilton (£25). To support the Guardian, order your copy at guardianbookshop.com. Delivery charges may apply.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

New Zealand MP trio handed record suspensions over haka protest
New Zealand MP trio handed record suspensions over haka protest

The Independent

timea day ago

  • The Independent

New Zealand MP trio handed record suspensions over haka protest

New Zealand 's parliament temporarily barred three Māori MPs for performing the haka to protest a controversial law, resulting in record suspensions for Rawiri Waititi, Debbie Ngarewa-Packer, and Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke. The suspensions, the longest in the country's history, were criticised by the suspended MPs, who declared that "Māori would not be silenced," and by the Labour party, which called the decision inconsistent with New Zealand's democracy. The MPs performed the haka in parliament in November before a vote on a bill that would have reinterpreted the 185-year-old Treaty of Waitangi, with video of the protest going viral. Hana-Rāwhiti Maipi-Clarke criticised the suspension as an effort to silence the Māori in parliament. Judith Collins, the committee chair, defended the decision, stating it was about following parliamentary rules.

Māori lawmakers suspended over protest haka performed in New Zealand Parliament
Māori lawmakers suspended over protest haka performed in New Zealand Parliament

NBC News

time2 days ago

  • NBC News

Māori lawmakers suspended over protest haka performed in New Zealand Parliament

Three Māori lawmakers in New Zealand received record suspensions of up to three weeks on Thursday, local media reported, over a protest haka they performed in Parliament last year against a contentious bill. The lawmakers drew global attention in November when they performed the haka, a ceremonial chanting dance of defiance that is a cherished cultural symbol of New Zealand. They were protesting legislation that would have reinterpreted the country's 184-year-old founding document, a treaty that was signed between colonial British rulers and Indigenous Māori. A parliamentary committee found the three lawmakers in contempt of parliament last month and recommended that they be suspended for up to three weeks 'for acting in a manner that could have the effect of intimidating a member of the House.' Debbie Ngarewa-Packer and Rawiri Waititi, co-leaders of Te Pāti Māori, the Māori party, which holds six of Parliament's 123 seats, were suspended for three weeks each. Hana-Rawhiti Maipi-Clarke, who at 22 is New Zealand's youngest legislator, was suspended for one week on the recommendation of the committee, which said in its report that she had demonstrated 'some level of contrition' in her written statement. It is rare for New Zealand lawmakers to receive such suspensions, which are unpaid, and the longest anyone had previously been suspended was three days. The opposition Labour Party as well as the Green Party criticized the suspensions as disproportionate, with the Labour Party proposing censure instead. The three lawmakers performed the protest haka in November during the reading of a bill that would have redefined the Treaty of Waitangi. Signed in 1840 between the British Crown and Māori chiefs, the treaty established British governance and structures to protect Māori rights and continues to influence policy today. The legislation was brought by the small libertarian party ACT New Zealand, which said the treaty had been misinterpreted to give Māori people special treatment. Critics of the bill, which was defeated in April, said it would undo decades of progress for Māori, who make up about 20% of New Zealand's 5 million people and fare worse than the rest of the population in health, education and the criminal justice system. One of the Māori lawmakers, Maipi-Clarke, led the haka by tearing up a copy of the bill, joined by other Māori members and some visitors in the public gallery. Video of the protest went viral and gathered hundreds of millions of views across social media. Some lawmakers objected to the way their Māori colleagues advanced toward them across the floor. 'This was a very serious incident, the likes of which I have never seen before in my 23 years in the debating chamber,' said Judith Collins of the center-right National Party, chair of the parliamentary committee that issued the report. She added that the lawmakers had performed the haka without permission and that the disruption had suspended legislative proceedings for 30 minutes. The three Māori lawmakers declined to appear before the committee during its investigation, citing disrespect for their cultural traditions. Their party said the way it was being conducted was 'grossly unjust' and that 'this was not about process, this became personal.' The committee said the lawmakers were being sanctioned not for performing the haka, but for 'the time at and manner in which it was performed.' It said the severity of the sanctions was intended to 'leave members in no doubt that the behavior discussed is not acceptable.' The vote had originally been scheduled for last month but was postponed so that the three Māori lawmakers could participate in debate over the federal budget. Performing haka in Parliament is not uncommon, and is typically seen when Māori members celebrate the passage of a particular bill. The dance is known abroad for being performed at matches by New Zealand's rugby teams, and variations of it are also performed at funerals and formal welcomes. 'It would have been clearly understood by everyone in the parliament that this was a peaceful act of protest done in a way that aligns with Māori tradition,' said Julian Rawiri Kusabs, a Māori historian and researcher at the University of Melbourne in Australia. Kusabs said the suspension was a setback in decades of reconciliation efforts between the New Zealand government and Māori communities, whose members have had to navigate 'a highly complex and frequently painful relationship' even to achieve representation in Parliament. The suspension, he said, reinforces the longstanding perception that 'Māori culture is not equally respected within New Zealand's formal institutions of governance.'

Indigenous leader Warren Mundine slams disgusting piece of 'artwork' that urges people to walk on the flag
Indigenous leader Warren Mundine slams disgusting piece of 'artwork' that urges people to walk on the flag

Daily Mail​

time6 days ago

  • Daily Mail​

Indigenous leader Warren Mundine slams disgusting piece of 'artwork' that urges people to walk on the flag

A New Zealand flag printed with the words 'please walk on me' and laid on the floor of an art gallery has once again been packed away following public outcry, 30 years after protests forced the removal of the same artwork. The Suter Art Gallery in the city of Nelson said Thursday it had taken down the work by Māori artist Diane Prince due to escalating tensions and safety fears. The episode mirrored an Auckland gallery's removal of the work amid public backlash and complaints to law enforcement in 1995. This time, the flag was meant to remain on display for five months. Instead, it lasted just 19 days, reigniting long-running debates in New Zealand over artistic expression, national symbols and the country's colonial history. Police said that officers were investigating 'several' complaints about the exhibition. The piece, titled Flagging the Future, is a cloth New Zealand flag displayed on the floor with the words 'please walk on me' stenciled across it. The flag features the British Union Jack and red stars on a blue background. The work was part of an exhibition, Diane Prince: Activist Artist, and was meant to provoke reflection on the Māori experience since New Zealand's colonization by Britain in the 19th century. Prince created the piece in 1995 in response to a government policy that limited compensation to Māori tribes for historical land theft. 'I have no attachment to the New Zealand flag,' Prince told Radio New Zealand in 2024. 'I don't call myself a New Zealander. I call myself a Māori.' New Zealand's reckoning with its colonial past has gathered pace in recent decades. But there has been little appetite among successive governments to sever the country's remaining constitutional ties to Britain or change the flag to a design that doesn't feature the Union Jack. Warren Mundine said the artwork made no sense especially since New Zealanders had already voted against changing their flag in 2015. 'Like the Voice Campaign in Australia, New Zealand actually voted on their flag,' Mr Mundine told Sky News Australia. 'The vast majority of New Zealanders - all supported the flag. 'This is not going to fix race relations in New Zealand.' 'Some artist is just having a brain explosion.' New Zealand is among countries where desecrating the national flag is considered taboo and prohibited by law. Damaging a flag in public with intent to dishonor it is punishable by a fine of up to $5,000 New Zealand dollars, but prosecutions are fleetingly rare. The country's flag is synonymous for some with military service. But for others, particularly some Māori, it's a reminder of land dispossession, and loss of culture and identity. A veterans' group also denounced the piece as 'shameful' and 'offensive.' City council member Tim Skinner said he was 'horrified' by the work's inclusion. But others welcomed it. Nelson's deputy mayor, Rohan O'Neill-Stevens, posted on social media 'in strong defense of artistic expression and the right for us all to be challenged and confronted by art.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store