Footballers play with Franco head at Spain art festival
The experimental "Ex Abrupto" art festival pitted two teams against each other for a self-styled "anti-fascist fixture" in Moia, around 50 kilometres (31 miles) north of Barcelona.
The choice of pitch was also highly symbolic, close to former trenches used by the defeated republican side in the 1936-1939 civil war that brought Franco to power after his coup.
The recreated hyper-realistic head was fashioned by the Indecline group and Eugenio Merino, an artist whose work has tackled Franco and the right-wing dictatorship on several occasions.
He attracted attention more than a decade ago with "Always Franco", a life-sized representation of the general in a refrigerator that sparked an uproar at Madrid's ARCO art festival in 2012.
Merino courted controversy again with "Punching Franco", a work that used the dictator's head as a punching ball.
The Francisco Franco Foundation, which works to promote the late dictator's legacy, lodged complaints against both works that were rejected by the courts.
Merino used the same mould for the resin and silicone-covered head which was the protagonist of Thursday's match.
"It's the 50th anniversary of Franco's death and I thought it was necessary to commemorate" it, Merino told local radio RAC 1.
"We recover that idea of the people that plays and enjoys, and we also recover the idea of anti-fascism."
The game, which only allowed limited spectator numbers, was recorded for broadcast on Friday and Saturday in a bar in Moia, while the head can be visited in a local museum.
Merino and Indecline had already teamed up to send political messages, using the recreated head of Donald Trump to play football at the wall on the US-Mexico border and one of Brazil's rightist former president Jair Bolsonaro.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Local France
6 hours ago
- Local France
OPINION: France's 'block everything' movement is reminiscent of the rise of the Yellow Vests
How France loves to caricature itself. In July the Prime Minister asked the country to work harder to pay off its debts. Response? The threat of a nationwide sulk - a sulk, not a strike - from September 10th when everyone is urged to stay at home. No work; no shopping; no school; no fun. In its more extreme form, the Bloquons-tout (block everything) movement calls for an open-ended, popular lie-in starting on the second Wednesday in September. READ ALSO : What do we know about the call to 'blockade France' on September 10th?✎ 'We are shutting up shop. We refuse to produce, to consume, to run, to serve…when the country is brought to a halt, the real power will appear. It is in our hands.' Advertisement The first demand of the more radical 'Bloquers' is to be paid by the state for staying in bed indefinitely. Others, less ambitious, seem to envisage only a one-day protest. The movement began in May in a Far Right, anti-EU, anti-Macron, pro-Russian account on social media. It has since spread to elements of the extreme Left. The online popularity of the idea has exploded since the Prime Minister François Bayrou called last month for radical action to reduce France's runaway budget deficit. He has proposed €44 billion in spending cuts and increased taxes in 2026 but most of the popular anger is directed at his vague plan to abolish two out of the eleven French bank holidays . The block-the-country movement is reminiscent of the rise of the Gilets Jaunes (yellow vests), the anti-Macron and anti-politics revolt which began in rural and outer suburban France in 2018. Like the GJs, the protest has incubated on social media. Like the GJs, the blockers reject all leaders, political parties and trades unions. Some of those involved appear to be ex- Gilets Jaunes . Other former GJs are dubious or hostile, suspecting that the 'blockers' are not as non-political as they claim. Unlike the yellow-vests, the movement does not favour public demonstrations or blockages of streets and roundabouts. It believes that the people should arise by doing nothing. Apart from being paid to stay at home, the demands of the movement are vague. Like the yellow vests, they want all political decisions to be made by online referenda. They want higher pay for all. Some of the block-all accounts reject big business, echoing the anarcho-Left. Other accounts attack the EU and migration, copying the Far Right. The only political party to support the September 10th movement so far is Jean-Luc Mélenchon's Far Left La France Insoumise (France Unbowed). Mélenchon has rarely seen a protest that he does not like. He refuses to accept that this one began on the Far Right which he claims to abhor. Marine Le Pen's Far Right Rassemblement National is observing events cautiously. Some of her party barons say that the anti-state rhetoric of the movement is more reminiscent of the Far Left, than the nationalist right. They will no doubt attempt to hijack the protests if they are successful - just as they tried and failed to hijack the Gilets Jaunes . Advertisement How seriously should the sleep-in revolt be taken? It seems to have all the weaknesses of the yellow vests and none of the strengths. Because the Gilets Jaunes mistrusted leaders, they squandered their initial success. An apolitical rural-suburban movement was eventually taken over by the urban, alternative Left. The yellow vests' initial power came from the fact that they were a social club as well as a social movement. Blocking roundabouts while grilling sausages with the neighbours or with strangers was fun. The 'blockers' plan to stage a revolution at home is unlikely to generate the same camaraderie or excitement. Initial soundings by the French security services, reported in the French media, suggest that the movement's numbers are growing fast but they are not exploding as the online support for the Gilets Jaunes did in the summer of 2018. Pro-blockage sites are popping up on Facebook, TikTok, X, and Instagram. Support is now in the tens of thousands but not the hundreds of thousands, as it was for the yellow vests. And yet… Advertisement Many mainstream commentators, myself included, were doubtful about the strength and staying power of the Gilets Jaunes in 2018. They lasted, in diminished form, until the Covid pandemic of early 2020. For a few weeks in 2018-9, they threatened to overturn French politics-as-usual. Whatever the success or failure of the mass sleep-in from September 10th, the rise of the blockers is a reminder that conventional French public life has become dangerously fragile. Prime Minister Bayrou is a man who believes that he understands the public mood. He appealed to the people over the heads of politicians and parties last month to wake up to the dangers of an accumulated debt of 114 percent of GDP. The most notable response so far has been an appeal by the people to the people to stay in bed.
Euronews
a day ago
- Euronews
BHP and Rio Tinto bosses lobby at White House for copper mine
US President Donald Trump welcomed Rio Tinto CEO Jakob Stausholm and incoming CEO Simon Trott, as well as BHP CEO Mike Henry, to the Oval Office on Tuesday to discuss the developments around a vast copper mine project called Resolution Copper. This came a day after the opponents succeeded in temporarily blocking the project. The president called opponents of a huge copper mine in Arizona 'radical left activists' in a social media post after the meeting. The project — a joint venture owned by international mining giants Rio Tinto and BHP — is set to be one of the biggest copper mines in North America. President Trump has emphasised the need for more copper production in the US, as the versatile metal is important for the country's mineral security. Copper is key to the energy transition and has many uses, remaining an essential component of electrical circuits, as well as defence and technology products. The two international mining giants teamed up to develop Resolution Copper after the deposit was discovered two decades ago. However, Native American tribes and environmentalists have been fighting fiercely ever since, citing religious, cultural and environmental concerns. After a series of court cases and environmental studies, the companies were set to take over the federal forest land in Arizona on Tuesday when a US appeals court temporarily blocked the transfer, delaying the mining. The US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary injunction late on Monday in response to last-minute appeals by a Native American tribe and environmentalists. The land includes Oak Flat — an area used for centuries for religious ceremonies, prayer and gathering of medicinal plants by the San Carlos Apache people and other Native American tribes. The tribe celebrated the pause. President Donald Trump, however, called the opponents 'Anti-American, and representing other copper competitive countries,' in his post on Truth Social. He also stated that delaying the project would affect thousands of jobs. A press release from Resolution Copper stated that the companies view this as 'merely a temporary pause". The statement added: 'We are confident the court will ultimately affirm the district court's well-reasoned orders explaining in detail why the congressionally directed land exchange satisfies all applicable legal requirements.' Mike Henry, CEO of BHP, said in a social media post that the project 'will create thousands of high-value local jobs in Arizona and billions in economic activity across America'. An earlier estimate from Resolution Copper stated that the mine would generate $1 billion (€860 million) a year for Arizona's economy and create thousands of jobs. A brief history of opposing Resolution Copper The fight over Oak Flat has spanned two decades, with the latest legal wrangling centred on a required environmental review that was released by the US Forest Service earlier this summer and an appraisal of the land to be mined by Resolution Copper about 60 miles (96 kilometres) east of Phoenix. Before the land exchange can happen, the plaintiffs argued that the federal government must prepare a comprehensive review that covers "every aspect of the planned mine and all related infrastructure". They said the government failed to consider the potential for a dam breach, pipeline failure and if there was an emergency plan for a tailings storage area. As for the appraisal, they said it did not account for the value of the copper deposits that are at least 5,000 feet (1,500 metres) below the surface. The appeals court plans to hear arguments on the merits of the case later this year, but no date has been announced yet. "This injunction comes in a desperate time of asking for miracles, all over the country and all over the world," Wendsler Nosie Sr. of the group Apache Stronghold said in a statement shared on social media. Resolution Copper has said the project underwent an extensive review by the US Forest Service that has included consultation with tribes that have ancestral ties to the land. "The collaborative process has directly led to major changes to the mining plan to preserve and reduce potential impacts on tribal, social, environmental and cultural interests," the company stated. The Forest Service has argued in court filings that it has no discretion because the land exchange was mandated by Congress when language was included in a must-pass national defence spending bill that was signed into law in 2014 by then-President Barack Obama. There have been unsuccessful legislative attempts in the years since to withdraw the Oak Flat area from mining activity.
Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
No, Trump didn't slam Irish government over immigration
A false video is circulating on social media that purportedly shows United States President Donald Trump berating the Irish government for its immigration policy. The video appears to show Trump blasting Taoiseach (Prime Minister) Micheál Martin and Tánaiste (Deputy Prime Minister) Simon Harris as "weak and useless leaders", who have supposedly allowed their country to be invaded by criminals. The speech contains a rambling, xenophobic tirade against the pair and their government, with Trump even appearing to call their actions "evil". "I will punish, humiliate and belittle you, for your sick globalist and woke ideology, anti-Irish agenda, you who say Irish identity, sovereignty and culture is backwards," Trump apparently says in the video. It has been shared thousands of times on Facebook, but the speech never happened. The footage of the press conference itself is real. It can be traced back using a reverse image search to a legitimate announcement by Trump about Apple's $600 billion (€513 billion) investment in the US. However, in the false video, Trump's voice appears to be AI-generated—it sounds robotic and doesn't sync with his lip movements. While the voice does bear a likeness to that of Trump, the speech pattern is stilted with numerous unnatural pauses and cadence. Nowhere in the real speech did Trump mention Ireland, Martin or Harris. The fake speech, however, is riddled with misinformation about immigration in Ireland, such as false claims about social housing being given to asylum seekers over Irish citizens. In reality, asylum applicants are placed in a separate system from social housing. This is known as the International Protection Accommodation Service (IPAS), which provides accommodation and other basic support to people applying for international protection. If they are permitted to remain, they can apply for social housing on the same basis as an Irish citizen. There is no special priority, and they must meet the same eligibility criteria.
