
Burns Bair Successfully Argues Class Certification Appeal in Prison Guard Wage Loss Claim in Wisconsin Supreme Court
MADISON, Wis.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--The Wisconsin Supreme Court issued a decision this week affirming that correctional officers at state penitentiaries can pursue class action litigation against the state prison system and seek additional compensation for their pre- and post-shift work.
The ruling overturns an earlier appellate court decision and now allows an estimated 5,000 Wisconsin correctional officers to pursue their wage-and-hour disputes on a class-wide basis.
Share
The ruling overturns an earlier appellate court decision and now allows an estimated 5,000 Wisconsin correctional officers to pursue their wage-and-hour disputes on a class-wide basis.
In overturning the Court of Appeals, the often-divided Wisconsin Supreme Court unanimously rejected the Court of Appeals' attempted expansion of United States Supreme Court's 'rigorous analysis' test relating to class certification, with both the majority and the concurring dissenters agreeing that class certification does not require a showing that the plaintiffs will prevail on the merits.
Tim Burns of Madison-based Burns Bair LLP, who argued the case before the Court, noted that he was deeply honored to have been asked to argue the case in the Supreme Court by Court-appointed Class Counsel, Burger Law, Cuneo Gilbert and LaDuca, and DiCello Levitt.
'Every Wisconsin resident should recognize that these men and women are providing essential and thankless service under trying conditions and deserve to be paid for the time they are in this dangerous environment,' said Mr. Burns. Mr. Burns ran for election to the Wisconsin Supreme Court in 2018 and this was his first argument before the Court since his race.
The claims were originally brought by Nicole McDaniel and Matthew Davis, employees of detention facilities in Boscobel and Oshkosh, respectively, seeking additional pay for everyday tasks that extend past strict eight-hour work shifts. For example, all officers at the state's 20 prisons are required to receive and provide briefings on events and security concerns, and these mandatory meetings occur outside of their normal, compensable shifts.
According to Mr. Burns, federal and state courts across the nation – including multiple appellate courts – have concluded that security screenings and correctional officers' other pre- and post-shift work are fundamentally integral to their jobs and as a result are compensable.
The proposed class action is now remanded to the Milwaukee County Circuit Court for further deliberation and a trial, should that become necessary.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

3 hours ago
Reeling from Trump rebukes, Europe weighs deeper ties with China
BARCELONA, Spain -- Jilted, betrayed, dumped, or defiant. It's hard to describe the European Union after relentless attacks from its once-dependable ally, the United States. The threat from Donald Trump's second administration against Greenland, its sweeping tariff plans and courtship of Moscow have firmed up some European leaders' vows to reduce their reliance on America. That has not gone unnoticed in another global power. China hopes for a Europe detached from the U.S. and is sensing an opportunity now to divide the West. For the past several years, the EU moved in lockstep with Washington to levy tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and sanction Chinese officials accused of rights violations. Now, locked in a trade war with Washington that may be prolonged, Beijing sees the 27-nation bloc as a desirable partner in blunting the impact from Trump's tariffs and to maintain its strong global position. But for EU leaders, meeting Thursday in Brussels to discuss China among a host of regional and global issues, managing ties with Beijing is no easy matter. An upcoming summit in China in July to mark 50 years of ties might offer the first hint of new consensus between these two global behemoths. The EU-China economic ties are hefty: bilateral trade is estimated at 2.3 billion euros ($2.7 billion) per day. China is the EU's second largest trading partner in goods, after the United States. Both China and the EU believe it is in their interest to keep their trade ties stable for the sake of the global economy, and they share certain climate goals. Like the U.S., Europe runs a massive trade deficit with China: around 300 billion euros last year. It relies heavily on China for critical minerals, which are also used to make magnets used in cars and appliances. As European companies are seeing declining profitability in China, Brussels is hoping Beijing will follow through on recent pledges, like one announced Thursday by the Ministry of Commerce, to ease restrictions on foreign business ventures. 'While other opened their market, China focused undercutting intellectual property protections, massive subsidies with the aim to dominate global manufacturing and supply chains,' said EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen at the G7 meeting in Canada. 'This is not market competition – it is distortion with intent." Now, Europe, already fretting over the trade deficit, worries that Trump's tariffs could divert even more Chinese goods to Europe, destabilizing markets across the continent. Such vulnerabilities could strengthen Beijing's negotiating position, said Alicia Garcia-Herrero, a China analyst with the Brussels-based Bruegel think tank. 'China has built so many strategic dependencies that the EU is trapped in an asymmetric relationship,' she said, and Beijing could leverage them to 'get a deal in July" at the summit. Analysts don't expect a grand bargain at the summit, but China will likely demand the EU lift tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles or even reopen the bilateral trade treaty, the Comprehensive Agreement on Investment. Either or both would send a powerful signal to Washington. But China's main goal is ensuring the EU remains an accessible and affluent market for goods that might not reach the U.S. because of Trump's tariff blitzkrieg. Despite a truce in the trade war, Chinese businesses are widening their global reach to be less dependent on the U.S. Regardless of any deal, the summit itself will be the message, said Noah Barkin, an analyst of Europe-China relations at the German Marshall Fund think tank. For the EU, the main goal would be for von der Leyen to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping, he said. Whereas she was 'treated rather shabbily' on a 2023 trip to Beijing, Barkin said the Chinese this time will probably 'roll out the red carpet," keen to see 'pictures of Chinese and European leaders walking through gardens and sending a message of unity.' Sun Chenghao, head of the U.S.-EU program at Tsinghua University's Center for International Security and Strategy, expressed hope 'that the future of China-Europe relations can be more independent on both sides.' 'For Europe, that would mean shaping its China policy based on its own interests, rather than simply taking sides,' Sun told the German Marshall Fund in a podcast. 'And for China, this means building a more independent and nuanced approach to Europe.' 'It is precisely because most European decision-makers realize the necessity of strategic autonomy that they have made it clear that they must strengthen cooperation with China," said Yan Xuetong, dean of the Institute of International Relations at Tsinghua University, to The Paper, a Shanghai-based news site. "Even if China and Europe have differences on the Ukraine issue, there is still room for expanding cooperation in areas beyond the differences.' China's deepening ties with its historic allies in Europe like Hungary and Greece stand alongside fears across the continent about its human rights record, espionage, trade policies, military buildup and support for Russia. European police arrested employees of the Chinese tech giant Huawei during an ongoing bribery investigation in Brussels. Czech intelligence services have claimed Beijing directed cyberattacks on its critical infrastructure. And the EU's criticisms of China's human rights violations remain unabated. Russia's invasion of Ukraine has further disaffected Europe from China. Despite Beijing's claims of neutrality, Europe largely sees China as complicit in, if not covertly supporting Russia's war machine. The EU recently cancelled a high-level economic and trade dialogue with China, due to a lack of progress on trade disputes. It also has moved to restrict Chinese participation in EU medical devices procurement. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has called out Spain for its courtship of China, warning that countries seeking to get closer to China would be 'cutting their own throat' because Chinese factories will be looking to dump goods that they can't ship to the U.S. By decoupling their positions on China, analysts say both Brussels and Washington have weaker hands dealing with Beijing. And that might hurt the U.S., which has vowed to prevail over China and retain its global dominance but, as many believe, needs help from its allies and partners. 'If we could just get Japan and the EU and the U.S. together on any issue, ... we could outweigh the Chinese at the negotiating table,' said Nick Burns, the U.S. ambassador to China in the Biden administration. 'President Trump, I think, because of his inattention to our allies and maybe even worse, his sometimes just acrimonious behaviors towards allies, has given away that leverage.' Joerg Wuttke, former president of the EU Chamber of Commerce in China and now a partner at DGA-Albright Stonebridge Group in Washington, argued that the fundamentals underlining EU-China relations have not changed as long as China does not take genuine steps to open its market and that the EU remains 'geared towards' the U.S., though he described Washington as a 'major backdrop noise.' 'We are not allies. We are trading partners,' Wuttke said of EU and China. 'And, so from my point of view is, what is there to worry for the United States?'


Newsweek
3 hours ago
- Newsweek
Samuel Alito Accuses Supreme Court of Ignoring Congress—'Indefensible'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Justice Samuel Alito said the Supreme Court ignored Congress's intention in its ruling on retroactive relief under the First Step Act on Thursday. "Instead, the Court embraces an interpretation that has no limiting principle and affords petitioners a windfall," Alito wrote in his dissent. "That is an indefensible result based on indefensible reasoning. I cannot agree with the Court's decision, so I must respectfully dissent." Justices Clarence Thomas, Brett Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett joined Alito's dissent. Why It Matters The case centers on the First Step Act, a 2018 law aimed at reforming federal prisons and sentencing laws. The legislation included more lenient sentencing guidelines for individuals who possess a firearm while committing other crimes. The law retroactively applies to an eligible offender whose sentence "has not been imposed." The Court majority ruled that any offender who appears before the court for sentencing since the First Step Act was enacted is subject to the new guidelines under the law, including offenders who are being resentenced. Justice Samuel Alito joins other members of the Supreme Court as they pose for a group portrait on October 7, 2022. Justice Samuel Alito joins other members of the Supreme Court as they pose for a group portrait on October 7, 2022. AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File What To Know In 2009, Tony Hewitt, Corey Duffey and Jarvis Ross were convicted of multiple counts of bank robbery and conspiracy to commit bank robbery, along with use of a firearm during a crime of violence. They were each sentenced to five years for their first use of a firearm offense, and 25 years for each count beyond their first. In total, they each received a sentence exceeding 325 years. Roughly 25 years of that sentence were due to robbery-related charges. A district court vacated the sentences and some convictions after the enactment of the First Step Act. At resentencing, Hewitt, Duffey and Ross argued that the more lenient penalties under the new legislation apply. Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson wrote the Court's majority opinion, except for parts four and five, which Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Neil Gorsuch did not join. She said the law indicates that "only past sentences with continued validity preclude application of the Act's new penalties." Alito said that the law's text does not support the Court's "boundless interpretation," which would allow any defendant whose sentence is vacated to claim retroactive relief. "Indeed, the portions of today's decision that command the votes of only three Justices give the game away," he wrote. What People Are Saying Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in the Court majority opinion: "A judge would thus correctly conclude at resentencing that, if an offender's past sentence has been vacated, a sentence 'has not been imposed' upon that offender for purposes of the First Step Act; hence, the court can impose a new sentence today." Justice Samuel Alito, in a dissenting opinion: "Animating the Court's atextual interpretation is a thinly veiled desire to march in the parade of sentencing reform. But our role is to interpret the statute before us, not overhaul criminal sentencing." What Happens Next The Court's ruling reversed the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals' interpretation of the law. The case was remanded for further proceedings. Do you have a story that Newsweek should be covering? Do you have any questions about this story? Contact LiveNews@
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
St. John's boosting security at parks over safety concerns, says mayor
Park visitors in St. John's this summer might notice additional bodies in uniform, as the city bolsters its security inside popular public green spaces. Bannerman Park will now have a patrol of private security hired by the city. St. John's Mayor Danny Breen said the move to bring in private guards is a response to calls from the community about safety. "After speaking to residents and hearing their concerns … we added additional security there to what we already had in Bowring Park," Breen told CBC Radio's The St. John's Morning Show. "As with other parks in the area … we're keeping an eye on everything and monitoring it to see what further measures may have to be taken." Public safety was recently identified as a top issue in several recent surveys conducted by the city, including a recent feedback forum on the annual Water Street pedestrian mall. Breen didn't say whether the city was considering putting security in other areas, adding it works closely with the RNC. St. John's isn't alone in working to address safety concerns, the mayor said, adding that people might have already noticed increased security inside private businesses. "I think there's just a heightened concern for safety in the city. And I think the city parks and properties are no different than the private ones that you see," said Breen. In April, some members of council, including Breen, said they wanted RNC officers to patrol downtown due to safety concerns. In response, RNC Deputy Chief Colin McNeil said foot patrols would not make the downtown safer and would not be a good use of police resources. Breen said private security will also be present at the pedestrian mall, which is opening this week. "Our staff are monitoring just to make sure that the complement we have is working and sufficient," he said. Angela Crockwell, executive director of the St. John's-based youth support organization Thrive, said she understands the public's concern about crime and the need to make sure people are safe, but worries the presence of guards could have the unintended consequences of targeting vulnerable people. "We know that marginalized and vulnerable populations often can get targeted," said Crockwell. "I would hope that those people who are doing security have appropriate training to make sure that their policies and practices reflect, again, not targeting certain populations." Crockwell wants to see further support and investments in programs that help the vulnerable, like Thrive's outreach program. Download our free CBC News app to sign up for push alerts for CBC Newfoundland and Labrador. Sign up for our daily headlines newsletter here. Click here to visit our landing page.