
What Comes Next: Pope Francis's Funeral and Conclave
Black smoke was sent atop Vatican City. His Holiness, Pope Francis I, is dead, and the necessary procedures to lay him to rest and appoint his successor are underway.
Kevin Farrell, the cardinal camerlengo, the pope's chief of staff, is now tasked with leading the transition.
First, Pope Francis's funeral arrangements will commence, the pope's apartments will be sealed, and his signet ring bearing the seal of his reign will be destroyed. Second, a multi-day funeral procession will take place at the Vatican, attended by clerical and lay people from all over the world. Third, the College of Cardinals will convene for the Conclave and elect the next pope.
The entire process could take around four weeks.
Pope Francis's Cause of Death
The Vatican did not release the immediate cause of the pope's death. However, he died just a few weeks after enduring 38 days hospitalized for double pneumonia, including time on a respirator.
His condition upon his release was considered stable and improving, but frail. The Holy See press office refrained from confirming his participation in any Holy Week and Easter celebrations.
According to the
Related Stories
4/21/2025
4/21/2025
Pope Francis's family members will participate along with the most eminent dean of the College of Cardinals, the Vatican's director of the Directorate of Health and Hygiene, and his vice director.
No other funeral event dates and times have been posted by the Holy See at the time of this article's publication.
Pope Francis's Funeral
In 2024, Pope Francis made changes to the burial rite, one of which was moving the declaration of death into the chapel, and his body was immediately placed there in the coffin rather than in the room where he died.
Other changes included stripping away most of the pomp and circumstance presented in the funerals of Pope St. John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI, such as having multiple coffins and being raised on a pedestal. Francis's body and coffin of wood and zinc will be processed and placed in St. Peter's Basilica for a public viewing period decided by the carmelengo. He will be buried in the Basilica of St. Mary Major rather than St. Peter's Basilica.
Archbishop Diego Ravelli, master of pontifical liturgical celebrations, said that the changes are in line with the pope's desire to simplify certain celebration rites so that they remain focused on Jesus Christ rather than the pope.
'The renewed rite also needed to emphasise even more that the funeral of the Roman Pontiff is that of a pastor and disciple of Christ and not of a powerful person of this world,' he said.
This more humble conclusion bookends the late pope's introduction to the Catholic world, appearing on the night of his election in the simple white daily dress rather than the more opulent appearances of the past, which included a papal crown and royal-like vestments.
The funeral is supposed to take place within four to six days of the pope's death. At the end of his funeral, a nine-day mourning period will be declared.
Conclave: What to Know
Upon conclusion of those nine days, the cardinal camerlengo will convene the College of Cardinals in the Sistine Chapel for conclave.
Typically, this means beginning 15 to 20 days after the pope's death.
The College of Cardinals has been exclusively tasked with electing the next pope since 1059, and was constituted in its current form in 1150.
The College consists of all current cardinals, but only those under the age of 80 are allowed to vote, and no cardinal older than 80 can be considered for the pope. While any Catholic man can technically be elected pope, the college has not elected a non-cardinal in more than 500 years.
As of Saturday, 135 cardinal electors are spread out across the world, including 10 from the United States. Those 10 include the cardinal camerlengo, as well as
The cardinals will be sworn to secrecy and secluded from the world within the Vatican, housed at the Casa Santa Marta building built by Pope St. John Paul II, to pray and discuss who should be the next pope without distractions from the outside world.
Only select people, such as the cardinals' secretaries, doctors, and masters of ceremonies, are allowed to enter.
One vote is cast on the first day, and four votes are cast each subsequent day.
Mandatory fasting measures can be imposed if the voting takes too long.
A minimum two-thirds majority vote is needed to elect the new pope. After each vote, the ballots are burned to send a smoke signal to those waiting in St. Peter's Square and around the world.
Black smoke means they did not reach a consensus. White smoke announces that the cardinals have picked the next pope.
The electee is then asked if he wishes to take the position. Once he accepts and chooses his papal name, the cardinal deacon will appear before the tens of thousands gathered in the square and declare, 'Habemus Papam' (we have a pope).
This will be the third time that Catholic Church leaders have come together in this century, starting with the election of Pope Benedict XVI, formerly Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger, in 2005, after the passing of Pope Saint John Paul II. The College of Cardinals convened a second time, in 2013, to elect Pope Francis after Benedict abdicated, citing health concerns.
No American cardinal has ever been elected pope. Pope Francis, a native of Argentina, was the first pope to come from the Western Hemisphere.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Is it true that … cold water plunges boost immunity?
'It's a long-held belief that taking to the waters is good for your health,' says Mike Tipton, a professor of human and applied physiology at the University of Portsmouth. From Roman frigidariums to Thomas Jefferson's foot baths, cold immersion has long been seen as curative. But does modern science support the idea that it boosts immunity? The answer: it's complicated. While cold water immersion does activate the body, that's not the same as strengthening the immune system. 'When you immerse yourself in cold water, your body undergoes the cold shock response,' says Tipton. 'You get rapid breathing, a spike in heart rate and a surge of stress hormones such as adrenaline and cortisol.' This may explain why people feel more alert or energised after a cold dip. But does it mean you're less likely to get sick? Many studies into the effects focus on immune cell activity in the blood – which can increase after cold exposure – but that doesn't always translate into fewer infections. 'It's easy to cherry-pick results,' says Tipton. He points to a frequently quoted Dutch study in which people who ended their daily hot showers with at least 30 seconds under cold water took 29% fewer sick days. While it's often used as an example of the powers of cold plunges, those participants actually reported the same number of infections as those who didn't have a cold shower. 'That might reflect increased resilience or just a willingness to push through because of being part of a study,' says Tipton, rather than better immunity. It may also be that regular cold plungers simply have a healthier lifestyle overall. A recent study by Tipton's team found that indoor and outdoor swimmers had fewer respiratory infections than non-swimmers, suggesting it may be the exercise, not the cold, doing the work. One thing is clear: too much cold is harmful. 'If your core temperature drops too far, it can suppress the immune system,' he says. His advice? Keep it short – no more than 90 seconds.

Epoch Times
3 days ago
- Epoch Times
Judge Rules Federal Rule on Gender Discrimination Violates Catholic Beliefs
A rule from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) violates the beliefs of members of a Catholic association, a federal judge ruled on June 5. The HHS rule requiring members of the Catholic Benefits Association to perform transgender procedures 'violates their sincerely held religious beliefs without satisfying strict scrutiny,' U.S. District Judge Peter Welte

3 days ago
A judge tells federal agencies they can't enforce anti-trans bias policies against Catholic groups
BISMARCK, N.D. -- Two federal agencies cannot punish Catholic employers and health care providers if they refuse for religious reasons to provide gender-affirming care to transgender patients or won't provide health insurance coverage for such care to their workers, a federal judge ruled Thursday. The ruling from U.S. District Judge Peter Welte, the chief federal judge in North Dakota, bars the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services from enforcing a health care rule it imposed in 2024 under Democratic President Joe Biden. The rule said that existing policies against sex discrimination covered discrimination based on gender identity, so that health care providers risked losing federal funds if they refused to provide gender-affirming care. Welte also barred the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission from telling employers that a failure to have health plans cover gender-affirming care for their workers would represent discrimination based on sex that could lead to a lawsuit against them and penalties. The judge rejected a request from an order of nuns, two Catholic homes and the Catholic Benefits Association, which represents employers, to impose similar bans on each agency covering abortion and fertility treatments Catholic organizations consider immoral. He said those claims were 'underdeveloped' and not ready for court review. But he concluded that allowing the two agencies to enforce policies on gender-affirming care or health coverage for it would restrict employers' and health care providers' ability to live out their religious beliefs, violating a 1992 federal law meant to provide broad protections for religious freedoms. The HHS rule had a provision allowing the agency to make case-by-case exceptions based on religious beliefs, but Welte said that would be insufficient. 'The case-by-case exemption procedure leaves religious organizations unable to predict their legal exposure without furthering any compelling antidiscrimination interests,' wrote Welte, who is based in Fargo. The two agencies did not immediately respond to email messages seeking comment Thursday. The Catholic Benefits Association serves more than 9,000 employers and about 164,000 employees enrolled in member health plans, according to its website. The group, founded in 2013, says it 'advocates for and litigates in defense of our members' First Amendment rights to provide employee benefits and a work environment that is consistent with the Catholic faith.' The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution protects religious freedoms. Association General Counsel Martin Nussbaum welcomed the ruling, saying the organization's members 'want to do the right thing in their health plan and in their medical services that they provide for those medical providers, and this gives them protection to doing that.' And he said the judge's ruling suggests there are no mandates from the federal government on abortion or fertility treatments, so there is 'no need to provide protection.' The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2020 that the Civil Rights Act's protections against discrimination based on sex also cover anti-LGBTQ+ bias in employment. The landmark 1964 act doesn't have specific provisions dealing with bias based on sexual orientation or gender identity. But courts also have intervened to limit how far the federal government can go in combating anti-LGBTQ+ discrimination when religious organizations or employers with religious beliefs against LGBTQ+ rights are involved. Both the HHS rule and the EEOC's policy on sex discrimination have their roots in efforts by President Barack Obama to protect LGBTQ+ rights in 2016, in his last year in office. When President Donald Trump began his second term in January, he issued an order saying the federal government would not recognize transgender people's gender identities. In April, two employees said the EEOC was classifying all new gender identity-related discrimination cases as its lowest priority, essentially putting them on indefinite hold. The 2024 HHS rule also covered bias based on 'pregnancy or related conditions," and the Catholic health care providers argued that they might face losing federal funds if they refused to perform abortions, in line with Catholic opposition to abortion. But HHS said the rule wouldn't have forced them to perform abortions or provide health coverage for abortions — only that it couldn't refuse to care for someone because they'd had one, according to Welte.