15 years after Deepwater Horizon oil spill, lawsuits stall and restoration is incomplete
NEW ORLEANS — Fifteen years after the Deepwater Horizon oil rig exploded off the Gulf of Mexico, killing 11 people and sending 134 million gallons of crude gushing into the ocean, the effects of the nation's worst offshore spill are still being felt.
Oil giant BP paid billions of dollars in damages, propelling ambitious coastal restoration projects across five states. Yet cleanup workers and local residents who suffered health effects they attribute to the spill have struggled to have their cases heard in court, and few have received significant compensation.
Conservation groups say the spill catalyzed innovative restoration work across the Gulf Coast, but are alarmed at the recent halt of a flagship land-creation project in Louisiana. As the Trump administration expands offshore oil and gas drilling, they are concerned the best opportunities for rebuilding the Gulf Coast are slipping away.
In the coastal community of Lafitte in southeast Louisiana, Tammy Gremillion is celebrating Easter Sunday, the anniversary of the April 20 spill, without her daughter. She remembers warning Jennifer against joining a cleanup crew tasked with containing the spill for BP.
'But I couldn't stop her — they were offering these kids lots of money,' Gremillion said. 'They didn't know the dangers. They didn't do what they should have to protect these young people.'
Jennifer worked knee-deep in oil for months, returning home reeking of fumes, covered in black splotches and breaking out in rashes and suffering headaches. She also was exposed to Corexit, a chemical approved by the Environmental Protection Agency that is applied on and below the water to disperse oil, which has been linked to health problems.
In 2020, Jennifer died of leukemia, a blood cancer that can be caused by exposure to oil.
Gremillion, who broke down in tears as she recounted her daughter's death, is '1,000% confident' that exposure to toxins during the cleanup caused the cancer.
She filed a lawsuit against BP in 2022, although the allegations have been difficult to establish in court. Gremillion's suit is one of a small number of cases still pending.
An investigation by the Associated Press previously found all but a few of the roughly 4,800 lawsuits seeking compensation for health problems linked to the oil spill have been dismissed and only one has been settled.
In a 2012 settlement, BP paid ill workers and coastal residents $67 million, which amounted to no more than $1,300 each for nearly 80% of those seeking compensation.
Attorneys from the Downs Law Group, representing Gremillion and about 100 others in cases against BP, say the company leveraged procedural technicalities to block victims from getting their day in court.
BP declined to comment on pending litigation. In court filings, the company denied allegations that oil exposure caused health problems and it attacked the credibility of medical experts brought by plaintiffs.
The environmental impact was devastating, recalled PJ Hahn, who served on the front lines as a southeast Louisiana coastal management official. He watched the oil eat away at barrier islands and marsh around his community in Plaquemines Parish until 'it would just crumble like a cookie in hot coffee, just break apart.'
Oyster beds suffocated, reefs were blanketed in chemicals, and the fishing industry tanked. Pelicans diving for dead fish emerged from the contaminated waters smeared in a black sheen. Tens of thousands of seabirds and sea turtles were killed, according to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
Since then, 'significant progress' has been made restoring Gulf habitats and ecosystems, according to the Natural Resource Damage Assessment Trustee Council, a group of state and federal agencies tasked with managing restoration funded by penalties levied against BP.
The council says more than 300 restoration projects worth $5.38 billion have been approved in the Gulf of Mexico. The projects include acquiring wetlands in Mississippi to protect nesting areas for birds, rebuilding reefs along Pensacola Bay in Florida and restoring about 4 square miles of marsh in Lake Borgne near New Orleans.
Though a tragedy, the spill 'galvanized a movement — one that continues to push for a healthier, more resilient coast,' said Simone Maloz, campaign director for Restore the Mississippi River Delta, a conservation coalition.
The influx of billions of dollars in penalties paid by BP 'allowed us to think bigger, act faster and rely on science to guide large-scale solutions,' she added.
Yet what many conservationists see as the flagship of the restoration projects funded by the Deepwater Horizon disaster payout — an approximately $3-billion effort to divert sediment from the Mississippi River to rebuild 21 square miles of land in southeast Louisiana — has stalled over concerns of its effect on the livelihoods of local communities and dolphin populations.
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry has said the project would 'break our culture' by harming local oyster and shrimp fisheries due to the influx of freshwater. This month, his Republican administration paused the project for 90 days, citing its high costs, and its future remains uncertain.
The Trump administration is seeking to sell more offshore oil and gas leases, which the industry trade group American Petroleum Institute called 'a big step forward for American energy dominance.'
BP announced an oil discovery in the Gulf last week and plans more than 40 new wells in the next three years. The company told the AP that it has improved safety standards and oversight.
'We remain keenly aware that we must always put safety first,' BP said in an emailed statement. 'We have made many changes so that such an event should never happen again.'
But Joseph Gordon, climate and energy director for the nonprofit Oceana, warned that Deepwater Horizon's legacy should be 'an alarm bell' against the expansion of offshore drilling.
Brook writes for the Associated Press.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time Magazine
2 days ago
- Time Magazine
As Fluoride Bans Spread, Who Will Be Hit the Hardest?
Cavities and dental costs are at risk of skyrocketing as a growing number of states consider banning the use of fluoride in public water —and children from low-income households are likely most vulnerable. In March, Utah became the first state to prohibit adding fluoride to drinking water. A couple months later, Florida followed suit. Several other states are now considering similar bills. In a recent study published in JAMA Health Forum, researchers projected what would happen if the entire country were to stop adding fluoride to the water supply. The potential impact on both people's oral health and their dental bills was substantial: Tooth decay, the study found, would increase by about 7.5%—representing about 25 million more cavities—and the U.S. would face about $9.8 billion in additional costs over five years, including both what families would have to pay out-of-pocket for dental care and what the government would need to pay for public health insurance. And those impacts would disproportionately affect children on public insurance plans or without insurance, the researchers found. Fluoridated water is 'an amazing public health intervention that comes straight from the tap,' says the senior author of the study, Dr. Lisa Simon, an internal medicine physician at Brigham and Women's Hospital, who is also a general dentist. 'Fluoride works for everyone—it benefits adults, it benefits children,' Simon says. 'But the people who derive the most benefit from it are people who have a harder time accessing routine dental care.' 'Unfortunately, in our country, that is more likely to be children and families who are low-income, who rely on public insurance, or who otherwise face challenges in getting to a dentist,' she says. States' moves to ban the use of fluoride in public drinking water come as the Trump Administration—due in large part to the influence of Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS)—has pushed back against the practice. Kennedy has long blasted water fluoridation, claiming it is linked to arthritis, bone cancer, IQ loss, and more, and signaled that HHS will stop recommending it. The Environmental Protection Agency has said that it is studying the potential health risks of fluoride, and the Food and Drug Administration said it is taking steps to remove prescription ingestible fluoride supplements for children from the market. Some research suggests that fluoride could be associated with lower IQ scores, but only at significantly high levels of exposure—the amount of fluoride that is added to public water, based on federal guidelines, is far lower. And the majority of public health experts, pediatricians, and dentists insist that water fluoridation is a long-standing practice that is both safe and effective at protecting oral health and fighting cavities and tooth decay. 'It's been touted to be one of the most successful or greatest public health initiatives, right up there with vaccinations,' says Dr. Tomitra Latimer, a pediatrician at Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago. U.S. localities started adding fluoride to public water in 1945, and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has credited the public health initiative for the 'dramatic decline in cavities' in the country in the years since. According to the CDC, drinking fluoridated water reduces cavities by roughly 25% in both children and adults. Tooth decay, though preventable, is one of the most common childhood diseases. And children of color, children who come from low-income households, children on public insurance plans that limit which providers they can see, and children who live in rural areas and have to travel long distances to access care—all of them are at greater risk of developing cavities, according to Latimer. Children with autism also tend to have a heightened risk of developing cavities because they may struggle with brushing their teeth regularly, she says. While there are alternative sources of fluoride that people can purchase, the cost may be out of reach for many families, Latimer says. That's why, she says, fluoridated water is so critical: It's an easily accessible tool that can help protect the oral health of children who are most vulnerable to cavities. And for generations, it's flowed straight from the tap.
Fox Sports
3 days ago
- Fox Sports
Whitecaps report illness following CONCACAF Champions Cup final
Associated Press The Vancouver Whitecaps said a 'significant number' of players who traveled to Mexico for last weekend's CONCACAF Champions Cup final have become ill. The Whitecaps canceled practice Wednesday and had a modified session for cleared players Thursday after both players and staff reported gastrointestinal symptoms. 'The health and well-being of our players and staff remain a top priority. Each player has been provided with an individualized program by the medical and performance staff to support their continued preparation and recovery,' the team said in a statement. The Whitecaps are scheduled to play the Seattle Sounders in a Cascadia Cup rivalry match at BC Place on Sunday. The Whitecaps lost 5-0 to Cruz Azul on Sunday in the CONCACAF Champions Cup final in Mexico City. Last year in the tournament final, players for the Columbus Crew also became ill. The Crew lost to Pachuca 3-0 in Mexico. ___ AP soccer: recommended in this topic
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Air quality getting worse amid Canadian wildfires. Is the smoke headed to Delaware?
Air quality continues to worsen across the United States as smoke stemming from Canadian wildfires begins moving south prompting air quality advisories in multiple states. The National Weather Service already issued alerts for Nebraska, Wisconsin, Indiana and Michigan in the Midwest, and for New York, Connecticut, New Jersey and Maryland in the Northeast. Although the majority of wildfires are occurring in western Canada, smoke from these fires has been drifting eastward, impacting air quality in areas around the Great Lakes and the U.S. Northeast, shows AirNow, the Environmental Protection Agency's interactive air quality map. In New Jersey, air quality started to worsen in the northern part of the state prompting the state Department of Environmental Protection to issue a code orange air quality alert early on the morning of June 5 for northern counties in the state. However, soon after, the alert was extended all the way down to the Jersey Shore. While no alert has been issued for Delaware, pollution continues to move southward in New Jersey, and most of Pennsylvania now has moderate air quality, according to AirNow. To the west of Delaware, a portion of Maryland has been under an air quality alert since early June 5. A Code Orange air quality alert means that pollution levels may be unhealthy for vulnerable groups, such as children, the elderly, and those with respiratory or heart conditions. To reduce health risks, vulnerable groups should limit outdoor physical activity. The air quality index for Delaware is good, overall standing in the mid-40s. But the Environmental Protection Agency is forecasting the index to rise to 80 on June 5. On June 6, the index should be around 58. The air quality index, or AQI, is a standardized rating system that assesses the severity of air pollution on a scale ranging from 0 to 500. The higher the number, the worse the quality. An AQI below 50 is considered optimal; between 51 and 100 is considered moderate; and above 100, unhealthy. This article originally appeared on Delaware News Journal: Air quality index worsens nears Delaware. See the air quality map
