Oakland police chief asks to lift 50 mph pursuit rules
OAKLAND, Calif. - Oakland's police chief wants to get rid of the current requirement where officers need to ask supervisors to drive faster than 50 mph during a police chase, but he is not asking to loosen the rules so much as to chase suspects who are accused of non-violent property crimes.
Police Chief Floyd Mitchell said he wants to give officers more autonomy and reduce the red tape to allow a pursuit where a suspect starts driving faster than 50 mph.
But Mitchell added that he is not trying to lift the rules to allow chases for traffic violations or property crimes – the latter of which many residents have been pushing for.
Oakland's policy still limits police chases to violent-crime categories, including murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, robbery and carjacking.
Mitchell's formal request to the Oakland Police Commission was documented in a May 19 letter to Police Commissioner Ricardo Garcia-Acosta, and which was discussed at the commission's May 22 meeting.
The chief does not need the commission's approval, but he did ask the civilian board to formally weigh in over the next four months.
Mitchell's specific request is to allow OPD to "rescind Special Order 9212" put into place in 2022 by then-Police Chief Leronne Armstrong that required the "automatic termination" of all police chases if the speed reached or exceeded 50 mph without a commander's approval.
Mitchell said that driving faster than 50 mph can be achieved "within a matter of seconds" and requiring a commander to weigh in to allow the chase to continue has resulted in far fewer pursuits.
He illustrated his point by pointing to a chart he created showing that police pursuits dropped from 130 to 68 – or by 47% – from 2022 to 2024. At the same time, Mitchell said that police ended up abandoning pursuits, or not initiating them at all, from 522 to 1,228 – or by 135.5% – in the same two-year period.
Overall, on average for the last decade, Mitchell said there are between 77 and 80 police pursuits a year.
The Oaklandside noted that there were many residents at last week's meeting who sided with the chief, but thought he wasn't going far enough.
City councilman Ken Houston said Mitchell's request wasn't "tough enough" and he wanted "law and order" to be restored in the city. Resident Tuan Ngo echoed Houston's sentiments.
But Millie Cleveland, chair of the Coalition for Police Accountability, said she was concerned about giving police officers the sole discretion – without their superiors' input – to drive faster, noting they have abused decisions like this in the past.
John Burris and Jim Chanin, two civil rights lawyers who filed the original Riders suit that keeps OPD under federal oversight, wrote in a May 5 letter to the police commission that they disagreed with changing the pursuit rules. They said it would be "very difficult, if not impossible," to discipline an officer for failing to notify a supervisor during a chase.
"The officer will say I gave the notice 'as soon as reasonably practical,' and given the stress of engaging in the pursuit, driving in a high-speed situation, and avoiding innocent bystanders and uninvolved vehicles, it will be very hard to second guess the officer no matter how unreasonably he or she may have acted," they wrote.
In January, Gov. Gavin Newsom called on the police commission to loosen OPD's restrictions on chases or risk losing support from the CHP.
But commissioners were perplexed as to why the governor would call them out specifically for a policy they don't have a formal say over. Their jurisdiction comes into play only with use-of-force issues. However, because the policy does impact compliance with the federal oversight, the police commission may review and propose revisions to the policy.
But while Mitchell doesn't need the commission's approval to change OPD pursuit policy, it appears as though he is seeking input from community members and stakeholders.
Police commissioners have three choices: Approve Mitchell's recommendations, keep the current policy, or propose their own changes. Commissioners will eventually submit their decision to the Oakland City Council at some point in the future.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Man arrested for child abuse in Oroville, endangering toddler in roadway
( — A 31-year-old man was arrested on Wednesday for child abuse after he was witnessed endangering his child in the roadway and admitted to being under the influence of cocaine, according to the Oroville Police Department. Video Above: Controversial child sex trafficking bill AB379 amended Police said officers responded to reports of a man creating a traffic hazard around 1:30 p.m. on Meyers Street and Greenville Street. Callers said the man, later identified as Oscar Bonilla, was playing with an infant in the roadway, refusing to move for cars, walking in traffic while carrying the child and even dropping the toddler on the pavement. More witnesses said that Bonilla put the child on the street, walked in and out of traffic, and described him to be 'flinging the child around like a rag doll.' It was also reported that the suspect was armed with a knife and made motions as if he were trying to hurt the baby, OPD said. A witness was eventually able to take the toddler away when Bonilla dropped them. OPD said Bonilla was exhibiting erratic behavior when they made contact and admitted to being under the influence of a large quantity of cocaine. Police discovered that the suspect had removed the toddler from their home. Police investigate fatal, solo-vehicle crash in Rocklin According to OPD, the baby was taken to the hospital after they were left with road rash, scrapes and bruises. The suspect was taken into custody after being treated for his injuries at the hospital. Bonilla was arrested on felony child abuse and felony assault with a deadly weapon. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
St. Paul police name detective, officer, employee of the year
St. Paul's police chief on Thursday named a homicide investigator as Detective of the Year and a patrol officer who regularly recovers firearms and large amounts of drugs as Officer of the Year. Sgt. Jennifer O'Donnell, a St. Paul officer of more than 30 years who works in the homicide/robbery unit, was the primary investigator on 156 homicides, robberies and aggravated assaults last year and assisted on more, according to her commendation. She was the primary investigator in the fatal shooting of Nicholas Sletten, 42, in the North End in October. Murder charges were filed in January. 'This was a complex investigation that required ongoing intensive work,' said O'Donnell's commendation, which described her and her colleagues as working 'tirelessly' on the case. Chief Axel Henry named Abdirahman Dahir as 2024 Officer of the Year. He grew up in St. Paul, became a Police Explorer at age 14, and later a St. Paul parking enforcement officer before he joined the department's police academy in 2021. A patrol officer in the Western District, Dahir recovered 22 handguns, of which 3 were stolen and one a 'ghost gun,' and several thousand fentanyl pills during 18 stops last year that were either traffic or investigative, his commendation said, adding that last year 'was not an anomaly.' Dahir recovered 30 handguns the year before. Richard Bertholf, who works in the police Video Management Unit, was recognized as Professional Employee of the Year. When Andre L. Mitchell, 26, was shot and killed while two children were in his backseat in November, Bertholf 'immediately responded to multiple urgent requests to gather nearby video that may have captured the shooting,' his commendation said. He found videos that showed four people shooting at Mitchell and two suspect vehicles, and gathered information about suspects. Four people have been charged in Mitchell's murder. Don't pay for traffic tickets over text: DPS warns of scam messages Who's in charge? CDC's leadership 'crisis' apparent amid new COVID-19 vaccine guidance DOC commissioner asks for patience from Stillwater prison families, dismisses idea of reopening Appleton prison Measles vaccination rates drop after COVID-19 pandemic in counties across the US 40 St. Paul street lights stripped of copper wiring, though reports are down overall
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
The Alabama Justice Behind Last Year's Radical IVF Decision Is Running For Office
Jay Mitchell, the former Alabama Supreme Court justice behind the contentious ruling that effectively banned in vitro fertilization for a short period last year, announced this week he is running for state attorney general. 'With President Trump in the White House, we have a unique opportunity to get conservative wins here in Alabama,' Mitchell said in a Monday statement announcing his run. 'I'm running for Attorney General to stop the lawlessness, restore order, and dismantle Joe Biden's radical left wing policies.' Mitchell, a Republican, was elected to the state Supreme Court in 2019 and stepped down late last month. His first campaign video describes him as 'a law and order conservative' with 'the guts to protect our constitution.' In the statement announcing his run, Mitchell did not comment on IVF but said he would 'defend the sanctity of life' and 'no matter the cost, I will stand firm to protect the unborn.' 'Known for his strong conservative rulings and tough-on-crime approach to law and order at the Alabama Supreme Court, Mitchell is eager to take a more proactive role in implementing the Trump agenda as the state's top law enforcement official,' the statement reads. Reproductive rights are under attack. HuffPost is committed to reporting the truth, amplifying voices, and covering this fight with depth and care. Support our work by today. As state attorney general, Mitchell would be in charge of enforcing state laws around reproductive health care, including the state's near-total abortion ban that has no exceptions for rape or incest. The attorney general can choose to investigate and prosecute pregnant people for miscarriage and stillbirth — situations that have happened in several states since the fall of federal abortion protections. Steve Marshall, the current Alabama attorney general who is term-limited, pledged to prosecute women who used abortion pills or traveled out of state to get care (a federal judge recently ruled against Marshall). In February 2024, Mitchell and several other conservative justices on the court handed down a sweeping decision that granted embryos the same legal status as children — posing a direct legal threat to physicians and patients using IVF. Mitchell, who authored the brief, equated frozen embryos used in IVF to 'unborn children' under the state's wrongful death statute. '[T]he Wrongful Death of a Minor Act is sweeping and unqualified. It applies to all children, born and unborn, without limitation,' Mitchell wrote in the decision. The ruling forced three of the state's largest fertility clinics to pause IVF services. Providers scrambled to find answers, and many patients were forced to delay time-sensitive care with no promise that access would be restored. Jamie Heard, who lives in Birmingham with her husband, was one of the patients who had to pause care when the ruling came down. 'When that Supreme Court decision shut down IVF care, I think a lot of people don't understand that it didn't just impact clinics, it also shattered families,' Heard told HuffPost. 'To hear that the judge who authored that decision now wants to be attorney general is definitely frightening.' Mitchell wrote in his May resignation letter to Republican Gov. Kay Ivey that he was stepping down because he wanted to be more vocal about his political beliefs and further President Donald Trump's agenda. 'Serving on the Supreme Court has been the privilege of a lifetime, but my role as a judge limits what I can say and do for our state and country,' Mitchell wrote, according to Alabama Daily News. 'President Trump is moving boldly to restore the United States Constitution — and we must ensure that his agenda takes root not only in Washington, but also in the state. I feel called to play a larger role in that effort in Alabama.' Dr. Mamie McLean, a reproductive endocrinologist and fertility specialist at Alabama Fertility, a clinic in Birmingham, was one of the providers whose clinic temporarily paused IVF services. When the decision came out, McLean was forced to cancel time-sensitive and costly appointments that devastated her patients. She told HuffPost at the time that those conversations with her patients were 'some of the most heartbreaking' she's had in her career. The state Supreme Court decision centered on a 2020 lawsuit in which three couples sued another Alabama fertility clinic and hospital for the 'wrongful death' of their frozen embryos, using a legal framework for bringing civil charges when a child dies. The couples' frozen embryos reportedly were destroyed by a patient who wandered into the cryogenic storage area where the embryos are kept and dropped them on the floor. The state Supreme Court's ruling essentially pushed the issue back to the Legislature, which passed a law protecting IVF weeks after the decision. 'We're tired of IVF being a political football,' McLean said. 'Just the suggestion that IVF would not be allowed in Alabama is creating extra worry and stress and that's not good for the men and women of Alabama. … It's important to the voters of our state that IVF is available and high quality.' The election for Alabama attorney general will be in November 2026. Current Attorney General Marshall is running for U.S. Senate. Heard has four remaining frozen embryos, which were moved from Alabama to Minnesota because of last year's political climate and due to storage costs. She hopes to one day give her son a sibling. 'We need leaders who protect families and not punish them or threaten their existence under the guise of quote-unquote politics,' she said. 'IVF is not a culture war issue, it's health care — and we won't forget who turned our path to parenthood into a political battlefield.' After Alabama Court Decision, Panic And Heartbreak In Fertility Clinics Trump Says He Supports IVF — But He Has Deep Ties To Those Who Oppose It Alabama AG Is First Republican Pledging To Prosecute Women Taking Abortion Pills Trump's IVF Executive Order Isn't 'Promises Made, Promises Kept'
