PDP VP backs president's criticism of partisan interference in Sibu community association
Wong stresses the importance of fair and balanced leadership appointments, calling for capable individuals from across the political spectrum to be given the opportunity to serve. – Photo by Chimon Upon
SIBU (June 11): Progressive Democratic Party (PDP) senior vice president Dato Sri Wong Soon Koh has voiced support for party president Dato Sri Tiong King Sing's recent remarks criticising the reduction of community leaders into mere 'party assets.'
He stressed the importance of fair and balanced leadership appointments, calling for capable individuals from across the political spectrum to be given the opportunity to serve.
In a statement, Wong referred to Tiong's recent allegation that a political party had interfered in the outcome of the Persatuan Ketua Kaum Masyarakat Cina Sibu Sarawak (Sibu Chinese Community Leaders Association) election.
He described the incident as part of a broader pattern of political meddling in grassroots affairs.
According to Wong, PDP had nominated 14 candidates for the association's executive committee, none of whom were successful.
The Bawang Assan assemblyman claimed the newly elected committee appears heavily aligned with one particular political party, which he said goes against the association's original inclusive spirit.
He also criticised the association's subsequent clarification statement, calling it unconvincing and evasive.
The former Sarawak minister questioned how the association could exert such influence over its own internal election and urged component parties within the Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) coalition to address the matter through calm and constructive dialogue.
He emphasised the need for a transparent, fair, and inclusive resolution due to its broader impact on the Chinese community.
Wong said if the association truly wants to be seen as impartial and community-driven, it should welcome representation from all political parties.
'Only then can the association rightfully claim to represent the broader Chinese community, rather than functioning as a partisan 'one-voice' platform,' he said.
He further questioned whether community leaders aligned with a single party would extend help to individuals from differing political backgrounds, noting that such behaviour is becoming increasingly common in Sibu.
Wong praised Tiong for speaking out, saying he exposed what he described as an ongoing attempt by a political party to dominate local influence and treat community positions as political tools.
'The people of Sibu are well aware of the unscrupulous tactics employed by the said party. As the party president rightly pointed out, this party seeks to monopolise influence at the local level.
'If it is truly that dominant, would it also adopt the same attitude during elections? If so, does it still require the support of allied parties? Let it then 'perform' accordingly during elections — and we shall all watch in silence to observe its real influence,' he said.
He again criticised the association's rebuttal as ineffective, asserting: 'Facts speak louder than words.'
'If the association truly wishes to earn the public's trust, it should transparently publish the list of newly elected committee members so the public can assess their political affiliations and backgrounds for themselves. The truth will then become evident to all.'
Wong also warned against excessive reliance on constitutional provisions to justify exclusionary decisions.
He said any objective observer can see the imbalance when a committee consists entirely of members linked to one party, risking turning the association into a partisan body and abandoning its core mission of community service.
He cautioned that such developments could erode the independence of civil society organisations in Sibu.
Wong called on the unnamed political party to stop interfering in grassroots matters, especially in the appointment of community leaders.
He warned that continued involvement could provoke public discontent and weaken the integrity of local associations.
Political parties at the local level should not be leading the charge in sowing division or partisanship, he said.
'Instead, they should serve the public with humility and act as effective bridges between the government and the people, ultimately working for the betterment of the entire Chinese community and its future,' he concluded.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Focus Malaysia
7 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Is America pulling a fast one on China threat?
THE United States and Malaysia are standing poles apart when it comes to dealing with China, as revealed in the recent Shangri-la Dialogue in Singapore. When US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth took to the podium, he promptly portrayed China as a very dangerous enemy preparing to 'use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific (region).' 'The threat from China is real,' he told participants from 47 countries gathered at the annual security forum to debate some of the pressing security challenges in these increasingly turbulent times. Presumably, he is raising the red flag over a potential conflict with China should the communist behemoth invade tiny Taiwan that could ignite a wider regional or even a global conflagration. The Indo-Pacific region covers the whole of Asean including Australia, Fiji, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand. But Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who also attended the forum, had a different take that is not exactly in line with the American political playbook. Essentially, he believes in promoting active non-alignment in foreign policy where all countries can pitch in to help 'shape a meaningful global order'. In other words, Malaysia, or Asean, will not side with anyone in a renewed Cold War. Being the Asean chair for this year, Anwar probably thinks he can steer the Asean ship of state away from the turbulent storms emanating from some hotspots around the world. But keeping-your-hands-off policy is unlikely to be effective as a diplomatic tool to calm tempers down because big powers will not listen to the likes of Anwar trying to broker a peace deal. These days the sounds of a world war are getting shriller and it appears the loudest noise is originating from China. America tells the nations in Southeast Asia and other countries the threat from that huge country is credible and hence, there is an urgent need to spend more on defence to meet the Chinese threat. Hegseth may be crying wolf but Asean must not dismiss his warning as just an American ploy to deliberately create trouble in order to pull the bloc away from Beijing and into the US orbit. Is the US pulling a fast one on the China threat? It is highly improbable that Washington wants to play a game of deception when the world knows that China is building up its military arsenal in a possible confrontation with the US over the contentious issue of Taiwan and territorial disputes in the South China Sea. When Hegseth removed the sugar from the coat to expose the unpalatable fact about this looming threat, he must have said it based on solid information about China's rapid military build-up. Where did he obtain such irrefutable proof of this disturbing development? It must have come from US satellite images which clearly showed China's massive expansion in the South China Sea's disputed Spratly Islands archipelago. Malaysia does not possess such technologically advanced 'spies in the skies' that can locate with pin-point accuracy any military activity in any country. Hence, it will be in the dark about what is secretly going on behind the Great Wall of China. But the US has sounded the alarm and Asean must sit up and prepare for a possible aggressive encounter with this giant northern neighbour. It would do well to remember that before Ukraine was invaded, the US, through satellite images, had warned its President Volodymyr Zelensky that Russia was massing troops on the country's borders for an invasion. But Zelensky dismissed the information as an attempt by the West to create unnecessary panic and he paid a heavy price for ignoring the dire warning. Now, a similar pattern is unfolding with, this time, China as the belligerent. There is no escaping from the fact that this superpower is flexing its military might as seen through the eyes of the spies in the skies. Although it is important to maintain vibrant ties with China, it is also equally crucial not to overlook the danger the nuclear-armed country poses to the rest of the world. In the rush to yet another world war, no country can stay neutral or stay safe. All will be sucked into the maelstrom. The weaker ones will have to seek protection from one of the superpowers or band together to help themselves. The danger is real and we ignore it to our own peril. ‒ June 12, 2025 Phlip Rodrigues is a retired journalist. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Reuters
The Star
10 hours ago
- The Star
No details from China after Trump announces "done" trade deal
BEIJING: (Bernama-dpa) The United States and China have made progress in resolving differences on their economies and trade, Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesman Lin Jian said in Beijing on Thursday (June 12) without providing details, German Press Agency (dpa) reported. Lin was speaking after US President Donald Trump said that a trade agreement that would include Chinese supplies of magnets and critical rare earth minerals had almost been finalised. Lin said China hoped that the two sides could work together to implement the consensus agreed in London. Trump announced an agreement on Wednesday on his Truth Social platform. "Our deal with China is done, subject to final approval with President Xi and me," Trump posted after US and Chinese negotiating teams wrapped up two days of talks in London. "Full magnets, and any necessary rare earths, will be supplied, up front, by China. Likewise, we will provide to China what was agreed to, including Chinese students using our colleges and universities (which has always been good with me!)," he posted. Trump also said there had been a deal on tariffs, with US tariffs on imports from China at 55 per cent and Chinese reciprocal tariffs at 10 per cent. Following talks in London on Monday and Tuesday, delegates said they planned to implement the consensus agreed in Geneva in mid-May, where agreement was reached to cut import tariffs by 115 percentage points on both sides for a period of 90 days. Details of the Geneva and London agreements have not been released, with US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick saying in London that the text of the agreement would not be published. - Bernama-dpa
Focus Malaysia
11 hours ago
- Focus Malaysia
Raising retirement as Malaysia ages: Navigating the workforce challenge
THERE is a well-known Asian saying—'older ginger will be spicier'—highlighting the wisdom that often comes with age. Across many Asian cultures, including our own, elders are held in high esteem, seen as valuable sources of guidance and experience. This deep-rooted respect reflect a broader tradition of valuing age not just as a number, but as a reservoir of accumulated insight. However, the increase in the elderly population is putting us between a rock and a hard place. With Malaysia's fertility rate continuing to decline, we are steadily marching into the category of an aged society. According to the Department of Statistics Malaysia, 11.6% of our total population in 2024 was aged 60 and above. This is projected to grow to 17.3% in 2050, and by 2057 we will become a super-aged society, as 20.5% of our population will be over 60 years old. This immediately poses some important questions that need to be answered quickly, like 'Will our healthcare system be adequate enough to handle the surge of senior citizens?' and 'Will the government be able to shoulder the financial strain of taking care of our elders?' However, the most important question among these is, 'Will we be able to replace the retired workforce when we inevitably become a super-aged society?' Currently, the minimum retirement age is set at 60 years old. Amid rising workforce concerns, the Minister in the Prime Minister's Department (Law and Institutional Reform) Datuk Seri Azalina Othman Said suggested we raise the minimum retirement age from 60 to 65. Raising retirement age to cope with demographic change—especially one that concerns the ageing population—is common practice across the globe. The Chinese government raised the retirement age for men from 60 to 63 years old, for women in blue-collar jobs from 50 to 55, and for women in white-collar jobs from 55 to 58. The Danish government is set to increase the retirement age for people born after December 31, 1970 to 70 years old by 2040. However, common practice does not mean that it is the only one we should consider, and it certainly doesn't mean it is the best. While it is logical, raising the retirement age has its own merits and concerns that need to be addressed. For one, raising the retirement age will certainly benefit future retirees, particularly in terms of their finances, as the cost of living continues to rise. Five more years in employment will be very helpful for workers to financially prepare for their retirement, considering only 33% of active EPF members had minimum savings of RM240,000 for retirement in May 2024. Furthermore, medical insurance premiums continue to rise. In lieu of more and more Malaysians living an unhealthy lifestyle, which leads to an increase in non-communicable diseases and a higher obesity rate, which is projected to hit 41% by 2035, this could quickly deplete retirement savings for the common working class. On a bigger scale, it was estimated that a 1% increase in elderly dependency would reduce our GDP growth by 6.6%. Other than economic and financial concerns, raising the retirement age would definitely have a positive impact on our workforce not only in quantity but also in the depth of experience older workers can provide. This is particularly important given the scale of Malaysia's brain drain. Our highly skilled youth are increasingly seeking better job opportunities abroad, leaving critical gaps in sectors such as engineering, healthcare, and ICT. In such a context, retaining experienced older workers becomes not just a demographic adjustment, but a strategic imperative. Yet, concern over its impact on youth employment immediately arises. Some fear that raising the retirement age would further limit opportunities for the youth, making the job market even tougher than it already is amid economic hardship and limited vacancies, in which over 65% of degree holders earn less than RM3,000 per month, and as much as 36.8% of graduates are underemployed. This suggests that the job market is so rough that the graduates are willing to work for less and accept jobs that do not match their skills. However, in reality, some older workers have faced age discrimination in their workplace. While people from all age groups could experience ageism, it most commonly affects those in their 50s and above, with 57% of respondents reporting experiencing age discrimination in their workplace. Furthermore, one study found that many employers are reluctant to hire older workers, with some actively excluding candidates over 40 years old. Hence, it is not entirely correct to say that raising the retirement age would further restrict opportunities for youth to secure better jobs and positions. In fact, data show that there is a positive correlation between employment rates of older workers and younger workers in Malaysia. Obviously, this matter requires many more studies to determine whether raising the retirement age is indeed viable, or if there are any other methods that can be implemented to negate the impact of becoming a super-aged society. Other than raising the minimum retirement age, the government needs to consider giving workers the flexibility to choose when they wish to retire. It is important for the government to recognise that while some senior workers wish to continue working past their 60s, others might want to retire earlier due to personal issues such as medical complications that prevent them from working comfortably. Allowing workers to choose not only when but also how they want to retire would certainly be beneficial for the future retirees, and the positive impact would most likely spill over to the younger generation of employees. While some may argue that flexible retirement would be ineffective in maintaining the working population, evidence from Singapore suggests a different result, as the flexible retirement scheme there effectively increased the likelihood of senior workers continuing in their longest-held jobs by 11.4%, delaying pension claims among elders, and had a general positive effect on Singapore's labour supply. In addition, although an increase of pension-eligibility age by one year would increase the full-time working rate by 8.2%, there was also had a negative impact on well-being of less-educated elders, many of whom work in physically demanding jobs. Raising the retirement age may seem like the simplest solution to an impending crisis, but giving people a choice could lead to a better outcome rather than forcing everyone to work longer than they want. In today's highly competitive job market, offering flexibility in retirement age would be a desirable action for both retirees and the youth. ‒ June 12, 2025 Chia Chu Hang is a Research Assistant at EMIR Research, an independent think tank focused on strategic policy recommendations based on rigorous research. The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia. Main image: Independent Spore News
