logo
Is America pulling a fast one on China threat?

Is America pulling a fast one on China threat?

Focus Malaysia12-06-2025
THE United States and Malaysia are standing poles apart when it comes to dealing with China, as revealed in the recent Shangri-la Dialogue in Singapore.
When US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth took to the podium, he promptly portrayed China as a very dangerous enemy preparing to 'use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific (region).'
'The threat from China is real,' he told participants from 47 countries gathered at the annual security forum to debate some of the pressing security challenges in these increasingly turbulent times.
Presumably, he is raising the red flag over a potential conflict with China should the communist behemoth invade tiny Taiwan that could ignite a wider regional or even a global conflagration.
The Indo-Pacific region covers the whole of Asean including Australia, Fiji, Japan, South Korea and New Zealand.
But Malaysian Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, who also attended the forum, had a different take that is not exactly in line with the American political playbook.
Essentially, he believes in promoting active non-alignment in foreign policy where all countries can pitch in to help 'shape a meaningful global order'.
In other words, Malaysia, or Asean, will not side with anyone in a renewed Cold War. Being the Asean chair for this year, Anwar probably thinks he can steer the Asean ship of state away from the turbulent storms emanating from some hotspots around the world.
But keeping-your-hands-off policy is unlikely to be effective as a diplomatic tool to calm tempers down because big powers will not listen to the likes of Anwar trying to broker a peace deal.
These days the sounds of a world war are getting shriller and it appears the loudest noise is originating from China.
America tells the nations in Southeast Asia and other countries the threat from that huge country is credible and hence, there is an urgent need to spend more on defence to meet the Chinese threat.
Hegseth may be crying wolf but Asean must not dismiss his warning as just an American ploy to deliberately create trouble in order to pull the bloc away from Beijing and into the US orbit.
Is the US pulling a fast one on the China threat? It is highly improbable that Washington wants to play a game of deception when the world knows that China is building up its military arsenal in a possible confrontation with the US over the contentious issue of Taiwan and territorial disputes in the South China Sea.
When Hegseth removed the sugar from the coat to expose the unpalatable fact about this looming threat, he must have said it based on solid information about China's rapid military build-up.
Where did he obtain such irrefutable proof of this disturbing development? It must have come from US satellite images which clearly showed China's massive expansion in the South China Sea's disputed Spratly Islands archipelago.
Malaysia does not possess such technologically advanced 'spies in the skies' that can locate with pin-point accuracy any military activity in any country. Hence, it will be in the dark about what is secretly going on behind the Great Wall of China.
But the US has sounded the alarm and Asean must sit up and prepare for a possible aggressive encounter with this giant northern neighbour.
It would do well to remember that before Ukraine was invaded, the US, through satellite images, had warned its President Volodymyr Zelensky that Russia was massing troops on the country's borders for an invasion.
But Zelensky dismissed the information as an attempt by the West to create unnecessary panic and he paid a heavy price for ignoring the dire warning.
Now, a similar pattern is unfolding with, this time, China as the belligerent. There is no escaping from the fact that this superpower is flexing its military might as seen through the eyes of the spies in the skies.
Although it is important to maintain vibrant ties with China, it is also equally crucial not to overlook the danger the nuclear-armed country poses to the rest of the world.
In the rush to yet another world war, no country can stay neutral or stay safe. All will be sucked into the maelstrom.
The weaker ones will have to seek protection from one of the superpowers or band together to help themselves. The danger is real and we ignore it to our own peril. ‒ June 12, 2025
Phlip Rodrigues is a retired journalist.
The views expressed are solely of the author and do not necessarily reflect those of Focus Malaysia.
Main image: Reuters
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Landmark trial kicks off over Trump's use of US military in policing role
Landmark trial kicks off over Trump's use of US military in policing role

The Star

time27 minutes ago

  • The Star

Landmark trial kicks off over Trump's use of US military in policing role

FILE PHOTO: Members of the California National Guard stand guard at the Paramount Business Center parking lot a day after clashes between protesters and law enforcement following multiple detentions by Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), in the Los Angeles County city of Paramount, California, U.S., June 8, 2025. REUTERS/Jill Connelly/File Photo (Reuters) -A landmark trial kicks off on Monday over the Trump administration's use of National Guard troops to support its deportation efforts and quell protests in Los Angeles, in a legal challenge highlighting the president's break from long-standing norms against deploying soldiers on American streets. The three-day non-jury trial before U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco will determine if the government violated a 19th-century law that bars the military from civil law enforcement when it deployed troops to Los Angeles in June. Los Angeles suffered days of unrest and protests sparked by mass immigration raids at places where people gather to find work, like Home Depot stores, a garment factory and a warehouse. The administration denies troops were used in civil law enforcement and plans to show they were protecting federal property and U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Many of the troops have been withdrawn, but California said in recent court papers 2,000 National Guard members are still going on immigration raids and restricting civilian movements in the state. A ruling against the government could restrict those troops' activities and constrain President Donald Trump if he tries to deploy troops to police American cities in the future. Trump said on Wednesday he might send the National Guard, a reserve force that answers to both state governors and the president, to patrol Washington, D.C., a city he said was "very unsafe." California and its Governor Gavin Newsom have asked Breyer to prohibit the troops from directly participating in domestic law enforcement and Newsom say the National Guard is accompanying ICE agents on raids and assisting in arrests, in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 and other laws that forbid the U.S. military from taking part in civilian law enforcement. Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June against Newsom's wishes. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on U.S. soil and inflamed political tension in the country's second-most-populous city. California sued the Trump administration over the troop deployment, arguing it violates federal law and state sovereignty. A U.S. appeals court has allowed Trump to retain control of California's National Guard during the legal challenge. California's lawsuit ultimately seeks a ruling that would return its National Guard troops to state control and a declaration that Trump's action was illegal. (Reporting by Dietrich Knauth and Jack Queen in New York; Editing by Tom Hals and Tom Hogue)

Poland's Tusk says he feels fear and hope before Trump-Putin talks
Poland's Tusk says he feels fear and hope before Trump-Putin talks

The Star

time27 minutes ago

  • The Star

Poland's Tusk says he feels fear and hope before Trump-Putin talks

FILE PHOTO: Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk speaks during a press conference announcing changes in his government in Warsaw, Poland, July 23, 2025. REUTERS/Kuba Stezycki/File Photo WARSAW (Reuters) -Poland's prime minister said on Monday he felt a mixture of fear and hope ahead of a Russia-U.S. summit on the war in Ukraine this week, but added that Washington had pledged to consult its European partners before the talks. U.S. President Donald Trump will meet his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska on August 15, and Kyiv fears that the two leaders may try to dictate terms for ending the 3-1/2-year war. "The American side has promised that it will consult with European partners on its position before the meeting in Alaska," Donald Tusk told a news conference. "I will wait... for the effects of the meeting between Presidents Trump and Putin - I have many fears and a lot of hope." He said that Trump's recent comments on the war in Ukraine could give the impression the U.S. president was increasingly understanding Ukrainian and European arguments regarding the conflict, but that he was not 100% sure that this position would be lasting. French, Italian, German, Polish, British, Finnish and European Commission leaders on Saturday welcomed Trump's efforts to try to end the war, but emphasised the need to pressure Russia and provide security guarantees for Kyiv. Tusk said that the joint statement from European leaders showed that they were united in their approach to Ukraine peace talks, adding that Kyiv must be involved in any suchdiscussions. "For Poland and our partners, it is clear that state borders cannot be changed by force," he said. "Russia's war with Ukraine must not bring benefits to the aggressor." (Reporting by Alan Charlish, Marek Strzelecki; Editing by Toby Chopra)

Landmark trial kicks off over Trump's use of US military in policing role
Landmark trial kicks off over Trump's use of US military in policing role

New Straits Times

time27 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

Landmark trial kicks off over Trump's use of US military in policing role

NEW YORK: A landmark trial kicks off on Monday over the Trump administration's use of National Guard troops to support its deportation efforts and quell protests in Los Angeles, in a legal challenge highlighting the president's break from long-standing norms against deploying soldiers on American streets. The three-day non-jury trial before US District Judge Charles Breyer in San Francisco will determine if the government violated a 19th-century law that bars the military from civil law enforcement when it deployed troops to Los Angeles in June. Los Angeles suffered days of unrest and protests sparked by mass immigration raids at places where people gather to find work, such as Home Depot stores, a garment factory and a warehouse. The administration denies troops were used in civil law enforcement and plans to show they were protecting federal property and US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agents. Many of the troops have been withdrawn, but California said in recent court papers that 2,000 National Guard members are still going on immigration raids and restricting civilian movements in the state. A ruling against the government could restrict those troops' activities and constrain President Donald Trump if he tries to deploy troops to police American cities in the future. Trump said on Wednesday he might send the National Guard, a reserve force that answers to both state governors and the president, to patrol Washington, D.C., a city he said was "very unsafe". California and its Governor Gavin Newsom have asked Breyer to prohibit the troops from directly participating in domestic law enforcement activities. California and Newsom say the National Guard is accompanying ICE agents on raids and assisting in arrests, in violation of the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 and other laws that forbid the US military from taking part in civilian law enforcement. Trump ordered 700 Marines and 4,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles in June against Newsom's wishes. Trump's decision to send troops into Los Angeles prompted a national debate about the use of the military on US soil and inflamed political tension in the country's second-most populous city. California sued the Trump administration over the troop deployment, arguing it violates federal law and state sovereignty. A US appeals court has allowed Trump to retain control of California's National Guard during the legal challenge. California's lawsuit ultimately seeks a ruling that would return its National Guard troops to state control and a declaration that Trump's action was illegal.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store