'Being Jewish in France today means being alone'
Everything changed 18 months ago. Admitting this costs me: I have had to overcome a certain fear to publish this op-ed. The fear of isolation; the fear of being reduced to a condition I would have preferred not to have to justify. It is first and foremost this fear that I wish to express. Because the mere fact that it is uncontrollable says a great deal about our country and the direction it is taking.
"It's not easy to be Jewish": What happened to make these words by Charles Péguy, written in 1910 in his essay Notre Jeunesse (Memories of Youth), applicable to France in 2025? Antisemitism has become part of the zeitgeist. It is present every day, almost unconsciously. It no longer emerges only on those rare occasions that a vigilant society once recognized and punished – as in 2014, when shows in which [antisemite comedian] Dieudonné insulted Jews and, mixing vulgarity with abjection, mocked their past suffering and present anxiety, were shut down. Today, thousands of little Dieudonnés thrive, from the Assemblée Nationale to university lecterns. Their calm hatred is becoming a dominant ideology.
Words have lost their meaning
This collapse, like all moral failures, began with a matter of vocabulary. Words have lost their meaning. Two in particular, whose misuse has greatly contributed to offending Jewish sensibilities in France: "genocide" and "Zionist."
"Genocide": It was not as a reference, for example, to the Sudanese war in 2023, with its tens of thousands dead and millions displaced, that this term has become firmly established in public opinion. No, it was carefully turned, with a certain perverse sophistication, against the country created to serve as a refuge for the survivors of the extermination of three-quarters of Europe's Jews. And it has been hammered home until it produced the ultimate offense: equating Israel with the Nazis. Jews, who are, in their hearts and in their very being, orphans of the Holocaust, now find themselves cast as the heirs of their executioners. It is a dagger driven, day after day, into the wounded memory of the Jewish people.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
LeMonde
4 hours ago
- LeMonde
Britain, France and Germany threaten to reimpose sanctions on Iran as nuclear program deadline nears
The top diplomats of Britain, France and Germany threatened to reimpose sanctions on Iran as an end-of-the-month deadline nears for the country to resume negotiations with the West over its nuclear program and cooperation with the United Nations nuclear watchdog . The three countries − known as the E3 − wrote in a letter to the United Nations dated Friday, August 8, that they were willing to trigger a process known as the "snapback" mechanism − which allows one of the Western parties to reimpose UN sanctions − if Tehran doesn't comply with its requirements. French Foreign Minister Jean-Nöel Barrot posted the letter on Wednesday to X. He co-signed it along with top diplomats from Germany and the United Kingdom. "E3 have always committed to use all diplomatic tools at our disposal to ensure Iran does not develop a nuclear weapon," the letter said. "We have made clear that if Iran is not willing to reach a diplomatic solution before the end of August 2025, or does not seize the opportunity of an extension, E3 are prepared to trigger the snapback mechanism." The Iranian government didn't immediately respond to the development, but parliament member Manouchehr Mottaki − who was Iran's top diplomat for five years in the 2000s − warned of a swift reaction to any move to trigger the snapback mechanism. He said the Iranian parliament has a "finger on the trigger" for quitting the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty, or NPT, the international treaty aimed at halting the spread of nuclear weapons. "We only need 24 hours to approve quitting the nuclear deal," if the E3 raises the issue at the UN Security Council, Mottaki said. The letter from the E3 comes following a period of apparent diplomatic deadlock after a 12-day war between Iran and Israel in June, where Israeli and American jets struck some key nuclear-related facilities in the Islamic Republic. The countries met with Iranian officials last month in Turkey at Iran's consulate building in Istanbul on the possibility of reimposing international sanctions, lifted in 2015 in exchange for Tehran accepting restrictions and monitoring of its nuclear program. Iran's Foreign Ministry spokesman, Esmail Baghaei, said at the time that he hoped that the meeting would see the E3 nations reassess their "previous unconstructive attitude." Since the war, talks with Washington for a new nuclear deal haven't resumed, and Iran has since suspended ties with the International Atomic Energy Agency, the UN nuclear watchdog , following the attacks. The IAEA's first visit to Iran since the war didn't entail any visits to nuclear facilities Monday, and cooperation wasn't officially restored. One of the three countries opting to trigger the snapback mechanism would renew sanctions on Iran, but Tehran renewing cooperation with the Vienna-based IAEA and addressing concerns about its highly-enriched uranium stockpile would delay it. Iran has had limited IAEA inspections in the past as a pressure tactic in negotiating with the West and it is unclear how soon talks between Tehran and Washington for a deal over its nuclear program will resume. German Foreign Ministry spokesperson Josef Hinterseher on Wednesday said that the letter "once again underlines that the legal preconditions for snapback have long existed." "Our position and our appeal is, very clearly, that Iran still has the choice of deciding to return to diplomacy (…) and full cooperation with the IAEA," he told reporters at a regular news conference in Berlin. US intelligence agencies and the IAEA had assessed Iran last had an organized nuclear weapons program in 2003, though Tehran had been enriching uranium up to 60% − a short, technical step away from weapons-grade levels of 90%.
Euronews
7 hours ago
- Euronews
'Putin is bluffing,' Zelenskyy says as Europe pushes for ceasefire
Just two days before a historic meeting in Alaska between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, a virtual summit was initiated by the leaders of Ukraine and Germany in an effort to remind the world of one of Kyiv's main diplomatic principles: "Nothing about Ukraine without Ukraine." Following the call with Trump and European leaders, Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said the top priority both for Wednesday's talks and Friday's summit is a ceasefire, a sentiment that, according to Zelenskyy, Trump agreed with. "We talked about ceasefire today. President Trump said this is one of his priorities in conversation with President Putin," Zelenskyy said after the call during a joint press conference with German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. "I very much hope that some agreement will be reached, because so far all the talks held with ended only with him increasing military presence, intensifying attacks." According to Germany's Chancellor Friedrich Merz, European leaders were jointly trying to steer the Alaska meeting between Trump and Putin "in the right direction." "We want the correct sequence: first, a ceasefire — this must be at the very beginning. Later, there may be a framework agreement. Third, Ukraine is ready to negotiate on talks and territorial issues, but our starting point is the contact line," Merz explained. Pressure must be put on Russia for peace Zelenskyy says Ever since Trump confirmed his meeting with Putin, Zelenskyy has been trying to get support from Ukraine's partners in an effort to convince the US president not to trust the Russian leader. "I told Trump and all of our European partners that Putin is bluffing," Zelenskyy said after the virtual meeting with the US president on Wednesday. "Putin is bluffing that the sanctions do not work, that they are nothing. In fact sanctions are hitting Russian economy hard," Zelenskyy said, adding that Russia's president has not changed his ultimate goal and he still wants to "to occupy the whole of Ukraine." Merz, together with French President Emmanuel Macron, both reiterated that Ukraine has to be present at any talks on putting an end to Russia's war. "We have addressed several important points. We made it clear that Ukraine must be at the negotiating table if there is to be a follow-up meeting," Merz said. Possible trilateral meeting Following the virtual meeting with Zelenskyy, Trump said he was "always going to meet Vladimir Putin" only, without Ukraine's president and European leaders present at the talks. Trump described the upcoming Alaska talks as "setting the table for the second meeting" which would include Putin and Zelenskyy. "We are going to have the second meeting if the first one goes well," Trump said, adding that he would prefer the second meeting between Putin and Zelenskyy to take place "almost immediately." When asked what would the format of the second meeting be, Trump suggested it would be either bilateral or trilateral, depending on whether Zelenskyy and Putin wanted the US president there. Zelenskyy said that the next steps and the possibility of the second meeting will be discussed with Trump immediately after his talks with Putin. "The US President has repeatedly spoken about this. He suggested to me that after the meeting in Alaska, we would be in contact and discuss all the results, if any, and determine our next steps," Zelenskyy said.
Euronews
11 hours ago
- Euronews
French plan for 'State of New Caledonia' rejected by independence bloc
The main pro-independence coalition in the French overseas territory of New Caledonia has rejected a Paris-brokered deal to establish the Pacific archipelago as a new state. France last month announced a sweeping, hard-fought agreement aimed at granting more autonomy to New Caledonia, but stopping short of the independence sought by many indigenous Kanaks. The accord proposes the creation of a "State of New Caledonia" that would remain French and be enshrined in France's constitution. Under the plan, the archipelago's citizens would hold both French and Caledonian nationalities, instead of just the former. The agreement was reached after 10 days of negotiations in Paris involving representatives of the French government and those on both sides of the territory's independence debate, including the Kanak Socialist National Liberation Front (FLNKS). However, the FLNKS, New Caledonia's leading pro-independence alliance, this week said its extraordinary congress had voted to reject the deal outright. "The FLNKS formally rejects the Bougival draft agreement because it is incompatible with the foundations and achievements of our struggle," Dominique Fochi, a member of the coalition, said at a press conference on Wednesday. Another FLNKS member, Marie-Pierre Goyetche, said the bloc had launched a "peaceful appeal to our supporters to say stop to the state if it intends to force this through." The lack of a provision for a new independence referendum, a key demand for many indigenous Kanak campaigners, was the deal-breaker, local media reported. France's Minister for Overseas Territories Manuel Valls said in a Facebook post that he would travel to New Caledonia next week in a bid to salvage the "historic compromise". Recent unrest New Caledonia was hit by mass riots in May 2024, triggered by French government plans to give thousands of non-indigenous long-term residents voting rights. The unrest resulted in the death of at least 14 people and caused billions of euros worth of damage. Currently, only Kanaks and those who arrived from France before 1998 can cast their ballots in elections. However, since 1998 a further 40,000 French citizens have moved to the overseas territory of New Caledonia. France held three referendums in New Caledonia on independence between 2018 and 2021 as part of an agreement known as the Noumea Accords that followed a 1988 peace deal that ended violence between rival factions. A majority of voters chose to remain part of France instead of backing independence. The Kanaks rejected the results of 2021 referendum, which they boycotted because it was held at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic that severely affected their community. According to the 2019 census, 32.5% of indigenous Kanaks, who make up 41% of the region's total population, live in poverty. There have been calls to diversify New Caledonia's indebted economy, which depends heavily on nickel mining, and ultimately make it less reliant on the French mainland.
