FBI demotes agents who took a knee during Washington DC Black Lives Matter protests in 2020: report
The agents took a knee – a gesture to express dissent against perceived racial injustices – during Black Lives Matter protests in Washington, DC, in June of 2020.
At least four of the kneelers were reassigned to positions widely viewed as demotions, according to the Washington Post.
The transferred agents previously held senior roles in counterintelligence, counterterrorism and cybercrimes, the outlet reported.
They were not given a reason for their transfers, according to the publication.
The decision by the agents to take a knee was viewed by some as necessary to de-escalate the demonstration – as several Floyd-related protests turned violent that summer – and by others as a political statement.
'Those agents were not ever trained to be in that situation,' a former agent familiar with the matter told the Washington Post. 'Riot control is not our mission. We are trained to de-escalate.''
The FBI Agents Association reportedly rewarded the kneelers with $100 gift cards for their actions during the protest.
Former Rep. Matt Gaetz (R-Fla.) claimed in 2023 that he had learned some of the kneeling agents received 'plum personnel opportunities and promotions and advancements' from the bureau.
'Many FBI personnel we were trusting to be on the front lines were photographed kneeling in surrender to people who at times were violent,' Gaetz told Fox News at the time.
'To climb the ladder in federal employment, you shouldn't have to shimmy up the woke totem pole,' he added, describing the behavior of the agents as 'demoralizing.'
'The purpose of law enforcement is to keep people safe, not to engage in politics,' Gaetz argued.
'And for the last several years, we've seen the FBI more interested in virtue signaling and political activity than in just the nuts and bolts in evaluating the facts and the law.'
The Trump administration has reportedly moved to investigate, reassign and oust several senior FBI officials, including those involved in the raid of President Trump's Mar-a-Lago residence and the investigation of Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot participants.
The FBI declined to comment on personnel matters.
Originally published as FBI demotes agents who took a knee during Washington DC Black Lives Matter protests in 2020: report
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
2 hours ago
- Sky News AU
Australians warned to ‘wake up' as Albanese's Labor government drifts further from US after Palestine recognition decision
Australians have been warned to 'wake up' over the impact the Albanese government's decision to recognise Palestine is having on the US relationship. The decision has sparked a war of words between the Albanese government and the Trump administration, with US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee blasting Australia over the decision to recognise the state of Palestine, revealing there was a sentiment of 'disgust' inside the Trump administration over the move. 'I think the timing has been very hurtful to any prospects of negotiating some settlement in Gaza with Hamas. They basically walked away. This is a gift to them, and it's unfortunate,' Mr Huckabee told ABC's 7.30 programme. "There's an enormous level of disappointment and some disgust.' Speaking to Sky News on Friday, former Labor MP Michael Danby said Australia was being led by 'not a normal Labor government'. 'We have a socialist left government … This is not a normal Labour government and they have abandoned our usual procedures,' he told Sky News host Rowan Dean. 'Wong said that she only called Rubio in a perfunctory way the night before they made an announcement. 'How would you not consult the Americans who are actually involved in negotiations for ceasefire, who have all of those forces over there, and consult the French?' Mr Danby said it was a 'ridiculous basis' to decide Australia's foreign policy and warned Australians of a 'fundamental shift'. The former Labor MP said Mr Albanese, Ms Wong, and the rest of the Labor Caucus were 'fundamentally shifting', which the Americans 'sense' was a shift away from a friendly 'pro-US stance' to a 'pro-China worldview'. 'Australians should wake up. This is not a matter of just Israel. This is a fundamental shift in Australian foreign policy, and it's absolutely unjustified,' he said. Responding to the US diplomat's comments on Friday morning, the Prime Minister said Mr Huckabee was an 'ambassador of a country, not Australia, to another country. Not Australia, Israel'. 'My job is to represent Australia's interests and Australians have been disgusted by what they see on their TV every night,' Mr Albanese told ABC Radio Melbourne radio.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
The one thing America could learn from us
A few weeks ago I watched as protesters braved the rain to cross the Sydney Harbour Bridge in a March for Humanity, calling for aid to Gaza. Among the Palestinian flags, one image stood out: the Indigenous flag, symbolising a shared history of dispossession. This week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that Australia will next month recognise a Palestinian state at the UN. These developments remind us that identity cannot be separated from politics. At a time when democracies elsewhere are fracturing under the weight of polarisation, Australia's institutional resilience should embolden us to embrace our differences more openly in political discourse – not frighten us. As an Australian studying in the US during both of Trump's presidential victories I saw first hand how identities can be politicised to fracture a society. After the October 7 Hamas attacks I witnessed, as a graduate student, how Harvard students retreated into ideological silos, avoiding dialogue with those whose identities they perceived to be at odds with their own. Australia feels different – partly because of how our political system is structured. Identity weighs less heavily on our social conscience, but perhaps that's why it's so often ignored. Identity politics refers to the idea that our race, gender, religion or class shapes our political views. Over time it has often been framed as divisive. Peter Dutton, after the 2023 Voice referendum defeat, said the result was a rejection of 'the madness of identity politics'. But his own loss in the 2025 election might suggest otherwise. A wave of post-election commentary emphasised the Liberal Party's need to better reflect 'modern Australia', with female representation highlighted as one of the most glaring absences in the party room. Loading Australia's electoral system structurally limits the worst elements of polarisation caused by identity politics. Unlike the US, where turnout hovers around 60 per cent, Australia's compulsory voting system ensures broad participation and fosters a more centrist politics. Our Westminster system means Australian voters elect a party to govern, not a singular leader. Our ballots are cast for local MPs, and the party with the majority elects our prime minister. In contrast, the US system centres on the direct election of a president, making national politics more personalised by design. Preferential voting also encourages engagement with more than one party and rewards coalition-building over extremism. This institutional design helps insulate us from the deep political tribalism seen in the US and gives us the space to explore identity in a less adversarial way. A few months ago, during the 2025 Australian federal election, the main topics on the campaign trail were the cost of living, Medicare, affordable housing and Australia's future energy mix – a far cry from the US presidential election, which focused on a 'war on woke' and employed rhetoric that divided American voters along lines of race, gender and sexuality. This contrast is driven in part by the need of American candidates to use emotionally charged narratives to boost voter turnout.
The Age
2 hours ago
- The Age
The one thing America could learn from us
A few weeks ago I watched as protesters braved the rain to cross the Sydney Harbour Bridge in a March for Humanity, calling for aid to Gaza. Among the Palestinian flags, one image stood out: the Indigenous flag, symbolising a shared history of dispossession. This week Prime Minister Anthony Albanese announced that Australia will next month recognise a Palestinian state at the UN. These developments remind us that identity cannot be separated from politics. At a time when democracies elsewhere are fracturing under the weight of polarisation, Australia's institutional resilience should embolden us to embrace our differences more openly in political discourse – not frighten us. As an Australian studying in the US during both of Trump's presidential victories I saw first hand how identities can be politicised to fracture a society. After the October 7 Hamas attacks I witnessed, as a graduate student, how Harvard students retreated into ideological silos, avoiding dialogue with those whose identities they perceived to be at odds with their own. Australia feels different – partly because of how our political system is structured. Identity weighs less heavily on our social conscience, but perhaps that's why it's so often ignored. Identity politics refers to the idea that our race, gender, religion or class shapes our political views. Over time it has often been framed as divisive. Peter Dutton, after the 2023 Voice referendum defeat, said the result was a rejection of 'the madness of identity politics'. But his own loss in the 2025 election might suggest otherwise. A wave of post-election commentary emphasised the Liberal Party's need to better reflect 'modern Australia', with female representation highlighted as one of the most glaring absences in the party room. Loading Australia's electoral system structurally limits the worst elements of polarisation caused by identity politics. Unlike the US, where turnout hovers around 60 per cent, Australia's compulsory voting system ensures broad participation and fosters a more centrist politics. Our Westminster system means Australian voters elect a party to govern, not a singular leader. Our ballots are cast for local MPs, and the party with the majority elects our prime minister. In contrast, the US system centres on the direct election of a president, making national politics more personalised by design. Preferential voting also encourages engagement with more than one party and rewards coalition-building over extremism. This institutional design helps insulate us from the deep political tribalism seen in the US and gives us the space to explore identity in a less adversarial way. A few months ago, during the 2025 Australian federal election, the main topics on the campaign trail were the cost of living, Medicare, affordable housing and Australia's future energy mix – a far cry from the US presidential election, which focused on a 'war on woke' and employed rhetoric that divided American voters along lines of race, gender and sexuality. This contrast is driven in part by the need of American candidates to use emotionally charged narratives to boost voter turnout.
