logo
Madurai corporation to hire 35 more tankers to supply water

Madurai corporation to hire 35 more tankers to supply water

Time of Indiaa day ago
1
2
Madurai: Madurai corporation has decided to hire 35 additional tanker lorries to tackle water supply issues in areas with old pipeline networks and areas experiencing low pressure.
The decision taken as part of measures to address distribution gaps and maintain service during emergency repairs. A senior corporation official said the new fleet will include 20 tankers with a capacity of 10,000 litres each and 15 tankers with a capacity of 6,000 litres. At present, the corporation has 40 hired tankers for regular water supply in areas not fully covered by pipelines as well as areas facing disruptions.
Officials said the newly laid drinking water pipelines under the Mullaperiyar drinking water scheme improved supply coverage but also require careful monitoring in the initial phase to address technical snags. "Whenever there is a drop in pressure or a pipeline leak, tankers are the quickest way to ensure households continue to receive water," the official said.
The additional tankers will be hired soon and will be pressed into service ahead of the complete launch of the Mullaperiyar scheme, the official added. The corporation has also urged residents to promptly report supply issues through its online portal so that water is supplied through tankers without much disruptions.
Stay updated with the latest local news from your
city
on
Times of India
(TOI). Check upcoming
bank holidays
,
public holidays
, and current
gold rates
and
silver prices
in your area.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

$18.8M Ozempic Scam: Vicky Ramancha's anticipatory bail rejected by city court
$18.8M Ozempic Scam: Vicky Ramancha's anticipatory bail rejected by city court

Time of India

time3 hours ago

  • Time of India

$18.8M Ozempic Scam: Vicky Ramancha's anticipatory bail rejected by city court

(You can now subscribe to our (You can now subscribe to our Economic Times WhatsApp channel On Monday, a city court denied anticipatory bail to businessman Vicky Ramancha, the main accused in an alleged $18.8 million international scam involving counterfeit doses of Ozempic, an anti-diabetic medication increasingly used for weight Sessions Judge Saurabh Partap Singh Laler noted that the magnitude of the alleged fraud and the serious health risks associated with exporting fake pharmaceuticals to the US made it unsuitable to grant anticipatory the order dated August 11, the court stated that the allegations pointed to "a sophisticated transnational fraud operation."[With TOI inputs]

Tariff Shock: $7 bn India–US auto parts trade braces for big impact
Tariff Shock: $7 bn India–US auto parts trade braces for big impact

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

Tariff Shock: $7 bn India–US auto parts trade braces for big impact

US tariffs on Indian auto components threaten to disrupt exports, potentially costing India 15-20% of its auto-part exports to the US. SMEs, which form the bulk of the sector, will be severely affected. While larger manufacturers explore alternative markets, smaller firms face pressure from American clients to absorb tariff costs, squeezing profit margins. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The US's new tariffs on Indian auto components are set to cause immediate disruption, with analysts and industry experts warning that 15-20% of India's exports to its largest auto-parts market could be lost in the short term, ToI reported. The US accounts for 27% of India's auto component exports, meaning around 8% of the country's total production will be directly affected, said Jitin Makkar, group head and senior vice-president (corporate ratings) at ICRA According to the Automotive Component Manufacturers Association (ACMA), exports to the US stood at nearly $7 billion in 2024. Of this, $3.6 billion worth of parts and components for cars and small trucks will now attract a 25% duty. The bigger hit will come from the remaining $3 billion, which includes commercial vehicle parts, construction equipment components, off-highway machinery, and tractor and farm equipment parts, all of which will face a reciprocal tariff of 50%.While larger original equipment manufacturers are already exploring alternative markets, the impact will be most severe for small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) that make up the bulk of the sector. Noble Cast Comp, an aluminium casting manufacturer in Bhosari, sends 60% of its products to the US. Its chairman and managing director, Nitin Bhagwat, said American customers were already asking the company to share the tariff burden, which would squeeze profit Pimpri Chinchwad, R K Industries exports computer numerical control machined components to global auto firms, with 20% of its shipments going to the US. 'Effects are expected to be felt from next month, with US customers likely seeking price reductions due to increased landing costs and clients may also explore alternative suppliers from countries with lower costs,' said the company's operations head, Nilesh effective duty rates will range from 25-28% to 45-50%, depending on the product category, and the extent of the impact will vary based on how essential the exported component is. Ravindra Patki, managing partner at Vector Consulting Group, said, '30-40% of India's auto component exports to the US comes from programmes in which India is one of multiple approved suppliers with a defined share of business.'For larger exportable parts, Indian suppliers will be at a disadvantage compared with exporters from countries such as Japan, Vietnam and Indonesia, which face lower tariffs of 15-19%.Component makers say much will depend on their individual ties with US buyers. Sipra Engineering managing director M Umadi said, 'US customers, accounting for 28-32% of exports, have assured support if we maintain cost, quality and delivery standards, but may request cost reductions later.'(with ToI inputs)

Court orders insurance company to pay Rs 2 lakh to Ghaziabad woman after it rejected her stolen car claim 10 years ago
Court orders insurance company to pay Rs 2 lakh to Ghaziabad woman after it rejected her stolen car claim 10 years ago

Time of India

time4 hours ago

  • Time of India

Court orders insurance company to pay Rs 2 lakh to Ghaziabad woman after it rejected her stolen car claim 10 years ago

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission has directed National Insurance Company Limited to pay 75% of the insured value, Rs 2 lakh, to an Indirapuram woman after her car, bought for rental income, was stolen in 2015. The commission also asked the company to pay Rs 5,000 as compensation for mental agony and litigation costs within 45 days, failing which interest at 6% on the total due amount will be charged, a TOI report stated. Claim for stolen car Meena Devi filed her complaint on April 18, 2017, stating that she had purchased an insurance policy from National Insurance on December 2, 2014, to cover loss and damage to her car, valid for one year. She said, "The car met with an accident on Jan 13, 2015, and I claimed reimbursement for the repair. The claim was honoured by the company, and Rs 95,000 were reimbursed, but the company officials made me sign some blank documents and stamp paper under the pretext of record-keeping. Later, when my car was stolen on Oct 21, 2015, the insurance company refused to make any payment saying the policy was closed." Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 4 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals Batch 2 By Ansh Mehra View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 3 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Artificial Intelligence AI For Business Professionals By Vaibhav Sisinity View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass - Batch 2 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Finance Value and Valuation Masterclass Batch-1 By CA Himanshu Jain View Program Insurance company's response The company argued that it was justified in rejecting the claim, stating that the policyholder had submitted an undertaking on January 13, 2015, agreeing to close the policy after the accident claim. "The undertaking was vetted by the notary, so it is wrong to say that we took blank documents from the policyholder and used them as per our choice," the counsel added. The commission, led by president Praveen Kumar Jain and members Shailja Sachan and RP Singh, noted a discrepancy in dates. The undertaking was signed on January 21, 2015, while the stamp paper on record was purchased on January 24, 2015. "It is hard to believe that the policyholder applied for cancellation of the policy," the commission observed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store