
LA Police Crack Down on Pro-Immigration Protests
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids carried out across Los Angeles, California, on Friday have ignited mass protests and heightened debate over the aggressive direction of US immigration policy under the Trump administration.
The coordinated operation unfolded without warning, with convoys of unmarked, military-style vehicles and federal agents descending on multiple worksites in Los Angeles. According to local news reports, dozens of people were taken into custody during this sweep.
Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) initially refused to disclose the total number of arrests, citing operational safety. A spokesperson simply stated that anyone in violation of immigration law, regardless of nationality, could be arrested, detained, and deported.
'This is not justice'
Estimates from immigrant rights groups suggested that between 45 and 80 individuals were detained. Among them was Service Employees International Union (SEIU) California President David Huerta, who was reportedly injured while in custody.
ICE and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) later reported the arrest of 44 individuals for immigration-related offences.
'This is about how we as a community stand together and resist the injustice that's happening,' said Huerta in a public statement. 'Hard working people are being treated like criminals.'
'We all collectively have to object to the madness because this is not justice. This is injustice. And we all have to stand on the right side of injustice,' he added.
Activists say the operation lacked legal foundation. Caleb Soto of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network criticized ICE for failing to obtain judicial warrants, alleging that agents targeted known immigrant-heavy worksites, using people's fear and flight as a pretext for mass detentions.
'They use someone running as 'reasonable suspicion' of being undocumented and then arrest everyone nearby,' Soto said. 'That's not law enforcement—it's fear tactics.'
The raids triggered swift mobilization from the community with hundreds of protesters marching toward the federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles, where some detainees were believed to be held.
Demonstrators reportedly spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on a federal building before being confronted by Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officers, who responded with tear gas and pepper spray, claiming that some protesters had thrown concrete debris.
LAPD swiftly declared the protest an unlawful assembly, raising questions about the city's commitment to protecting the right to dissent in the face of aggressive immigration enforcement.
Local officials issued immediate and vocal condemnations with all City Council members releasing a joint statement rejecting 'fear tactics to support extreme political agendas.'
Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez directly challenged federal claims that ICE focuses on criminals, saying: 'It's never, ever, ever been the case. When they come for one of us, they come for all of us.'
Arrest quotas
The raids are part of a broader federal campaign aimed at drastically increasing immigration enforcement under president Trump.
White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem met last month with ICE leadership and demanded the agency increase arrests to 3,000 per day—reportedly threatening job loss for officials who didn't comply.
The result was a dramatic escalation in enforcement nationwide, including the detention of over 2,200 individuals in a single day in early June. Many of those detained had reportedly been enrolled in ICE's Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program – a monitoring system meant to offer a more humane and cost-effective substitute for incarceration while individuals await immigration proceedings.
Participants in the ATD program are typically subject to electronic ankle monitoring, biometric surveillance, or mandatory check-ins via phone or in person. Advocates argue that the decision to target individuals already complying with government oversight not only violates the spirit of the program but also undermines trust in any form of cooperation with immigration authorities.
Legal experts and immigrant advocacy groups have expressed alarm over these developments, warning that constitutional rights are being eroded under the guise of policy.
Access to legal counsel remains limited — only three attorneys were reportedly allowed to meet with detainees following the Los Angeles raids.
Even prior to this escalation, immigration enforcement in the Los Angeles area had already been intensifying. Between 2022 and 2024, ICE detentions surged by 155% to nearly 3,900 people, while removals rose by 180% to over 3,500. Among those without criminal records, the numbers were even more stark: detentions jumped by 432% and deportations by 547%.
As federal officials inflate arrest quotas to protect their jobs, immigrant communities across the US are left to endure the relentless terror imposed by a system more invested in punishment than justice.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Morocco World
6 hours ago
- Morocco World
LA Police Crack Down on Pro-Immigration Protests
US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raids carried out across Los Angeles, California, on Friday have ignited mass protests and heightened debate over the aggressive direction of US immigration policy under the Trump administration. The coordinated operation unfolded without warning, with convoys of unmarked, military-style vehicles and federal agents descending on multiple worksites in Los Angeles. According to local news reports, dozens of people were taken into custody during this sweep. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) initially refused to disclose the total number of arrests, citing operational safety. A spokesperson simply stated that anyone in violation of immigration law, regardless of nationality, could be arrested, detained, and deported. 'This is not justice' Estimates from immigrant rights groups suggested that between 45 and 80 individuals were detained. Among them was Service Employees International Union (SEIU) California President David Huerta, who was reportedly injured while in custody. ICE and Homeland Security Investigations (HSI) later reported the arrest of 44 individuals for immigration-related offences. 'This is about how we as a community stand together and resist the injustice that's happening,' said Huerta in a public statement. 'Hard working people are being treated like criminals.' 'We all collectively have to object to the madness because this is not justice. This is injustice. And we all have to stand on the right side of injustice,' he added. Activists say the operation lacked legal foundation. Caleb Soto of the National Day Laborer Organizing Network criticized ICE for failing to obtain judicial warrants, alleging that agents targeted known immigrant-heavy worksites, using people's fear and flight as a pretext for mass detentions. 'They use someone running as 'reasonable suspicion' of being undocumented and then arrest everyone nearby,' Soto said. 'That's not law enforcement—it's fear tactics.' The raids triggered swift mobilization from the community with hundreds of protesters marching toward the federal detention center in downtown Los Angeles, where some detainees were believed to be held. Demonstrators reportedly spray-painted anti-ICE slogans on a federal building before being confronted by Los Angeles Police Department (LAPD) officers, who responded with tear gas and pepper spray, claiming that some protesters had thrown concrete debris. LAPD swiftly declared the protest an unlawful assembly, raising questions about the city's commitment to protecting the right to dissent in the face of aggressive immigration enforcement. Local officials issued immediate and vocal condemnations with all City Council members releasing a joint statement rejecting 'fear tactics to support extreme political agendas.' Councilmember Eunisses Hernandez directly challenged federal claims that ICE focuses on criminals, saying: 'It's never, ever, ever been the case. When they come for one of us, they come for all of us.' Arrest quotas The raids are part of a broader federal campaign aimed at drastically increasing immigration enforcement under president Trump. White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller and Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Kristi Noem met last month with ICE leadership and demanded the agency increase arrests to 3,000 per day—reportedly threatening job loss for officials who didn't comply. The result was a dramatic escalation in enforcement nationwide, including the detention of over 2,200 individuals in a single day in early June. Many of those detained had reportedly been enrolled in ICE's Alternatives to Detention (ATD) program – a monitoring system meant to offer a more humane and cost-effective substitute for incarceration while individuals await immigration proceedings. Participants in the ATD program are typically subject to electronic ankle monitoring, biometric surveillance, or mandatory check-ins via phone or in person. Advocates argue that the decision to target individuals already complying with government oversight not only violates the spirit of the program but also undermines trust in any form of cooperation with immigration authorities. Legal experts and immigrant advocacy groups have expressed alarm over these developments, warning that constitutional rights are being eroded under the guise of policy. Access to legal counsel remains limited — only three attorneys were reportedly allowed to meet with detainees following the Los Angeles raids. Even prior to this escalation, immigration enforcement in the Los Angeles area had already been intensifying. Between 2022 and 2024, ICE detentions surged by 155% to nearly 3,900 people, while removals rose by 180% to over 3,500. Among those without criminal records, the numbers were even more stark: detentions jumped by 432% and deportations by 547%. As federal officials inflate arrest quotas to protect their jobs, immigrant communities across the US are left to endure the relentless terror imposed by a system more invested in punishment than justice.


Morocco World
a day ago
- Morocco World
Trump and Musk Feud Erupts After Spending Bill Fallout
Rabat – The once-strong alliance between US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon Musk has fractured in dramatic fashion, with a fierce exchange of insults playing out across social media on Thursday. The public row began after Musk denounced Trump's flagship tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination,' urging Americans to pressure their representatives to reject it. Trump responded that he was 'very disappointed' in Musk, hinting that the dispute could spell the end of their 'great relationship.' Musk hit back swiftly, accusing Trump of 'ingratitude' and claiming credit for his political success. 'Without me, Trump would have lost the election,' Musk wrote on X. At the heart of the dispute is Trump's recently passed spending bill, which Musk argues dangerously inflates the national debt and removes crucial subsidies for electric vehicles, impacting his Tesla business. Trump dismissed the concerns, suggesting Musk's anger stemmed from the loss of government incentives. In another tweet, 'If America goes broke, nothing else matters,' Musk wrote. The fallout has had financial consequences. Tesla's stock plunged over 14% on Thursday, wiping out around $150 billion in market value, the largest single-day loss in the company's history. SpaceX also briefly threatened to decommission its Dragon spacecraft, though Musk later walked back the decision. The rift marks a sharp reversal in fortunes for two of America's most high-profile figures, whose political and business collaboration began with Musk's endorsement of Trump following an assassination attempt last year. Musk later poured $290 million into Trump's campaign and briefly led the Department of Government Efficiency (Doge). According to Reuters, attempts to arrange a reconciliation call on Friday were reportedly abandoned. A White House official confirmed that no conversation between the two men is expected, suggesting that the political partnership that once dominated headlines may now be over. Tags: Donald Trumpelon muskMusk Trum falloutTrumpUSX


Morocco World
a day ago
- Morocco World
World Reacts to Trump's Latest Controversial Travel Ban
Rabat – Countries across the world have strongly reacted to President Trump's latest controversial travel ban, pointing to its severe and unwelcome international consequences. Nationals from twelve countries – including Afghanistan, Myanmar, Chad, Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Haiti, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, and Yemen – face a complete travel ban following Trump's announcement. Meanwhile, citizens from seven countries, namely Burundi, Cuba, Laos, Sierra Leone, Togo, Turkmenistan and Venezuela, face partial travel restrictions. The global response to the bank has largely been condemnatory, with the prevailing feeling being that the move is discriminatory and unfair. But President Trump has signaled his readiness to shrug off US and global media's critical coverage of his decision, stating: 'I must act to protect the national security and national interests of the United States and its people.' Reactions There have meanwhile been different levels of reactions from the nations that have been affected by the controversial announcement. Venezuela has hit back against Trump, stating that the US itself is a dangerous place to travel. 'Being in the United States is a great risk for anyone, not just for Venezuelans,' said the country's interior minister. By contrast, Somalia has pledged to work with Washington on the security issues President Trump cited as the reasons for his ban. Dahir Hassan Abdi, the Somali ambassador to the US, said: 'Somalia values its longstanding relationship with the United States and stands ready to engage in dialogue to address the concerns raised' by the Trump ban. The President of the National Iranian American Council lamented the decision, stating that 'the impact of the ban will once again be felt by Americans who were denied the ability to see their loved ones.' The chairman of #AfghanEvac, a charity involved in getting Afghan refugees out of the country, described the ban as shameful and morally bankrupt. 'To include Afghanistan, a nation whose people stood alongside America for 20 years, is a moral disgrace,' he argued The president of Oxfam America agreed, fuming: 'This policy is not about national security, it is about sowing discord.' Another, controversial addition to the ban was Haiti, which is currently going through a period of Gang warfare, with Port-Au-Prince being one of the most dangerous places on earth. This controversial decision, which will come into effect on Monday morning, will continue to have a large impact on all the countries and people concerned. For observers, it is the latest installment in President Trump's indifference to the moral standing the US has long claimed in international politics.