Baby not given antibiotics 'until after cardiac arrest'
A baby suffering with a respiratory illness was not given prescribed antibiotics until after he suffered the first of two cardiac arrests, an inquest heard.
Ben Condon, who was born prematurely, was two months old when he died at Bristol Children's Hospital in April 2015.
He was being treated in the intensive care unit for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and metapneumovirus (hMPV), which are similar to the common cold in adults.
University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust has previously admitted a failure to give Ben antibiotics sooner contributed to his death.
A previous inquest recorded Ben's death as being caused by ARDS, hMPV and prematurity, but this was quashed by the High Court after new evidence emerged.
Ben's parents, Allyn and Jenny Condon, from Weston-super-Mare, fought hard for a second inquest which is under way at Avon Coroner's Court.
The inquest heard Ben had developed a pseudomonas bacterial infection before his condition deteriorated and he died having suffered two cardiac arrests.
Mr Condon previously claimed doctors "intentionally" did not disclose his son had the infection until after he was cremated.
On Thursday, a junior doctor on the unit told the court she did not return to Ben with antibiotics after another patient needed urgent attention.
Dr Jessica Spaull told the inquest she could not recall a conversation with a consultant about giving Ben antibiotics, other than it would be "reasonable to start".
"I recall I was in the process of doing that [writing up the prescription] when another of my allocated patients… when their endocrinal tube was accidentally removed," she said.
"I recall I went over to that bed in an emergency, and I recall that I was involved re-intubating that patient.
"That meant I had not completed that prescription at that point."
She realised the prescription had not been administered while completing a handover for the evening shift.
"I recall looking at the drug chart and realising that the antibiotic prescribed earlier hadn't been given," she said.
Jennifer MacLeod, representing the Condon family, asked Dr Spaull whether there was a "general consensus" among doctors that Ben's respiratory illness was caused by a virus, rather than a bacterial infection.
Dr Spaull said in response she did not "and still does not have the expertise to have formulated ideas about ARDS causality" because of a lack of experience in that area.
Ms MacLeod asked whether there was a "level of complacency" about how poorly Ben was.
Dr Spaull said the question was hard for her to answer, because at the time she was a junior doctor and was only five weeks into her first placement on a paediatric intensive care unit.
The inquest continues.
Follow BBC Bristol on Facebook, X and Instagram. Send your story ideas to us on email or via WhatsApp on 0800 313 4630.
Baby death detail 'kept back until after cremation'
Mum tried to take own life after baby son's death
Operator failed to send ambulance to baby, inquest hears
HM Courts & Tribunals Service
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
Prehistoric humans may have used fire to smoke meat one million years ago, study suggests
Over time, as the availability of large game declined, humans had to adapt to hunting smaller animals and using fire more consistently. A groundbreaking study by researchers at Tel Aviv University suggests that early humans may have started using fire for a surprising reason: to smoke and preserve meat. According to the study, which was published in Frontiers in Nutrition, this practice could date back as far as one million years. The research, led by Dr. Miki Ben-Dor and Professor Ran Barkai of the university's Department of Archaeology and Ancient Near Eastern Cultures, challenges the long-held assumption that early humans initially used fire primarily for cooking. Instead, the researchers argue that fire served two essential purposes for our ancient ancestors: first, to protect large game from predators and scavengers, and second, to prevent meat from spoiling by smoking and drying it, thus extending its shelf life. 'Fire was a precious resource for early humans, requiring significant effort to gather fuel, ignite, and maintain,' said Dr. Ben-Dor. 'They wouldn't have invested that effort without a strong, energy-efficient reason. Smoking meat was a way to preserve their most important source of calories.' The study focuses on sites dating from 1.8 million to 800,000 years ago, where evidence of fire use has been found. Researchers reviewed nine such sites worldwide, including two in Israel - Gesher Benot Ya'aqov and Evron Quarry -six in Africa, and one in Spain. Intriguingly, all of these sites also contained the remains of large animals such as elephants, hippos, and rhinoceroses, creatures that would have provided a rich and vital source of nutrition for early humans. 'The meat and fat from a single elephant could feed a group of 20 to 30 people for over a month,' explained Prof. Barkai. 'That's an enormous amount of food that needed protection not just from other predators, but also from spoilage.' The study fits into a larger theory developed by Ben-Dor and Barkai that connects many prehistoric phenomena, such as tool use and hunting strategies, to early humans' reliance on large animals for survival. Over time, as the availability of large game declined, humans had to adapt to hunting smaller animals and using fire more consistently. 'Once fire was used to protect and preserve meat, it likely also provided opportunities to cook meat,' Barkai added. 'Cooking could have emerged as a byproduct of this initial use, at no extra energetic cost.' The findings provide a fresh perspective on a question that has long fascinated archaeologists: why did early humans first harness fire? The answer, according to this new research, may lie in the simple need to make the most of a hard-won meal.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Diver who lost leg to underwater machinery awarded more than £750,000
A deep sea diver has been awarded more than £750,000 in compensation after losing a leg when he was crushed by a giant underwater hammer. Allan Peacock, 55, was injured while working underwater off the coast of India in 2011. A heavy pile, which acts like a hammer to nail another pile into the seabed, unexpectedly moved, sucking him between the two pieces of equipment and crushing his foot. Mr Peacock was able to drag himself away and received medical treatment in India and Newcastle after flying home, but his injuries resulted in him having a below-knee amputation. With efforts described as 'quite exceptional' by a surgeon, Mr Peacock was back working underwater within 18 months, with the help of a prosthetic leg. Now, after suing at the High Court, he has been awarded £765,866 in compensation from his former employer, Del Seatek India Private Limited. He had already received £169,000 from the operator of the barge on which he was working. The court heard Mr Peacock qualified in 1998 and was working as a saturation diver for Del Seatek when he was injured while working from a cargo barge in pipe-laying operations in Paradip, Odisha, in November 2011. His barrister, Mark Chapman KC, said conditions were difficult, with poor visibility of only about a metre and a strong tide when he descended underwater in a dive basket to work at a depth of up to 30m. His task was to disconnect two chains holding vertical piles together, one on top of the other, with the top driving the other into the seabed and 'acting like a hammer on a nail'. As he began to work, the top pile parted from the other and the barge began to roll because of the tide, also causing the piles to move, the barrister continued. 'They parted because they were insecurely attached,' he said. 'There was too much slack in the chains holding them together. 'The claimant's right foot was sucked in between the parted piles before the top pile fell back on top of the bottom pile and, in doing so, crushed the foot.' Mr Peacock was transferred to the Royal Victoria Infirmary in Newcastle, where he had to have an amputation because of the lack of blood flow to his foot. Mr Chapman said the extent of his injury had been 'graphically revealed' to him and he was told without warning that amputation was required, which left him 'extremely shocked and quite emotional'. 'Following the accident, the claimant was absent from all/any work for a period of around 18 months,' he added. 'However, he is a stoical, resourceful and determined individual. He was resolute in his ambition to return to his pre-accident work, having independently researched the regulatory position applicable to amputees and commercial diving operations. 'The claimant has managed to return to work in a field which is very demanding with the use of prostheses provided by the NHS.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.
Yahoo
7 days ago
- Yahoo
Missing Lockport attorney located in Niagara Falls
A missing Lockport attorney was located by Niagara County Sheriff's deputies at a Niagara Falls department store on Saturday afternoon. Deputies were called to the store about 3:30 p.m. Saturday to interview Scott Stopa. A release from the sheriff's office about half an hour later said it was determined he was safe. Family members had reported Stopa had not been seen or heard from since Tuesday. 'Our family is extremely concerned for his safety and well-being,' Stopa's sister Jenny told the Gazette Thursday night. 'No one's heard from him and his phone is at his home.' Stopa is a partner at Ben & Stopa Attorneys-at-Law on East Avenue in Lockport. He lives in the Town of Cambria. Stopa's online profile indicates that his legal practice is 'family-law focused.' The profile says Stopa 'represents clients in divorce, custody, paternity, and guardianship proceedings.' He is also described as a 'court-certified' child guardian. Filicetti said Thursday members of his office's Criminal Investigation Bureau had been working on Stopa's disappearance since the missing person's report was first filed.
