logo
Here is the training that the Army says is no longer mandatory

Here is the training that the Army says is no longer mandatory

Yahoo01-04-2025

The Army is cutting hours worth of training that were previously mandatory for soldiers, including the basics of combat medicine and a primer on the laws of war. The new approach to so-called 'mandatory training tasks,' officials say, will make a long list of courses and training events optional, with commanders allowed to pick and choose which training their troops are likely to need.
Command Sgt. Maj. Chris Mullinax, the top enlisted soldier for the Army's operations, planning and training department, said reducing hours spent on mandatory online training will allow soldiers to focus on building 'warrior ethos' through 'tough, realistic training.'
'What our Army senior leaders are trying to do is make sure that they have as much time available so that they can focus on those things. There's no distractions, there's no burdens and our war fighters are focused on war fighting and that is absolutely tough, realistic training in the field,' Mullinax told reporters.
Resiliency training, which taught soldiers and commanders coping mechanisms for stress and adversity — whether it was how families can handle the stress of deployments or how soldiers can maintain healthy relationships — was completely removed from the Army's training and leadership development regulation.
Commanders will now decide whether the following training courses are necessary for their units:
Individual and unit chemical, biological, radiological, nuclear (CBRN) training.
Combat Lifesaver Training and certification, a 40-hour course with both hands-on and academic classes that teach the basics of battlefield first aid. The course includes training on action under fire; tourniquet use; bleeding control methods for gunshot wounds, explosions or other trauma; airway management; wound care; splinting; and emergency evacuation procedures.
Safety and occupational health training which includes basic risk management, traffic safety for drivers under 26 and blast overpressure for traumatic brain injury mitigation.
Law of war training for operational units, which covers rules of engagement and prohibited behavior for soldiers facing combat and how to handle detainee operations.
Code of conduct training, which provides an ethical and moral guide for soldiers who are captured during war.
Online training courses on Personnel Recovery and Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape (SERE) which covers avoiding capture, resisting enemy influence if captured, and escape.
Training for certain job fields will remain unchanged. For example, chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear training for CBRN specialists will still be required, as will medical training for combat medics. Under the new regulation, soldiers in other fields may participate in that, or similar training, if their commanders deem it necessary.
'Not every organization needs to do those tasks at any given time,' Mullinax said.
Soldiers will now have to take 16 mandatory training courses each year, down from 27 that soldiers were required to complete online and in person annually. The changes were directed by Army Chief of Staff Gen. Randy George 'to reduce administrative burdens' on unit leaders, according to a fact sheet provided to Task & Purpose by the Army.
The changes mean more flexibility for commanders who will decide which types of training are needed for their soldiers or their unit's mission. For example, a sustainment brigade may have different courses than an infantry unit, based on their specific mission.
'Part of the message is saying to our commanders that, 'hey, we we trust you, and we're giving this back to you so that you can assess your organization and manage that risk appropriately and focus on the things that you need to focus on and build readiness in a way that's important for your organization,'' Mullinax said.
The Army does not have a specific office or unit dedicated to tracking the effects of softening the requirements for these types of training courses, but Mullinax said they will manage it 'the same way we manage everything else, which is commanders having conversations.'
Soldiers have long griped about the slew of mandatory training that all ranks are expected to complete. Criticisms have centered around squeezing the required courses into already full schedules of field training, pre-deployment workups, actual deployments, and other administrative tasks. Many soldiers say they end up completing their training after work hours. The issue even caught the attention of Elon Musk, who responded to a soldier's video posted to X sarcastically asking for the Department of Government Efficiency not to eliminate the 'very important online training we do in the military every year.'
The Army previously announced cuts to 346 hours worth of Professional Military Education, or PME, that the service deemed redundant and overwhelming. The courses, which soldiers needed to complete in order to be promoted, included topics like squad drills, Army doctrine, land operations, leadership, problem-solving, the law of armed conflict, reducing stress, public speaking, transition to civilian life, grammar and writing skills.
Mullinax said there was no expectation that soldiers had to complete mandatory training on their own time but 'the reality of it is, is they probably were.'
'Some of these training modules are 40 hours, 80 hours, and just imagine every soldier being required to do those things over an entire formation over time. It adds up to a lot of time back to the organization and to the soldiers,' he said. 'Not every formation all the time needs to do all these things.'
The Army has now removed resiliency training from the regulation completely. The service previously used its Comprehensive Soldier and Family Fitness program to teach soldiers about personality and character traits that make them to be more 'resilient' against obstacles in life and with their jobs. The program regulation defines resilience as the 'mental, physical, emotional, and behavioral ability to face and cope with adversity, adapt to change, recover, learn, and grow from setbacks.'
The previous version of the Army's training regulation said its resilience program had 'positive' impacts on the psychological health of soldiers, especially among 18 to 24 year olds or those who are considered 'high-risk' for mental health concerns. In the Pentagon's latest annual suicide report, troops 17 to 24 years old accounted for almost half of the suicides across the active duty force in 2023. In the Army, that age group made up more than 40% of suicides that year.
'Each Soldier becomes a sensor to behavioral indicators that can inform the command or encourage individuals to seek help. Positive outcomes have resulted from leaders talking
about resilience skills during formations, and by integrating resilience and performance enhancement skills into physical training,' the old training regulation stated.
But under the new shift, the service now sees this training as 'outdated,' according to a fact sheet about the changes.
Mullinax said informal resiliency training will still exist in other parts of the Army and that it is built through a culture 'focused on a strong warrior ethos, tough, realistic training' that happens when soldiers are physically present 'so that you can actually strengthen that team and build a resilient team and build resilient soldiers.'
'Our resiliency training is happening every day, all the time, in good formations,' he added.
Retired Army Reserve Maj. Gen. Tammy Smith, who last served as special assistant to the assistant secretary of the Army for manpower and Reserve affairs said she worries that removing it is short sighted and that the Army benefited from it over the years. With the training, soldiers and leaders were given more tools to talk about value systems, how to develop good character and what it means to be resilient — something she doesn't remember having as a lieutenant or captain.
'Of course, we all learned resiliency by falling off the obstacle course and getting back up and that sort of thing so we learned it from other things but I didn't have a language for it,' she said, adding that without resiliency training, 'I could perhaps tell them, well stop crying. Buck up.'
An Army 'resilience' website described the concept as part of personal readiness through five main focuses such as physical, emotional, social, spiritual and family — a majority of factors that pertain to soldiers' well-being outside of their immediate Army job and ones that can impact their stress levels at work.
Beyond younger enlisted soldiers, the Army's resilience training also included topics for commanders on leadership behaviors that promote a positive culture, a lesson that Smith taught herself. And in the Army, where leaders are not only the equivalent of civilian work managers but are also heavily involved in soldiers' personal lives, Smith said that resiliency training gave them tools to counsel soldiers dealing with hard times or recovering from catastrophic life events.
'Where do I as a leader get my language now to talk to them about their own resiliency without at least some of this particular training? I don't think that we can assume that people are just going to get it by taking it completely away and by removing it from the curriculum,' Smith said.
Before the changes, the Army regulation required ongoing resiliency training, taught by a master resilience trainer in a classroom or through more informal activities like discussions led by chaplains or having the themes incorporated into a unit's weekly meetings like morning PT or during a safety brief.
Smith said resiliency training focused a lot on 'self awareness of where you are,' adding that when she worked on personnel readiness policies, Defense Secretary Mark Esper combined the resiliency division with sexual harassment and assault response prevention, or SHARP, efforts under the idea that 'a lot of the things that are being taught in each of those come down to how we form character and how we teach values across our different systems.'
Smith acknowledged that soldiers have a lot of mandatory training with a finite amount of time, meaning priorities are going to change, but said that in the long-term, it'll change the Army's culture.
'If they take it out of the regulation, and they remove all requirements from it, it will be something that eventually people don't know about, incorporate or take into account, because all of the folks who had previously been given a language for resiliency they're going to retire,' she said. 'We'll come to a place where we don't know how to talk about it.'
Those 'Hegseth bodyguards' are actually there for the Air Force's 'Doomsday' plane
Army wants junior officers to fix quality-of-life issues that drive soldiers out
'100% OPSEC' apparently means texting military plans to a reporter
Ranger School's new fitness test is tougher than ever, but nixes sit-ups
This photo of Air Force special ops pool training is chaos. There's a reason for that.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Cancer Risk at Air Force Missiles Sites Low 'But Not Zero,' Latest Service Data Shows
Cancer Risk at Air Force Missiles Sites Low 'But Not Zero,' Latest Service Data Shows

Yahoo

time2 days ago

  • Yahoo

Cancer Risk at Air Force Missiles Sites Low 'But Not Zero,' Latest Service Data Shows

Airmen who watched over America's nuclear intercontinental ballistic missiles in Cold War-era facilities faced marginally higher risk of cancer due to contaminants found there and more workplace oversight is needed, according to the latest findings of an Air Force health study. Air Force Global Strike Command, during a town hall event Wednesday, released the latest data showing the slightly elevated cancer risk as part of its ongoing probe into health concerns for America's missileers, maintainers and other support roles at several bases in the Midwest and Western U.S. The lifetime cancer risk for all Americans is around 39%, and the Air Force's Health Risk Assessment found rates of 39.9% to 40.13% for men and women if they would have served anywhere from eight to 70 years in those jobs. Service officials said consistent workplace inspections and monitoring would likely be necessary to address the risks, which are caused by the presence of chemicals and toxins. Read Next: Army Faces Backlash over Plan to Divert Barracks Funds to Border Mission Contaminants linked to cancer were found during a series of environmental studies at F.E. Warren Air Force Base in Wyoming, Malmstrom Air Force Base in Montana, and Minot Air Force Base in North Dakota. "In summary, this health risk assessment characterizes the health risk as low but not zero," Col. Ric Speakman, the commander of the U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine, said during the town hall presentation. "Therefore, the appropriate action is to include missile alert facility workers in an occupational surveillance." Air Force Global Strike Command is still in the process of an ongoing epidemiological study and is gathering more data from states as well as national cancer registries before more definitive cancer and health conclusions can be made. Last year, reported in an investigative series that past probes by the Air Force into cancer concerns roughly two decades ago went ignored, and past and current missileers and nuclear missile maintainers raised alarms about the environmental conditions, toxins and chemical dangers they faced while in uniform. They believe the conditions made them sick. In the wake of reporting, the service announced changes that included new workplace inspections and health record tracking, and the spouse of a missileer who died from non-Hodgkin lymphoma was able to secure Department of Veterans Affairs benefits related to his death. While polychlorinated biphenyls, or PCBs, were one of the known outlawed carcinogenes that the Air Force's remediation efforts focused on, research shown during Wednesday's town hall showed there were other toxins detected as well that were factored into the service's health risk assessment. "Although only PCBs were detected at levels above the Environmental Protection Agency's standards for cleanup and remediation, the environmental sampling was sensitive enough to detect chemicals such as benzene and chloroform at levels well below standards for remediation," a Thursday news release from Air Force Global Strike Command following the town hall said. The Torchlight Initiative, a grassroots organization that began shortly after a Space Force officer and former Air Force missileer raised concerns about non-Hodgkin lymphoma rates at Malmstrom, released its own independent study in April examining the rates of blood cancer reported in its online health registry. That study found that service members were diagnosed at younger ages compared to the wider population. Air Force Global Strike Command officials briefly mentioned that study at the town hall, stating that, "while this study is separate from the missile community cancer study, it does add to the work advocacy and the well-being of the missile community." Representatives from the Torchlight Initiative were on Capitol Hill in early April alongside other advocacy groups, and made a plea to lawmakers in hopes of expanding the PACT Act -- a 2022 law that mostly covered veterans sickened by toxic exposure in war zones -- to cover those who experienced health issues stateside as well. "The Torchlight Initiative is happy to hear that Global Strike and U.S. Air Force School of Aerospace Medicine are still working on their long-term study and research," the organization said in a statement to on Thursday. "However, our focus and energy remains with the families who are disproportionately affected by these cancers and illnesses." The remaining data in the ongoing health study is slated to be released in late 2025. Gen. Thomas Bussiere, the head of Air Force Global Strike Command, said during the town hall he would advocate for a registry, if the VA also supported such a move, based on the study's findings. "The level of interest and oversight with the Department of the Air Force and Congress has not waned, and I'm very thankful and happy with the interest and actions on the part of the VA," Bussiere said in a news release after the town hall. "They've been great partners, and I anticipate they will continue to be great partners." Related: Independent Study Raises Alarm About Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma at Malmstrom Air Force Base

Can you hold a plank longer than others your age? Fox hosts test their core strength
Can you hold a plank longer than others your age? Fox hosts test their core strength

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Can you hold a plank longer than others your age? Fox hosts test their core strength

How long can you hold a plank — and how does it stack up to others in your age group? That's the question that was posed on "Fox & Friends" Thursday morning, when co-hosts Brian Kilmeade and Lawrence Jones competed in a plank challenge. A plank is an isometric move where the person holds a push-up position for a set period of time. Army Unveils New Fitness Test With Tougher Standards — Could You Pass It? Both held a low plank for well over a minute, exceeding the thresholds for their ages, although Kilmeade held his for a few seconds longer. A fitness expert at Lifetime in New York City provided the below targets for how long you should be able to hold a plank by age. Read On The Fox News App 20s: 1 to 2 minutes 30s: 1 to 2 minutes 40s: 1 minute or longer 50s: 30 to 60 seconds 60s and above: 20 to 30 seconds Planks are often touted as an abdominal exercise, serving as an alternative to traditional sit-ups and crunches, which can strain the back and neck. However, the isometric move benefits the body in many other ways beyond just sculpting a six-pack. In addition to working the abdominals, planks also strengthen the muscles in the arms, legs, chest and back, according to Healthline. They can also help improve posture while sitting or standing and can boost flexibility by stretching the lower half of the body, the above source stated. While Kilmeade and Jones both held low planks, some may opt for a high plank, which is where the arms are straight and the person balances on the palms of the hands. Click Here To Sign Up For Our Health Newsletter For those who are still working up to holding a full plank, the move can be modified by dropping the knees to the floor. There are also variations of the plank that target different parts of the body. Those include side planks, knee touches (touching alternating knees to the ground), hip dips and leg/arm extensions. For more Health articles, visit If you've just started planking, experts recommend starting with 15 to 30 seconds and gradually increasing the duration, with two minutes generally regarded as a good article source: Can you hold a plank longer than others your age? Fox hosts test their core strength

Navy offers early retirement to more sailors with gender dysphoria
Navy offers early retirement to more sailors with gender dysphoria

Yahoo

time3 days ago

  • Yahoo

Navy offers early retirement to more sailors with gender dysphoria

The Navy is offering more sailors with gender dysphoria the opportunity to take early retirement, according to a notice from the service released this week. Under the new rule, sailors with as few as 15 years on active duty can now apply for early retirement. The cash and benefits of a formal military retirement package, which troops must usually serve 20 years to earn, are significantly more generous than those offered to those who separate earlier in their careers. Announced Wednesday in a NAVADMIN message, the 15-year rule matches similar policies in the Air Force and Army for troops facing separation under gender dysphoria rules. The offer is a change from the Navy's March guidance for separating sailors with gender dysphoria, in which the service said that active duty sailors with 18 to 20 years of service who volunteered for separation could be eligible for early retirement. The Wednesday message allows sailors with 15 to 18 years of service to request retirement under an exception to the early retirement policy. The Pentagon has said troops with gender dysphoria who voluntarily separate will be eligible for more separation pay than those who are eventually involuntarily separated. In mid-May, the Pentagon set a deadline of June 6 for service members on active duty and with gender dysphoria to self-identify for voluntary separation. The Navy's new early retirement guidance notes it would be in effect 'until superseded or canceled,' but it was unclear if it would extend past the Pentagon's June 6 deadline. Also unclear was if troops with 15 to 18 years who have already agreed to separate could now apply for the exemption. Virtually all service members are eligible to retire from the military after 20 years of active duty service or equivalent careers in the guard or reserve. However, the military has previously offered earlier retirements under a process called Temporary Early Retirement Authority, or TERA. For instance, from 1993 to 2001, troops with 15 to 20 years could apply for TERA. That temporary policy ended in September 2002. In previous versions of TERA, service members granted early retirement received full retirement packages, including healthcare benefits, but collected a lower monthly retirement pay. The new Navy guidance appears to match the approach taken by both the Army and Air Force. A May 23 Air Force memo lays out guidance on voluntary separation, which allows airmen with 18 to 20 years of service to request early retirement and also notes an exception process for those with 15 to 18 years of service. An Army spokesperson told Task & Purpose that Inquiries sent to the Marine Corps and Army about early retirement policies were not immediately returned. The Pentagon estimates that there are more than 4,200 service members with gender dysphoria. Around 1,000 have self-identified, a defense department official told reporters May 15. Troops who do not leave voluntarily, officials have said, could be involuntarily separated from their military branch through information on their annual health assessment that identifies a previous or current diagnosis of gender dysphoria. Officials have also said commanders will be able to use their 'discernment and judgment in how to interpret and apply the guidance.' The Pentagon has said that troops who agree to voluntary separation, and who are not eligible to retire, will be eligible for twice the amount of separation pay as those who are involuntarily separated. For example, an E-5 with 10 years of service who is forced to separate would get a payment of just under $51,000 compared to $101,000 for voluntarily separating. An O-3 with seven years of service would receive a one-time payment of close to $62,000 if involuntarily removed from the military, versus roughly $125,000 if they leave voluntarily. Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has trumpeted the policy as a ban and removal of trans service members throughout the military services. 'Trans is out at the DOD,' Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth said in a public message on X. The Pentagon's guidance centers around troops with gender dysphoria, a medical diagnosis developed by the American Psychiatric Association. Not all transgender people exhibit or have diagnoses of gender dysphoria, according to the APA. Navy SEAL Team 6 operator will be the military's new top enlisted leader Veterans receiving disability payments might have been underpaid, IG finds Guam barracks conditions are 'baffling,' Navy admiral says in email Navy fires admiral in charge of unmanned systems office after investigation The Pentagon wants troops to change duty stations less often

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store