Mexico's Judicial-Election Farce
Mexico held elections Sunday to fill nine seats on its new Supreme Court, five seats on its new judicial disciplinary tribunal, half the seats on federal circuit and district courts, and two vacancies on the Federal Electoral Tribunal. Learning the full results could take a week or more. The rest of the circuit and lower-court bench will be elected in 2027.
Government critics and independent analysts warned that the sweeping overhaul of the judiciary through popular elections would politicize the courts, putting them under the thumb of the Morena Party's corporatist populism. They aren't wrong. It's the goal of former President Andrés Manuel López Obrador, who pushed through the constitutional change as he was leaving office last year. This way when the state wants to discriminate against private investors in favor of its own interests, property rights and contracts won't get in the way.
AMLO, as the former president is known, wants Mexico to look more like it did in the 1970s. This is a leap in that direction.
The number of open judicial seats varied across the country with 19 states also electing nearly 1,800 local judges. The average voter in Mexico City was given nine ballots and asked to choose 51 judges out of 293 candidates, according to Mexico City-based Integralia, a political-risk consultancy. Most citizens would have found it almost impossible to be well-informed about their decisions.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
29 minutes ago
- Politico
All noisy on the Western solar panel front
Presented by the Stop the Oil Shakedown Coalition. With help from Alex Nieves and Timothy Cama SOLAR WARS: There's enough heat behind California's long-simmering rooftop solar fight that it's boiling over on two fronts this week. On Wednesday, the California Supreme Court will hear arguments from both sides on whether regulators broke the law when they slashed rooftop solar credits for new customers in 2022. At the same time, assemblymembers have a Friday deadline to pass (or not) a controversial legislative proposal to reduce the payments for legacy rooftop solar customers. The multipronged fight shows just how entrenched the two camps are — with rooftop solar advocates allying with builders and real estate agents on one side and utilities with labor unions and ratepayer advocates on the other — and just how willing they are to take their arguments to as many venues as possible. It's a fight that's likely to continue, given that the Supreme Court appears poised to rule narrowly — and perhaps not even on the policy debate itself. Instead, the Supreme Court's clerk and executive officer, Jorge Navarrete, asked lawyers last month to focus on how much the judicial branch should give deference to the California Public Utilities Commission when reviewing its various decisions. A lower court had previously cited deference to the CPUC — one of the rare state agencies created by the California Constitution itself — to reject a lawsuit by environmental groups that sought to restore the rooftop solar subsidies. For the environmental groups, the focus on deference is now an opportunity to take their fight to the agency itself, which some see as too cozy with the investor-owned utilities it regulates. 'Already, there's a gap in checks and balances on the commission,' said Roger Lin, an attorney with the Center for Biological Diversity, which is bringing the lawsuit against the CPUC. 'The implications of this case stretch beyond rooftop solar.' The investor-owned utilities, who otherwise argued in support of the CPUC's decision, declined to weigh in on how much the court should defer to the agency in a filing earlier this year. But Attorney General Rob Bonta's office is defending the agency, arguing in a brief that the CPUC deserves deference because of precedent, because of the agency's expertise and because the Legislature has 'repeatedly tasked the Commission with studying the effects of the NEM tariff and revising it as appropriate.' It's timely, then, to point out that the Legislature is currently considering doing part of the commission's work itself. Assemblymember Lisa Calderon's AB 942 would slash the payments to longstanding rooftop solar customers who got spared by the CPUC's 2022 decision to reduce payments solely for new customers. Calderon agreed this week to exempt farms and schools, which is eliminating opposition from farming groups close to some moderate Democrats. She also picked up support from the CPUC's Public Advocates Office, which said the measure could reduce costs for ratepayers without rooftop solar. But it'll come down to the wire: Some progressive Democrats have already peeled off from the bill in committee votes, citing concerns from their constituents with rooftop solar that the bill would break existing contracts. The Supreme Court will start hearing arguments at 9 a.m. on Wednesday (and it will be livestreamed if you want to follow along). AB 942 has until Friday to pass off the Assembly floor. — CvK Did someone forward you this newsletter? Sign up here! MUSK MANIA: Elon Musk has finally returned to his roots — and Democrats are loving it. Musk's departure from the White House, where he was once among Trump's top advisers, took an explosive turn Tuesday as the Tesla CEO ripped Republicans' budget megabill on X, calling it a 'disgusting abomination' that will raise the national debt. As we've noted, Musk's company never stopped stumping for California policies like the low-carbon fuel standard, even as Trump promised to unravel the state's regulations and Republicans blamed state officials for high gas prices. The eccentric billionaire was always expected to eventually butt heads with an administration poised to throttle the electric vehicle transition and eliminate clean energy incentives his company has profited greatly from. While the episode shocked Republicans and drew pushback from House Speaker Mike Johnson, Democrats could barely hide their excitement, Timothy Cama reports for POLITICO's E&E News. 'I haven't spoke to Elon Musk, I'm not sure what the reasons are for this extraordinary statement, but we're in complete agreement,' House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said. — AN WE HAVE A BEE PROBLEM: California lawmakers are coming to the rescue of one of nature's most important insects: honeybees. The Assembly unanimously approved Assemblymember Rhodesia Ransom's bill today to launch a program within the California Department of Food and Agriculture to monitor the health of honeybee populations. AB 1042 would allow the department, when extra funding is available, to provide incentives and grants for health intervention projects to support the state's managed honeybee population. The critical species is responsible for pollinating crops like fruits and tree nuts that underpin the state's agriculture sector and maintaining natural ecosystems, but are dying in large numbers due to climate change, habitat loss, pesticides and other factors. Commercial beekeepers reported an average loss of 62 percent of their bee colonies between June 2024 and February of this year, according to a national survey by Project Apis m. (honeybees' Latin name). — AN RECYCLE THE REDO: Gov. Gavin Newsom told CalRecycle to redo its plastic waste reduction rules in the name of affordability. Now, the lawmakers that passed the law behind the rules say the redo goes against their intent — and that they were the ones who wanted to make recycling affordable to begin with. Twenty-two lawmakers joined Sen. Ben Allen, the author of 2022's SB 54, in a letter to Newsom, CalEPA Secretary Yana Garcia and CalRecycle Director Zoe Heller last week. Their goal all along, they write, was to lower costs to cities and ratepayers by making manufacturers responsible for recycling their products. The new rules, they argue, stray from their intent by exempting too much food and medication packaging and not preventing hazardous recycling technologies. A coalition of environmental groups including Oceana and Californians Against Waste also blasted the new rules Monday. 'Getting this right is about more than checking a legislative box,' the letter reads. 'California has an opportunity to lead in the global effort to tackle plastic pollution, but not if vague, watered-down language subverts that very goal.' Who is happy: the California Chamber of Commerce, which is arguing that the new rules are more achievable. Spokesperson John Myers shared a takeaway: 'By fostering a regulatory environment that balances ecological responsibility with economic viability, the state sets a precedent for sustainable innovation of a circular economy.' — CvK TWO STRIKES: It's been a bad week for Sable Offshore Corp.'s oil drilling ambitions. Santa Barbara Superior Court Judge Donna Geck issued an order Tuesday blocking a waiver granted by the state fire marshal that would allow the Texas-based oil company to restart a crude pipeline off Santa Barbara. That decision comes just days after a different Santa Barbara judge sided with the California Coastal Commission and stopped repairs on the 124-mile pipeline that leaked over 100,000 gallons in 2015. Linda Krop, chief counsel for the Environmental Defense Center, which sued the fire marshal and Sable, cheered the rulings and used the moment to call out Newsom, who has stayed relatively quiet on the issue. 'At the very least, Governor Newsom should demand that his agencies follow the law and do everything possible to prevent another ecological and economic disaster in our state,' she said. — AN — Former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has a message for climate activists worried about the White House: roll up your sleeves and "stop whining.' — Southern California is being hit with a triple whammy of thunderstorms, dry lightning and rip tides. — Underground water supplies in the Colorado River basin are depleting even faster than the river itself, according to a new study based on NASA satellite data.
Miami Herald
33 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Luxury outerwear brand avoids tariffs as rivals try to exit China
In 2018, for my 25th birthday, my mom and I went to the Canada Goose store in Boston. I'd been eyeing one of their famously warm jackets for years, and the store's immersive "cold room" just seemed too fun not to try. This was no gimmick. The subzero chamber blasts you with industrial chill and fake snow while you test-drive your jacket of choice (okay maybe I am exaggerating on the snow part). My mom and I went in and out of that cold room at least half a dozen times, each time trying a different jacket. After some dramatic pacing and completely ridiculous over-analysis, I finally settled on a bright red coat with a fur-lined hood. Related: Key Marshalls, TJ Maxx, and Dillard's partner bets big on USA Seven winters later? I still live in that jacket. It's survived Nor'easters, icy sidewalks, and at least one impromptu snowball fight. And while that coat is built for extreme weather, it turns out Canada Goose is also built for something else: extreme tariffs. While other brands are scrambling to shift production out of China, Canada Goose hasn't had to flinch. The brand's decision to keep most of its manufacturing close to home is suddenly looking like a genius-level move in a shaky global market. Most brands treat manufacturing like a group project: outsource everything and pray it shows up on time. Canada Goose? They're more the "do the whole project yourself and get an A" type. According to Supply Chain Drive, over 90% of the company's down-filled outerwear is made in-house in Canada. That kind of vertical integration is rare in fashion and it's giving the brand a serious edge. "Our vertical manufacturing is a real source of competitive advantage for us," President and COO Beth Clymer said during the company's Q4 2025 earnings call. "We are currently leveraging this capability more than we ever have before." Related: Huge appliance brand leaving China to avoid tariffs Translation: while other global brands are redrawing supply chain maps and scrambling to diversify away from China, Canada Goose is already sitting pretty. Their made-in-Canada model means they're mostly untouched by U.S. tariffs under the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement. Now, that's not to say they're totally immune. About 20% of their goods are still made in Europe, and that's where they've felt some sting. But with most of their key production locked down locally, they've been able to pivot fast-something that's proving harder for competitors. Canada Goose ( (GOOS) ) might be one of the few fashion brands thriving because they're control freaks. Instead of chasing trends or racing to the cheapest factory, they've doubled down on quality, ownership, and-apparently-weatherproofing their business. And it's working. The company reduced inventory by 14% over the full fiscal year and expanded gross margins to 71.3% in the fourth quarter. All of this happened while the company dodged the kind of global supply chain chaos that has bigger brands sweating through their technical fleece. Nice. They didn't even offer a full-year forecast-not out of weakness, but because they know the consumer landscape is unstable. That's not panic. That's discipline. While others rush to rejigger production and rewrite playbooks, Canada Goose is what it's always done. The same way my red jacket hasn't lost a stitch, the company's strategy hasn't needed much tailoring either. Turns out, being built for the cold might also mean being built for uncertainty. Related: Versace, Michael Kors, Jimmy Choo stumble hard The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Luigi Mangione's team asks court to remove 'shackles,' bulletproof vest on UnitedHealthcare CEO murder suspect
Attorneys for Luigi Mangione have filed a motion urging a New York judge to allow the suspect in the 2024 assassination of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson to appear in court without handcuffs or a bulletproof vest, arguing that the visible restraints are unnecessary. The Tuesday motion comes ahead of Mangione's scheduled court appearance on June 26. The request, submitted to Justice Gregory Carro of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, calls for Mangione to be allowed to sit at the defense table with unshackled hands and in standard courtroom attire. His legal team argues that the security measures, particularly the use of shackles and a bulletproof vest, serve no legitimate safety function and instead reinforce a damaging public narrative that depicts Mangione as dangerous. They argue that the visual impact of such restraints, frequently captured by the media, undermines his presumption of innocence. Luigi Mangione Argues Double Jeopardy In Bid To Drop Murder Case, Suppress Evidence Pointing to one photograph of Mangione's shackled ankles while seated in court that garnered more than 36 million views on X, his defense argued that it is impeding the accused killer of his right to a fair trial. Read On The Fox News App The motion also says that Mangione has not caused any trouble since his arrest in December 2024. He didn't resist arrest, cooperated with law enforcement, and hasn't been a problem in jail. He's being held in a regular part of the federal jail in Brooklyn, meets with his lawyers almost daily without shackles, and has been assigned work inside the prison. READ THE MOTION – APP USERS, Click Here Accused Ceo Assassin Luigi Mangione Indicted On Federal Charges The defense said that in federal court, where Mangione faces the possibility of the death penalty, he was only made to wear leg shackles and did not wear a bulletproof vest or handcuffs. They also say that making Mangione wear a bulletproof vest doesn't make sense because everyone is required to go through a metal detector. GET REAL-TIME UPDATES DIRECTLY ON THE True Crime Hub Mangione, a Maryland man, is the suspect in the assassination of Thompson on Dec. 4, 2024 in New York City. Thompson was shot from behind outside a New York City Hilton hotel just hours before a shareholder conference. At the crime scene, police discovered bullet casings with handwritten words: "depose," "deny," and "defend," which drew comparisons to the book "Delay, Deny, Defend: Why Insurance Companies Don't Pay Claims and What You Can Do About It." The now 27-year-old was arrested in Altoona, Pennsylvania, while eating breakfast after a McDonald's customer and employee recognized him from a wanted poster. A federal grand jury indicted Mangione on four counts: murder through the use of a firearm, a firearms offense and two counts of stalking. If he is found guilty, he could be eligible for the death penalty. In addition to the federal indictment, Mangione has been charged in Pennsylvania and New York. In Pennsylvania, where he was arrested, Mangione has been charged with carrying a firearm without a license, forgery, providing false identification to law enforcement, and possession of instruments of crime. These charges remain pending. In New York State, Mangione faces 11 charges, the most serious being first-degree murder as an act of terrorism. Prosecutors allege the murder was committed to intimidate or coerce a group and to influence government policy. Other charges include multiple counts of criminal possession of a weapon related to a ghost gun and silencer, as well as criminal possession of a forged instrument for using a fake New Jersey driver's license to check into a hostel near the crime scene. His next state court appearance is set for June 26, while his federal court hearing is scheduled for Dec. article source: Luigi Mangione's team asks court to remove 'shackles,' bulletproof vest on UnitedHealthcare CEO murder suspect
