
‘I can't order 100 pieces of junk for $15?': How Trump's tariff will hit fast-fashion devotees
Vivi Armacost loves Temu. She uses the Chinese online marketplace to buy crafting supplies for her purse-making hobby. 'You can get purse detailing and hardware for cents and pennies,' said Armacost, who is 24 and lives in New York. She says it seems like 'basically everything' in her apartment comes from Temu.
Donald Trump's 10% tariff on China-made goods sold to the US, which went into effect early on Tuesday morning, might change her shopping habits.
The tariff closes off a trade loophole that allowed fast-fashion companies like Temu and Shein to ship packages under $800 into the US duty free; this loophole, called 'de minimus' has been criticized by both political parties in recent years. On Tuesday, Reuters reported that Shein and Temu are now likely to raise prices, as is Amazon's Haul, a new e-commerce app that imports products from China-based sellers.
Shoppers are concerned the tariff will get in the way of their retail therapy.
'Trying to get that last Temu order in before Trump puts another tariff on China,' Armacost, who works in consulting and also makes comedy videos on TikTok, captioned a post on Monday that shows her frantically typing on a computer, hacker movie-style. It was mostly a joke, but she has friends who made one final Temu run. 'My friend Piper got a ton of apartment stuff during a last-minute tariff haul,' she said.
Temu – which surpassed Amazon as the most-downloaded shopping app in 2023 – and Shein are beloved by both the overly trendy and the obsessively thrifty. While Shein is known primarily for clothing, Temu also sells makeup, home goods and decor. These products are cheap – just over $4 for a pair of women's sneakers on Temu, or $1.45 for bracelet on Temu – but of dubious quality. Inevitably, many end up in landfills.
'A lot of the stuff comes actually way smaller than you expect,' Armacost said. 'I bought a desk lamp, except it can fit in my hands.'
In the months before Trump took office, shoppers urged each other to stock up on Temu and Shein, in case the new administration followed through on its promise to tax US trade partners. 'Kinda feeling emo bc this may be the last good Black Friday for a while because of the tariffs,' one TikTok user wrote in a clip. 'Better collect your 'vintage Shein' because they will probably go for $100 next year.''
Two days after the election, the fashion writer Amy Odell warned readers of price hikes in a post to her BackRow Substack titled: 'Trump Won. So Shop Now.' Susan Scafidi, a lawyer and founder of Fordham's Fashion Law Institute, told Odell: 'Everything's going to be more expensive, which is a little crazy when you realize that a lot of the Trump appeal was with regard to the economy.'
Could the tariff kill fast fashion, an industry defined by wasteful over-consumption, as we know it? No, says Margaret Bishop, a textile and apparel specialist and professor at New York's Parsons School of Design and the Fashion Institute of Technology. 'If anything, I think these tariffs will strengthen fast fashion's hold on customers,' she said. 'If everything costs more, particularly food, transportation and housing, they're going to have to cut back somewhere.
'Americans have a real hunger for new fashion, so they will trade down to be able to continue to buy things. If a $1 pack of T-shirts at Temu becomes $2 a pack, that's still cheaper than spending $20 for a couple of T-shirts that are better made,' she continued.
Sheng Lu, an associate professor of fashion and apparel studies at the University of Delaware, agreed that tariffs won't 'fundamentally shift' Americans' love of a good, if sketchy, deal. While small businesses will bear most of the pain from tariffs – due to supply chain snarls or the fact that Americans won't be able to spend as much – larger corporations such as Shein and Temu tend to absorb costs.
'These companies are resourceful,' Lu said. 'My more immediate concern is that small and medium-sized enterprises won't survive, or will face significant challenges.'
In 2023, a US congressional report alleged that there was an 'extremely high risk' that Temu used forced labor in its supply chain, and that both Shein and Temu evaded US human rights reviews. (Shein denied these claims at the time, while Temu did not comment on the report.) A recent report from the Swiss advocacy group Public Eye found that some Shein workers endure 75-hour work weeks. (Shein told the BBC it was 'working hard' to address the issues raised in the report.)
The fast-fashion industry is also synonymous with high carbon emissions and pollution.
Lu fears that tariffs will exacerbate these issues. 'If they have to pay more on tariff duties but at the same time make their prices competitive, that's not good news for workers or the environmental impact, because companies will have more incentive to cut corners,' he said.
Armacost knows that these e-commerce giants represent the worst of Americans' desire for excess. 'But also, at the same time, spending does stimulate the economy,' she said. 'In response to the idea that it's a good thing if people stop ordering so much random stuff, I say: 'What's the point of living in a country if I can't order 100 pieces of junk for $15?''
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NBC News
38 minutes ago
- NBC News
Trump says he thinks the government has a ‘very easy case' against Kilmar Abrego Garcia
President Donald Trump on Saturday said that it wasn't his decision to bring Kilmar Abrego Garcia, a Maryland man who was mistakenly deported to El Salvador, back to the U.S. to face federal charges, saying the 'Department of Justice decided to do it that way, and that's fine.' 'That wasn't my decision,' Trump said of Abrego Garcia's return in a phone call with NBC News on Saturday. 'It should be a very easy case' for federal prosecutors, the president added. Trump added that he did not speak with Salvadoran President Nayib Bukele about Abrego Garcia's return, even though the two men spoke about Abrego Garcia during an April meeting in the Oval Office. His remarks came after Abrego Garcia arrived back in the U.S. on Friday and was charged in an indictment alleging he transported people who were not legally in the country. The indictment came amid a protracted legal battle over whether to bring him back from El Salvador that escalated all the way up to the Supreme Court. Abrego Garcia's family and lawyers have called him a family man, while Trump and his administration have alleged that he is a member of the gang MS-13. The case drew national attention amid the Trump administration's broader push for mass deportations. After Abrego Garcia's deportation, lawyers for the Trump administration said he was deported in an ' administrative error,' as Abrego Garcia had previous legal protection from deportation to El Salvador. Still, the Trump administration did not attempt to bring Abrego Garcia back, even as the Supreme Court ruled that it had to ' facilitate ' his return to the U.S. Democrats, including Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., had for weeks said that Abrego Garcia was denied due process when he was detained and deported, arguing that he should have been allowed to defend himself from deportation before he was sent to El Salvador. Trump on Saturday called Van Hollen, who went to visit Abrego Garcia in jail in El Salvador in April, a 'loser' for defending the man's right to due process. 'He's a loser. The guy's a loser. They're going to lose because of that same thing. That's not what people want to hear,' the president said about Van Hollen. 'He's trying to defend a man who's got a horrible record of abuse, abuse of women in particular. No, he's a total loser, this guy.' On Friday, Attorney General Pam Bondi alleged that Abrego Garcia 'was a smuggler of humans and children and women. He made over 100 trips, the grand jury found, smuggling people throughout our country.' In a statement Friday, Abrego Garcia's lawyer called Bondi's move 'an abuse of power, not justice.'


Reuters
41 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump says Musk will face 'very serious consequences' if he funds Democratic candidates -NBC News
June 7 (Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump, in an interview with NBC News on Saturday, said there would be "serious consequences" if billionaire Elon Musk funds Democratic Party candidates to run against Republicans who vote for Trump's sweeping tax-cut bill. Trump declined to say what those consequences would be in the phone interview, and went on to add that he had not had discussions about whether to investigate Musk. Asked if he thought his relationship with the Tesla (TSLA.O), opens new tab and SpaceX CEO was over, Trump said, "I would assume so, yeah."


Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Mother-of-two 'addicted to TikTok' blew £300,000 on gifts for her favourite creators after stealing £500,000 from her employer
A mother-of-two who was 'addicted' to TikTok spent £300,000 on gifts for her favourite content creators after stealing almost half a million pounds from her company. Katherine Greenall, 29, from St Helens, Liverpool, was left in tears as she was told she would spend 28 months in prison for her fraud. The mother stole the eye-watering sum of money while working as an accounts manager for a car company and spent her ill-gotten gains on TikTok tokens. The virtual currency was then spent on Greenall's favourite content creators for her 'amusement and entertainment'. She claimed she had not been living a lavish lifestyle and only started stealing from her boss to fund household purchases but her spending spree quickly spiralled and she splashed out on hotels, holidays and Amazon purchases. Over the course of 121 payments, she siphoned off £443,523.26 from the company and her crime spree was only stopped after bosses began to ask questions over lower than expected profits, the Liverpool Echo reported. The 29-year-old had been working at New Reg Ltd, a car buying company, as a customer services manager since April 2021 and in December 2022 was promoted to accounts manager, giving her access to the company bank accounts. Christopher Taylor, prosecuting told Liverpool Crown Court on Friday that the 'trusted and respectable' manager committed a 'significant abuse of trust' by manipulating financial reports to cover her tracks. During her spending spree, Greenall made 53 unauthorised deposits in to her bank account, totalling £57,036 in 2023. She spent the small fortune on supermarket shops, restaurants and cafes, Amazon Prime and sports shops. She also splashed out on family holidays and hotel bookings and even hired a family lawyer. The mother-of-two then ramped up her spending the following year, making another four deposits to her account totalling £8,917 in January alone. In February she siphoned off a further ten payments amounting to £14,916. And the following month her illegal bank transfers had exploded and she took home a shocking £146,288 over the course of 20 payments. By April, Greenall's spending was completely out of control and in the course of just four weeks, transferred herself £196,364.26. The Liverpudlian only began to raise suspicion among senior management after they discovered smaller than expected profits were being officially recorded. In a company meeting on May 1, Greenall promised to investigate the discrepancies and returned to her desk where she made a final deposit of £20,000 and then fled work, clamming her family were sick. A week later on May, 7, Greenall admitted her criminal actions and was arrested on May 13. When interviewed by police, the young mother claimed she had 'not been living a lavish lifestyle' and had only £700 in her bank account. She explained how the deposits had started off as small and were only used to fund household purchases but quickly ballooned as she spent the cash on TikTok tokens. She confessed to becoming addicted to the social media app and revealed sending the tokens made her feel better during a period where she felt very low. Out of the enormous £443,523.26 of swindled funds, Greenhall spent £301,162.55 on TikTok tokens in the 21-month period. Her spending spree almost pushed the car company, which had been operating since 1995, to financial ruin and put 30 of her former colleagues at risk of redundancy. Greenall has no previous convictions. Paul Becker, defending, told the court that she 'may have been suffering from a form of addiction to TikTok', but stated that she had 'no formal diagnosis to such an addiction'. Greenall admitted one count of fraud by abuse of position. Her two children, a six-year-old girl and an 11-year-old boy with severe ADHD, will be cared for by her sister, a nursery care worker while she is in prison. Sentencing, Judge Neil Flewitt KC said: 'You are 29 years of age and of previous good character. You are a good mum to two young children, one of whom has particular challenges. You were trusted and respected. Your employers were aware of the challenges that you faced at home and made allowed allowances. 'You repaid their trust in you by stealing from them on a massive scale. Over a period from January 2023 to the beginning of May 2024, you stole almost £450,000. You covered you what you were doing by manipulating documents that were used for accounting purposes by the company, and you put that money into your own bank account. He concluded by saying: 'It is a matter of regret that I have a public duty which I have to fulfil. It is a tragedy that those children are going to suffer as a result of your dishonesty. I have taken the view that there is simply no way to avoid what I am sure you have been advised is the inevitable sentence of imprisonment. This is simply too much money and too much damage caused here.'