logo
British Wagner spies ‘plotted to kidnap Mayfair restaurant owner'

British Wagner spies ‘plotted to kidnap Mayfair restaurant owner'

Yahoo3 days ago

Two men took money from the Russian-backed Wagner terrorist group to firebomb a Mayfair restaurant and nearby wine store and kidnap the owner, a court has heard.
Dylan Earl, 21, and Jake Reeves, 23, have admitted taking cash from the notorious mercenary organisation to carry out an arson attack at the Hide Restaurant in Piccadilly and Hedonism Wines in Davies Street.
They were also planning to kidnap the owner, described as a high-profile Russian dissident, in order to 'influence the Government' for the 'purpose of advancing a political and ideological cause', the Old Bailey was told.
The jury was told that following an arson attack on an east London warehouse in March 2024, Earl began work on the Mayfair plot.
Duncan Penny KC, prosecuting, said: 'Acting at the behest of the Wagner Group, [Earl] planned a similar arson attack on two businesses – a wine shop called Hedonism and a restaurant called Hide – in West London.
'Collectively, the businesses employ 200 people and are valued in excess of £30 million. There is residential accommodation above both premises.
'The businesses belong to a high-profile Russian dissident and refugee who has been vocal in his criticism of president Putin and the war in Ukraine. He has, for example, driven aid trucks from the UK to Ukraine personally.'
Details of the kidnap and bombing plot emerged as a group of men, allegedly recruited by the pair, went on trial accused of setting fire to the warehouse in east London, which had been storing and sending humanitarian aid to Ukraine.
The court heard the warehouse also contained a business that supplied Starlink satellite equipment to Ukraine.
Earl and Reeves have already admitted their role in the blaze at the premises in Leyton on the evening of March 24 last year, which caused an estimated £1 million worth of damage.
They have also pleaded guilty to plotting to attack the Mayfair restaurant and wine store.
The Wagner Group is a mercenary group set up by the Kremlin in 2014 to help its initial invasion of Ukraine's eastern Donbas. It was proscribed as a terrorist organisation by the UK in September 2023.
Paul English, 61, Nii Kojo Mensah, 22, Jakeem Barrington Rose, 22, and Ugnius Asmena, 19, deny aggravated arson in connection with the fire at the east London warehouse.
Dmitrijus Paulauskas and Ashton Evans deny two counts of failure to disclose information about terrorist acts.
On the first day of the trial at the Old Bailey, Mr Penny said the prosecution case was that, acting under the direction of Earl, Reeves had recruited Mr Mensah and Mr Asmena to carry out the warehouse attack.
It is alleged Mr Mensah in turn recruited Mr Rose, while Mr Asmena recruited Mr English to act as a driver.
Mr Mensah filmed the arson attack on his mobile phone and livestreamed it on FaceTime, jurors were told.
Mr Penny said the fire had caused a 'risk to human life' and destroyed £100,000 worth of goods bound for Ukraine.
He said: 'The reason for the selection of this building as a particular target … appears to have been its connection to Ukraine, to be more precise, the fact that the business conducted there was concerned in logistics, frequently delivering goods to Ukraine, including Starlink satellite equipment.
'The businesses which operated from there were also involved in organising humanitarian aid efforts to support Ukraine.'
The prosecutor added: 'This was deliberate and calculated criminality – at the behest of foreign influence. In the case of these defendants, at the time of the fire they may have been ignorant of that influence and the motive may have been financial – good old-fashioned greed.
'For others, however, it appears to have been both political and ideological.'
Describing the circumstances of the warehouse attack, Mr Penny said the company targeted was called Oddisey Ltd and it specialised in receiving and delivering goods ordered by customers mainly in post-Soviet countries.
A company called Meest UK Ltd, the UK arm of a Ukrainian-based shipping company, was also based at the site.
Following Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, Oddisey Ltd handled, stored and delivered packages containing Starlink satellite devices and generators.
The businesses were also involved in organising humanitarian aid efforts to support Ukraine, Mr Penny explained.
The prosecutor said in March 2024, Earl, acting at the behest of the Wagner Group, commissioned the arson attack on the warehouses.
He said: 'Dylan Earl contacted the Wagner Group when he joined a broadcast channel in its name on the social media application Telegram.
'From there, he became connected to two handlers who acted on behalf of the Wagner Group.
'It appears that Dylan Earl expressed a willingness to undertake 'missions' of which the Leyton arson attack was the first. It is apparent that he knew he was acting against Ukrainian, and for Russian, interests.'
Explaining the other plot, Mr Penny said: 'Dylan Earl accepted acting on behalf of the Wagner Group and taking preparatory steps towards committing arson at Hide Restaurant and Hedonism Wines and kidnapping their owner.
'You might think that it is self-evident that these actions were designed to influence the Government and to intimidate at least a section of the public and furthermore were made for the purpose of advancing a political and ideological cause.
'At least one method of attack on the Mayfair premises discussed between Earl and Evans was by way of explosion.'
Mr Penny said Reeves had also admitted an offence under the recently drafted National Security Act of agreeing to accept a material benefit from a foreign intelligence service – money from the Wagner Group that was to be provided by or on behalf of a Russian intelligence service.
Mr Penny went on: 'He agreed to accept the money in return for taking part in the plan to commit arson at Hide Restaurant and Hedonism Wines and to kidnap their owner.'
The trial continues.
Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Russia launches one of war's largest air attacks days after Ukraine's bomber raid
Russia launches one of war's largest air attacks days after Ukraine's bomber raid

Yahoo

time30 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Russia launches one of war's largest air attacks days after Ukraine's bomber raid

Russia launched a barrage of drones and ballistic missiles across broad swaths of Ukraine early Friday, killing at least six people and injuring dozens of others, days after Kyiv launched a daring raid on Moscow's fleet of strategic bombers. For residents of Kyiv, the night's soundtrack was familiar: the shrieking whir of drones, air raid sirens and large explosions overhead – whether from air defenses successfully downing missiles, or projectiles puncturing the capital. Three firefighters were killed in Kyiv, two civilians were killed in Lutsk, and another person was killed in Chernihiv, according to the Ukrainian State Emergency Service. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said Russia had used more than 400 drones and 40 missiles in the overnight attack, putting it among the war's largest. He said Moscow's attack injured 80 and targeted 'almost all' of Ukraine, listing nine regions, from Lviv in the west to Sumy in the northeast. Although Russia has pummeled Ukraine almost daily over three years of full-scale war, Ukrainians had been bracing for retaliation since Sunday, when Kyiv launched an audacious operation that struck more than a third of Russia's strategic cruise missile carriers. In a call with his US counterpart Donald Trump on Wednesday, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that Moscow would have to respond to Kyiv's assault. Speaking aboard Air Force One on Friday, Trump told reporters Ukraine 'gave Putin a reason to go in and bomb the hell out of them last night.' Russia's Ministry of Defense said its strikes were in response to what it called Kyiv's 'terrorist acts.' It was not immediately clear if the attack was the extent of Russia's pledged retaliation, or if Putin intends to escalate further. After the embarrassment of Kyiv's operation, there was a chorus of bellicose calls from pro-Kremlin pundits for a severe – potentially nuclear – response. Although Ukrainians had been buoyed last weekend by the news of Kyiv's successful operation, many were wary of how Russia might strike back. But after Friday's strikes, Kyiv residents told CNN they supported Ukraine's strikes against the aircraft Moscow has used to bomb Ukraine for more than three years. 'It didn't break us at all. The morale is as high as it was. We strongly believe in our armed forces,' said Olha, a 39-year-old from the capital who did not wish to give her last name. She said the apparent 'retaliation' from Russia was not so different to countless other nights of the war. 'Maybe (this was the retaliation), but maybe the retaliation is yet to come. Either way, it doesn't change our attitude towards the enemy or towards our country.' Meanwhile, Ukraine's general staff on Friday said it launched overnight strikes on two Russian airfields, where it said Moscow had concentrated many of the aircraft that had not been damaged in Kyiv's 'Spiderweb' operation last weekend. Ukraine stressed that the operation, which blindsided the Kremlin, had targeted the planes that Russia uses to launch missile strikes on Ukrainian cities and kill civilians. After Russia's large-scale attack Friday, Ukraine's Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha said Moscow had 'responded' to its destroyed aircraft by once again 'attacking civilians in Ukraine.' As daylight broke, images from Kyiv showed flames rising over apartment buildings and firefighting crews at work, with residents picking through the debris of damaged apartments. Several cars parked in the streets below were covered with shards of glass and slabs of masonry torn from the walls of residential buildings. Ukraine's air force said Russia's barrage comprised 407 drones, six ballistic missiles, 38 cruise missiles and an anti-radar missile. Of those 452 projectiles, the air force said it had downed 406, including 32 of the cruise missiles and four of the ballistic missiles. The other two ballistic missiles did not reach their targets, it added. The strikes also hit Chernihiv, near the border with Belarus, which was rocked by 14 explosions from drones and ballistic missiles, including cruise missiles and Iskander-M missiles, local officials said. Five others were wounded in strikes in the northwestern city of Lutsk, near the border with Poland. Footage geolocated by CNN showed at least four missiles slamming into the city, kicking up fiery explosions on impact. The Russian Ministry of Defense said it had also intercepted and destroyed 174 Ukrainian drones from Thursday evening to early Friday morning and had destroyed three Ukrainian Neptune-MD guided missiles over the Black Sea. All week, Ukrainians have been bracing for Russia's retaliation to last weekend's drone attack, which struck 34% of Moscow's nuclear-capable bombers stationed at airfields as far away as Siberia. On Tuesday, Ukraine also launched an attack on the Kerch Bridge, the only direct connection point between Russia and the annexed Crimean Peninsula, with 1,100 kilograms of explosives that had been planted underwater. After Trump's call with Putin on Wednesday, the US president said his Russian counterpart had told him that Moscow would have to respond to Ukraine's assaults. Trump's account of the call gave no indication that he had urged Putin to temper his response, to the dismay of many in Ukraine. 'When Putin mentioned he is going to avenge or deliver a new strike against Ukraine, we know what it means. It's about civilians,' Ukrainian lawmaker Oleksandr Merezhko told CNN earlier this week. 'And President Trump didn't say, 'Vladimir, stop.'' Despite Trump's support for recent peace talks in Istanbul between Ukraine and Russia, on Thursday he signaled that he may be adopting a more hands-off approach, likening the war to a brawl between children. 'Sometimes you see two young children fighting like crazy,' Trump said in the Oval Office, while German Chancellor Friedrich Merz looked on silently. 'They hate each other, and they're fighting in a park, and you try and pull them apart. They don't want to be pulled. Sometimes you're better off letting them fight for a while and then pulling them apart.'

Houston U.S. Army member plans move to Honduras after wife's deportation
Houston U.S. Army member plans move to Honduras after wife's deportation

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Houston U.S. Army member plans move to Honduras after wife's deportation

The Brief Aysaac Correa, a U.S. Army member, plans to move to Honduras to reunite with his wife, Shirly Guardado, who was deported after being in federal custody for over two months. Correa expressed disappointment in the Trump administration, feeling betrayed after voting for him and serving the country, as he believed only violent criminals would be targeted. While Guardado has the option to return to the U.S. legally, the process will take time, and the couple has already started working on it. HOUSTON - Aysaac Correa, an active-duty U.S. Army member, is preparing to leave the country to reunite with his wife, Shirly Guardado, who was deported to Honduras. What they're saying Aysaac Correa is counting down the days until June 16, when he plans to sell all his belongings and move to Honduras to be with his wife and their one-year-old son. Guardado was in federal custody for over two months before her deportation. "It was a chill that came down my spine," Correa said. "It felt almost as bad as finding out that she got taken in by ICE, but at the same time, I have the possibility of going to see her again." Guardado described her difficult journey via Facetime, recounting her experience of being taken from the Montgomery Processing Center in Conroe. She was shackled on a plane with mostly men, traveling through Louisiana and Texas before reaching Honduras. "This administration, they're being heartless," Correa said. "They're targeting people coming out of their cases, their hearings. They're out of control." Correa expressed disappointment in President Donald Trump, whom he voted for, believing he would target only violent criminals. As a U.S. Army member, Correa feels betrayed by the administration's actions. "It is exhausting. Putting my life on the line for this country wasn't an easy decision. Honestly, I just feel betrayed," he said. A video captured the moment Guardado arrived in Honduras. While she is now free, Correa can only communicate with her through video calls until they reunite. What's next Guardado still has the option to return to the United States legally, but the process will take time. The couple has already begun working on it. Correa has put in a transfer to the Soto Cano Air Base, which is a part of the Joint Task Force-Bravo, a military base in Honduras. The backstory Shirly entered the U.S. illegally in 2014 at age 16 and was issued an expedited removal order, later released under supervision. She has consistently reported to immigration authorities, graduated from high school, and married Asyaac, an active-duty U.S. Army service member, in 2022. In 2023, U.S. Customs and Immigration Services (USCIS) approved Asyaac's petition for Shirly, making her arrest unexpected. Dig deeper When a petition is approved by USCIS, it means they have determined the petitioner meets the requirements for the requested immigration benefit and has approved the petition. This approval is typically followed by an official notice, such as Form I-797 Notice of Action, which can be used as evidence of the approval. Correa filed Shirly's petition, and it was approved on November 18, 2023, and is sponsoring her request for Military Parole in Place – which the couple were waiting for. Military Parole in Place (PIP) is a program that allows certain family members of U.S. military personnel, veterans, or reservists who entered the U.S. without authorization to remain in the country for a specified period. It provides temporary legal status to these family members, enabling them to stay while addressing their immigration status and potentially applying for permanent residency. Timeline FOX 26 news reporter Jonathan Mejia first reported the story before it gained national attention. March 15, 2025: Houston family faces separation after ICE arrests Honduran mother despite documentation May 2, 2025: Houston father and son celebrate birthday amid mother's ICE detention June 6, 2025:Houston U.S. Army member plans move to Honduras after wife's deportation The other side On Friday night, ICE sent FOX 26 Houston a statement: STATEMENT: Shirley Daniela Guardado-Funez, a 27-year-old alien from Honduras, illegally entered the United States on or around Feb. 22, 2014, and was immediately apprehended by the U.S. Border Patrol. Guardado was processed as an expedited removal and released on an order of supervision based on the immigration enforcement priorities at that time. Guardado filed a request for parole in place with U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services Dec. 14, 2023. However, that request was denied May 29, 2024. As an alien in expedited removal proceedings, Guardado is not entitled to an immigration hearing or eligible to adjust her status and is subject to mandatory detention. To ensure compliance with the law, ICE took her into custody March 13, 2025, and she was taken to the Montgomery Processing Center in Conroe, Texas. On May 30, ICE removed Guardado-Funez to Honduras. ON BACKGROUND: On Jan. 21, 2025, the Department of Homeland Security published a notice in the Federal Register titled Designating Aliens for Expedited Removal that restored the scope of expedited removal to the fullest extent authorized by Congress under section 235(b)(1)(A)(iii) of the INA. Aliens in expedited removal proceedings – who have not expressed an intent to apply for asylum or a fear of persecution or torture should they be returned to their country of origin – are not entitled to an immigration hearing before an immigration judge or to appeal the expedited removal order to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Aliens who are subject to expedited removal are not entitled to adjust their status. Military parole in place allows certain alien family members of U.S. military personnel, veterans, and enlistees to remain in the United States legally. It is granted on a case-by-case basis for urgent humanitarian reasons or significant public benefit, allowing individuals who entered the U.S. without authorization to stay for a certain period of time. ICE's detention authority is based on the furtherance of an alien's immigration proceedings, and if so ordered, their removal from the country. Federal immigration laws mandate the detention of certain categories of aliens, including terrorist aliens, aliens with certain criminal convictions, arriving aliens, and aliens in the expedited removal process. Aliens who have been authorized to work in the U.S. (work permits) are not conferred any form of lawful status and can be placed in immigration proceedings or detained at any time. The Source FOX 26's Jonathan Mejia spoke with Aysaac Correa and his wife, Shirly Guardado.

Ukraine's drone strike on Russia spurs global military rethink, raises U.S. preparedness concerns
Ukraine's drone strike on Russia spurs global military rethink, raises U.S. preparedness concerns

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Ukraine's drone strike on Russia spurs global military rethink, raises U.S. preparedness concerns

Ukraine's drone attack on Russia last weekend was a technological and intelligence game changer. It will reshape not only how the United States bolsters its military, but how the entire world does — allies and adversaries alike. While defense specialists examined the feat in the days since the attack and Ukraine celebrated its success, the question remains: How prepared is the U.S. to use and fend off this emerging tech in warfare? Not well enough, former Utah Rep. Chris Stewart told the Deseret News. Stewart spent 14 years as a pilot in the Air Force and served on the permanent Select Committee on Intelligence while he was in the House of Representatives. He argued that President Volodymyr Zelenskyy's attack, which took more than a year and a half to plan, was 'brilliantly planned' and 'brilliantly executed.' It was a 'dramatic event' that will reshape military thinking globally, Stewart said. On June 1, more than 100 Ukrainian drones targeted military airfields and warplanes in Russia that held equipment used in the more than three-year war. Zelenskyy shared a thread online celebrating his military's success in the mission, nicknamed 'Spider Web.' The attack was unique because it demonstrated Ukraine's ability to conduct a successful mission without intelligence assistance, it struck deep into Russian territory, destroyed billions of dollars of Russian equipment and came at a very low cost to Ukraine. The attack consisted of 117 unmanned drones, each with a drone operator. Drones were smuggled into Russia and placed in wooden containers that had remote-controlled lids. The drones then 'took off to strike their targets,' which were at four different Russian airfields, Ukraine's Security Service said. Ukraine said 41 Russian aircraft were hit by their drones, dealing Russia a blow of an estimated $7 billion. Zelenskyy touted that one of the targeted locations was directly next to one of the FSB Russian security service offices and Russia had 'suffered significant losses.' Zelenskyy said Ukraine will continue to propose a 'full and unconditional ceasefire' and work toward peace with Russia, but its June 1 attack may have pushed Russia further away from the negotiating table. Stewart argued that the attack, while largely successful in its goal of targeting some of Russia's prized possessions, is also a 'destabilizing event.' 'It was an attack, direct attack on an asset that Vladimir Putin considers his highest priority and I worry a little bit about the implications of that,' he said, later adding, 'I'm not saying Zelenskyy shouldn't have done it, I'm just saying … one of the outcomes for that is it's going to make … the peace negotiations that are taking place much harder.' President Donald Trump — who was apparently not aware of Ukraine's attack ahead of time — spoke with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Wednesday. According to Trump, Putin said he would respond to the drone attack. It was a 'good conversation,' but not one that would lead to immediate peace, Trump said. Hours later, Russia struck the Ukrainian city of Pryluky, killing at least five people, including a 1-year-old child. On Friday, Russia launched one of its largest aerial attacks of the war, bombing six Ukrainian regions. The attack included 407 drones and 33 missiles. It killed four people, Ukraine said. As Ukraine balances protecting its front lines and cities, continuing its counteroffensive against Russia and seeking to strike a peace deal, the escalation raises questions about what the recent attack means for the United States and its adversaries. Stewart noted that the conflict between Russia and Ukraine has been interesting to watch because, in some ways, they are fighting a World War I-style war through trench warfare, but the use of unmanned drones in the battlefield has escalated fighting to World War III-level combat. The drones used by Ukraine aren't 'sophisticated weapons' by any means, Stewart pointed out. They aren't much different than drones seen flying in the park on weekends. However, if they're deployed strategically, they can cause 'enormous damage,' as seen by Russia. 'Last Friday, could you have imagined what happened in Russia over the weekend? And the truth is is no one did. And that's just one example of, we don't know really how this is going to change and be implemented and we're probably not nearly as prepared as we should be,' Stewart said. He also highlighted how Russia and Ukraine have 'leapfrogged' one another throughout the war. If Russia develops a drone with a new capability, Ukraine will develop a superior one weeks later, and so on. The technology itself is rapidly evolving in the war, Stewart said. 'Going back three years, if you had talked about how will drones affect the war in Ukraine, everyone would have shrugged their shoulders and said, 'Well, I'm not sure,' or they would have said, 'Well, probably not a lot,'' he said. 'And the answer to that question is, it impacted it greatly.' During a briefing on Tuesday, White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Ukraine's drone attack 'absolutely does' raise questions about the United States' security. She pointed to Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and the expansion of defense funding to bolster the U.S. military as it examines how to respond to the emergence of drone usage. 'The president has a full understanding, I can tell you because I've spoken to him about it, about the future of warfare and how drones are a big part of that, and I will not get ahead of our policy team, but I think you can expect to see some executive action on that front in the very near future,' she said. Evelyn Farkas, a former U.S. deputy assistant secretary of defense, said she believes the United States doesn't have the capability to protect against swarms of drones, should an adversary launch an attack. It's something the Department of Defense would need to look at, both domestically and at its overseas bases, she said. But bolstering U.S. military operations would need to start with production. Most drones are being produced overseas, including by U.S. adversaries like China. 'Now that they've used them to strategic effect, it will be even more urgent for the United States to improve its drone capability and to invest in drones,' Farkas, who is the executive director of the McCain Institute, said. The attack over the weekend proved that while drone warfare is not entirely a new operational tactic, the strategy behind using them changed the game. Stewart argued the attack also proved there are two major issues facing the U.S. as it stands on the sidelines of the current war: drone defense and implementation plans need to be drafted, and the supply chain needs to be less dependent on China. China, Stewart noted, has also been successful in purchasing land near U.S. military installations globally. Commanders have likely spent the last several days reviewing how to protect assets after seeing Ukraine launch drones into Russian bases at a very close range, he said. 'They weren't really particularly worried about the aircraft sitting out on their tarmac, and it turned out they should have been, right?' he said of the Russian military, later adding, 'I think people are looking at that differently now than they were.' The U.S. military has said it must invest in drones, commonly called unmanned aircraft systems or UAS. Secretary of the Army Dan Driscoll said in a post online that modernization is critical to U.S. national security. 'Investing in UAS isn't optional — it's essential for battlefield dominance, enhancing precision and protecting Soldiers,' he said. Air Force Gen. David Allvin highlighted the need for technological advancement and investment, pointing to Ukraine's attack. 'In today's environment not every asset must be exquisite/expensive. Look what Ukraine just did,' he said in a post online. 'We can't afford to walk by assets like this that generate lethal effects.' Hoover Institution fellow Jacquelyn Schneider has long argued that the U.S. needs to invest in low-cost technology to advance its military. In a 2023 op-ed, she expanded on her research and argued that the U.S. military has ended up in a paradox. It chased emerging technology that made weapons so expensive that upgrading them would be difficult. It left the Pentagon with a stockpile that was 'neither good enough nor large enough' for its plans, Schneider argued. 'The United States also underprioritized technology that would rein in the cost of logistics, maintenance, and replenishment, opting instead for high-tech weaponry patched together with fragile and outdated software,' she wrote. Schneider said the U.S. needs to 'urgently' prioritize technology that would cut warfare costs and admit it cannot replace all of its systems. High-cost technology should be complemented with cheaper options, she said. 'If the United States hopes to persevere against Russia in the short term and China in the long term, it must consider the economic impact of technology even as it pursues technological advantage,' Schneider wrote. Farkas agreed. The United States has an undeniable issue by having 'very expensive systems that are now vulnerable to foreign drones,' she said. War is a 'great accelerator,' Stewart said of technological advancements. It just depends on if the U.S. military will use it properly, he argued. 'The problem on the defense spending side is, we're just not spending the money we should. The bigger problem is, are we spending it right?' he questioned. 'It doesn't do us much good to buy $50 million Predator drones when we know now that a $500 plastic drone can do nearly the same thing.' Stewart said one of his largest concerns after Ukraine's attack is how the U.S. will respond. It's a pressing issue for the industry and the Pentagon as it grapples with rapidly evolving technology and the price tag of modern warfare. 'Will we spend it in the right way and are we keeping up with technology?' he asked, saying he hopes the administration is prompted to ask those questions after Ukraine's attack.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store