‘Not everyone was Paul Revere': Mass. historians reimagine America's founding tale
:
Advertisement
These overlooked perspectives
—
included in the museum's '
'Not everyone was
Advertisement
A more inclusive accounting of Massachusetts history is a massive undertaking in the current moment, local historians acknowledge. They are taking the charge when public history funding is scarce, the sector lacks few diverse perspectives, and mentions of
The Trump administration's canceling of millions of
Against these odds, though, 'this is really the time to hook people,' Folsom said.
Governor
The state closed a second, $2 million grant cycle for organizations marking the
But the programming has drawn some
Advertisement
'An important focus for us from the start has been on telling the untold stories and spotlighting underrepresented voices from the Revolution,' the spokesperson said in a statement. That focus includes 'Indigenous peoples, enslaved and free Black communities, and women,' along with cities and towns that aren't usually included in Revolutionary War-related tourism.
Fifty years ago, or even a few years ago, Independence Day revelers might have heard a different Revolutionary War story. Globe coverage from America's bicentennial captures celebrations centered around figures such as George Washington, John Hancock, and Thomas Jefferson.
Protests from Black and Indigenous groups about these figures' owning of people, and genocide of Native tribes, respectively, were mentioned in mainstream media, albeit briefly.
Brian Boyles, executive director of MassHumanities, sits on the state's commemoration commission and co-chairs
MassHumanities has allocated at least $600,000 toward '
Boyles said the nonprofit realized that philanthropic initiatives for more diverse public history isn't enough. Historians must also ensure their money will ensure that marginalized communities are shaping the stories visitors hear.
'Expertise lives in a lot of different ways and communities,' Boyles said.
Also broadening the Revolutionary War's narrative are exhibits such as '
Advertisement
The item, with its endless pattern of circles and focus on King Philip's War, 'serves as a touchstone to multiple stories'
of the past, present, and future,
Walley said.
Related
:
Walley sees Concord Museum as a potential model for museums reckoning with their outdated interpretations of the nation's founding. It is using its privilege, Walley said, as an institution with extensive collections and funding to center voices such as hers.
'It's not like they're the only museum that's doing good things,' Walley said, but there are many museums that haven't even started improving.
As the demand for more inclusive histories grows, community-bred, public historians such as Joel Mackall are in high demand. For years, he has led walking tours of Black history around Greater Boston, mostly among Black people like him. But recently, he has received several inquiries from outside the community to give tours, lectures, and speeches.
The surge in popularity is something he's still getting used to, but at times, he feels he can't be as candid about America's problems with race.
'We always have to tone down or reshape our suffering" to ensure some audiences don't feel uncomfortable, Mackall said. 'It's a lot.'
At popular Revolutionary War sites such as the Old State House in downtown Boston, historians don't shy away from the political aftershocks of violent protest. This touchy subject is fleshed out in the '
Advertisement
But when it comes to race, things get tricky, said Nat Sheidley, CEO of Revolutionary Spaces, the nonprofit managing the landmark.
'It's dangerous, it's hard to create a space you can't control,' Sheidley said. 'You put other people at risk by inviting them to be in dialogue with it.'
Joe Palumbo, a Concord native and historian, believes that learning a more complete story will benefit everyone. The state recently awarded the town a $25,000 grant for a project related to the 250th commemoration, which includes Palumbo's tours that highlight the different sites shaped by patriots of color.
Take the
Across the street from the famous span, there is The Robbins House. Its namesake, Caesar Robbins, was born into slavery in Chelmsford and fought in two wars. At 16, he served in the French and Indian War, and his enslaver received his wages. In his early 30s, he fought in the Revolutionary War and gained his freedom. He served at both Dorchester Heights and Fort Ticonderoga.
And these are just two stories.
For Palumbo, inclusion in the story of the town, and the nation, matters.
'The country was really built by everybody,' he said.
Danny McDonald of the Globe staff contributed to this report.
Tiana Woodard can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mississippi Supreme Court map violates Voting Rights Act, judge rules
JACKSON, Miss. (AP) — A federal judge has ordered Mississippi to redraw its Supreme Court electoral map, after finding the map dilutes the power of Black voters. U.S. District Judge Sharion Aycock ruled the map, which was enacted in 1987, violates the Voting Rights Act and cannot be used in future elections. The Mississippi branch of the American Civil Liberties Union helped litigate the lawsuit, arguing the map cut Mississippi's Delta region — a historically Black area — in half. 'This win corrects a historic injustice," said Ari Savitzky, a senior staff attorney at the ACLU Voting Rights Project. "All Mississippians will benefit from fair district lines that give Black voters an equal voice — and new generations of Black leaders an equal chance to help shape the state's future by serving on the state's highest court.' The lawsuit, which was filed on April 25, 2022, argued the map diminished the Black vote in the Central District. Aycock's ruling notes that only four Black people have served on the Mississippi Supreme Court. All of them held the same seat in the Central District and were first appointed to the position by a sitting governor. Aycock wrote that she will impose a deadline for the Mississippi Legislature to create a new map. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mississippi DEI ban blocked by federal judge. Will IHL walk back its new campus policies?
U.S. District Court Judge Henry Wingate on Monday, Aug. 18, indefinitely blocked Mississippi's new law banning diversity, equity and inclusion, also known as DEI initiatives, in public education, calling the measure likely unconstitutional and overly vague. The ruling, issued Monday, stops the state from enforcing House Bill 1193 while the case plays out in court — raising questions about whether Mississippi's public universities will move forward with new policies meant to comply with the now-paused law. Wingate initially issued a temporary restraining order for the new law in July, and after an August hearing, he upgraded that to a preliminary injunction — blocking enforcement of key parts of the law while the lawsuit plays out. HB 1193 bans public schools from running DEI offices, requiring DEI training, or asking for 'diversity statements' in hiring. It also outlaws programs deemed 'divisive concepts,' allows formal complaints and lets the state cut funding for repeat violations. The bill passed the Mississippi Legislature this past session and was signed into law by Republican Gov. Tate Reeves in April. What IHL did in response to the law In July, Mississippi's Institutions of Higher Learning adopted one policy and introduced another in a closed, behind-doors session, both aimed at complying with House Bill 1193. Those two policies are: The 'Academic Responsibility' policy, which is currently in effect, prohibits public universities from requiring ideological or political statements in hiring, promotion or admissions processes. It affirms academic freedom while emphasizing that universities must remain ideologically neutral in their official operations. According to the policy, faculty and students are free to explore ideas, but instructors 'should be careful not to introduce into their teaching controversial matters or divisive concepts which have no relation to their subject.' The policy also states that IHL institutions must provide learning environments free from requirements to conform to specific political or ideological beliefs — including those related to DEI. Universities are expected to maintain rigorous and relevant curricula, while faculty are encouraged to clarify when they speak as individuals, not as representatives of their institution. The 'Non-Discrimination' policy, still in draft form, goes further. It would bar universities from operating DEI offices, requiring DEI training or asking job applicants to submit diversity statements. It also prohibits giving preferential treatment in hiring or contracting based on race, sex or national origin, and protects individuals who disagree with DEI-related initiatives from being penalized. The policy remains under review and must complete the Administrative Procedures Act process before it can be finalized. How IHL is responding to the court's ruling In a statement Wednesday, IHL spokesperson John Sewell clarified the status of the two policies. 'The non-discrimination policy considered by the IHL Board of Trustees on July 18 remains in draft form and has not received final consideration by the Board,' Sewell said. 'The academic responsibility policy is in effect and provides guidance to universities in a way that does not conflict with the federal court's preliminary injunction.' Sewell also confirmed that Wingate's ruling does not jeopardize any other policies the board may be planning to implement in response to HB 1193. Why Wingate blocked HB 1193 In his 22-page ruling, Wingate said HB 1193 is likely unconstitutional, noting that it imposes vague and viewpoint-specific restrictions that could discourage free speech on college campuses. Wingate also criticized the statute for being poorly defined and prone to selective enforcement. "It (HB 1193) is unconstitutionally vague, fails to treat speech in a viewpoint-neutral manner, and carries with it serious risks of terrible consequences with respect to the chilling of expression and academic freedom," Wingate wrote. Who sued over the DEI law? The plaintiffs in the case are a coalition of civil rights groups and educators. That includes the Mississippi Center for Justice, the American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi and Legal Defense Fund attorneys, among others. They filed the lawsuit on behalf of several professors and students at public universities in Mississippi, arguing that House Bill 1193 violates the First and Fourteenth Amendments by restricting academic freedom and free speech. In a press release Tuesday, the groups applauded Wingate's ruling, calling it a win for public education: "We are please that this law is preliminarily enjoined," said Joshua Tom, legal director at the ACLU of Mississippi. "The State's attempt to impose its preferred views — and ban opposing views — on Mississippi's public education system is not only bad policy, it's illegal, as the Court has preliminarily found today.' Additionally, Rob McDuff, attorney and director of the Mississippi Center for Justice George Riley Impact Litigation Campaign, said Wingate's ruling offers a reprieve for Mississippi's teachers and students, who were left wondering how to keep teaching subjects like history and biology without running afoul of the law 'Thankfully, this puts to rest for now the concerns springing up among administrators, teachers, and students around the state, wondering how they could suddenly stop teaching and learning about issues that have long been essential to a complete education in courses like history, biology, literature, and many others,' McDuff said. Contact Charlie Drape at cdrape@ This article originally appeared on Mississippi Clarion Ledger: Mississippi's anti-DEI law blocked. What IHL plans to do next Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
How Trump's Tariffs Stymied Black Business Growth
The Trump administration's aggressive stance on tariffs is ravaging small business owners, including Black-owned enterprises. New data from Small Business for America's Future show that 80% of over 860 small businesses worry tariffs could force them to close. And 79% fear a U.S. recession emerging in the next 12 months. The fallout is potentially catastrophic as Black businesses are often unable to absorb unexpected cost increases. And they must decide whether or not to boost prices for budget-strapped customers battling inflation. To boot, Black households are more apt to spend a greater share of income on necessities like food, clothing, and utilities. Those expenses are more prone to being affected by tariffs. BLACK BUSINESSES DEAL WITH OBSTACLES AMID TARIFF UNCERTAINTY Simultaneously, around 80% of Black Americans were getting ready to shift their spending habits and buy fewer items, per this report. Exacerbating matters, unemployment for Blacks in July reached its highest point in nearly four years. The findings could potentially trim spending with Black firms if people become more frugal with their finances. Although this report disclosed greater optimism about conditions over the next six months, sluggish sales are a mounting worry for small businesses. Eleven percent mention say its 'top business problem,' the highest point since February 2021. Around 52% of Black businesses report that they saw declining sales due to tariffs as of June 2025. Another account projects that U.S. consumers' share of paying for tariff-related costs will surge to 67% this October from 22% this past June, with Trump disputing the analysis. With the August 1 tariff deadline by Trump now lifted, Black small business owners have expressed frustrations to BLACK ENTERPRISE on how the charges are harming them. RESTAURANT OWNER FORCED TO MAKE DIFFICULT DECISIONS Gladys Harrison is experiencing the tariff sting. She is the owner of Big Mama's Kitchen in Omaha, Nebraska. The restaurant is known for its oven-fried chicken. The spices and seasonings are blended locally but the ingredients come from several different countries. Harrison stressed the special ingredients are what make her dishes stand out, but the unpredictable nature of current tariff policies is forcing her to make complex business decisions. For instance, Harrison had planned an expansion to roll out signature seasonings to grocery stores nationwide, backed by a big marketing campaign. But she says the plan has been scaled down significantly because of tariff uncertainty. 'When I can't predict what my costs will be from month to month, I can't commit to the kind of investment that expansion requires.' (She talks more about the impact here.) UNPREDICTABLE NATURE OF TARIFFS CATCHES THE OWNER OFF GUARD For Black entrepreneur Legrand Lindor, the unpredictable nature of current tariff policies caught his business off guard. He owns LMI Textiles, a small medical supply and manufacturing company in Milton, Massachusetts. He is the leading distributor for a French firm that makes harm reduction products in Europe. His clients include critical public health organizations like the Boston Public Health Commission and health departments nationwide. Lindor says his business was hit with a retroactive $5,000 charge on a February shipment that had already been delivered when aluminum-based product tariffs were implemented. Plus, he says, his firm's most recent shipment received an increased tariff of 50%. That meant instead of paying $4.000 in pre-February times, the firm now faces a $15,000 tariff bill for the items. 'This kind of surprise cost is devastating for a small operation like mine,' Lindor says. He is encountering medical supply challenges, with those product lines facing pressure from many directions. He reflected further on how his firm is being affected by tariffs. COST OF SUPPLIES FOR THIS PROPRIETOR HIT DOUBLE-DIGIT LEVELS For Katrina Golden, owner of Lil Mama's Sweets & Treats in Augusta, Georgia, the tariffs are affecting businesses like her bakery and coffee shop differently than large corporations. For example, her Chinese supplier offered the chance to lock in coffee cup prices at $225 per case before tariffs hit; however, she couldn't take advantage of that opportunity. 'Unlike big businesses, I don't have the cash flow to make bulk purchases that could save money in the long run,' she says. 'There is no wiggle room in my bottom line.' Another blow has been rising costs. Golden says the cost of nearly everything needed to run the business grew by 20-25%. This includes basic supplies like flour, parchment paper, napkins, paper plates, butter, sugar, and spices. 'My coffee cups are expected to jump from $225 to potentially $300-400 per case for my next order, and I only have about 60 days of supply left,' she says. 'I would hire two more employees today if I knew I could afford to keep them, but how do you create a sustainable business plan when policies change so rapidly? I currently employ four people, and we're all feeling the uncertainty.' Lindor summed up the devastating impact of tariffs. 'We don't have the resources that large corporations must absorb these kinds of sudden changes. This has certainly curtailed our plans to open our own warehouse and provide additional jobs.' RELATED CONTENT: Financing Groceries: More Shoppers Are Buying Now And Paying Later For Food Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
