Julia Deluney's diaries: Bible verses, crypto and future plans
DeLuney was found guilty of murdering Helen Gregory, 79, at the elderly woman's home in Baroda St in Khandallah in January last year.
The Crown argued it had been a financially motivated attack, and that DeLuney had been receiving money - or at worst, stealing it - from her mother for at least a year before the murder.
Over the course of the trial, her diaries were presented as evidence of her emotional state and financial struggles.
They contained little reminders and checklists: "car service, pay credit card $10,000, hair tidy up".
ADVERTISEMENT
But that sat alongside Bible passages, musings about her future, and some existential questions.
DeLuney had been a teacher until about 15 years ago. In recent years she had turned her hand to trading cryptocurrency.
The court saw photographs of the diary pages, with typed transcriptions alongside.
Helen Gregory. (Source: rnz.co.nz)
Some entries contained references to FET, WOO, DXY, buying on red days, selling on green days, FOMO of "green candles" (good trades) and speculation about when the US regulating body would approve the first Bitcoin ETF.
In early December, she wrote: "Bitcoin hit, $40,000, waiting for FET to break through."
Some entries contained Bible passages: "Give back what the locusts have taken away, God, double what he had before! I, Julia, stand for the word of the Lord."
ADVERTISEMENT
The Crown pointed to other entries as a sign she had been struggling mentally - like this one in mid-December: "I need to remember how tough and discouraging these past five-six years have been waiting for such a time as this."
As December passed, her diaries begin to reveal a desire to cash out and step back.
December 16, 2023: "Having a healthy pullback today after a big green week.... Yes, I'm desperately impatient to resume my life after six years of staring at charts. It's been a terribly traumatic and challenging period of my life. I need to leave this crypto world behind me soon. Please dear lord."
And on the last day of the year, there was a glimpse into her dreams for the future.
December 31, 2023: "100x from here and we're out of here! New life begins! Remuera goal for 2024, 10m. Generational family home, pool [...], great kitchen, bathrooms, 4+ bedrooms, beautiful tropical garden."
The diaries showed how turbulent cryptocurrency trading could be.
One early January day, DeLuney wrote the markets were "waking up" - and the next, "Market crashed. Liquidations everywhere."
ADVERTISEMENT
DeLuney's bank records showed between January 2023 and January 2024, she spent more than $155,000 on crypto-currency investments.
Cryptocurrency consultant Nicolas Turnbull gave evidence to help the jury understand some of the jargon, but he said there seemed to be "no real structure" to DeLuney's trading.
"There's a lot of emotion in it, where if you're trading, and you're doing this as a job ... in my professional opinion you need structure, you need risk management."
And as January wore on, the diaries revealed DeLuney's increasing disillusionment with trading.
On January 10, she wrote: "It's been an awful year so far, I'm done. Been trying so hard to crack this but as soon as I think it's in my reach, it gets taken away - again and again. I can't keep doing this, I just want a f***ng home and some financial security in old age. It's obviously not happening. F*** life!"
On January 24, DeLuney visited her mother to book tickets to the ballet.
Her diary entries that day - likely written before she visited her mother that evening - were Bible passages.
ADVERTISEMENT
"This is the day that the Lord has made. Let us rejoice and be glad in it." Psalm 118.24
And: "For I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me." Philippians 4.13
Crown prosecutor Stephanie Bishop told the jury in her closing argument they may never know the details of that evening, but "something happened, something changed" - that led to DeLuney violently assaulting her mother.
The next entry was on January 26, 2024 - two days after her mother's death:
Alongside a to-do list of funeral arrangements, she quoted Romans 8.28: "For all things work together for good to those who love him and that are called according to his purposes" and Matthew 6.33: "Seek ye first the kingdom of God and his righteousness and all those things shall be added unto you."
The funeral took place on February 3 - a "beautiful service".
"I'm going to miss you forever my one and only darling, beautiful mum, be at rest and in peace with your Lord and savior Jesus Christ," DeLuney wrote.
ADVERTISEMENT
The court saw diary entries up until February 8: "Dear God, I love and miss mum sooo much, please take care of her. Thank you for blessing me with such a loving, kind and wise mum."
The jury took only a day to deliberate, returning their guilty verdict on Wednesday, just before 5pm.
DeLuney was remanded in custody, to be sentenced in September.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NZ Herald
6 hours ago
- NZ Herald
Repeat sex offender Michael Buck receives home detention for child abuse
Her victim statement was read out in the Christchurch District Court by Crown prosecutor Jade Lancaster when Buck appeared for sentencing on multiple charges of sexual conduct with a child aged under 12. The victim said the hardest thing to do was telling her family about Buck's offending. 'I didn't really think anything of it, the damage it might cause, the guilt, talking about it, I still get a sore throat, my heart caves into the pit of my stomach. 'It is heartbreaking, gut-wrenching, it makes me sick now; I have stopped trying to understand why someone like that would take advantage of me, not realising that things like that shouldn't happen to you.' She wanted Buck to acknowledge what he had done. The court heard the victim was often in Buck's care, and that when she was 4 or 5 years old, he had committed an indecent act on her. When the victim was aged between 8 and 9 years old, he again committed an indecent act on her. He went on to deny the offending before saying he didn't have a direct recall of the events, but accepted the summary of facts if that was what the victim had recalled. While defence lawyer Rupert Ward said Buck had shown remorse and taken responsibility for the situation, Judge Gerard Lynch didn't accept his claim of remorse. 'Any remorse was about the fix you found yourself in rather than any heartfelt remorse for this child,' Judge Lynch told him. Judge Lynch said the thought of going back to jail had 'terrified' Buck. Lancaster submitted an uplift in the sentence for Buck's criminal history. 'Obviously this is offending of a type where prison is appropriate.' The Crown also sought to have Buck placed on the Child Sex Offender Register. Judge Lynch said Buck, now 65, had been sentenced to three and half years' jail in 1991 for indecent acts on a girl aged under 12. While there had been more than 30 years between the convictions, it was only 12 years between the offending, the judge said. 'That you have offended again like this is worrying. 'She was very young, you exploited her for your own gratification, it is plain the harm he caused, it will be with her for some time.' Judge Lynch told Buck he did not accept his claim of remorse after Buck had entered not guilty pleas and sought a sentencing indication. From a starting point of 24 months' jail, Judge Lynch sentenced him to 10 months and two weeks' home detention and placed Buck on the Child Sex Offender Register. 'This is the sort of case when an order is needed to protect any children or any other person, the risk is real and genuine.' Al Williams is an Open Justice reporter for the New Zealand Herald, based in Christchurch. He has worked in daily and community titles in New Zealand and overseas for the last 16 years. Most recently he was editor of the Hauraki-Coromandel Post, based in Whangamatā. He was previously deputy editor of the Cook Islands News.
1News
12 hours ago
- 1News
Nephew allegedly murdered relative in his 80s during Sydney home invasion
Failing to locate stacks of cash during a home invasion, a money-hungry masked man fatally beat a relative in his 80s over the head before fleeing the scene, a jury has heard. Kalim Saliba was asleep in his lounge room while his wife Shahidy Saliba watched television in their western Sydney home in the wee hours of April 28, 2020. This peaceful scene was shattered after a masked man broke in just after midnight. Minutes later, the couple - who were both in their 80s - were struck over the head in their Cherrybrook garage with Shahidy losing consciousness and Kalim collapsing to the floor and dying later in hospital. "Where is the money?" the masked man said before attacking the couple, a NSW Supreme Court trial was told on Monday. ADVERTISEMENT Tony Phillip Tadrosse, 60, and Danny Stephen, 35, have both pleaded not guilty to murdering Kalim and assaulting Shahidy while armed and intending to rob and wound her. Stephen is one of the elderly couple's great nephews, and Tadrosse is an extended relative. The pair sat before a jury on Monday as Crown Prosecutor Eric Balodis described how Shahidy and her husband heard someone breaking the glass at the front of their home. They soon saw a masked man with a bag inside, he said. Balodis told the jury there might have been a second person inside the house making noise upstairs and a possible third person in a car driving outside. Two men were charged with the murder of Kalim Saliba. (Source: Supplied) He said while Tadrosse or Stephens weren't identified within the Cherrybrook home, there was a strong circumstantial case they were there at the time. ADVERTISEMENT The motive was financial, Balodis said, with the two men on the lookout for money. Despite not having money in his bank account, Tadrosse called to inquire about getting expensive dental implants the morning before the home invasion, the prosecutor said. It was well-known amongst the extended family Kalim and his wife were old-fashioned with their money, preferring to keep cash in a safe rather than digitally, the jury was told. Tadrosse and Stephens formed a plan to break into the property, knowing one of the occupants could be killed or suffer grievous bodily harm, the prosecutor said. Through this joint criminal enterprise, the pair were guilty of murder, he argued. The Crown's case relies heavily on CCTV footage showing a Hilux and an Audi driving through the streets of Cherrybrook doing "reconnaissance" of the house in the hours before the home invasion. Tadrosse and Stephen had access to these vehicles, Balodis said. ADVERTISEMENT The timing of calls made between phone numbers allegedly belonging to the two co-accused aligned with the events of that night, jurors heard. After returning to his Kings Cross home, Tadrosse tried to establish an alibi by calling the coronavirus hotline and saying he had woken up in a cold sweat, Balodis argued. The morning's headlines in 90 seconds, including the atmospheric river arrives, Epstein's girlfriend pushes for appeal, and Jennifer Lopez's wardrobe malfunction. (Source: Breakfast) Both men deny any involvement in the events of that tragic night. "Danny Stephen didn't murder Kalim Saliba or injure his wife Shahidy," defence barrister Karl Prince said. Tadrosse's barrister Madeleine Avenell SC said there was no doubt the home invasion was a "terrible incident" with a "terrible outcome". However, her client also rejected allegations he was there. If the more serious charges can't be proven, the jury can consider alternative charges of manslaughter and assault with intent to rob. The trial continues on Tuesday.
Otago Daily Times
16 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Relative allegedly murdered man in home invasion
Failing to locate stacks of cash during a home invasion, a money-hungry masked man fatally beat an elderly relative over the head before fleeing the scene, a jury has heard. Kalim Saliba was asleep in his lounge room while his wife Shahidy Saliba watched television in their western Sydney home in the wee hours of April 28, 2020. This peaceful scene was shattered after a masked man broke in just after midnight. Minutes later, the couple - who were both in their 80s - were struck over the head in their Cherrybrook garage. Mrs Saliba lost consciousness and Mr Saliba collapsed to the floor and later died in hospital. "Where is the money?" the masked man said before attacking the couple, a NSW Supreme Court trial was told on Monday. Tony Phillip Tadrosse, 60, and Danny Stephen, 35, have both pleaded not guilty to murdering Mr Saliba and assaulting Mrs Saliba while armed and intending to rob and wound her. Stephen is one of the elderly couple's great nephews and Tadrosse is an extended relative. The pair sat before a jury on Monday as crown prosecutor Eric Balodis described how Mrs Saliba and her husband heard someone breaking the glass at the front of their home. They soon saw a masked man with a bag inside, he said. Mr Balodis told the jury there might have been a second person inside the house making noise upstairs and a possible third person in a car driving outside. He said while Tadrosse or Stephens weren't identified within the Cherrybrook home, there was a strong circumstantial case they were there at the time. The motive was financial, Mr Balodis said, with the two men on the lookout for money. Despite not having money in his bank account, Tadrosse called to inquire about getting expensive dental implants the morning before the home invasion, the prosecutor said. It was well-known amongst the extended family Mr Saliba and his wife were old-fashioned with their money, preferring to keep cash in a safe rather than digitally, the jury was told. Tadrosse and Stephens formed a plan to break into the property knowing one of the occupants could be killed or suffer grievous bodily harm, the prosecutor said. Through this joint criminal enterprise, the pair were guilty of murder, he argued. The Crown's case relies heavily on CCTV footage showing a Hilux and an Audi driving through the streets of Cherrybrook doing "reconnaissance" of the house in the hours before the home invasion. Tadrosse and Stephen had access to these vehicles, Mr Balodis said. The timing of calls made between phone numbers allegedly belonging to the two co-accused aligned with the events of that night, jurors heard. After returning to his Kings Cross home, Tadrosse tried to establish an alibi by calling the coronavirus hotline and saying he had woken up in a cold sweat, Mr Balodis argued. Both men deny any involvement in the events of that tragic night. "Danny Stephen didn't murder Kalim Saliba or injure his wife Shahidy," defence barrister Karl Prince said. Tadrosse's barrister Madeleine Avenell SC said there was no doubt the home invasion was a "terrible incident" with a "terrible outcome". However, her client also rejected allegations he was there. If the more serious charges can't be proven, the jury can consider alternative charges of manslaughter and assault with intent to rob. The trial continues on Tuesday.
