
LaFrance administration aims to set up 24 'microunits' in Anchorage pilot program for homeless
May 26—Mayor Suzanne LaFrance's administration told members of the Assembly that it hopes to have a new pilot project providing homeless residents substance abuse treatment in a small community of "microunits" by October.
"This could be unrealistic," special assistant to the mayor Thea Agnew Bemben said of the tight timeline. "But we're just gonna give it a whirl."
Bemben detailed the plan to members of the Assembly during a Housing and Homelessness Committee meeting Wednesday.
The goal of the "Microunit Recovery Residences" pilot program, according to Bemben's presentation, is to "create immediate access to transitional living and treatment for people experiencing homelessness with substance use disorders."
To do that, the administration aims to put 24 tiny houses on a piece of municipal land, potentially near the U-Med District in the area of Tudor and Elmore roads.
"These are small structures," Bemben said — around 100 square feet per unit. "Inside you just basically have the basics for one person. So it's a bed, some storage, a fridge, a microwave, a window."
Outside the single-person domiciles are bathrooms and, potentially, on-site showers as well as a communal indoor space.
[Town Square Park, Anchorage's troubled downtown centerpiece, is set for a major overhaul]
The municipality had been studying the idea of using tiny homes as a partial solution to homelessness since 2023, she said, and it was looked at separately by members of the Assembly too. For several months the administration has consulted locally with a similar initiative, In Our Backyard, which as of last year had six small units for seniors set up on the property of a church in Fairview. They also took lessons from different tiny-home projects in Atlanta; Corvallis, Oregon; and elsewhere.
There would be two components: operations and treatment.
In the plan Bemben presented to the Assembly, the Anchorage Community Development Authority would oversee physical components of the pilot. That would mean purchasing or building the tiny homes, developing the selected parcel of land and connecting the site to utilities, including electricity and water.
The Anchorage Community Development Authority is a quasi-governmental municipal entity that traditionally has overseen parking lots, garages and meters but has increasingly helped connect public and private resources for redevelopment projects in the municipality, particularly housing.
Bemben said the administration wants the Assembly to approve a plan to use about half of the $2.4 million the municipality currently has from a legal settlement with opioid manufacturers that it believes can be spent on the program, since it is geared toward people in treatment and recovery from substance abuse. Though the exact amount is still being fine-tuned, Bemben said they think $1.2 million of the settlement passed to the authority will be enough to hire a contractor to construct and install the microunits and get them set up for tenants.
"I just want to double check my math here," said Assembly member Zac Johnson, who represents South Anchorage. "$1.2 million for 24 units to have them built and connected to services, I mean that's about $50,000 a pop —"
"$47,000," Bemben interjected.
"That's pretty good value," Johnson replied.
The second component of the pilot is drug and alcohol treatment as a requirement for eligibility.
"This is designed to be a very low-barrier way of getting people into treatment," Bemben said. "In order to remain there you would have to remain compliant with the program."
The municipality would not be the one funding treatment and operating costs. As early as June 10, the administration could submit a measure to the Assembly that includes a request for $500,000 for startup costs to help a third-party health care provider get a treatment program established in the recovery residences, Bemben said. The Anchorage Health Department will be in charge of selecting a provider that is qualified to charge Medicaid for behavioral health services to residents. Creating a program that can bill the federal health care system will be essential to making it financially sustainable, Bemben said, something they'd learned from looking at treatment provider peers in Wasilla and Fairbanks.
Assembly member Daniel Volland, from the downtown district, asked how standing up a community of two dozen tiny homes compared to the municipality buying an apartment or hotel building to provide shelter and treatment, an approach to homelessness and addiction the municipality has pursued with varying degrees of focus for several years. Bemben told him the city should be working on both.
"The advantage of this is it can be done quickly," she said.
In the ideal timeline, Bemben said, the Assembly will approve funding for the pilot program in June, a contractor will be selected in July, and work begun in August or September so that tenants are able to move in in October, before winter hits. Developing the treatment program with a health care provider would happen simultaneously on a parallel track.
A location for the tiny homes has not been selected, but the prime candidate is a municipal-owned parcel near the Tozier track by the intersection of Tudor and Elmore roads. Bemben said the site had a lot of what the city needs to make it successful and cost effective like paving, fencing and proximity to utilities.
"This one's the most promising so far," she said.
Assembly Chair Chris Constant pointed out that the municipality owns that particular parcel in a land swap that was part of a redevelopment plan that imagined adding more permanent housing, a new Health Department building and a grocery store to the area.
Bemben responded that one of the draws of a pilot program was that if it didn't work, then the microunits could be moved elsewhere or scrapped entirely.
"We have choices after that two-year period," she said.
Erin Baldwin Day, who was elected this spring to represent the area, told Bemben that neighborhoods around that land have had a lot of experience with homeless encampments in the area. She asked the administration, if the parcel is ultimately selected, to commit to holding town halls or community listening sessions to inform residents of the plan and build support for it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CBS News
44 minutes ago
- CBS News
Denver Health partners with Flight for Life to provide critical care transport
Denver Health is launching a new partnership that they said will save lives. A bright orange helicopter will now be stationed at Denver Health on the first Thursday of each month. It's one of the aircraft that belongs to Flight for Life, a critical care transport company the hospital said is known for its state-of-the-art fleet and experienced medical teams. CBS Dr. Gene Moore, a surgeon at Denver Health, said traffic can often keep regular ambulances from reaching patients in a timely manner. "Furthermore, I think we have learned more and more, particularly with our war experience in Iraq and Afghanistan, that survival is based on care to the patient as soon as possible," said Moore. Flight for Life is one of several air ambulance services that work with Denver Health.


TechCrunch
44 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Genetics testing startup Nucleus Genomics criticized for its embryo product: ‘Makes me so nauseous'
Nucleus Genomics, a genetic testing startup founded by 25-year-old Kian Sadeghi, initially launched in 2021 with the goal of calculating a patient's risk for specific diseases. But it's been courting controversy for years with products that claim to tell people how their genetics correlate to a host of complex issues, including their IQ. On Wednesday, it ratcheted up the controversy to an ear-splitting level when it announced a new product called Nucleus Embryo with a tweet that said: 'Every parent wants to give their children more than they had. For the first time in human history, Nucleus adds a new tool to that commitment.' Every parent wants to give their children more than they had. For the first time in human history, Nucleus adds a new tool to that commitment. Welcome to Nucleus — Nucleus Genomics (@nucleusgenomics) June 4, 2025 Nucleus says it can test IVF embryos not just for well-known specific genes that have a high chance of illnesses like breast cancer, but also for appearance — sex, height, hair color, eye color — as well as IQ and complex health attributes like anxiety and ADHD. The launch video includes a screen shot of a comparison menu. The idea is to help parents choose which embryos to pick and which ones to, perhaps, discard. Nucleus Genomics embryos features screen Image Credits:Nucleus Genomics (opens in a new window) Genetic testing of embryos isn't unheard of. IVF physicians can test for genes that can cause conditions like Down syndrome, or when parents know they are of high risk for a particular genetic disorder, like cystic fibrosis. Techcrunch event Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Save $200+ on your TechCrunch All Stage pass Build smarter. Scale faster. Connect deeper. Join visionaries from Precursor Ventures, NEA, Index Ventures, Underscore VC, and beyond for a day packed with strategies, workshops, and meaningful connections. Boston, MA | REGISTER NOW But that's not exactly what Nucleus is doing. It is using controversial 'polygenic scores' to determine 'complex genetic outcomes, like intelligence and anxiety,' a spokesperson says. According to the National Human Genome Research Institute, polygenic scores only calculate the probabilities of a certain complex illness occurring, mainly within populations. 'A polygenic risk score can only explain the relative risk for a disease,' the NHGR says. This is not the same as discovering a specific gene, such as for example the BRCA1 gene mutation, which gives a person a 60-80% 'absolute risk of breast cancer,' the NHGR says. There's a reason doctors don't typically use such tests for individuals. 'Polygenic risk scores are not yet routinely used by health professionals because there are no guidelines for practice and researchers are still improving how these scores are generated,' according to the NHGR. Nucleus defends that its method can be used to determine an individual's risk. The spokesperson pointed us to a 2018 paper where the authors said they had developed validated methods for five common diseases: coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation, type 2 diabetes, inflammatory bowel disease, and breast cancer. That paper was advocating screenings to help individuals make lifestyle or therapeutic decisions, similar to Nucleus's initial concept. Wednesday's tweet was promising parents that Nucleus can help them create designer babies. It has now been viewed more than 4 million times and has hundreds of comments, many of them either expressing disbelief that this works as promised, or horror at the idea. One VC chimed into the discussion saying, 'I was going to type something like Noah get the boat but honestly the reality of this just makes me so nauseous.' I was going to type something like Noah get the boat but honestly the reality of this just makes me so nauseous — Max Niederhofer ❤️🔥 (@maxniederhofer) June 5, 2025 Nucleus has experienced this kind of controversy before, as TechCrunch previously reported, when it its $14 million series A earlier this year. The startup is backed by Founders Fund, Alexis Ohanian's 776, and angels including Adrian Aoun (CEO at Forward Health), Brent Saunders (former CEO at Allergan), and Matteo Franceschetti (CEO at Eight Sleep). Last year, Sadeghi launched Nucleus IQ, which is supposed to tell users how much their genetics influence intelligence. The product was blasted as 'bad science and big business' by some critics. Sadeghi published a lengthy defense of his company's methodology. Even so, telling adults that they are genetically smart is one thing. Telling IVF parents that they can choose the appearance and other complex attributes for their children is, many would argue, something else. Nucleus is not currently conducting such tests via IVF lab partners itself, The Wall Street Journal reports. It's partnering with Genomic Prediction, which works with IVF clinics. A Genomic executive told the WSJ that many parents request intelligence tests, and it doesn't provide that. Parents can voluntarily upload genetic data information to Nucleas if they want to pursue it. Or, as Sadeghi said in the launch video aimed at would-be parents: 'Not that long ago IVF-1 sparked fear and the stigma of test tube babies,' he said. 'What was once controversial is now an everyday practice. The same is true with genetic optimization. The technology is now here and it's here to stay.'


Medscape
44 minutes ago
- Medscape
Restricting Kids' Cell Phone Use at School: Ethicist
This transcript has been edited for clarity. Hi. I'm Art Caplan. I'm at the NYU Grossman School of Medicine, where I'm the head of the Division of Medical Ethics. The state that I live in, Connecticut, has seen some very interesting legislative proposals recently around cell phone use. Many other states — New York, New Jersey, and many others — are having similar Connecticut one, I think, is the furthest along of them all. It becomes important because I think parents ask questions about cell phone use for their kids. What should I be thinking? Should I restrict it? Is it dangerous? What should I do? The state of Connecticut wants to help. First, they've proposed legislation to pull cell phones out of schools — at least kindergarten up through high school — to get the cell phones taken away from the kids so that they're not distracted and that they're paying attention to the teacher and also engaged in social interaction. Even more radically, there's a proposal in Connecticut, a bill that would ban in young children from being able to access social media platforms, iPads, cell phones, or whatever between midnight and 6:00 AM. Is this a good idea? A colleague of mine at NYU, Jonathan Haidt, wrote a book called The Anxious Generation . He believes that the rates we see of teenagers who are now experiencing anxiety, which has increased from 2010 to today from 1 in 10 to 1 in 4; the number of teenagers experiencing depression, which has gone up from 1 in 10 to 1 in 5; and even death by suicide, one of the leading causes of deathfor kids aged 15-24, have to do with social media. Harassment, peer pressure, and getting stalked and bombarded with messages that attack self-esteem, target young people, and make them feel bad about their bodies can absolutely create mental health disorders. Is there sufficient evidence in his book?Do we have sufficient evidence from other studies to say for sure it's the cell phone or the iPad that somebody's looking at late at night? I'm going to concede that we don't. There's suggestive evidence, but not really many gold-standard studies that say, yes, it's the cell phone, iPad, or computerand where they are on social media. On the other hand, I support these legislative efforts, like Connecticut's, to get the cell phones out of school, to get kids talking to one another, to get them paying attention more, and to do what we can to get them off [of their devices] in the middle of the night. I would look at it this way.[Cell phones] may be causing problems by giving access to disturbing social media outlets. Let's face it, social media is a cesspool at this point, a sewer all over the place, and the companies that run it are doing nothing to self-regulate it. If we're wrong, the worst that happened is [kids] are not online for certain parts of the day. I know parents sometimes say, well, what about if there's a shooting or an emergency at school? I think we can manage that. You can absolutely have teachers with cell phones. The staff can have cell phones. It's not that there wouldn't be any ability to alert the police or to allow some communication as necessary with the kids.I don't think the rarity of a school shooting, as much as we worry about it, is enough to say, yes, let's let the kids just get lost all day long at school in their cell phones. I also understand why people are asking how this is going to really be enforced. Maybe it will be possible at school when you ask the kids to turn the cell phones in and lock them up or put them in a pouch where the teacher has the code or is that enforceable at home at night? One of the things missing, I think, from these efforts in Connecticut and elsewhere to decrease access by young kids to social media is the use of parental controls. I think some social platforms do a pretty good job saying before you give that cell phone to your kid or let them have their own computer, you're going to be able to program it with social parental discretion controls. Other platforms don't seem to care. Let's set some standards and expectations about what parents could do and would be able to do to restrict access at different times. It's going to take an across-the-board effort from parents, government requirements, and a willingness of people who control social mediato try to make sure that kids aren't getting in trouble, but we have to really start to take steps. We've got a problem in just saying there's nothing we could do about it, like the horse is out of the barn. That's not a response. I support the Connecticut effort. We'll see. I don't think federal government's going to be moving in this area anytime seem oriented toward deregulation. I think many states may, and I think that's something that, as physicians, we should try to support. Less access to social media at certain times of the day and night is not a bad thing for kids. I'm Art Caplan. I'm at the Division of Medical Ethics at NYU Grossman School of for watching.