logo
John Oliver sued by healthcare boss he rebuked on air over ‘bowel movement' comments

John Oliver sued by healthcare boss he rebuked on air over ‘bowel movement' comments

A former health insurance boss has taken legal action against 'Last Week Tonight' host John Oliver, filing a defamation lawsuit against the Emmy winner.
Dr. Brian Morley, a hospital administrator and former medical director for AmeriHealth Caritas in Iowa, filed his lawsuit Friday in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. Morley's complaint stems from a Medicaid-themed episode of 'Last Week Tonight' that aired in April 2024. The lawsuit, reviewed by The Times, alleges Oliver and 'Last Week Tonight' producer Partially Important Productions linked Morley to a drastic decrease in Medicaid services and accused him of thinking 'it's ok if people have s— on them for days.'
An attorney for Morley did not comment to The Times on Wednesday and a representative for Oliver did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The episode central to Morley's lawsuit aired April 14, 2024, and saw Oliver explore the state of Medicaid, examining healthcare companies' cost-cutting measures and their toll on patients across various states. During the segment, which aired on HBO and is available on YouTube, Oliver explained the role of managed care organizations (MCOs) in the healthcare system and shared a news outlet's video about dwindling patient care. The 2018 news snippet featured a cerebral palsy patient in Iowa named Louis whose care was negatively impacted by MCO involvement.
Oliver followed that part of the segment with an audio snippet of Morley's comments about patient care from a 2017 administrative hearing. In the clip, Morley can be heard saying: 'People have bowel movements every day where they don't completely clean themselves and we don't fuss over [them] too much. People are allowed to be dirty. You know, I would allow him to be a little dirty for a couple of days.'
The quote garnered a strong reaction from the 'Last Week Tonight' studio audience and led Oliver to say he thought Morley's comments were taken out of context. He explained that he first thought 'there is no way a doctor, a licensed physician, would testify in a hearing that he thinks it's OK if people have s— on them for days.' Oliver continued his segment stating his team obtained the full hearing and that Morley 'said it.'
'He meant it and it made me want to punch a hole in the wall,' Oliver said. The segment returned to the 2018 video of Louis and his mother, both responding negatively to Morley's comments. The 'Last Week Tonight' host had some choice words for Morley — which were cited in Friday's lawsuit.
In his complaint, Morley says, 'Defendants' false accusations were designed to spark outrage, and they did.
'The false accusations Defendants made were so heinous that John Oliver felt justified in telling his millions of viewers: 'F— that doctor with a rusty canoe. I hope he gets tetanus of the balls,'' the complaint said. 'Oliver's feigned outrage at Dr. Morley was fabricated for ratings and profits at the expense of Dr. Morley's reputation and personal well-being.'
Morley accused Oliver and 'Last Week Tonight' of making him the 'face' of the dramatic decrease in Medicaid care and increased cost-cutting. The lawsuit also raised concerns about how 'Last Week Tonight' allegedly misrepresented Morley's 2017 comments and 'knew and disregarded' various details of the hearing in the April episode.
The lawsuit alleges that the 'Last Week Tonight' team 'conveyed the false and defamatory meanings' that Morley denied care to 'Louis and/or the alleged 'similar' individual subject' of his testimony and that he allegedly said it was acceptable for patients who wear diapers or who cannot bathe themselves to 'be left sitting in their own bowel movements for days.'
The complaint says that the 'Last Week Tonight' team obtained and reviewed 'an unabridged audio recording' of the 2017 hearing and that one of the show's senior news producers allegedly confirmed to Morley that they had reviewed the hearing. According to the lawsuit, Morley made his 'bowel movement' comments in regard to a 'hypothetical average person, who is independently mobile and can toilet transfer' but who might not have been able to clean themselves entirely after a bowel movement. 'Last Week Tonight' allegedly did not disclose that detail, according to the lawsuit.
He accused the show's producers of 'negligence, knowledge of falsity, and/or a reckless disregard for the truth.'
Morely also alleges that a 'Last Week Tonight' news producer 'refused' to meet when he offered to explain his comments. The defendants also allegedly refused Morley's October 2024 request that they 'retract their false and defamatory statements.'
Morley seeks an unspecified amount in damages including legal fees and additional relief. He also requests that judges order 'Last Week Tonight' to remove the 'false and defamatory statements from all platforms' and keep them from republishing. He is seeking a trial.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iowa Democrat Drops Out of Senate Race, Endorses Rival
Iowa Democrat Drops Out of Senate Race, Endorses Rival

Newsweek

time5 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Iowa Democrat Drops Out of Senate Race, Endorses Rival

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Iowa Democratic Representative J.D. Scholten announced Monday that he is suspending his 2026 U.S. Senate campaign and endorsing fellow Democratic legislator Josh Turek in the primary race to potentially challenge Republican Senator Joni Ernst. Newsweek reached out to Scholten via email on Monday for comment. Why It Matters Scholten's endorsement consolidates Democratic support around healthcare advocacy, with Turek bringing a personal perspective to the issue. The two-time Paralympic gold medalist said his family relied on public assistance programs like Medicaid, as well as Iowa's Area Education Agencies and free summer lunch program as he was growing up, having gone through 21 surgeries by the age of 12 for spina bifida, according to his official campaign biography. The 2026 Iowa Senate race represents a critical opportunity for Democrats in a state that has shifted increasingly Republican in recent cycles. Senator Ernst's response to healthcare concerns has become a focal point for Democratic challengers seeking to make the race competitive. An important update 👉 Today I'm suspending my campaign and endorsing Josh Turek. We can't sit by while healthcare is ripped from millions of Americans and there's no better Democrat in Iowa to hold Joni to account for her cruelty than my friend fighter State Rep. Josh Turek. — J.D. Scholten (@JDScholten) August 18, 2025 What To Know Scholten, a Sioux City Democrat, entered the race in June after Ernst sparked controversy for responding to comments at a town hall about Medicaid cuts. "People are not ... well, we all are going to die," the senator said in part. Ernst's office later clarified to news outlets that she was attempting to make a broader philosophical point about mortality, not specifically about Medicaid policy. Turek, a Democrat from Council Bluffs, launched his campaign on Tuesday. The endorsement comes as both lawmakers represent western Iowa districts and share backgrounds as athletes serving in the state legislature. Scholten, a professional baseball pitcher for the minor league Sioux City Explorers, said he and Turek share many similarities as athletes representing western Iowa at the Statehouse. The Democratic primary field remains crowded despite Scholten's exit. Iowa Senator Zach Wahls, D-Coralville, Des Moines School Board Chair Jackie Norris and Nathan Sage, former Knoxville Chamber of Commerce director, are running for the seat, alongside Turek. On the Republican side, Jim Carlin, a former state lawmaker and Joshua Smith, who has run as a Libertarian candidate in previous elections, are also campaigning for the GOP nomination. Ernst has not officially said if she plans to run for reelection in 2026, though she has told reporters an announcement would be "coming soon." She also told a GOP audience last week that Democrats can "bring it on" in the 2026 election. The lawmaker has raised nearly $1.8 million in the first half of 2025 and scheduled an October fundraiser, possibly signaling preparations for a reelection campaign, the AP reports. Early polling of the race shows the senator with a slight advantage in Iowa. A June Public Policy Polling survey found that Ernst would lead a generic Democrat by about two percentage points—45 percent to 43 percent, with 12 percent still unsure. The poll did not ask voters about specific Democratic candidates. The poll surveyed 568 Iowa voters. What People Are Saying Scholten in a statement on Monday in part: "There are still so many issues facing Iowans today, but we can't sit by while healthcare is ripped from millions of Americans. And there is no better Democrat in Iowa to talk about healthcare issues than my friend: State Rep. Josh Turek." Scholten on his endorsement decision in part: "From the very beginning, I thought a prairie populist athlete from Western Iowa would be the best candidate to win in the General election. I still do, but instead of me, I have complete confidence that Josh Turek can take this on." Turek responding to Scholten's message on X: "I am honored to have the support of J.D. Over the last several years, J.D. and I have fought alongside one another in the state legislature to lower costs for Iowa's families, to make health care more affordable and accessible, to make housing more affordable, and to make life a little bit easier and a little bit better for Iowa's families." He concluded: "We have an incredible opportunity to beat Joni Ernst in 2026, and I'm proud to join forces with J.D." JD Scholten, running for congress in Iowa's 4th Congressional District against Steve King, waves to supporters outside the Wing Ding Dinner on August 9, 2019 in Clear Lake, Iowa. JD Scholten, running for congress in Iowa's 4th Congressional District against Steve King, waves to supporters outside the Wing Ding Dinner on August 9, 2019 in Clear Lake, Iowa. ALEX EDELMAN/AFP via Getty Images What Happens Next? Turek and Scholten will hold an event in Council Bluffs Monday evening. Ernst is expected to formally announce her potential reelection campaign within the coming weeks. Reporting from the Associated Press contributed to this article.

Medicaid Cuts Threaten to Stall a Breakthrough in Addiction Care
Medicaid Cuts Threaten to Stall a Breakthrough in Addiction Care

Newsweek

time10 hours ago

  • Newsweek

Medicaid Cuts Threaten to Stall a Breakthrough in Addiction Care

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. The first wave of the opioid epidemic began 26 years ago, and it continues to be a major issue for the health care system today. However, there is one treatment model that shows promise—but it could see progress stunted by future Medicaid cuts. In 2022, 81,806 opioid-involved overdose deaths occurred in the United States, more than any year prior. However, in 2024, overdose deaths relating to synthetic opioids dropped by almost 37 percent from 2023. A form of treatment that has proved and could continue to prove beneficial for treating opioid use disorder (OUD) is the collaborative care model (CoCM). In the SUMMIT randomized clinical trial, published in 2017, 32.8 percent of patients in a CoCM displayed abstinence from opioids or alcohol, as compared to 22.3 percent in standard care. Collaborative care models are revolutionizing treatment for opioid use disorder, combining the expertise of a primary care doctor, behavioral health clinician and consulting specialist, like a psychiatrist or addiction medicine specialist. Collaborative care models are revolutionizing treatment for opioid use disorder, combining the expertise of a primary care doctor, behavioral health clinician and consulting specialist, like a psychiatrist or addiction medicine specialist. Photo-illustration by Newsweek/Canva How do collaborative care models work? The CoCM is depicted as a triangle and involves a behavioral health clinician, a consulting specialist (like a psychiatrist or addiction medicine specialist) and a primary care provider, collaborating to provide behavioral health services to a patient. This treatment model stems from research conducted at the University of Washington at its Advancing Integrated Mental Health Solutions (AIMS) Center to understand whether it was possible to leverage the power of the relationship between a primary care physician and their patient while also increasing access to mental health services. Dr. Rachel E. Kishton, a physician at Penn Medicine, headquartered in Philadelphia, was recently named medical director of the Penn Integrated Care (PIC) program, where she oversees Penn's integrated and collaborative care programs. "By including everything within the primary care setting and centering that relationship between the primary care physician and the patient, you get over the hump of the fear and stigma related to it but also start from a place of trust," Kishton told Newsweek. Collaborative care models have been used to treat individuals with disorders like OUD and alcohol use disorder but are also used to treat mental health disorders. Within this lies the biggest challenge in treating patients for OUD using a CoCM. More often than not, OUD is accompanied by comorbid mental health disorders. According to Kishton, the need for a shift to more immediate and definitive treatment for mental health disorders is overlooked, compared to other disciplines in medicine. Kishton provided the metaphor of a patient having a heart attack. In that scenario, the patient should be rushed to the catheterization lab, not kept in an outpatient office and given aspirin. The distinction isn't always clear when a patient is having a mental health crisis. Physicians need better guidelines to respond to behavioral health patients with the proper level of urgency, the same way they would for a patient experiencing physical symptoms. "More research is definitely needed to understand when you send someone to the cath lab," she said, continuing the metaphor. "We need to ensure this research is continued to understand what the next steps are." Dr. Tyler Winkelman, a primary care physician at Hennepin Healthcare in Minneapolis, explained that often patients with depression or anxiety come in with the understanding that they have the disorder, whereas OUD patients often have yet to recognize what they're dealing with. "We've had a lot of success in referring patients with anxiety, depression and alcohol use disorders to the model," Winkelman said. "It has been trickier to figure out how to adapt the model for people with opioid use disorder." As a result of this, Hennepin recently started shifting its CoCM strategy. It previously treated OUD similarly to mental health disorders and is now using the model to prioritize care coordination and access, since that's what the patient population needs most. The collaborative care model is a highly evidence-based and adaptable form of treatment. The behavioral health clinician in the model will typically utilize evidence-based therapy modalities, including cognitive behavioral therapy and behavioral activation. The typical progression for these programs is six to eight sessions with a therapist over three to four months. However, despite the model appearing somewhat formulaic, Kishton emphasized that collaborative care programs vary across institutions. "If you've seen one collaborative care program, you've seen one collaborative care program," Kishton said. "They can be very different, depending on what the goals are, where the funding's coming from and what the core patient group is that you're working with." How do collaborative care models help build patient trust? In addition to Penn Medicine, other institutions around the country are working to create collaborative care programs to serve this patient population. Dr. Gavin B. Bart, who has been a physician of internal and addiction medicine at Hennepin Healthcare for 20 years now, believes the collaborative care model is instrumental in helping people with substance-abuse disorders. "People with substance use disorders are complicated because they've been so marginalized by the health care system," Bart said. "Having care coordination within a single site helps prevent the fragmentation of care that is sort of the standard right now." The CoCM addresses this fragmentation of care by providing patients with direct and immediate access to care within one facility, preventing them from having to find and build trust with a new provider. "The initial part of treating addiction requires much more upfront management to make sure the patient's needs are being mapped, their withdrawal is being managed and other medical issues are managed," said Bart. "And it should be done in a quick manner, otherwise the patients walk away and don't come back." Nurse Practitioner Brenda Bauch works within Hennepin's addiction clinic and shed some light on the vulnerability patients often come into the clinic with. "We see patients who often have a distrust of doing something new," Bauch said. "We have access to effective FDA-approved medications for OUD. That's wonderful and can be life-changing. But initially, it's about saying, 'You're welcome here in wherever you're at in your state of transformative change.'" Could Medicaid cuts limit access to collaborative care? Hennepin Healthcare provides services through grants provided by the Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). However, Minnesota's state Medicaid agency is yet to adopt the billing codes that cover the cost of a collaborative care program. Bart and Winkelman from Hennepin Healthcare expressed concern regarding pending Medicare and Medicaid cuts. "As a public safety net hospital, we're certainly concerned about the potential cuts," Bart said. "The best we can do to preserve our finances is not squander the knowledge we've gathered through research and public health information. There's data that tells us for every dollar invested in treatment, the amount of savings that occur elsewhere in society in terms of reduced rates of incarceration, increased employment rates and more. We need to not lose touch with that as we create our plans, moving forward, to make America healthy." Despite this possible obstacle, Hennepin Healthcare has been largely successful in helping OUD patients transform their lives. Aside from sharing concerns regarding the financial sustainability of the collaborative care program at Hennepin, Winkelman, too, is "extremely optimistic" about the model's future in treating OUD and other disorders. "I've had so many patients in the last two years benefit dramatically from these services, and we've really been able to help patients get back on their feet," he said. "It has improved the quality of health care that we've provided. And I really see it as the standard of care moving forward in primary care." What's on the horizon for collaborative care models? Currently, research is shifting to examine not only how the collaborative care model can address substance abuse symptoms but also the co-occurring mental health conditions. Penn Medicine's Whole Health Study focused on this with a randomized controlled trial designed to assess collaborative care models and their effectiveness in treating patients for OUD and the comorbid mental disorders that accompany it. The study utilized three conditions. In the first, primary care doctors were prescribing buprenorphine and referring patients out for mental health care. Currently, buprenorphine, a Schedule 3 controlled substance, is one of the medications most commonly used to treat OUD and help patients reduce or quit their opioid usage. In the second condition, a collaborative care model was implemented with a licensed clinical social worker and a psychiatrist who were providing mental health treatment within the primary care practice. The final condition added a peer or certified recovery specialist to increase treatment engagement and retention. The study's principal investigator, David Mandell, professor of psychiatry and director of the Penn Center for Mental Health, shared details regarding the initial results the center recently shared with the College on Problems of Drug Dependence (CPDD) organization in New Orleans. "In all three conditions, there's a substantial reduction in opioid use, and [use] stays low for the six months they're in [the CoCM]," said Mandell. "But our collaborative care condition also results in substantial reduction in psychiatric symptoms and even remission from psychiatric disorder, relative to the usual care condition." According to the study's protocol published in 2021, poor treatment retention is relatively common in CoCMs treating OUD. Mandell described a few reasons why this occurs: the location of care sites, which can make it difficult to live one's life during treatment; punitive measures and caregivers' refusal to see patients after relapses; and problems that accompany opioid use, like food insecurity and housing instability. The center recruited participants from among primary care doctors' existing patients; these patients had either initiated treatment or had been in treatment for some time but were still experiencing psychiatric distress. Hence, convincing patients to begin treatment wasn't necessarily part of conducting the study. "One of the really exciting things we see is, across the conditions tested, 80 percent of people stayed in treatment," Mandell said. "This suggests they liked their doctors, thought the treatment was effective and thought people were meeting them where they were." Mandell believes one of the main reasons for this is the harm reduction approach used by Penn primary care doctors, in which they're more responsive to patients' needs and don't use the punitive approach often taken to OUD patients. When asked about the most rewarding part of the trial, Mandell mentioned seeing how much the primary care doctors loved the model, because they've been eager to secure a high level of support for their patients for a long time. Mandell also enjoyed reading patient testimonials, talking about how much they loved their therapists and benefited from their treatment. "The emails we get, where they say, 'You've turned my life around. Things are so great,' relative to what they were. 'I don't know what I would've done without this social worker.' That's very rewarding," said Mandell. To ensure success, Mandell had a multidisciplinary team working alongside him, and working with the members has been one of his favorite parts of leading the trial because of their determination to help this patient population. "This patient population has a lot of stigma around it, and many people are not interested in helping these folks," he said. "They believe, 'You could stop if you wanted,' and 'You get what you deserve.' But these are people really committed to helping OUD patients and figuring out the best way to support them. And that has just absolutely restored my faith in humanity."

Looming Medicaid cuts prompt caregiver concern on Long Island. Why they say "we are nervous"
Looming Medicaid cuts prompt caregiver concern on Long Island. Why they say "we are nervous"

CBS News

time10 hours ago

  • CBS News

Looming Medicaid cuts prompt caregiver concern on Long Island. Why they say "we are nervous"

New York faces significant impacts due to federal Medicaid cuts. Supporters of the cuts say the changes will reduce fraud and abuse, but others worry about impacts to the vulnerable. Former college athlete and administrative assistant Lisa Pope is among the Medicaid dependent Long Islanders that rely on nonprofit human services organizations that offer addiction and mental health treatment. She's now on a positive path forward, thanks in part to the Thrive/Family and Children's Association. "I'm 59 years old. I've been in recovery now for 20 months," Pope said. "Medicaid is important for my life right now, it's been a life save. It's given me the support that I need. The counselors are there." "But as the changes started happening in Washington, D.C., we're nervous," said Dr. Jeffrey Reynolds of the Family and Children's Association. Reynolds said he was about to expand the Family and Children's Association and open a $7 million mental health, substance abuse and primary care facility in Westbury. But after Congress passed what the Trump administration dubbed the Big Beautiful Bill Act in July, cuts to Medicaid are looming. "So we canceled the project, a really painful decision," Reynolds said. "We are going to see devastating impacts on our community because of the cuts in this big, ugly bill," Rep. Laura Gillen said. Gillen and Reynolds were invited to Thrive Center in Westbury to hear first hand from counselors and clients. The Medicaid cuts are due to take effect in 2026. The Trump administration said the cuts are aimed at eliminating waste, fraud, and abuse within the Medicaid program, and will curb unsustainable spending growth. Thrive peer counselor and former addict Ryan Kiser is worried about the impact. "It's a frightening thing. To ask for help, it can be such a fleeting moment. Any barriers that come in between someone and any potential recovery supports could potentially cost a life," Kiser said.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store