
Ohio Bill Proposes Mandating Success Sequence Education
The Ohio legislature is considering joining the list of states that mandate character education, including the 'success sequence.'
HB 269, called the THRIVE Act, would require schools to teach students the success sequence as well as fifteen values 'deeply rooted in the history and tradition of the United States.' Those include trustworthiness, kindness and generosity, respect and care for human life, respect for parental authority, respect for patriotism, respect for religious faith, gratitude, and courage.
The success sequence and character education curriculum would be created for grades 7 through 12.
The success sequence has been touted by numerous conservative groups. The Institute for Family Studies calls it 'a proven path to the American dream.' The Heritage Society, one of the groups linked to Project 2025, created model state and district policy for promoting the sequence.
The sequence is most commonly described as
1) Finish high school
2) Get a full-time job
3) Get married
4) Have children.
The promise is that this will lead to a life that will be, if not prosperous, at least free of poverty. It uses individual action, rather than policy and legislative solutions, to address poverty.
The success sequence surfaced in 2006 in a report by Barbara Whitehead and Marline Pearson focused on teen pregnancy. Brookings Institution, American Enterprise Institute, and the Institute for Family Studies have all popularized the idea. IFS published research that claimed 97% of millennials who followed the sequence avoid poverty as adults.
Critics have pointed out problems with that research. Michael Tanner of the libertarian Cato Institute noted that it confuses correlation with causation:
Ownership of a private jet is even more strongly associated with financial success, yet that doesn't mean jet ownership is what allowed these individuals to escape poverty. And we certainly shouldn't blame the poor for the failure to pursue jet ownership.
Matt Bruenig writing for People's Policy Project noted two issues. One was that the bit of research often cited made different assumptions about what the sequence actually involved (e.g. Should students get a job right out of high school, or after they are 21?). More importantly, the research simply omitted huge numbers of poor people from its data base.
Rachel Cohen Booth, writing for Vox, questions the sequence itself:
There's little to back up the claim that the exact sequence matters. A 2021 study funded by the federal Department of Health and Human Services found that young adults who finish high school, work full time, and get married are less likely to experience poverty, but the specific order doesn't seem to matter much.
The sequence raises many questions. Should both young men and women get a full time job before marriage and children? The Heritage Foundation has also argued that women are spending too much time getting education, thereby hurting the nation's birth rate. But if new sequence-aware couples are getting starter jobs just out of high school, how are they supposed to afford having a baby right away? And what about all the other societal factors that affect poverty? If the success sequence is important, why not pursue policy goals that would support it (such as cheaper child care, or easily available birth control) rather than simply making it one more thing that schools are mandated to teach?
The bill's main sponsors are Kevin Ritter and Johnathan Newman, both freshman representatives. Newman is a 'pastor entrepreneur' who has started a new Southern Baptist affiliate church. Ritter has run a business, taught history, and co-founded a Veritas Classical Academy.
'Our public schools are crucial partners in this mission. A well-rounded education is more than reading, writing and arithmetic. It includes teaching kids that good life choices will enable them to thrive and be happy,' said Rep. Ritter, quoted by American Family Association. 'Our bill also teaches what I call Grandma's Recipe for Success. If you graduate high school, get a job, get married and have kids, in that order, you're going to have a pretty good life. Of course, we may not always follow what grandma says, but we all know it's good advice kids need to hear.'
The idea sounds appealing, but Grandma probably didn't follow the sequence. 1970 was the first year in our country's history that more than half of Americans graduated from high school.
Tennessee and Utah both now have laws requiring that the 'success sequence' be taught in school. Kentucky, Mississippi, Alabama, and Texas considered similar laws this year.
I reached out to Rep. Ritter's office; if he offers comment, it will be added to this post.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California voters support EV tax incentives, but are wary of sales mandates says poll
California drivers don't want to lose their electric vehicle tax incentives, but even voters in one of the bluest states are wary about reviving plans to phase out gas cars. Voters are split down the middle on whether California should stick to its guns on its Trump-blocked plans to phase out sales of gas cars by 2035, according to an exclusive POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll. Only 46 percent of the more than 1,400 registered voters surveyed said they support the policy, while 47 percent said no. Yes, there was an obvious partisan split: 60 percent of Democrats said they backed the phase-out, compared with 40 percent of independents and 31 percent of Republicans. But the results offer a note of caution for Gov. Gavin Newsom, who directed the California Air Resources Board to start writing new vehicle emissions rules after Republicans revoked the state's sales mandates for cars and heavy-duty trucks in June. 'None of us really like the idea of government intervening to take something away from us,' said Dan Sperling, a former California Air Resources Board member and director of the University of California, Davis' Institute for Transportation Studies. 'That's even the most liberal of us.' Poll respondents are more bought into Newsom's plan to backfill the soon-to-be-defunct $7,500 federal EV tax credit. Nearly two-thirds — 64 percent — said they would support state-funded tax incentives once the federal subsidy ends Sept. 30, as part of the Trump administration's ongoing attacks on clean energy policy. That question again showed a partisan divide, with 80 percent of Democrats saying they back the approach, compared with 60 percent of independent voters and just 43 percent of Republicans. But the overall result bolsters Newsom's push to backfill incentives that the Biden administration used to coax drivers off fossil fuels, as he suggested using cap-and-trade revenues last year and directed state agencies to consider in a June executive order. But Jack Citrin, a veteran political science professor at UC Berkeley and partner on the poll, said a closer look at the poll results shows that Democrats need to keep affordability in mind. He pointed to the fact that 28 percent of respondents said they'd support new EV incentives only if gas prices aren't impacted and another 20 percent said they should be reserved for low-income buyers, reflecting the fact that cost of living was the top concern of voters polled. And 64 percent of respondents said gasoline prices are putting a significant, extreme or moderate burden on their household budgets. 'That reflects a concern with the cost of all of this,' Citrin said. 'Yes, we're for environmental protection. Yes, we're for all of this, just as long as it doesn't cost a lot.' The poll comes as state agencies released a joint report Tuesday with recommendations for countering Trump's assault, calling on lawmakers to bolster tax incentives, improve charging infrastructure and regulate facilities that attract polluting trucks, but offering few specific timelines or dollar figures. CARB Chair Liane Randolph framed the report — which Newsom asked for in his June order — as a first step in the state's defense against a hostile federal government. 'Clean air efforts are under siege, putting the health of every American at risk,' she said during a press briefing. 'California is continuing to fight back and will not give up on cleaner air and better public health.' Sperling called the report a surprisingly 'modest document,' and said it lacks the specificity he hoped to see. 'The word I would use is disconcerting,' Sperling said when asked about where California stands in its fight against Trump. The POLITICO-Citrin Center-Possibility Lab poll was fielded by TrueDot, the artificial intelligence-accelerated research platform, in collaboration with the Citrin Center and Possibility Lab at UC Berkeley and POLITICO. The public opinion study, made possible in part with support from the California Constitution Center, was conducted in the field between July 28 and Aug. 12. The sample of 1,445 registered voters was selected at random by Verasight, with interviews conducted in English and Spanish, and includes an oversample of Hispanic voters. The modeled error estimate for the full sample is plus or minus 2.6 percent. The policy influencer study was conducted from July 30 to Aug. 11, among 512 subscribers to POLITICO Pro, and the modeled error estimate is plus or minus 3.7 percent. Like this content? Consider signing up for POLITICO's California Climate newsletter.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal funding cutoff is breeding concerns for local governments U of M survey finds
Road construction in Lansing | Susan J. Demas Many Michigan localities expect to see harm from the loss of public funding, though few are preparing for cuts according to a recent survey from the University of Michigan Center for Local, State and Urban Policy. Released earlier this month, the survey examines city and county governments' plans as funding from several major streams enacted during the administration of former President Joe Biden, including the American Rescue Plan Act, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act and the Inflation Reduction Act, come to an end, with federal cuts to housing and transportation championed by President Donald Trump and congressional Republicans also on the table. The survey included county, city, township and village officials from 1,328 jurisdictions across the state, with a 72% response rate. In their responses, 40% of local government officials said the loss or pause of one type of federal or state funding would pose problems. Of that 40%, 72% of cities, 68% of counties, 46% of villages, and 30% of townships voiced concerns with the loss of funding. Concerns were greater in communities facing high fiscal stress, with 6% of jurisdictions with high fiscal stress reporting that the loss of American Rescue Plan Act Funding would pose a significant problem, compared to 2% of communities with low fiscal stress. MPPS Federal Funding Infographic Spring 2025 Through the American Rescue Plan Act, Michigan's counties received a collective $1.93 billion in federal funds, while 49 townships received $1.8 billion and a group of smaller cities, villages and townships received $664 million. Although governments were required to commit the funds to specific purposes by December 2024, and have until December 2026 to spend them, the Michigan Public Policy Survey has previously noted administrative challenges tied to procuring the funding and navigating bureaucracy. Despite these concerns, 60% of governments had not begun preparing for a loss of state or federal funding as of spring 2025. According to the survey, this includes 31% of counties, 42% of cities, 59% of villages and 66% of townships. 'Both uncertainty as well as other internal local governmental capacity challenges are hindering some local governments from girding themselves for the coming drop in revenues that will impact their budgets and their service provision,' Debra Horner, the survey's senior program manager, said in a statement. For local governments who are preparing for a loss in funding, 12% of jurisdictions focused on water and sewer infrastructure, with 14% focusing on other capital improvements, with both categories among the most commonly reported uses of ARPA funds. Eleven percent of jurisdictions were preparing for a loss of funding for public safety and economic development while 5% were preparing for a loss of funding on energy programs and infrastructure. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Political Beat Candidate Guide: Charlotte City Council—District 3
Democratic incumbent Councilmember Tiawana Brown is facing two challengers, Joi Mayo and Warren Turner. A third challenger, Montravias King, has dropped out of the race but will remain on the ballot. The winner will face Republican James Bowers in November. District 3 is composed of the western part of Charlotte, including the airport, Steele Creek, and part of South End. For more information on this race, watch the Political Beat on August 24 at 11:30 am and 11:30 pm on WSOC and 10:30 pm on TV64. The Political Beat asked questions of each candidate in this race. Below are their unedited responses: Tiawana Deling Brown What is your occupation? Charlotte City Council D3. Why are you running? I'm running to keep a different and unique voice on City Council—a voice rooted in lived experience, truth, and community. Since the day I took my seat, there's been a shift in the atmosphere because I don't speak for politics—I speak for the people. I've brought real energy, real fight, and real transparency to the dais. None of my opponents bring what I bring. I'm running because the people deserve a champion who doesn't fold under pressure and never forgets who sent them. What is the most important issue and how do you plan to address it? Housing costs and crime are top concerns. People can't afford to live here, and communities are impacted by rising violence. As a member of the Housing, Safety & Community Committee, I've prioritized these issues—allocating funds to grassroots groups, championing the People's Budget, and advocating for better pay for airport workers to build a safer, more affordable Charlotte. How are you voting on the sales tax increase referendum for transit and why? I will continue to engage in tough conversations and make decisions based on the voices of the constituents I serve. Displacement support is not an option—I will not support anything that harms our communities. My vote on the sales tax referendum will reflect what's best for District 3 and ensure residents are fully informed and protected. Do you support Charlotte City Council's settlement with CMPD Chief Johnny Jennings? Why or why not? This was a closed-door matter that I'd prefer not to go into detail about. However, I will say that any matter involving taxpayer dollars should be transparent and disclosed to the public. Public trust depends on accountability, and transparency must be the standard in all financial decisions—especially those involving leadership compensation. How should Charlotte City Council address working conditions and pay issues raised by the SEIU at Charlotte Douglas International Airport? I am the People's Champ—and I've stood with the workers from day one. As an advocate for SEIU and a former airport worker myself, I know firsthand the conditions our essential airport workers face. This is not about politics for me—it's about justice, dignity, and fair treatment. The way to resolve this is through transparent and accountable conversations within the appropriate Council committee. What concerns me most is that SEIU has been a constant presence on the City Council agenda, yet there's been little to no real progress. That's unacceptable. We can't continue to overlook the people who keep our airport running. They deserve to be heard, respected, and compensated fairly. I will continue to push for real solutions and not allow this issue to be buried in bureaucracy. What sets you apart from your opponents? All my life I've had to fight—and I live as an open book with nothing to hide. I answer tough questions and lead with a voice that's different because it's real. That's earned me the title 'The People's Champ.' I meet people where they are, resolve issues, and put people over politics—always. For the record and full transparency- I meet all people where they are at- Unsheltered, Justice impacted, the developers, Business owners . the constituents and the youth- I've been told you are the People's Champ- because People are tired of Politics. That's what separates me from my opponents. Joi Mayo What is your occupation? Community Engagement Manager for an environmental nonprofit; former Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools middle school math & social studies teacher. Why are you running? I'm running for Charlotte City Council District 3 to ensure every neighborhood receives equitable investment in infrastructure, housing, and economic opportunity. I've seen firsthand how disinvestment harms communities, and I have a proven record of turning ideas into action. What is the most important issue and how do you plan to address it Equitable investment across District 3. I will establish a District 3 Community Council to enable residents to identify priorities, track progress, and hold the city accountable for results. How are you voting on the sales tax increase referendum for transit and why? Neutral. I support improving transit and investing in multi-modal options, such as light rail, buses, bike lanes, and sidewalks, but I worry about displacement. Any plan must include affordable housing protections, land banking, and community benefits agreements before I would support it. Do you support Charlotte City Council's settlement with CMPD Chief Johnny Jennings? Why or why not? No. Taxpayer funds must be spent responsibly and transparently. Without a filed lawsuit, I would not have supported the settlement and would have required greater public disclosure for such payments. How should Charlotte City Council address working conditions and pay issues raised by the SEIU at Charlotte Douglas International Airport? As a former teacher, I believe in using a clear rubric to ensure accountability and transparency. The city should apply a rubric to all businesses and contractors working with the city or on city property, one that rewards companies meeting or exceeding the city's $23/hour minimum pay, prioritizes local businesses over those from other counties or states, and elevates minority-, women-, and small-business owners. If we hold these values dear, we must prioritize them in every partnership. What sets you apart from your opponents? More than a decade of proven community leadership, including over four years on CharMeck's Community Relations Committee, with two years as chair of its Public Relations Committee, as well as service as HOA president, coalition organizer, and nonprofit board chair, delivering real results in safety, infrastructure, and neighborhood revitalization. I bring both grassroots experience and the ability to navigate city systems effectively. Warren Turner What is your occupation? Retired North Carolina Department of Public Safety Chief Probation Officer. Why are you running? I'm running because I deeply love this city and the people who call it home. But I'm concerned about the path we're on. Rising crime, burdensome taxes, and unchecked urban sprawl are threatening the character and safety of our community. I believe we can do better, and I'm ready to serve. What is the most important issue and how do you plan to address it? The most pressing challenges facing our city are rising crime rates and unchecked urban sprawl, which continues to outpace the development of essential infrastructure. In an effort to address these issues, we should consider restructuring city policy around UDO's, creating a moratorium on rezonings, increasing our tree save requirements, as well as getting tough on crime. How are you voting on the sales tax increase referendum for transit and why? I've carefully reviewed the proposed 1% transit tax and remain deeply concerned about several aspects of the overall plan. While the proposal touches on critical elements that could shape the future of mobility in our region, its long-term implications demand thoughtful short-term decisions. If we don't get this right, the consequences could be felt for decades. Given the significance of this measure, I believe the public deserves more time and clarity to fully understand what's included in the package. An informed community is essential for making such a consequential decision. Do you support Charlotte City Council's settlement with CMPD Chief Johnny Jennings? Why or why not? I won't pass judgment, as I don't have all the facts surrounding this issue. However, I do believe the situation could have been approached with greater transparency and handled differently overall. How should Charlotte City Council address working conditions and pay issues raised by the SEIU at Charlotte Douglas International Airport? I firmly believe that the city has a duty to actively listen to the needs and concerns of all its employees. This includes addressing serious issues such as reports that working conditions for airport staff may not meet safety standards. We are responsible for ensuring these concerns are thoroughly investigated and resolved. When it comes to private-sector employees, our role is not to dictate wages. Instead, we should lead by example: by providing city workers with a fair, living wage and cultivating safe, supportive, and high-quality working environments. In doing so, we set a standard that others can aspire to. What sets you apart from your opponents? As the former District 3 representative, I bring a deep understanding of city operations and council responsibilities that clearly distinguishes me from my opponents. Over eight years of dedicated service, I delivered results that reshaped Charlotte's efforts to reduce crime, expand economic development, and implement 9.2 miles of light rail infrastructure. My work spurred new housing developments along Freedom Drive, Wilkinson Boulevard, and West Boulevard, transforming these corridors into vibrant, thriving communities. I also laid a strategic blueprint for future transportation and economic growth across the district, ensuring long-term progress beyond my tenure. Partnering with federal and state leaders, I championed two HOPE VI housing projects in District 3, revitalizing neighborhoods and improving quality of life. Additionally, I introduced Charlotte's first roundabouts, modernizing our transportation network and enhancing traffic flow. This is proven leadership with a legacy of tangible results. (WATCH BELOW: 2nd Mecklenburg County chief deputy resigns in less than a year) Solve the daily Crossword