Internet drags Elon Musk's parting words to DOGE, calling it the most awkward goodbye in tech history
Elon Musk's farewell note after leaving the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) was not met with applause. Instead, the internet savagely mocked it. From broken promises to exaggerated savings claims, social media users didn't hold back in calling him out.Critics panned his unverified fraud-saving claims and dubbed his departure the "most awkward goodbye in tech history." The internet wasted no time mocking Musk's dramatic demeanor and broken promises.President Donald Trump was thanked by Musk on X on Wednesday "for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending."'The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government.'
As my scheduled time as a Special Government Employee comes to an end, I would like to thank President @realDonaldTrump for the opportunity to reduce wasteful spending.
The @DOGE mission will only strengthen over time as it becomes a way of life throughout the government. — Elon Musk (@elonmusk) May 29, 2025 The tech billionaire Elon Musk claimed that DOGE would reduce the $7 trillion federal budget by $2 trillion. Only $150 billion in fraud was discovered, though, and that sum has not yet been confirmed.
His farewell note was a prime target for online sarcasm because of bothersome details like that.
One user said, 'The 'mission' has already failed, as you admitted; the debt will now explode.'
Dearest Donald: I must leave you. Why? I cannot say. Where? You cannot know. How I will get there? I haven't decided yet.
But one thing I can tell you; any time I hear the wind blow it will whisper the name... Elon. pic.twitter.com/8q7OBHu2Dl — Simpsonito (@SoySimpsonito) May 29, 2025 Someone else mocked, 'All that time and money you gave to him and you've been cast aside at the first opportunity and blamed for all their failings. The entire world could see this coming but you.''Still five year statute of limitations on your probable violations of the federal criminal conflict of interest statute,' said another user.One user questioned, 'It seems unfair that Elon found $500 billion in annual Social Security and Medicare fraud and is leaving before telling us where it is.'A different user tweeted, 'this has damaged your brand beyond anything you can imagine.'
Why are people mocking Elon Musk's DOGE goodbye? His dramatic exit and unverified claims about waste reduction made him an easy target online.
Did Elon Musk actually save $2 trillion, as promised? No, only about $150 billion in fraud was reportedly discovered, and even that is unverified.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
40 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Unjustifiably low' satcom spectrum price, says COAI
India's top telcos have slammed the satcom recommendations from the telecom regulator, terming the spectrum price as 'unjustifiably low' and said that the proposals are based on "incorrect assumptions" and are "non-transparent".In their first reaction to the recommendations given by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (Trai) last month, all three bitter rival operators have closed ranks and said that if implemented in the current form, the regulator's satcom suggestions would create a non-level playing field and impact the sustainability of terrestrial services. In a strongly worded joint letter through the Cellular Operators Association of India ( COAI ) to various government authorities, seen by ET, the carriers highlighted data and said the planned capacity of Elon Musk-owned Starlink and Jeff Bezos led-Amazon Kuiper are set to surpass the current capacity of Reliance Jio, Bharti Airtel and Vodafone Idea. "These recommendations are non-transparent based on non-justifiable assumption rather than factual data," the telcos said in the letter, marked to Trai, Department of Telecommunications (DoT), Finance Ministry, Commerce ministry, Ministry of Electronics and IT (Meity) and Niti Aayog etc. The operators have said the proposed spectrum charges are even lower than the administrative fees currently levied on GSO-based VSAT services-which do not compete with terrestrial networks. "It appears that Trai has underestimated the potential capacities of satellite network while possibly overstating those of terrestrial networks that have resulted in a flawed foundation for the entire exercise," the letter said, adding this fundamental flaw in the capacity assumptions exercise undermines the DoT's clear mandate to ensure competitive parity between satellite and terrestrial services. Trai had recommended the administrative allocation of satcom spectrum for a fee pegged at 4% of adjusted gross revenue (AGR) to be assigned for five years. There won't be any upfront fee for getting spectrum. Trai chairman AK Lahoti had categorically rejected the level-playing field argument by telcos, stating that the two technologies were different and that satellites could only be complementary. "It's not factually correct that satcom services are competing with terrestrial services because there is a huge difference between the capacity of the terrestrial network and the satellite network," he had said while releasing the recommendations. The telcos, however, feel the entire exercise was flawed as it was based on incorrect assumptions. "Despite a clear mandate from DoT, Trai's consultation process and final recommendations do not appear to address the core issue of competitive parity which shows a misalignment between the intent of DoT references and Trai's approach during the consultation process," the telcos said. The additional proposal by Trai to subsidise user terminals or satellite operators through the Digital Bharat Nidhi (DBN) fund further tilts the level playing field against the terrestrial operator, especially given that a majority of the DBN levy is contributed by telcos.
The Hindu
an hour ago
- The Hindu
Silicon Valley VCs navigate uncertain AI future
For Silicon Valley venture capitalists, the world has split into two camps: those with deep enough pockets to invest in artificial intelligence behemoths, and everyone else waiting to see where the AI revolution leads. The generative AI frenzy unleashed by ChatGPT in 2022 has propelled a handful of venture-backed companies to eye-watering valuations. Leading the pack is OpenAI, which raised $40 billion in its latest funding round at a $300 billion valuation, unprecedented largesse in Silicon Valley's history. Other AI giants are following suit. Anthropic now commands a $61.5 billion valuation, while Elon Musk's xAI is reportedly in talks to raise $20 billion at a $120 billion price tag. The stakes have grown so high that even major venture capital firms, the same ones that helped birth the internet revolution, can no longer compete. Mostly, only the deepest pockets remain in the game: big tech companies, Japan's SoftBank, and Middle Eastern investment funds betting big on a post-fossil fuel future. "There's a really clear split between the haves and the have-nots," says Emily Zheng, senior analyst at PitchBook, told AFP at the Web Summit in Vancouver. "Even though the top-line figures are very high, it's not necessarily representative of venture overall, because there's just a few elite startups and a lot of them happen to be AI." Given Silicon Valley's confidence that AI represents an era-defining shift, venture capitalists face a crucial challenge: finding viable opportunities in an excruciatingly expensive market that is rife with disruption. Simon Wu of Cathay Innovation sees clear customer demand for AI improvements, even if most spending flows to the biggest players. "AI across the board, if you're selling a product that makes you more efficient, that's flying off the shelves," Wu explained. "People will find money to spend on OpenAI" and the big players. The real challenge, according to Andy McLoughlin, managing partner at San Francisco-based Uncork Capital, is determining "where the opportunities are against the mega platforms." "If you're OpenAI or Anthropic, the amount that you can do is huge. So where are the places that those companies cannot play?" Finding that answer isn't easy. In an industry where large language models behind ChatGPT, Claude and Google's Gemini seem to have limitless potential, everything moves at breakneck speed. AI giants including Google, Microsoft, and Amazon are releasing tools and products at a furious pace. ChatGPT and its rivals now handle search, translation, and coding all within one chatbot, raising doubts among investors about what new ideas could possibly survive the competition. Generative AI has also democratised software development, allowing non-professionals to code new applications from simple prompts. This completely disrupts traditional startup organisation models. "Every day I think, what am I going to wake up to today in terms of something that has changed or (was) announced geopolitically or within our world as tech investors," reflected Christine Tsai, founding partner and CEO at 500 Global. In Silicon Valley parlance, companies are struggling to find a 'moat' that unique feature or breakthrough like Microsoft Windows in the 1990s or Google Search in the 2000s that's so successful it takes competitors years to catch up, if ever. When it comes to business software, AI is "shaking up the topology of what makes sense and what's investable," noted Brett Gibson, managing partner at Initialized Capital. The risks seem particularly acute given that generative AI's economics remain unproven. Even the biggest players see a very uncertain path to profitability given the massive sums involved. The huge valuations for OpenAI and others are causing "a lot of squinting of the eyes, with people wondering 'is this really going to replace labor costs'" at the levels needed to justify the investments, Wu observed. Despite AI's importance, "I think everyone's starting to see how this might fall short of the magical" even if its early days, he added. Still, only the rare contrarians believe generative AI isn't here to stay. In five years, "we won't be talking about AI the same way we're talking about it now, the same way we don't talk about mobile or cloud," predicted McLoughlin. "It'll become a fabric of how everything gets built." But who will be building remains an open question.
Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Elon Musk vs Cory Booker: A tale of two 'Nazi salutes'
'If it looks like a Nazi salute and smells like a Nazi salute, but one guy's a tech billionaire and the other is a Democrat senator, only one of them ends up being banned in Berlin.' Welcome to yet another episode of Who Gets Cancelled Today?—where the rules are made up, the outrage is algorithmic, and consistency is strictly optional. Let's set the stage. In January 2025, at Donald Trump's second inauguration—a carnival of CPAC cosplay, Mar-a-Lago loyalists, and Liberty University dropouts—Elon Musk stepped on stage, placed his hand over his heart, and extended his arm outward with the ceremonial stiffness of a Leni Riefenstahl extra. Reuters confirms the gesture and backlash. Germany, where the Nazi salute is criminalised when used in ideological contexts, responded with moral indigestion and political outrage. Politicians demanded travel bans. German media erupted. The New York Times ran grim explainer columns. MSNBC activated their "Rise of Fascism" chyron package. (No, seriously, they have one.) The Anti-Defamation League, bless their diplomatically exhausted souls, tried to de-escalate: they called it 'an awkward gesture made in a moment of enthusiasm.' But that didn't stop former ADL director Abraham Foxman from calling it exactly what it looked like: a Nazi salute. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Esta pastilla olvidada limpia las venas a un ritmo impresionante NEWSCASA Undo BBC and Haaretz captured the range of reactions. Musk, predictably, memed through the chaos. He dismissed the outrage as 'dirty tricks' and said the ''everyone is Hitler' attack is sooo tired.' His actual words on X/Twitter. Meanwhile, some far-right Telegram channels threw digital confetti. Fast forward to May 2025. Enter Senator Cory Booker—America's favourite motivational speaker in a suit. At the California Democratic Convention, Booker made a gesture eerily similar: hand over heart, arm extended outward, open palm. Footage surfaced on social media. Cue: crickets. No Germany. No ADL. No CNN panels dissecting palm angles. No panicked Atlantic thinkpieces. Just a quick clarification from Booker's spokesperson: 'He was waving to the audience.' Case closed. Nothing to see here. Piers Morgan, ever the thundercloud of transatlantic outrage, noticed. He highlighted the double standard and triggered an X-storm. Elon the Meme Lord vs Cory the Choirboy Elon is the algorithm's favourite villain: a ketamine-fuelled libertarian who co-signed Trump's chaos and dropped $275 million to support the re-election campaign. He's what happens when Reddit becomes sentient and buys a stake in SpaceX. So when Musk makes a vaguely Roman gesture? Of course it's fascism. Throw in some AI-enhanced screenshots and a Daily Show segment, and suddenly it's 1933 again. Cory Booker, on the other hand, is Progressive America's wholesome avatar—the kind who quotes Rumi during climate speeches. His identical gesture? A heartwarming wave. If Elon had done it while holding a 'Biden 2024' placard, Vox would've called it 'a subversive reclaiming of classical Americana.' The Outrage Exchange Rate In this economy of curated outrage, Musk trades at Tesla volatility. Every blink is a Bitcoin crash. Booker? He's a mutual fund of liberal goodwill. You'd need a Wagner soundtrack and SS cosplay before NPR considers it problematic. But here's the rub: when the rules of moral outrage change depending on the party—or the palm—you can kiss public trust goodbye. Remember when the Left said 'symbols matter'? Apparently not when it's one of their own accidentally doing a salute straight out of Triumph of the Will: The Musical. When Satire Becomes News There's an old Dr Strangelove scene where the titular character can't stop his arm from flying up in a Nazi salute. That's what this feels like. Except instead of satire, we now have real-life Democrats doing the salute, Republicans doing the same, and both sides frantically uploading context to cloud drives of morality. The media? Just a referee selectively enforcing the rules. Final Salute So here's your closing thought: if you're going to raise your hand in American politics, make sure it's the correct hand, with the correct party ID, at the correct convention—preferably surrounded by coastal elites and NPR donors. Otherwise, you might find yourself Photoshopped into history's darkest moments and banned from Bavaria. Because in today's reality-TV democracy, gestures are never just gestures. Unless, of course, they are.
