How one Perth council is making Facebook Marketplace exchanges safer
It intends to provide a more secure option for people using online selling platforms, such as Facebook Marketplace and Gumtree, through having CCTV surveillance and passive public surveillance in a public space.
The site at 679 Beaufort Street in Mt Lawley was chosen as it was deemed the most suitable location without the need for 'significant investment'.
Your local paper, whenever you want it.
The city believes the site has most of the key features for a good exchange location: free parking, accessible seating, good lighting, a public toilet and access to public transport.
Mayor Mark Irwin said this was an emerging safety issue that was only going to become more prominent. The Mt Lawley location was considered the most appropriate site for the trial. Credit: Google Maps
'A lot of people who use these online platforms are happy to make exchanges at their house or at someone else's house — and that's fine,' he said.
'A safer exchange site just gives members of our community another option and allows them to meet in a public place where they may feel more comfortable.
'If this trial is successful, we will look at the possibility of creating safer exchange sites in other areas of the city.'
Last year Victoria police created 35 exchange sites outside police stations after a trial in 2022.
There are currently no plans announced to replicate the Victorian model in WA, so this would be the first of its kind in the State.
The area is now fitted with signage and the city is encouraging community members and local businesses to share their feedback.
The trial was proposed by deputy mayor Suzanne Migdale and will run for 12 months from May 6, with support from WA Police.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Age
3 minutes ago
- The Age
Fears emerge on Liberal religious right that cult inquiry unfairly targets Pentecostal churches
The committee said recruitment tactics included using social events to build rapport (like potluck dinners or youth groups); isolating recruits from 'negative' outsiders; promising secret or higher knowledge; asking recruits to commit in small ways, then escalating; using charismatic leaders; creating insider language and symbols; and targeting vulnerable people. Heath's employee said some examples misrepresented church activities as 'deceptive or sinister' while sports clubs and political parties were ignored. He claimed, in a 'church guidance note' attached to the email, that anonymous submissions 'fuelled by media-driven stereotypes and Facebook groups … could be used to justify new laws that potentially criminalise and censor pastors, leaders and churches and expose them to vexatious legal actions. 'Despite high levels of coercion and control displayed in unions, activist groups, political parties and sport, the Victorian government is targeting religion.' Heath said her office had been contacted by constituents concerned about the inquiry and that she had asked her employee to get in touch with key stakeholders. But she said she had no knowledge of this specific correspondence or the email's content, which was sent from the employee's private email but claimed to be on her behalf. She said her employee had sent the email in good faith, expressing his own opinions about the Geelong Revival Centre. Loading 'My staff member now acknowledges this was based on insufficient information and was a mistake. The allegations against this organisation are serious, and I expect more information will come to light during this inquiry.' Heath is from the Pentecostal church, City Builders, in Gippsland, where her parents are pastors. In 2022, the church rejected allegations it sought to engage improperly in politics or supported gay-conversion therapy. The employee's email ultimately reached devastated survivors who say they faced coercive practices within religious groups and who have found hope in the inquiry. Ryan Carey, from Geelong Revival Centre Survivors and Stop Religious Coercion Australia, said the committee had shown good faith by focusing on behaviours rather than any beliefs. He wants freedom of belief, association and religion. 'We also want it to be safe and free of abuse, exploitation, and harm,' he said. 'Healthy churches shouldn't require survivor groups upon exit. Ours does. 'Survivors are used to having people in power try to silence them and invalidate their stories. This is spit in the face of survivors, and frankly, I think they deserve an apology.' Renee Spencer, from Survivors of Coercive Cults and High-Control Groups, said she was not surprised by Heath's employee's apparent attempt to indirectly influence the inquiry but it was damaging nonetheless. 'Survivors who took the time to dredge up their deepest pain for this inquiry have already retraumatised themselves in the hope of meaningful change and harm prevention. Thankfully, for the most part, we have found people to be empathetic and measured,' Spencer said. Christian legal think tank Freedom for Faith shared concerns religious freedoms could be infringed, in a submission co-signed by Australian Christian Churches, the Baptist Union of Victoria, the Anglican Diocese of Melbourne, the Seventh Day Adventist Church of Australia and the Presbyterian Church of Victoria. They were encouraged by the committee's insistence it was not looking to judge faith, and acknowledged coercive control did exist in some religious contexts. But they worried the definition of cult could be expanded 'under anti-religious pressure … to include faiths that involve whole-of-life commitment, and faiths that teach unpopular beliefs (especially concerning sexuality, gender and marriage)'. The Australian Christian Lobby urged against introducing any new legislation, to avoid inadvertently stepping on the right to freedom of expression, religion and association, and agreed there was a risk of mainstream church practices being misinterpreted as 'cult-like'. Loading The bipartisan committee is chaired by Labor MP Ella George, who said Victorians could practise their faith freely without fear. 'There is no truth to any claim that the committee's inquiry is about sanctioning religious practices. The religious beliefs of Victorians are irrelevant to the inquiry's terms of reference,' George said. 'The emphasis is on how these groups operate, not what they believe.' Patrick McIvor left City Builders in 2016 and was the lead author of a submission to the inquiry called 'Beyond Belief', which was endorsed by Survivors of Coercive Cults and High-Control Groups, Stop Religious Control Australia and Victorian Cult Survivors Network. He said the inquiry appeared to have a genuine interest in getting things right. 'I understand the nerves of some groups, particularly some religious groups. And we agree, it shouldn't be about religious groups. Any solution should absolutely uphold freedom of belief, freedom of association, and that's why we've kept the focus [of our submission] squarely on harmful behaviours and not vilifying people.'
Sydney Morning Herald
3 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Fears emerge on Liberal religious right that cult inquiry unfairly targets Pentecostal churches
The committee said recruitment tactics included using social events to build rapport (like potluck dinners or youth groups); isolating recruits from 'negative' outsiders; promising secret or higher knowledge; asking recruits to commit in small ways, then escalating; using charismatic leaders; creating insider language and symbols; and targeting vulnerable people. Heath's employee said some examples misrepresented church activities as 'deceptive or sinister' while sports clubs and political parties were ignored. He claimed, in a 'church guidance note' attached to the email, that anonymous submissions 'fuelled by media-driven stereotypes and Facebook groups … could be used to justify new laws that potentially criminalise and censor pastors, leaders and churches and expose them to vexatious legal actions. 'Despite high levels of coercion and control displayed in unions, activist groups, political parties and sport, the Victorian government is targeting religion.' Heath said her office had been contacted by constituents concerned about the inquiry and that she had asked her employee to get in touch with key stakeholders. But she said she had no knowledge of this specific correspondence or the email's content, which was sent from the employee's private email but claimed to be on her behalf. She said her employee had sent the email in good faith, expressing his own opinions about the Geelong Revival Centre. Loading 'My staff member now acknowledges this was based on insufficient information and was a mistake. The allegations against this organisation are serious, and I expect more information will come to light during this inquiry.' Heath is from the Pentecostal church, City Builders, in Gippsland, where her parents are pastors. In 2022, the church rejected allegations it sought to engage improperly in politics or supported gay-conversion therapy. The employee's email ultimately reached devastated survivors who say they faced coercive practices within religious groups and who have found hope in the inquiry. Ryan Carey, from Geelong Revival Centre Survivors and Stop Religious Coercion Australia, said the committee had shown good faith by focusing on behaviours rather than any beliefs. He wants freedom of belief, association and religion. 'We also want it to be safe and free of abuse, exploitation, and harm,' he said. 'Healthy churches shouldn't require survivor groups upon exit. Ours does. 'Survivors are used to having people in power try to silence them and invalidate their stories. This is spit in the face of survivors, and frankly, I think they deserve an apology.' Renee Spencer, from Survivors of Coercive Cults and High-Control Groups, said she was not surprised by Heath's employee's apparent attempt to indirectly influence the inquiry but it was damaging nonetheless. 'Survivors who took the time to dredge up their deepest pain for this inquiry have already retraumatised themselves in the hope of meaningful change and harm prevention. Thankfully, for the most part, we have found people to be empathetic and measured,' Spencer said. Christian legal think tank Freedom for Faith shared concerns religious freedoms could be infringed, in a submission co-signed by Australian Christian Churches, the Baptist Union of Victoria, the Anglican Diocese of Melbourne, the Seventh Day Adventist Church of Australia and the Presbyterian Church of Victoria. They were encouraged by the committee's insistence it was not looking to judge faith, and acknowledged coercive control did exist in some religious contexts. But they worried the definition of cult could be expanded 'under anti-religious pressure … to include faiths that involve whole-of-life commitment, and faiths that teach unpopular beliefs (especially concerning sexuality, gender and marriage)'. The Australian Christian Lobby urged against introducing any new legislation, to avoid inadvertently stepping on the right to freedom of expression, religion and association, and agreed there was a risk of mainstream church practices being misinterpreted as 'cult-like'. Loading The bipartisan committee is chaired by Labor MP Ella George, who said Victorians could practise their faith freely without fear. 'There is no truth to any claim that the committee's inquiry is about sanctioning religious practices. The religious beliefs of Victorians are irrelevant to the inquiry's terms of reference,' George said. 'The emphasis is on how these groups operate, not what they believe.' Patrick McIvor left City Builders in 2016 and was the lead author of a submission to the inquiry called 'Beyond Belief', which was endorsed by Survivors of Coercive Cults and High-Control Groups, Stop Religious Control Australia and Victorian Cult Survivors Network. He said the inquiry appeared to have a genuine interest in getting things right. 'I understand the nerves of some groups, particularly some religious groups. And we agree, it shouldn't be about religious groups. Any solution should absolutely uphold freedom of belief, freedom of association, and that's why we've kept the focus [of our submission] squarely on harmful behaviours and not vilifying people.'
Sky News AU
an hour ago
- Sky News AU
Allan government refuses to rule out introducing a new tax on households to fill Suburban Rail Loop funding black hole
The Victorian government has repeatedly refused to rule out introducing a new tax on households to fund the Suburban Rail Loop. The Allan government has pledged to use 'value capture' to cover up to a third of the $34 billion required for the eastern section of the SRL. On Sunday, the Herald Sun revealed former premier Daniel Andrews had been presented with a list of five options for value capture, including a 'modest' levy on households in metropolitan suburbs. Mr Andrews was reportedly opposed to the tax proposal - viewing it as political poison - but when Transport Minister Gabrielle Williams was asked whether it was still on the table, she refused to say. 'Look, as we've as we've said consistently on this topic, there is a power of work going on to examine and evaluate a range of different value capture opportunities,' she told reporters on Monday. 'That work is ongoing and is in the process, I understand from colleagues, of being finalised as we speak and we'll have more to say about it in due course." Pressed on whether a levy on households was one of the options being considered, Ms Williams said a 'range of different potential measures' were being assessed, before claiming the government would 'be transparent with the Victorian community about what that will involve'. Asked a third time whether she could rule out an SRL tax on households, the Transport Minister again refused - stating it was 'still being worked through'. Opposition Leader Brad Battin said Victorians across the state ought to be wary about the Allan government when it came to taxes. 'They've increased or added another 63 taxes across Victoria, and now they're saying they won't rule out a new tax for the SRL,' he said. Mr Battin said the government 'simply can't afford' the SRL but said he felt the government would press on regardless. 'They will do anything they can (including) stealing money from people who are hardworking across our state to put back in their coffers for their failures,' he said. 'The Allan Labor government have an option: Do you continue with a project that is going to impact people during a cost of living crisis for a long period of time, or do you do the right thing, take the step back now, cancel the project and ensure that Victorians can get on with their lives with less government interference, and put the money into the projects where it's desperately needed in the growth corridors?" The Opposition Leader said the government's infrastructure cost blowouts were already impacting services across the state. 'They're spending billions of dollars over what they project every time, and that impacts on the cost of every other service across Victoria,' he said. 'There's a reason that ambulances are ramped at hospitals; there's a reason you don't feel safe in your home; there is a reason education standards drop – because the Allan Labor government continue to waste money on projects with cost overruns on each and every project they have.' According to the Herald Sun, the other value capture options presented to the former Premier included a levy on off-street car parks, taxes on developers, a windfall gains tax on station precincts, as well as the ring-fencing of land tax revenue from SRL precincts. Tunnelling on the SRL East is set to begin next year, however there remains a huge funding black hole in the $34 billion project. While the Victorian government has committed $11.8 billion towards the project, the Albanese government has only pledged $2.2 billion - leaving $20 billion unaccounted for.
