Should Canada have warned the U.S. about recognizing Palestinian statehood?
Carney clearly mentioned speaking this week with France President Emmanuel Macron and U.K. Prime Minister Kier Starmer — both of which have announced their intention to recognize a Palestinian state at the United Nations General Assembly in September.
Carney said he also had conversations with the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, and Canada's Ambassador to the UN, Bob Rae.
U.S. President Donald Trump was apparently not given the same heads up, and he promptly expressed his displeasure on his social media platform hours later.
'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine,' he wrote on Truth Social. 'That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them. Oh' Canada!!!'
After meeting with his cabinet Wednesday, Carney told reporters that the recognition was conditional on the Palestinian Authority, which governs the West Bank, going forward with significant reforms which include demilitarization and holding a general election in 2026.
He added Canada's longstanding hope for a two-state solution negotiated between the Palestinian Authority and Israel was 'no longer tenable' because of the war in Gaza.
Carney called the U.S. an 'essential partner' for peace in the Middle East, among many areas of the world, but made it clear Canada would be moving without its neighbour.
'We make our own independent foreign policy positions,' he said, later clarifying 'independent of the United States.'
Louise Blais, who was Canada's Deputy Permanent Representative to the United Nations in New York from 2017-2021, said this announcement marks a significant change of position for Canada, which has been more or less aligned with the U.S. on Israel for years.
'At minimum, I think it would have been prudent … to have had a conversation. It's possible it took place. But it certainly doesn't seem that way,' said Blais in an interview.
'It is always a good idea not to take allies by surprise,' she added.
A source close to Carney's thinking, speaking on a not-for-attribution basis to speak more freely, said there has been a sharing of views between Canada, France and the U.K., but their subsequent announcements on Palestinian statehood were not a co-ordinated effort.
'This is an example of like-minded countries acting like-minded,' said the source.
Carney explained on Wednesday that 'it does matter that others are moving … because it increases the prospect of success.' But he added that the 'rights of people to self-determination' are at the core of this decision for the Canadian government.
'We have long … felt that this should come later in a process and that our recognition … of the State of Palestine, should come a point of maximum impact during a peace process,' he said.
'We're now at a position … where, in our judgment and the judgment of others, the prospect of a Palestinian state is literally receding before our eyes,' he added.
Blais said Carney is clearly signalling that Canada is aligning itself with its European partners more closely, but warned he has to weigh that decision 'very carefully.'
'Geography matters, and our neighbour is a superpower,' she said. 'And last time I checked, we still very much depend on them for our national security, and it will be so for a while, and so we have to be fairly balanced and careful about that.'
It is also a question of timing. Blais said Trump definitely voiced 'a level of annoyance' that was not preferable as Canadian negotiators were trying to get to a trade deal by Friday.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Trump 'expressed his displeasure and his disagreement' with the leaders of France, the U.K. and Canada on that decision.
'He feels as though that's rewarding Hamas at a time where Hamas is the true impediment to a ceasefire and to the release of all of the hostages,' she said.
But Trump is also dealing with growing displeasure towards Israel within his own ranks. This week, Marjorie Taylor Greene became the first House Republican to publicly refer to the humanitarian crisis in Gaza as 'genocide.'
U.S. special envoy to the Middle East, Steve Witkoff, and U.S. ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, will be travelling to Gaza on Friday to inspect food aid distribution sites in the area and hear first-hand from Gazans about their living conditions, said Leavitt.
Following their visit, they are expected to secure a plan to deliver more food.
Canada, for its part, partnered with Jordan to arrange airdrops of aid in Gaza on Thursday.
'Much more aid is needed and Canada will continue to do all it can to ensure it is delivered to the Palestinians in Gaza who so desperately need it,' said Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand in a post on X.
— With files from Christopher Nardi.
National Post calevesque@postmedia.com
John Ivison: Carney's Palestinian recognition emboldens terror, not peace
Michael Higgins: Mark Carney abandons Canadian principles for pinky promises on Palestine
Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark nationalpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Intel's stock tumbles after Trump says its CEO must resign
Intel's shares are tumbling before markets opened Thursday after President Donald Trump said in a social media post that the chipmaker's CEO needs to resign. 'The CEO of Intel is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately,' Trump posted on Truth Social. 'There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!' Trump made the post after Senator Tom Cotton sent a letter to Intel Chairman Frank Yeary expressing concern over CEO Lip-Bu Tan's investments and ties to semiconductor firms that are reportedly linked to the Chinese Communist Party and the People's Liberation Army. 'In March 2025, Intel appointed Lip-Bu Tan as its new CEO," Cotton wrote in the letter. "Mr. Tan reportedly controls dozens of Chinese companies and has a stake in hundreds of Chinese advanced-manufacturing and chip firms. At least eight of these companies reportedly have ties to the Chinese People's Liberation Army.' Intel's stock dropped more than 4% in premarket trading.
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TSMC Dodges Trump's 100% Chip Tariff--Stock Explodes to Record High
Shares of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co. (NYSE:TSM) just hit an all-time high, climbing 4.89% to NT$1,180, after officials confirmed the chip giant won't be subject to a proposed 100% US tariff on semiconductor imports. The reason? TSMC's deepening roots in Arizona. The company recently boosted its US commitment to $165 billion, including three fabs, two advanced packaging facilities, and an R&D center. Taiwan's National Development Council chief Liu Chin-ching said plainly: if you're building in the US, you're in the clear a message that echoed former President Donald Trump's own remarks about favoring companies that invest locally. The market reaction was swift. Foreign equity inflows surged, pushing the Taiwan dollar up nearly 0.9% intraday and lifting the broader stock index by 2.4% outpacing regional peers. Khoon Goh, head of Asia research at ANZ, said investors had been on edge awaiting clarity on the chip tariff rate. With TSMC exempt, a major risk overhang may be off the table at least for Taiwan's most important stock, which now makes up close to 40% of the nation's benchmark index. The company's role in powering AI infrastructure worldwide only adds to investor conviction. Other chipmakers may not be as lucky but some could still find shelter. United Microelectronics is working closely with Intel (NASDAQ:INTC), which may soften the blow. Meanwhile, Samsung's Texas fab and Apple's US supply chain commitments put them in strong positions. Malaysia, another chip hub, is seeking clarity from Washington, though its prime minister said the impact could be limited given many of the firms operating there are US-based. The message for global chipmakers is becoming clearer: plant your flag in America or risk being priced out. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Citi, Bank of America CEOs join the parade to pitch Trump on taking Fannie, Freddie public
Citigroup (C) CEO Jane Fraser and Bank of America (BAC) CEO Brian Moynihan met with President Trump on Wednesday to discuss how to relinquish the government's grip over two housing giants, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, according to people familiar with the matter. The president has been inviting the chiefs of big Wall Street banks one by one recently to discuss what such a deal could look like, which would include an initial public offering (IPO), Bloomberg first reported last Thursday. JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon and Goldman Sachs CEO David Solomon also met with Trump for such discussions last week. Some of these discussions have revolved around how the banks value these organizations, how they think they could sell them, and how this wider privatization effort could be structured, according to one person familiar with the matter. The over-the-counter shares of Freddie Mac (FMCC) and Fannie Mae (FNMA) both fell more than 3% Wednesday. They are up 101% and 147%, respectively, year to date. Spokespeople for the banks declined to comment. Fannie and Freddie play integral roles in the US housing market by purchasing mortgages and repackaging them as securities. Both fell under government conservatorship during the 2008 financial crisis when mortgage defaults soared and the US Treasury Department injected over $180 billion into the mortgage lenders. A combined stock offering of these two mortgage giants could mean one of the world's largest public deals, which would result in a major payday for the stock underwriting desks of these big banks. The president vowed in late May to take the mortgage giants public in a post on Truth Social. However, pulling off such a move would be far from a simple feat. The challenge with relinquishing the government's conservatorship of Fannie and Freddie is that turning these massive institutions into private businesses could drastically impact access to affordable credit in the housing market, which has steadily relied on these institutions to fund 30-year mortgages for over a decade. Read more: Best low- and no-down-payment mortgage lenders of 2025 For these reasons, Democratic politicians, civil rights organizations, and some housing experts have been critical of the effort. "This could mean stricter lending requirements, higher interest rates, and even higher guarantee fees to reflect greater risk. This could mean higher costs for credit unions to sell these loans," Kelsey Nelson, federal regulatory compliance counsel for the credit union advocacy group America's Credit Unions, wrote in June. Republicans, including many Trump allies, argue that the government backing of Fannie and Freddie was never intended to be permanent and that loosening its grip over these entities would promote better competition in the mortgage market. The government selling its stakes in these companies could also generate billions that could be used to reduce the deficit and return money to taxpayers, they claim. Some prominent Wall Street investors, including Bill Ackman, long ago purchased stock in Fannie and Freddie, betting that the companies would eventually be returned to private control. These investors hoped the transition would happen during the first Trump administration, only to see that effort fizzle. These two entities constitute approximately 40% of one-to-four-family mortgage originations and close to half of the multifamily mortgage market, according to the the Urban Institute, a left-leaning Washington, D.C.-based think tank. Last November, Mark Calabria, the former director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), which oversees the two mortgage giants, said in an interview that privatizing Fannie and Freddie "is 100%, in my mind, mechanically doable." However, in that same interview, Calabria said there was "zero chance" such a development could be pulled off in 2025. David Hollerith is a senior reporter for Yahoo Finance covering banking, crypto, and other areas in finance. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data