'We strengthen Glasgow every time we invest in our communities'
This centre has been at the heart of the Ruchill community for years.
It has hosted youth clubs, parent and toddler sessions, and much more.
It wasn't just a building – it was a space where neighbours came together, isolation was tackled, and opportunities were created.
Local people were led to believe the centre had a future.
In May, the SNP City Administration proposed closing the centre permanently – despite those earlier commitments.
The building has been closed since 2020.
Local campaigners – including Ruchill Community Council – worked tirelessly to make their voices heard.
Backed by Glasgow Labour councillors, their efforts forced the administration to delay their closure plans.
But this shouldn't have happened in the first place.
Ruchill is not alone.
Across Glasgow, vital community facilities are being lost or left to deteriorate.
From Possil to Pollok, facilities that once served communities are being shuttered, mothballed, or handed over without proper support.
These aren't just administrative decisions – they are political choices, the costs of which are borne by people who rely on these spaces for connection, support, and resilience.
When community centres close, we lose more than just bricks and mortar.
We lose the after-school clubs keeping children safe, mental health support groups, and clubs combating loneliness.
These centres are a lifeline – and it is shameful that they are being treated as expendable.
Glasgow Labour will continue to stand alongside communities like Ruchill and call for both more funding from the SNP Scottish Government and political will and creative solutions from the council.
In conjunction with the local community, Glasgow Labour successfully forced the SNP-led administration to defer the closure decision, but our work isn't done.
We're calling for a clear, despite promises, and also upon the Scottish Government to allocate what Glasgow needs to ensure we maintain our community infrastructure.
The people of Ruchill deserve better.
Glasgow's communities deserve better.
It's time that we valued communities.
Because when we invest in communities, we don't just save buildings – we strengthen the very fabric of our city.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Kemi Badenoch calls for oil and gas windfall tax and licence ban end
The Conservative leader is set to address her first Scottish branch office conference in Edinburgh on Friday and will speak about the oil and gas industry. Scottish Tory leader Russell Findlay is set to address the party conference for the first time since taking over the role from Douglas Ross. The energy profits levy, also known as the windfall tax, was brought in by the previous Tory government, and extended by Labour when they took power. READ MORE: John Swinney and Anas Sarwar clash over reports of SNP secret meeting Badenoch is expected to tout the oil and gas sector during her conference speech, accusing the UK Government of 'killing' it, claiming 'renewing our party and our country means standing up for our oil and gas industry'. She will add: 'When the oil and gas windfall tax, the energy profits levy, was brought in, the oil price was near a historic high, at the exact time as energy bills for the British people were sky-rocketing. 'But there is no longer a windfall to tax. It has long gone. And the longer this regressive tax on one of our most successful industries remains, the more damaging it becomes. 'Labour have extended and increased this tax. They are killing this industry.' (Image: House of Commons/PA Wire) If the measure remains in place to 2030 as intended, Badenoch will say 'there will be no industry left to tax'. She will add: 'So, today, I say enough. Labour must remove the energy profits levy. Labour must speed up the process of replacing it with a system that rewards success and incentivises investment. 'Because we shouldn't have this energy profits levy at all. 'We must scrap the ban on new licences. 'We must overturn the ban on supporting oil and gas technology exports. 'And we must champion our own industry. READ MORE: Mairi McAllan: I'm back and I want quick progress on housing emergency 'We must let this great British, great Scottish industry thrive, grow and create jobs – ensuring our energy security for generations to come, driving growth and making this country richer in the process.' Badenoch will address her first Scottish party conference as leader on Friday while her counterpart north of the border Russell Findlay will deliver his inaugural address on Saturday. Responding to Badenoch, Simon Francis of the End Fuel Poverty Coalition said her comments were 'out of touch', adding: 'Even with the windfall tax in place, the energy industry made over £115 billion in profits in 2024 alone. 'Meanwhile, average household energy bills remain hundreds and hundreds of pounds higher than they were before the energy crisis started. 'While the Government is right to be consulting on reform of the windfall tax, maintaining a profits levy could help fund home upgrades and a social tariff which would bring down energy bills for the most vulnerable in society.' SNP MSP Kevin Stewart said: 'The Tories wrecked our economy, presided over soaring household bills and ripped Scotland from the EU against our will. 'And now they're lurching further to the right as they haemorrhage votes to Nigel Farage. 'This weekend will be an important reminder of how Westminster has failed Scotland. Only the SNP is offering hope and a brighter future as an independent nation.' READ MORE: UK Government must 'urgently engage' with Scotland over migration Luke Murphy, MP for Basingstoke, and chair of the All Party Parliamentary Group on Climate Change, commented: "Under the previous government, which Kemi Badenoch was a part of, 70,000 jobs were lost from the oil and gas industry, even as hundreds of new licences were handed out. "The North Sea is a mature basin, and its reserves are in terminal decline. Responsible governance means being honest about that reality — and focusing on creating new opportunities for workers, and supporting them in the transition, rather than pretending we can hold onto the past. "The workers in oil and gas, and the communities that rely on the industry deserve better. That's why this Labour government is determined to secure a brighter future through clean energy — with high-quality jobs where people need them most."
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Which side of history will our politicians be on?
But increasing disappointments around equality and human rights rollbacks across the world beg the question: where can the community find that joy and hope when it feels like there is none? Pride started not as the palatable rainbow march, parades and parties that we have become accustomed to, but as the result of a riot to fight for LGBTQIA+ rights. The police raid and subsequent riot on the Stonewall Inn, a gay bar in New York, was commemorated a year later and has since become the catalyst for the annual celebration of LGBTQIA+ rights that we call Pride. In those 56 years, the overall picture for LGBTQIA+ rights and liberation has promised progress overall. READ MORE: Tartan Army fan who trekked to Euros embarking on new challenge with 'special' goal Scotland just celebrated 10 years of equal marriage, and the importance of protecting LGBTQIA+ rights is internationally recognised. This should be a reason to celebrate how far we have come in just over half a century. What has also been constant, though, is the use of the community as political pawns. This is becoming increasingly obvious to those who feel they are being pulled along for the ride, their existence scrutinised and challenged time and time again. This year's nationwide ban on political parties from marching in Pride celebrations only proves that there is a lot of love lost. We need to rebuild LGBTQIA+ people's trust not only in democracy, but in politicians elected to represent them. During Pride Month this year, it would do well for all politicians to go back to basics and understand what allyship really means, and decide which side of history they wish to be on. First, allyship is a continued commitment. The SNP Government let down LGBTQIA+ people late last year with the delay of a long-promised conversion practices ban, keeping them suspended only to let them down again in May when they dropped the ban completely. These horrific practices are permitted in the UK, and are a hidden shame we must stamp out if we are to continue to be viewed as a progressive nation. (Image: Ed Nix) The SNP's allyship seems to stop at doing the work. They are more than happy to outsource a ban on conversion practices to the UK Government despite having the powers to implement it here in Scotland right now. Choosing to rely on a Labour Government which is yet to prove itself as champions of any marginalised community, especially the ones that won them their election, is looking like a long shot for progress. Slamming on the brakes is simply not the right action to take when we are seeing a global rollback of progressive values and human rights. Just weeks ago, the UK dropped to its lowest-ever position on the European rankings for LGBTQIA+ rights. We cannot sit on our hands and wait for the rest of Europe to fall behind us to improve our score. We must take action to do better now. Allyship is best when it is with rather than for people. That means showing up and listening, not just paying lip service. We need more LGBTQIA+ representation in politics, and that means parties must take deeply seriously the bigoted, homophobic nature of much of the bile that is spewed upon candidates, particularly on social media. Setbacks such as Thatcher's Section 28 should be viewed as a cautionary tale of how bad things can get, not as the blueprint for how Scotland and the UK should move forward. Human rights and equalities must extend beyond party politics and policies. These are real people we interact with each day, who bear the emotional and mental toll of the debates and discussions held. These are people who vote for us in good faith, in the hopes that we will protect their rights and improve their lives. And recently, it is clear that they have felt abandoned and excluded from the conversation. We need to take seriously the calls which LGBTQIA+ people make, and not just those made in formal political settings. The voices chanting at the rally are as valid as the ones sending policy briefs to elected representatives. The Scottish Greens have been long-time proponents of a more participative democracy – that means inviting members of the public into policy development at early stages, facilitating learning and healthy dialogue, and then honouring the proposals that they craft. Initiatives like these can increase public trust in politicians, showing communities how valued and critical they are in decision-making. These sessions have been used across Europe including in France to discuss assisted dying and in Ireland to shape the lifting of their notorious abortion ban. Political decisions should include those who will be directly affected by the choices made in our chambers and committees. We regularly see the power that lobbying groups hold to effect change when legislation is being debated. There needs to be a tone shift by politicians to invite even more groups of people into their decision-making fold, specifically including marginalised groups like the LGBTQIA+ community. By this time next year, I hope that I will be able to write a more positive column for Pride Month, and I hope that I can proudly say we live in a more compassionate and welcoming Scotland that tops the list as far as allyship goes.
The National
an hour ago
- The National
There's no hero waiting in the wings who'll ride to indy's rescue
This may be no bad thing if it leads to the party redefining its failing strategy, confirming independence as the only real source of hope for Scotland's future and re-imagining itself as the party with the firmest grasp on how modern Scotland sees itself. That need not require a change of leader – surely a dogfight involving Stephen Flynn and Kate Forbes would risk disaster – but Swinney needs to show he knows what needs to be done and has what it takes to do it. Another election campaign which promises to put independence at its heart but in reality sidelines and then ignores it could be an almost fatal blow to the Yes campaign. The stakes are incredibly high. Swinney is right to say general support for independence has to be converted into political action, but he needs to provide evidence that he and the SNP Government are up to that job and willing to take it on. We have heard that promise before and it has not been delivered. READ MORE: Mairi McAllan talks leadership aspirations and tackling Scotland's housing emergency Before anything else, the SNP need to establish a route to independence. Increasing support in opinion polls is all very well but will not in itself bring it about. Only political determination will deliver that change and, like it or not, the SNP are the only party capable of doing that. But its tactics have to change. If the Hamilton by-election result is proof of anything, it is that the gradualist approach has not worked and will not work in future. That's not to say it has been a mistake. It has shown voters and the world we have exhausted every avenue available to us to find a way of allowing our democratic will to be expressed. We have voted for a pro-independence majority of MSPs at every Scottish election since the 2014 referendum. In the 2015 UK election, we returned SNP MPs in all but three of Scotland's 59 seats. However, in the years since the referendum, successive Westminster governments have been steadfast in their refusal to countenance a second independence referendum. There is no hope of that changing and there is no hero waiting in the wings to ride to Scotland's rescue. Given all this, it is amazing recent opinion polls show 54% of Scots voters – rising to 60% if Reform UK come to power in Britain – still support the principle of independence. But they are denied the chance to vote for it, and there would in any case be little point in doing so without a mechanism for delivering it. The SNP simply cannot go into another Scottish election without a solution to this problem. Only a madman does the same thing over and over again while expecting different results. People will only really engage with the independence issue when they see a way of it becoming a reality. I had my reservations over the plan laid out in The National earlier this week by the MSP James Dornan that the Scottish Government should hold its own referendum if the 2026 Scottish election returns a pro-indy majority of MSPs. I worry the Unionist side would refuse to take part. But then, they had to be dragged screaming and kicking into participating in the 2014 referendum by the prospect of a Yes win. (Image: Danny Lawson) Something new has to happen if there is a pro-indy majority at Holyrood next year, otherwise we will be ignored until Scots become convinced there's no point in voting for independence. Dornan's plan may not be perfect but it's the best I've heard yet. The SNP also need a plan to meet the huge, competing demands of running the country while at the same time campaigning to extricate Scotland from an unjust and unsuccessful Union. Voting SNP in a Scottish election has three purposes. First, to have the country run in a better way than the opposition parties. Second, to instil confidence in the party's good governance and by extension in Scotland's ability to govern itself. Thirdly, to demonstrate the democratic support for independence. Different wings of the party will attach a different importance to each of those purposes. The current arrangement has rendered the third irrelevant. No matter how strong support is for independence, Westminster has demonstrated its refusal to acknowledge it and there has been no international comment, far less outcry. The onslaught of criticism of the SNP's performance in government, whether justified or not, has dented the party's reputation for good governance in the public's eye. Given the media's role is to hold power to account, a reasonable level of criticism has to be expected. When combined with a determination by some to undermine the case for independence it can be overwhelming. The Scottish Government has not been good enough at communicating its own successes. As Professor Danny Dorling of the University of Oxford told the Sunday National last weekend, policies such as the Scottish Child Payment have been almost entirely ignored by English political elites and are therefore under-appreciated in Scotland as well as in England. As well as that, policies such as free tuition fees and mitigations of damaging Westminster policies are now taken for granted. All this leaves Scottish Government failures as the dominant narrative. That in turn demands the attention of government ministers, leaving little headroom for campaigning for independence. The role of a minister for independence created by Humza Yousaf was at least an attempt to underline the central position of independence in the Scottish Government's agenda, even if it was largely unsuccessful. Its removal was one of the first acts by Swinney when he became First Minister. It needs to be re-established and made more powerful and dynamic. It needs to stand as a rebuttal of the growing view that the SNP is paying lip service to independence while concentrating on its own electoral fortunes. It needs to show it is serious. And while we're at it, the case for independence needs refreshed and updated. We are a long way from 2014. The independence campaign of that year was one of the most inspiring I've ever lived through. I'm one of the many independence supporters who spent the following 10 years trying – and failing – to recapture the exciting atmosphere of those days. We instead need to update the case for independence to take into account major developments such as the cost of living crisis, attacks on devolution and the rise of Reform. Independence has a direct relevance to all these issues but that needs to be constantly driven home. That's a job for the whole of the Yes movement – and indeed Yes organisations like Believe in Scotland have done much to encourage some new thinking. But it needs the SNP to provide the political clout to propel new ideas into the mainstream. The Hamilton fall-out suggests there is some confusion over what the SNP now stands for. I'll admit to being one of those who argued that the big issues should be decided after independence. After all, what's the point in arguing that independence would put the big decisions into the hands of the Scottish people if they have all been taken before we even get independence? I've changed my mind. If we're asking people to vote for independence it seems only fair to provide some information on what values would guide the creation of that new country. The SNP have always been a broad church, but there is a danger that they have now become too broad. Personally, I want to live in a country which reflects left-wing, progressive beliefs. A country which seeks a major redistribution of wealth and an end to obscene profiteering by power companies. A country leading the way on land reform, more humane policies on drugs, a protection of abortion rights and LGBTQ rights and a foreign policy brave enough to stand against genocide and fascism. (Image: Colin Mearns) Recent retreats on issues such as trans rights and worrying statements made by Forbes, particularly during the leadership contest which followed Nicola Sturgeon's resignation, have alienated many former supporters … and particularly young people whose support for independence had been strong. I've talked to many who are no longer sure what kind of independent country the SNP envisages and are therefore less eager to vote for it. Modern divisions are too deep to leave room for a party that seeks to be all things to all people. The self-reflection post-Hamilton need not lead to despair and division. It should lead to rebirth and recommitment. That ball is in the SNP's court. It's time to play it.
